ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Area of Research
NoTitleAuthorJournalPublishing DatenMain ConclusionsLinkSearch TermOutcome ParameterManufactuer mentionedAbstract with all details
2
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison1Long-term patient satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring: a comparison among different systemsJessica Artico 1, Massimo Zecchin 1, Anna Zorzin Fantasia 1, Giulia Skerl 1, Benedetta Ortis 1, Stefania Franco 1, Stefano Albani 1, Giulia Barbati 2, Jacopo Cristallini 1, Antonio Cannata' 1, Gianfranco Sinagra 1Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine2019604Daily impact of cardiac implantable electronic devices still remains a challenging issue for caregivers. The introduction of remote monitoring allowed closer follow-up and improved outcomes. Our results highlighted patients’ satisfaction, who also felt safer, with the remote monitoring, its ease of use, and the absence of any disturbances in patients’ everyday activities or in their privacy.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31107287/internal defibrillators manufacturers comparisonQoLnon
3
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison2Cognitive performance in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Associations with objective sleep duration, age and anxietyAshley F. Curtis, Alicia J. Roth, Samuel F. Sears, Jamie B. Conti, Richard B. Berry, Joseph M. Dzierzewski, Himangshu Rathinakumar, Christina S. McCraeJournal of Sleep Research201841To our knowledge, the present study is the first to examine associations between sleep and cognition in patients with ICDs. Results suggest that regardless of patient age, objectively assessed sleep duration may play an important role in the prediction of executive function and a lower-order task measuring attention and processing speed in patients with an ICD and self-reported sleep disturbance. Given that cognitive function is associated with quality of life in ICD patients (Moulaert et al., 2010), as well as functional independence in older adults (Mehta, Yaffe, & Covinsky, 2002), who were widely represented in the present analysis, the results may inform clinical applications related to sleep and ageing, and potentially facilitate the management of cognitive aspects of daytime functioning.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jsr.12810internal defibrillators manufacturers comparisonpsychological/sleepnon, age
4
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison3Associations between pain, objective sleep efficiency and cognition in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillatorsAshley F.CurtisabAlicia J.RothcSamuel F.SearsdeJamie B.ContifRichard B.BerrygJoseph M.DzierzewskihChristina S.McCraeaSleep Medicine202037Similar to previous research on subjective sleep in fibromyalgia (Fang et al., 2019), we found no independent associations between objective SE or pain on cognition. It may be only in the context of worse pain where sleep fragmentation/lower level cognition associations arise. Absence of associations between SE/pain and higher order cognition (reasoning, working memory) is somewhat surprising, given previous findings of associations between objective sleep duration and these tasks in ICD patients (Curtis et al., 2018). However, research suggests sleep fragmentation is uniquely associated with brain regions associated with attention (Kingshott, Cosway, Deary, & Douglas, 2000), and there is substantial overlap between these neural regions and pain processing (Forn et al., 2009; Torta & Cauda, 2011). We speculate that more fragmented sleep may exacerbate pain-related attention deficits in patients with disturbed sleep and more severe pain. It is possible that ICD patients with worse pain may benefit most in aspects of cognitive functioning (greater improvement in attention/processing speed) from interventions (e.g., Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia) aimed at improving SE.In ICD patients with sleep disturbance, associations between objective SE and cognition may depend on pain level. ICD patients with worse pain may be most vulnerable to effects of worse sleep fragmentation on sustained attention/processing speed. Pain level should be considered in the understanding and treatment of daytime dysfunction related to poor sleep in these patients.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987212/internal defibrillators manufacturers comparisonpsychologicalnon, age
5
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison4Living with a pacemaker: patient-reported outcome of a pacemaker systemPeter Magnusson & Per LivBMC Cardiovascular Disorders volume2018342The vast majority of patients report excellent overall satisfaction with the pacemaker system, and are not affected by pain, soreness/discomfort, or concern about device malfunction. They also reported favourable outcomes with respect to cosmetic results, shoulder movement, and sleep. However, some patients underwent a surgical correction of the pacemaker pocket.https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-018-0849-6QoLnon, age, follow up
6
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison5Effect of remote monitoring on patient-reported outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: primary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trialHenneke Versteeg, Ivy Timmermans, Jos Widdershoven, Geert-Jan Kimman, Sébastien Prevot, Thomas Rauwolf, Marcoen F Scholten, Edgar Zitron, Philippe Mabo, Johan Denollet, Susanne S Pedersen, Mathias MeineEP Europace2019595Large clinical trials have indicated that RPM can safely and effectively replace most in-clinic check-ups of ICD patients. The REMOTE-CIED trial results show that patient-reported health status and ICD acceptance do not differ between patients on RPM and patients receiving in-clinic check-ups alone in the first 2 years after ICD implantation.https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/9/1360/5511581?login=trueHealth Status & ICD acceptanceBoston Scientific Latitute RPM
manufacturer, n, follow up period
