Military Spending Flows
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAAB
1
2
St. Paul ST
3
4
-- Burden of the Pro
5
to show the spending,
6
need to show INCREASE
7
8
Increase goals of the US
9
10
11
Arms Race -- December 15
12
classic security dilemma
AR now, beter to
US and Russia fuel
They agree China increasing its military power
AR now
Has to be SIGNIFICANT
13
increasing their own military capacity
participate than lose
we will fall behind
14
sparking an arms race already
A2/AD proliferation now
Ru/China AR
Still control global commons
331% history of war with each other
15
Small countries
Petreus, even before waste
US doesn't go to war with Russia/China
16
BBC 2015
wont' cause war
17
Russia has increased its defense spending
not sit out and lose
18
store heavy military equipment in Eastern Europe
only occur if prior history
19
of going to war
Fiscal Times -- AR Now
20
Journal of Peace Research September 2010
Keep pace
21
Arms races cause war
22
Diplomacy
23
Broader june 2016
24
reduce diplomatic efforts
requires a strong miitary
Diplomacy trades-off
we can stop it, identify it
Defense spending has decreased, diplomacy has not solvled
we don't have these big pear harobr attacks
Diplomacy is decreasing
25
force alone badtrades-offfake news
Terrorism not solve
while the military budget is decreasing
26
diplomacy won't stop cyberattack
27
Kristoff -- diplomatic efforts
won't stop fake news
28
reduce terrorism
fake news only be solved reduced 1A
US military backs it up
29
assumes diplomacy with own government
US still a democracy
30
Stephen Walt -- diplomacy
31
is what works, "little or no direct
US overstetched, compete with
32
role"China
33
"kill our way to victory"
AR means war
could cut-off trade
34
we already have the defenses
35
diplpmacy
Hacking -- Russia has hacked
36
Walt Whitman HH
Estonia, illiberal people
37
Global Commons
38
Sea, land air space
Whitlock -- 2016
only $20 bil.lion per year
waste money
not prove it will re-allocat properly
39
US has control of the commons
administrative waste
need $50
Petreus & O'Hanlon not needed
need $50 billion
40
gentle upward path
41
no need to increase military spending
US only $585, need $45
42
China is a regional power A2/AD
43
US can block military and trade
will make adjustmanets
lot of money
44
45
S
strongest in the military
46
"far short of what is needed"
not change
47
"problematic consequences"
not need to increase levels
48
49
50
51
52
53
Cyber Security
no cyber warfare
theoretical
54
DNC
55
need to deter and prevent
not how the US would
no cyber security peral harbor
56
defend against fake against
57
(a) Beck -- eevery aspect of the
cyber defense
58
US economy is cyber
59
we won't take control of the world's media
would have to shut it down
DOS attacks
60
violates free press
goals of foreign policy
stop hacking into our news
61
shut-down the electrical grid
stop hacking into our accounts
62
63
Russians, hack
64
spread fake news
65
66
long-term peace
67
need to protect liberal ideas
68
69
Levy -- absence of war between democratic states
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Walt Whit HH v. St Paul ST
Walt Whit GL v. HoraceMA FR
Walt Wht HS v. UnivAs
Walt Whit MM v. Eastview
Hawken GL v. Newton South GS