SAT_Sites_Survey_Configs_Study
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJ
1
Band center in GHztotal tiles & tubessigma(r), w/ dcrsigma(r), w/out dcrsigma(r), w/ dcrsigma(r), w/out dcrsigma(r), w/ dcrsigma(r), w/out dcrwith 2% unmodeled FG residualswith 0.5% unmodeled FG residualswith 2% unmodeled FG residualswith 0.5% unmodeled FG residuals
2
30408514595155220270after 4 yrs of obs,after 4 yrs of obs,after 7 yrs of obs,after 7 yrs of obs,after 7 yrs of obs,after 7 yrs of obs,sigma(r)+unm_bias, w/out dcrsigma(r)+umn_bias, w/out dcrsigma(r)+unm_bias, w/out dcrsigma(r)+umn_bias, w/out dcr
3
color indicates dichroic grouping
x10^-4x10^-4x10^-4x10^-4x10^-4x10^-4after 4 yrs of obs,after 4 yrs of obs,after 7 yrs of obs,after 7 yrs of obs,
4
x10^-4x10^-4x10^-4x10^-4
5
PoleA_L=0.106A_L=0.106A_L=0.081A_L=0.081A_L=0.106, fsky=5.25%A_L=0.106, fsky=5.25%
6
6 tubes1221613.3710.588.896.82310.118.0012.2910.699.267.00
7
9 tubes1332910.248.017.0415.3427.746.0610.178.168.235.57
8
12 tubes1443128.786.876.1564.6826.645.199.297.057.824.94
9
18 tubes1665187.345.785.2414.0565.554.378.525.997.464.35
10
30 tubes210108306.094.964.4153.5764.613.757.985.207.213.90
11
Note: f_sky = 3% or 5.25%, and A_L as stated (compared to f_sky=3% and A_L=0.083 for the CDT); assumes Config 5 (link below) and same galactic foreground assumptions as CDT
12
A_L=0.083 (as for CDT)A_L=0.083 (as for CDT)
13
Note : to make these calculations apples-apples, Config 5 is used throughout. Substituting Config 9 in Chile will yield very similar (just slightly higher) sigma(r) numbers there.
The CDT and Config 5 and 9 are detailed at:
CDT6.765.10
14
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B9A5-IYr1wAbOUgFDcnYv7q0_WXgXNU7EhlfBRqavm4/edit#gid=329331219
Config 56.695.05
15
16
ChileA_L=0.337A_L=0.337A_L=0.27A_L=0.27A_L=0.337A_L=0.337A_L=0.27A_L=0.27
17
100%50% of Pole100%50% of Pole100%50% of Pole100%50% of Pole100%50% of Pole100%50% of Pole100%50% of Pole100%50% of Pole
18
6 tubes1221624.7942.2021.4337.4315.87126.5613.43922.93129.4242.5222.0237.7724.2330.5314.3523.48
19
9 tubes1332918.0430.0115.2925.8111.72319.019.81815.98325.3032.7516.1026.3022.4225.7211.0416.76
20
12 tubes14431214.7624.0012.4720.379.73715.3258.17412.77723.7028.6613.4520.9921.7523.879.6013.73
21
18 tubes16651811.4917.949.7715.097.77711.6486.6049.69322.4025.1810.9915.9121.2122.378.3110.92
22
30 tubes210108308.8513.007.6811.006.1978.6755.3967.31921.5722.969.1812.1020.8721.447.388.89
23
Note: assumes f_sky = 20% and A_L as stated; also assumes Config 5 and same galactic foreground assumptions as CDT
24
4 year surveys7 year surveys
FG power @ 95 GHz
assumed % unmodeled FG residual power
25
Cummulative sigma(r) calculated in inverse quadrature using w/out dcr and 100% efficiencyChilePole 069121830Cummulative sigma(r) calculated in inverse quadrature using w/out dcr and 100% efficiencyChilePole 069121830
r equiv x 10^-4
2.00%0.50%
26
010.588.016.875.784.9606.825.344.684.063.58
Pole (fsky 3%) FG @ 95 GHz
3136.261.57
27
621.439.497.516.545.584.83613.446.084.964.423.883.46
Chile (fsky 20%) FG @ 95 GHz
1007.8620.165.04
28
915.298.707.106.275.414.7199.825.604.694.233.753.36
29
1212.478.076.746.025.254.61128.175.244.474.063.633.28
These numbers come from this posting: http://bicep.rc.fas.harvard.edu/CMB-S4/analysis_logbook/20181106_site_dep_fg_residual_bias/
30
189.777.186.195.624.984.42186.604.754.153.823.463.15
31
307.686.215.545.124.624.16305.404.233.803.543.242.98
32
33
same as first, but assuming 50% Chilian efficiencyChilePole 069121830same, but assuming 50% efficiencyChilePole 069121830
34
010.588.016.875.784.9606.825.344.684.063.58
35
637.4310.187.846.765.724.91622.936.545.204.593.993.53
36
925.819.797.656.645.644.87915.986.285.074.493.933.49
37
1220.379.397.466.515.564.821212.786.024.934.403.873.44
38
1815.098.667.086.255.404.71189.695.584.684.223.743.36
39
3011.007.626.485.835.124.52307.324.994.323.943.553.21
40
41
same as first, but assuming 100% efficiency and 0.5% unmodeled FG redisual uncertaintyChilePole 069121830same, but assuming 100% efficiency and 0.5% unmodeled FG residual uncertaintyChilePole 069121830
42
010.698.167.055.995.2007.005.574.944.353.90
43
622.029.627.666.715.785.06614.356.295.194.674.163.77
44
916.108.917.286.455.624.95911.045.914.974.514.053.68
45
1213.458.376.986.245.474.85129.605.664.824.393.963.62
46
1810.997.666.555.935.264.70188.315.354.624.243.853.53
47
309.186.976.105.595.024.52307.385.084.454.103.753.45
48
49
same as first, but assuming 100% efficiency and decorrelationChilePole 069121830same, but assuming 100% efficiency and decorrelationChilePole 069121830
50
013.3710.248.787.346.0908.897.046.165.244.42
51
624.7911.779.478.287.035.92615.877.766.445.744.984.25
52
918.0410.748.917.906.805.77911.727.086.045.454.794.13
53
1214.769.918.427.556.575.63129.746.575.715.204.624.02
54
1811.498.727.656.986.185.38187.785.855.224.834.353.84
55
308.857.386.706.235.655.02306.205.084.654.374.003.60
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...