7
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison6Health Status and Depression Remission in Patients With Chronic Heart FailureGlen L. Xiong , Mona Fiuzat , Maragatha Kuchibhatla , Ranga Krishnan , Christopher M. O’Connor , Wei Jiang and on behalf of the SADHART-CHF InvestigatorsCirculation: Heart Failure2012469
Patients with heart failure whose depressive symptoms remitted had significantly greater improvement in physical function, social function, and quality of life.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.967620patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorPsychologicalnon
8
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison7Monitoring Device Acceptance in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients Using the Florida Patient Acceptance SurveyHENNEKE VERSTEEG Ph.D., ANNEMIEKE STARRENBURG M.Sc., JOHAN DENOLLET Ph.D., JOB VAN DER PALEN Ph.D., SAMUEL F. SEARS Ph.D., SUSANNE S. PEDERSEN Ph.D.Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology2012272A shortened 12-item, three-factor version of the FPAS was shown to be a valid and internally consistent instrument to assess device acceptance in Dutch ICD patients. Psychological but not clinical factors were the primary correlates of device acceptance, which underlines the importance of taking into account the patient's psychological profile when seeking to identify patients at risk for adjustment difficulties after ICD implantation.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03299.x?casa_token=ayflMgPPWbQAAAAA%3AcDPFeOXNY7VN0cLMb-IQZ1ZocH5T8mFJtPRZx2I_ci_f3su8fW1VUvW0LRf04KWxMkEgGdRrptvCKSWIpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorICD acceptance/psycholohgynon, mean age
9
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison8Management of patients receiving implantable cardiac defibrillator shocks: Recommendations for acute and long-term patient managementFrieder Braunschweig, Giuseppe Boriani, Alexander Bauer, Robert Hatala, Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, Josef Kautzner, Susanne S. Pedersen, Steen Pehrson, Renato Ricci, Martin J. SchalijEP Europace2010N/AN/Ahttps://academic.oup.com/europace/article/12/12/1673/431085?login=truepatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorexpert consensus
Boston (Guidant/CPI), Medtronic, St Jude Medical, Sorin, Biotronik
n/a
10
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison9Pre implantation psychological functioning preserved in majority of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients 12 months post implantationSusanne S.PedersenabMadelein T.HoogwegtaLucJordaensbDominic A.M.J.TheunsbInternational Journal of Cardiology2013332The majority of ICD patients maintained their pre implantation level of psychological functioning at 12 months. A subset of patients was at risk of poor psychological adaptation, attributable to ICD shocks, Type D personality, atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular dysfunction, while primary prevention indication and older age had a protective effect against deterioration in functioning.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527311019668?casa_token=UJBIF3RysM0AAAAA:_h3BnDcquPhBWpraYmCkjTExki4Z8tYxIM5q5tB6bI3C_By_Mwkd-txEhoqJIihXFL7u7kntgjMpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatornon, follow-up period
11
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison10Prediction of Arrhythmic Events in Ischemic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients Referred for Implantable Cardiac DefibrillatorPeng Gao , Raymond Yee , Lorne Gula , Andrew D. Krahn , Allan Skanes , Peter Leong-Sit , George J. Klein , John Stirrat , Nowell Fine , Luljeta Pallaveshi , Gerald Wisenberg , Terry R. Thompson , Frank Prato , Maria Drangova and James A. WhiteCirculation: Cardiovascular Imaging2012124Myocardial scar quantification by LGE-CMR predicts arrhythmic events in patients being evaluated for ICD eligibility irrespective of cardiomyopathy etiology.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971549patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatornot performance outcome/ scaringnon, follow-up period
12
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison11Australian implantable cardiac defibrillator recipients: Quality-of-life issuesDianne Pelletier RN BSci(Nurs), DipEd, MasterSci(Soc), FCN, FRCNA, Robyn Gallagher RN Cardiothoracic Nursing Certificate, BA, MN, PhD, Suzanne Mitten-Lewis BA, Sharon McKinley RN BAppSc, PhD, Jill Squire RGNInternational Journal of Nursing Practice200274One major element of the overall impact on the patient and family is the shock itself, and from this study, we report that despite the pain, the response to the single therapeutic shock is mostly positive. However, the issue of the effects of dysrhythmias and shock sequela on safety have not been adequately addressed. These aspects need to be considered in terms of what driving cessation means for the recipient and their family. There is a need for clearer guidance to be given to those wishing to drive. Patients can be taught more about the shock experience and the potential for using warning signs effectively. Nurses might find themselves well placed to participate in the education and ongoing support of this population whose numbers are likely to increase.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1440-172x.2002.00345.x?casa_token=JrpojK1L8oAAAAAA%3AdwGBsDSMzKavblPfTgsszWOD-WCvnnF6T1SL1rIdQc6T77ZN4klJpTj55rzlnSeAGCcj8awy7tvARc5Rpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorQoLnon, follow-up period
13
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison12Benefits of the Implantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorAndrew E. EpsteinJournal of the American College of Cardiology2008N/AN/Ahttps://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.035patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorcommentaryn/an/a
14
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison13Home Telemonitoring in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
A Chance to Improve Patient Care?
