Network 20/20 RFP Rubric

	A	B	C	D	E	F
1	Evaluation Area	Total point potential	Does not meet requirements 0-20% of point potential	Needs support 21-50% of point potential	Meets Requirements 51-80% of point potential	Is positioned for success 81-100% of point potentail
2	Applicant and organization qualifications	10	Applicant does not meet basic qualifications outlined in Section 3 of the RFP (0-2)	Applicant needs minimal support to meet requirements outlined in RFP Section 3 (eg. Challenges can be resolved via email or less than 60 minutes over conversation, or with one additional connection) (2-5)	Lead Applicant meets all requirements outlined in Section 3 of RFP, Organization is able to receive funds from US-based 501c3 nonprofit. Qualifications are outlined, but lack a strong record of execution (5-8)	Lead Applicant, Organization, and Advisor all have strong qualifications to successfully execute the project (8-10)
3	Project Overview	50	Project does not fit to one of the three impact areas identified in the Overview of Impact Goals in the RFP. Actions and impact goals are unclear. (0-10)	Project fits into one of the three impact areas identified in the Overview of Impact Goals in the RFP. Actions are identified, but it is unclear how actions will lead to intended outcomes. (10-25)	Project clearly fits into one of the three impact areas identified in the Overview of Impact Goals in the RFP. Project actions and goals are clearly articulated, but there is not a clear path from action to impact. (25-40)	Project clearly fits into one of the three impact areas. Market need is clear articulated. Actions align to identified needs and are likely to lead to intended impact. (40-50)
4	Project Impact (impact on region and population served)	50	Poposed project does not impact the population or region required by the RFP. (0-10)	Proposed project has potential to have a positive impact on intedend population or region. Support and mentorship will be needed. (10-25)	Proposed project is likely to have intended impact on the population or region identified. Applicant will need continued support in seeking additional funding or other resources for growth, iteration, and sustainability. (25-40)	Proposed project has the chance for long-term, transformational impact on the population or region identified. Applicant has considered sustainability, iteration, and growth of efforts. (40-50)
5	Realistic Budget	25	Budget does not align to request restrictions outlined in RFP Section 3 Area 2 (0-5)	Budget needs adjustments but can be resolved with support and coaching (5 - 12.5)	Budget needs minimal adjustments. Budget requests are aligned to actions and intended outcomes (12.5 - 20)	Budget aligns directly to action and impact. Budget is reasonable and needs minimal adjustments (20-25)
6	Alignment to Design Criteria	25	Applicant does not articulate how project meets the Project Design Criteria outline in Section 3 Area 1 of the RFP (0-5)	Applicant identifies weak alignment or minimal consideration to the Project Design Criteria. Advising is needed to support the applicant in prioritizing cirtieria and setting guardrails (5 - 12.5)	Applicant identifies alignment to the majority of (more than 3) of the 6 Project Design Criteria outlined. Where possible, the applicant has identified growth areas (12.5 - 20)	Applicant identifies alignement to most or all of the 6 Project Design Criteria. Consideration of criteria is evident in project design and metrics developed. Where possible, applicant has outline improvement and growth opportunities. (20-25)
7	Project Outcomes and Learning Goals	25	Project outcomes and learning goals are not unclear. Actions and outcomes do not align to target demographic. Actions are unlikely to reach intended outcome. (0-5)	Project outcomes and learning goals are named but need support in reaching clarity (5 - 12.5)	Proposed project identified clear outcomes and learning that will have a positive impact. Proposed project will need some, yet minimal support in project completion. (12.5 - 20)	Proposed project is well positioned to meet project outcomes or learning goals. Applicant and team will be able to document and present outcomes and lessons learned to a broader community. (20-25)
8	Alignment to Network 20/20 priorities (internal staff only)	15	Proposal does not align with the goals of Network 20/20 (0-3)	Proposal needs minimal support or advisory to align to Network 20/20 goals (eg. Challenges can be resolved via email or less than 60 minutes over conversation, or with one additional connection) (3-7.5)	Proposal aligns to Network 20/20 priorities well, but would not be a transformative, high-impact, or strategic project for Network 20/20 (7.5-12)	Proposal has the potential to be a leading project for Network 20/20's mission, visibility, and success (12-15)
9	Total Points allocated	200
10
11	EVALUATOR FEEDBACK
12	Evaluator Name and Title	Anne Beane Rudman	Evaluataor. Women Carpetmakers in Kairouan
13
14	Evaluator Subject Matter Expertise and Qualifications	Been to countless carpet makers through out the world & read alot abot subject maker.
15
16	Overall Application Strengths
17
18	Overall Growth Areas
19
20	Budget Adjustment Recommendations
21
22	Applicant Support Priorities
23	Budget support, learning and outcomes, organizational partnership / fiscal sponsorship, advisory support, local conntections
24	Recommended overlap or connects to other proposals received
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100