Silke Schmidt, Prof. Dr. phil.,*,1 Andreas Schuchert, Prof. Dr. med.,2 Thomas Krieg, Dipl-Psych.,1 and Michael Oeff, Prof. Dr. med.3Health Affairs201826It is critical that future studies deliberately test all essential intervention elements, such as intervention duration and the moderating effect of home care. Researchers, clinicians, and policy makers must not assume that, with HTM, decreased mortality is necessarily associated with decreased utilization. With HTM, early recognition of exacerbation can be promptly resolved at home, whereas a patient who may have delayed or more serious symptom recognition can be managed successfully in the ED. Either way, the result is decreased mortality.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2840250/patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorreviewn/an, follow-up period
15
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison14Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis Involving Implantable Cardiac DevicesEugene Athan , MD; Vivian H. Chu, MD, MHS; Pierre Tattevin, MD, PhD; Christine Selton-Suty, MD; Phillip Jones, MD; Christoph Naber, MD, PhD; José M. Miró, MD, PhD; Salvador Ninot, MD; Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo, MD; Emanuele Durante-Mangoni, MD; Denis Spelman, MD; Bruno Hoen, MD, PhD; Tatjana Lejko-Zupanc, MD, PhD; Enrico Cecchi, MD; Franck Thuny, MD; Margaret M. Hannan, MD; Paul Pappas, MS; Margaret Henry, PhD, BSc (Hons); Vance G. Fowler, MD, MHS; Anna Lisa Crowley, MD, MHS; Andrew Wang, MD; for the ICE-PCS InvestigatorsJAMA20122760Among patients with CDIE, the rate of concomitant valve infection is high, as is mortality, particularly if there is valve involvement. Early device removal is associated with improved survival at 1 year.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1148195patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalitynon, age
16
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison15Implantable Cardiac Device Procedures in Older PatientsUse and In-Hospital OutcomesJason P. Swindle, MPH; Michael W. Rich, MD; Patrick McCann, MD; Thomas E. Burroughs, PhD; Paul J. Hauptman, MDArch Intern Med.201026887Despite the fact that most device trials have excluded patients 80 years or older, more than one-fifth of ICD and CRT devices are implanted in this age group. Advanced age is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality following device implantation, suggesting that additional study is needed to define criteria for appropriate device use in older patients.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/225338patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalitynon, age
17
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison16Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator prescription in the elderlyAndrew E.EpsteinMD, FHRS⁎G. NealKayMD⁎Vance J.PlumbMD⁎H. ThomasMcElderryMD⁎HarishDoppalapudiMD⁎TakumiYamadaMD⁎JeffShafiroffPhD†Zaffer A.SyedMS†SergioShkurovichPhD†ACT InvestigatorsHeart Rythm Journal20094566More than 40% of new ICDs and CRT-Ds are implanted in patients >70 years old and more than 10% in patients >or=80 years old. A significant proportion of those receiving a CRT-D did not fulfill accepted criteria for implantation. Noncardiac death occurred more frequently in older patients, but cardiac death rates were similar.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S154752710900407Xpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorno outcomeSt Jude Medicaln, age
18
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison17Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical OutcomesNirmalatiban Parthiban , Adrian Esterman , Rajiv Mahajan , Darragh J. Twomey , Rajeev K. Pathak , Dennis H. Lau , Kurt C. Roberts-Thomson , Glenn D. Young , Prashanthan Sanders , and Anand N. GanesanJournal of the American College of Cardiology20156469Meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates that RM and IO follow-up showed comparable overall outcomes related to patient safety and survival, with a potential survival benefit in RCTs using daily transmission verification. RM benefits include more rapid clinical event detection and a reduction in inappropriate shocks.https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.029patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorreview and meta analysisnn/a
19
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison18Management and Outcome of Permanent Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator InfectionsMuhammad R. Sohail , Daniel Z. Uslan , Akbar H. Khan , Paul A. Friedman , David L. Hayes , Walter R. Wilson , James M. Steckelberg , Sarah Stoner , and Larry M. BaddourJournal of the American College of Cardiology2007189Cure of CDI is achievable in the large majority of patients treated with an aggressive approach of combined antimicrobial treatment and complete device removal. Based on findings of our large retrospective institutional survey and previously published data, we submit proposed management guidelines of CDI.https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.072patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorinfectionsnon, age
20
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison29Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Distinguishes Between Patients Likely and Patients Not Likely to Benefit From Implanted Cardiac Defibrillator TherapyDaniel M. Bloomfield , Richard C. Steinman , Pearila B. Namerow , Michael Parides , Jorge Davidenko , Elizabeth S. Kaufman , Timothy Shinn , Anne Curtis , John Fontaine , Douglas Holmes , Andrea Russo , Chuen Tang and J. Thomas BiggerJrCirculation2004n/aCompared with QRS duration, an abnormal MTWA test is a stronger predictor of death in patients with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction who fit MADIT II criteria. More importantly, MTWA can better identify a group of patients not likely to benefit from ICD therapy.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.CIR.0000143160.14610.53patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalitynofollow-up
21
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison20Sexual concerns and educational needs after an implantable cardioverter defibrillatorElaine E.SteinkePhD, RNaKathyGill-HoppleRN, MSNbDaraValdezRN, BSNbMarilynWoosterRN, BSNcHeart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and acute care200512Themes identified were (1) anxiety and apprehension, with subthemes of partner overprotectiveness and fear of ICD discharge with sexual activity; (2) varying interest and pattern of sexual activity; (3) powerfulness of ICD discharge; and (4) a need for information and sexual counseling.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956305000373?casa_token=la06wtKRoOIAAAAA:JbbsE49iR3tpK6_IwsFsNr3hxNsLEaXBb61kS0HAsdGkqxUxXJgMMvo-NYJsSDHg3u2RtEgq_Uopatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorpsychologicalnon, sex, age
22
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison21Efficacy and safety of implantable cardiac defibrillators for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac sarcoidosisJordana Kron, William Sauer, Joseph Schuller, Frank Bogun, Thomas Crawford, Sinan Sarsam, Lynda Rosenfeld, Teferi Y. Mitiku, Joshua M. Cooper, Davendra Mehta, Arnold J. Greenspon, Matthew Ortman, David B. Delurgio, Ravinder Valadri, Calambur Narasimhan, Nalla Swapna, Jagmeet P. Singh, Stephan Danik, Steven M. Markowitz, Adrian K. Almquist, Andrew D. Krahn, Luke G. Wolfe, Shawn Feinstein, Kenneth A. EllenbogenEP Europace2013235Patients with CS and ICDs are at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias. This population also has high rates of inappropriate shocks and device complications.https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/15/3/347/432687?login=truepatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorsafetynon, age, follow up
23
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison22Effect of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: secondary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trialCheyenne S L Chiu, Ivy Timmermans, Henneke Versteeg, Edgar Zitron, Philippe Mabo, Susanne S Pedersen, Mathias Meine, for the REMOTE-CIED Trial InvestigatorsEP Europace2021595RPM is non-inferior to conventional In-Clinic visits regarding clinical outcomes. Routine In-Clinic follow-up may partly be substituted by RPM without jeopardizing safety and efficiency, and thus reducing unnecessary In-Clinic visits.https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/24/2/256/6354873?login=truepatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalitycompatible with Boston Scientific Latituden, follow-up period
24
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison23Worldwide experience with a totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: early results from the EFFORTLESS S-ICD RegistryPier D. Lambiase, Craig Barr, Dominic A.M.J. Theuns, Reinoud Knops, Petr Neuzil, Jens Brock Johansen, Margaret Hood, Susanne Pedersen, Stefan Kääb, Francis Murgatroyd, Helen L. Reeve, Nathan Carter, Lucas Boersma, on behalf of the EFFORTLESS Investigators, P. Adragão, S. Agarwal, C. Barr, L. Boersma, J. Brock-Johanssen, C. Butter, L. Calò, L. Eckhardt, M. Gulizia, M. Scholten, L. Dekker, R. Khiani, S. Hjortshot, H. Høgh Petersen, M. Hood, S. Kääb, R. Knops, J. Kuschyk, P. Lambiase, K. A. Maass, K. McLeod, G. Molon, J. Morgan, P. Mortensen, F. Murgatroyd, P. Neuzil, C. Pepper, P. Sheridan, C. Stellbrink, G. Stuart, D. Theuns, K. Vernooy, C. Veltmann, C. WendeEuropean Heart Journal2014472The first large cohort of real-world data from an International patient S-ICD population demonstrates appropriate system performance with clinical event rates and inappropriate shock rates comparable with those reported for conventional ICDs.https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/35/25/1657/2480979?login=truepatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatortechnicalnon, age, follow up
25
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison24Characteristics and Outcomes of Peripartum Versus Nonperipartum Cardiomyopathy in Women Using a Wearable Cardiac DefibrillatorMitchell T.SaltzbergMD1StevenSzymkiewiczMD2Nicole R.BiancoPhD2Journal of Cardiac Failure2012266The mortality rate of 2.8% (over 3.0 ± 1.2 years) in PPCM patients is low compared to published data. The role of WCD therapy among PPCM patients deserves further study.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916411011432?casa_token=X3CbgJRyC0wAAAAA:lN_NwOlfvR3_ba4HHydbPhRNjEPQBAQvfh77fzjLSnbQrg60CvAHcaO8lAH2mhgtSj7Ff4mMB5Upatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalitynon, age
26
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison25Evaluation of Early Complications Related to De Novo Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation: Insights From the Ontario ICD DatabaseDouglas S. Lee , Andrew D. Krahn , Jeffrey S. Healey , David Birnie , Eugene Crystal , Paul Dorian , Christopher S. Simpson , Yaariv Khaykin , Douglas Cameron , Amir Janmohamed , Raymond Yee , Peter C. Austin , Zhongliang Chen , Judy Hardy , Jack V. Tu , and and Investigators of the Ontario ICD DatabaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology20103340Complications after de novo defibrillator implantation were strongly associated with device type. Major complications were associated with increased risk of mortality.https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.029patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalityyesn, age, follow up
27
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison26Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Receiving New and Replacement Implantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorsDaniel B. Kramer , Kevin F. Kennedy , Peter A. Noseworthy , Alfred E. Buxton , Mark E. Josephson , Sharon-Lise Normand , John A. Spertus , Peter J. Zimetbaum , Matthew R. Reynolds and Susan L. MitchellCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes2013463978Patients receiving replacement ICDs are older and at greater risk for death compared with those receiving initial ICD implants. The battery life of initial ICDs is shorter than previously reported.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000054patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalityboston scientificn, age
28
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison27Do Positive Health Expectations and Optimism Relate to Quality-of-Life Outcomes for the Patient With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator?Sears, Samuel F. PhD; Serber, Eva R. MA; Lewis, Tara Saia PhD; Walker, Robyn L. MS; Conners, Nancy RN; Lee, John T. MD; Curtis, Anne B. MD; Conti, Jamie B. MDCARDIAC REHABILITATON: BRIEF REPORT200488Positive health expectations and optimism are differentially related to various components of QOL. Collectively, these two resilience factors may be targeted in future studies of interventions to improve QOL for ICD patients.https://journals.lww.com/jcrjournal/Fulltext/2004/09000/Do_Positive_Health_Expectations_and_Optimism.8.aspx?casa_token=kJX9aaRAtCEAAAAA:WO47UsK4-YBovPNa6t-tk76gAYiNJNXouXfh3kgN7lkgpSpnZhVP9G-VL4JGvAmrYbfa3mtA9s3JF3CjZ4Es27msPSBriApatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorQoL, psychologicalnon, age follow up period
29
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison28Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients: a randomised controlled trialA Fitchet1, P J Doherty2, C Bundy3, W Bell1, A P Fitzpatrick1, C J Garratt1Cardiovascular medicine200316CCR appears to be safe for patients with ICDs. It can improve exercising ability and lower the levels of psychological distress. A larger multicentre study is recommended to confirm these findings.https://heart.bmj.com/content/89/2/155.abstract?casa_token=Gx4Rvhtrb-QAAAAA:h1MTfxIbVfpPlV24ZZt4uKH7JcDsj1VCwPCmos0_YJ1ja2hA1b_BIuhVVsYZJ9gLMtWMkgSWLttjpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorpsychologicalnon, sex, age, follow-up
30
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison29Individual patient data network meta-analysis of mortality effects of implantable cardiac devicesB Woods1,2, N Hawkins2,3, S Mealing2, A Sutton4, W T Abraham5, J F Beshai6, H Klein7, M Sculpher1,2, C J Plummer8, M R Cowie9Heart failure and cardiomyopathies201512638These data provide estimates for the mortality benefits of device therapy conditional upon multiple patient characteristics. They can be used to estimate an individual patient's expected relative benefit and thus inform shared decision making. Clinical guidelines should discuss age and gender as predictors of device benefits.https://heart.bmj.com/content/101/22/1800.shortpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalitynon
31
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison30Psychosocial Considerations for Children and Young Adolescents with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: An UpdateSAMUEL F. SEARS Ph.D., JAY B. ST. AMANT B.S., VICKI ZEIGLER Ph.D., R.N.Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology2009n/aAdditional research and clinical attention is warranted to further assist young ICD patients to achieve desirable quality of life outcomes.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02391.xpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorreviewn/An/a
32
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison31Posttraumatic Stress and the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator PatientSamuel F. Sears , Jessica D. Hauf , Kari Kirian , Garrett Hazelton and Jamie B. ContiCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology2011n/aCurrent available research suggests that approximately 20% of patients with ICDs have PTSD. Increased attention to PTSD is a relatively new development to the broader findings of psychosocial research with ICD patients, suggesting a point prevalence of 13% to 38% for anxiety across studies and 10% to 41% for depressive symptoms. Current treatment research for ICD patients focuses on the prophylaxis of distress (through education and medication management) and the treatment of anxiety and depression. Our review indicates that electrophysiologists “need to know” how to develop a screen and refer plan for patients with PTSD symptoms. Mounting evidence suggests that PTSD symptomatology is highly prevalent in electrophysiology clinics and detrimental to psychosocial and physical health end points.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCEP.110.957670patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorcase-studynon/a
33
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison32Implant and Midterm Outcomes of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry: The EFFORTLESS StudyLucas Boersma , Craig Barr , Reinoud Knops , Dominic Theuns , Lars Eckardt , Petr Neuzil , Marcoen Scholten , Margaret Hood , Juergen Kuschyk , Paul Jones , Elizabeth Duffy , Michael Husby , Kenneth Stein , Pier D. Lambiase , and on behalf of the EFFORTLESS Investigator GroupJournal of the American College of Cardiology201782This registry demonstrates that the S-ICD fulfills predefined endpoints for safety and efficacy. Midterm performance rates on complications, inappropriate shocks, and conversion efficacy were comparable to rates observed in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator studies. (Evaluation oF Factors ImpacTing CLinical Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICDhttps://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.040patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorsafetynon, follow-up period
34
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison33Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use in Patients With Comorbidities: Results From a Combined Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical TrialsBenjamin A. Steinberg , Sana M. Al-Khatib , Rex Edwards , JooYoon Han , Gust H. Bardy , J. Thomas Bigger , Alfred E. Buxton , Arthur J. Moss , Kerry L. Lee , Richard Steinman , Paul Dorian , Alfred Hallstrom , Riccardo Cappato , Alan H. Kadish , Peter J. Kudenchuk , Daniel B. Mark , Lurdes Y.T. Inoue , and Gillian D. SandersJournal of the American College of Cardiology20143348Patients with extensive comorbid medical illnesses may experience less benefit from primary prevention ICDs than those with less comorbidity; implantation should be carefully considered in sick patients. Further study of ICDs in medically complex patients is warranted.https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jchf.2014.06.007patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalitynon
35
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison34Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsSamuel F.SearsPh.D.Tara SaiaLewisPh.D.Emily A.KuhlM.A.Jamie B.ContiM.D.Psychosomatics200588The impact of psychological maladjustment on quality of life is clear, and, despite methodological weaknesses, the influence of ICD shocks cannot be discounted.13,14,34 Given the wealth of data identifying factors associated with quality of life outcomes, future psychological research should focus on the impact of psychosocial interventions. Further research is also needed to more specifically address the independent value of each of the psychological predictor variables by determining the differential risk associated with each of these factors. The ICD represents a great innovation in decreasing mortality of sudden cardiac death. These data emphasize the importance of a biopsychosocial model in understanding the quality of life outcomes for ICD patients.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033318205700578?casa_token=BQokoMm4wJ4AAAAA:HGDVvTJBjLNTth6_cQbCMR5t9TLVIjPu3XpJshIo4ABYLX7MDRfiEgvRY2tQ9wfXTY6gQNAMK8Upatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorQoLnon, follow-up period
36
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison35Undertreatment of anxiety and depression in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Impact on health status.Hoogwegt, Madelein T. Kupper, Nina Theuns, Dominic A. M. J. Zijlstra, Wobbe P. Jordaens, LucPedersen, Susanne S.Health Psychology2012448There was a serious gap between the need for psychological treatment and the actual delivery of treatment, with consequences to patients' health status. Detection and adequate treatment of distress in ICD patients remains an important target in this patient group in order to safeguard health status postimplantation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10743-001patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorpsychologicalno
n, age, gender, follow-up
37
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison3616-Year Trends in the Infection Burden for Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the United States: 1993 to 2008Arnold J. Greenspon , Jasmine D. Patel , Edmund Lau , Jorge A. Ochoa , Daniel R. Frisch , Reginald T. Ho , Behzad B. Pavri , and Steven M. KurtzHeart Rythm Disorder2011n/aThe infection burden associated with CIED implantation is increasing over time and is associated with prolonged hospital stays and high financial costs.https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.033patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorinfectionsnon/a
38
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison37Outcome and Complications After Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyArend F.L. Schinkel , Pieter A. Vriesendorp , Eric J.G. Sijbrands , Luc J.L.M. Jordaens , Folkert J. ten Cate and Michelle MichelsCirculation: Heart Failure20122190This meta-analysis demonstrates a low cardiac and noncardiac mortality rate after ICD therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Appropriate ICD intervention occurred at a rate of 3.3%/year, thereby, most probably, preventing SCD. Inappropriate ICD intervention and complications are not uncommon.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.969626patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorreviewn/an, age, gender
39
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison38Costs and Quality-of-Life Effects of Implantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorsPeter W.GroeneveldMD, MSabcMary AnneMattaMSbJanice J.SuhBSbPaul A.HeidenreichMD, MSdeJudy A.SheaPhDbcThe American Journal of Cardiology2006259The best published estimates indicate that ICD implantation costs approximately $28,500 to $55,200, and subsequent annual ICD-related follow-up costs range from $4,800 to $17,000. Although insufficient data exist to confirm a time trend in ICD costs, it is plausible that current costs are in the lower half of these ranges. The published research also suggests that QOL of ICD recipients is better than QOL of patients taking antiarrhythmic drugs, but ICD recipients’ QOL is not as high as that of the general public or of recipients of more “benign” cardiac devices, such as pace- makers. Concerns about ICD shocks and the negative ef- fects of ICDs on patients’ sense of control, social interac- tions, driving, sexuality, capacity to work, and ability to engage in leisure activities appear to adversely influence ICD recipients’ perceptions of health and well-being.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291490601530X?casa_token=tHmQqCdVHCYAAAAA:a2oS0M2wapxZi6Ntm0mUeWN_QA59hj-sa-KncrZZlnxOOrI6eXehuYDvJH39j5yp-_axsngzxY4patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorreviewnon/a
40
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison39Cardiac Resynchronization and Quality of Life in Patients With Minimally Symptomatic Heart FailurePeter J. Veazie , Katia Noyes , Qinghua Li , W. Jackson Hall , April Buttaccio , Kelly Thevenet-Morrison , and Arthur J. MossJournal of the American College of Cardiology20121820Compared with patients with ICD only, CRT-ICD is associated with greater improvement in QOL among relatively asymptomatic patients, specifically among those with left bundle branch conduction disturbance.https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.054patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorQoLno (but funded by Boston Scientific)n, follow-up period
41
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison40A brief cognitive behavioural preimplantation and rehabilitation programme for patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator improves physical health and reduces psychological morbidity and unplanned readmissionsR J Lewin1, S Coulton2, D J Frizelle3, G Kaye4, H Cox5Heart rhythm disorders and pacemakers2009192The ICD Plan improved health-related quality of life, reduced the incidence of clinically significant psychological distress and significantly reduced unplanned readmissions. It is a cost effective and easily implemented method for delivering rehabilitation and psychological care to patients undergoing ICD implantation.https://heart.bmj.com/content/95/1/63.abstract?casa_token=PSZmTgw3guwAAAAA:Z1IhuxxWXnEKuq6JJogR4p4oQ0joGlxdCnj96gSbB9noY2RoHNTbwQeZCwsblpOgjDgGCZCz2CP-patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorpsychological, QoLnon, follow-up period
42
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison41How to Respond to an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator ShockSamuel F. SearsJr , Julie B. Shea and Jamie B. ContiCirculation2005n/aExperiencing an ICD shock can be an unwelcome reminder about your heart condition. However, the ICD remains the best treatment option to keep you safe from cardiac arrhythmias. Desirable quality of life can also be achieved despite the experience of shock. Collectively, you, your family and significant others, and your healthcare team can plan for shock, engage in preshock and postshock coping strategies, and resume a desirable quality of life.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.508663patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorcommentarynon/a
43
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison42Applicability of a Risk Score for Prediction of the Long-Term (8-Year) Benefit of the Implantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorAlon Barsheshet , Arthur J. Moss , David T. Huang , Scott McNitt , Wojciech Zareba , and Ilan GoldenbergJournal of the American College of Cardiology2012991These findings suggest that a simple risk score can identify patients who derive significant long-term benefit from primary ICD therapy. High-risk patients with multiple comorbidities composed 17% of the MADIT-II population and did not derive long-term benefit from nonresynchronization device therapy.https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.036patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorsafetynofollow-up
44
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison43Gender and outcomes after primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)Andrea M.RussoMDaStacie L.DaughertyMD, MSPHbFrederick A.MasoudiMD, MSPHbYongfeiWangMScJepthaCurtisMDcRachelLampertMDcAmerican Heart Journal201538912Among older patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention in clinical practice, women experience worse outcomes than do men. Reasons for gender differences in outcomes are poorly understood and require further investigation.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870315002379?casa_token=wzh9Bcx23XAAAAAA:l1UQAhOB0Pd_RNvYz_XU1yDbr8KgmZL-oAYc0jxWmc8HTUQfjN-qVsRTZAMzWBA676K10HAdrt0patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatormortalitynon
45
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison44Living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: The patients' experienceNina K.HumphreysPhDaRobLowePhDaJaynieRancePhDbPaul D.BennettPhD, RNaHeart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and acute care201618ICD recipients might be helped by a psycho-social intervention that corrects false beliefs about exercise and offers some simple stress management techniques. Additional elements might include helping recipients to re-evaluate goals and find a valued sense of self which this study found aided ICD acceptance.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956315002691?casa_token=U6CrrGMyV8gAAAAA:mHYAqpjV7x1CYNN0mZYL9CC-BYtrrwRLyIjEuynlqFZaf2jOv0qSbaxmA_rbKEdhXrgcMc--QdMpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorpsychologicalnon
46
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison45Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: quality of life in recipients with and without ICD shock delivery: A prospective studyH. C. M. Kamphuis, J. R. J. de Leeuw, R. Derksen, R. N. W. Hauer, J. A. M. WinnubstEuropace2003167Overall quality of life and psychological well-being did not change in ICD recipients, irrespective of whether they experienced defibrillatory shocks. The high prevalence of depression and anxiety can be interpreted as a response to the perceived physical and mental problems regarding daily activities. Our data indicate that patients who have experienced an ICD shock do not adapt well to living with an ICD, they are more anxious than ICD recipients who received no shocks. However, the anticipation of having another shock after experiencing one is less stressful than that of the first shock. We conclude that the lasting psychological distress will not dissipate spontaneously or naturally and that psychosocial interventions may be warranted.https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/5/4/381/551389?login=truepatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorpsychological, QoLnon, follow-up period
47
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison46The Relation Between Patients’ Outcomes and the Volume of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation Procedures Performed by Physicians Treating Medicare BeneficiariesSana M. Al-Khatib , F. Lee Lucas , James G. Jollis , David J. Malenka , and David E. WennbergJournal of the American College of Cardiology2005n/aWe observed an association between a higher volume of ICD implants and a lower rate of mechanical complications and infections. This association suggests that ICD implantation should not be performed by physicians without regard to their procedural volume.https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.063patient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorpsychological, QoL
no but study funded by Medtronic and Guidant
follow-up
48
CardiologyICDOutcome Based Comparison47A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Association Between Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks and Long-term MortalityRiccardoProiettiMD, PhDabChristopherLabosMD, CM, MScaMarkDavisMDaGeorgeThanassoulisMD, MScaPasqualeSantangeliMDcVincenzoRussoMDdLuigiDi BiaseMD, PhDefJean-FrancoisRouxMDagAtulVermaMDahAndreaNataleMDeijkVidalEssebagMD, PhDalCanadian Journal of Cardiology2015n/aOur analysis showed a significant association between appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks and mortality, with a stronger association for appropriate shocks. Previous trials of ICD therapy reduction programming have shown a significant reduction of inappropriate shocks. The management of appropriate shocks is more challenging and may be optimized by the assessment and treatment of the underlying ventricular arrhythmias. The role of therapies aimed at modifying the arrhythmic substrate and the potential impact on ICD shocks and mortality requires further investigation.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X14016122?casa_token=tUGbcdK9kEgAAAAA:AqnYbxg3ySCxs1rpaaWiHO-_32vgH83dqmzqZtli0tPvL1Lf3wpTLe5_2NTSXfH2r6QImHxPi_wpatient reported outcomes implantable cardiac defibrillatorreviewn/an/a
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100