Benchmark Scoring Experiment 2 - Silver

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W	X	Y	Z
1	Overview
2	Total Score	Date Audit	Scope		Total issues			Combined			Currency 1			Currency 2			Functional Areas			Effort to Fix
3		Between	Sampled		Guidelines	T	%	Criticality	T	%	Pass / Fail	T	%	Task Completion	T	%	Impact	%	S	Complexity	T	%	S	Responsibility	T	%
4		January 29 2020	Screens	25	Applicable	14	100	High	69	30	High	43	30	High	26	32	Vision	28	7	High	69	30	6	Requirements	53	24
5	Silver Medal	February 29 2020	Features	8	Failed	9	64	Medium	74	33	Medium	52	36	Medium	22	27	Cognition	43	8	Medium	74	33	7	Editor	53	24
6			Widgets	3				Low	82	36	Low	48	34	Low	34	41	Mobility	29	5	Low	82	36	8	UX	69	30
7																	Hearing	9	3					Design	74	33
8					Total	50	N/A	Total	225	100	Total	143	100	Total	82	100				Total	225	100		Developer	82	36
9	Total Scores			36			36%			56%			42%			63%			63%			56%
10
11
12	Executive Summary
13	Date	Between January 29, 2020 and February 9, 2020 [auditor] tested [web / app]
14	Scope	Tested 25 screens, 8 tasks and 3 custom widgets of the [company + application] iOS and Android apps.
15	Total WCAG Issues	We discovered 9 issues in violation of 14 WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria.
16	Combined impact Adjectives	This means that some people with disabilities will find it difficult or impossible to use the [company + application] application. This report provides results of our testing, including examples of issues, and explains what work will be needed to remediate the issues found.
17	Pass / Fail	This means that some people with disabilities will find it difficult or impossible to use the [company + application] application. This report provides results of our testing, including examples of issues, and explains what work will be needed to remediate the issues found. - Use of custom components that are not usesable for screen reader users - Screens with an illogical reading and focus order - Images lacking textual alternatives - Screens lacking headigns and titles
18	Task Completion	This means that some people with disabilities will find it difficult or impossible to use the [company + application] application. This report provides results of our testing, including examples of issues, and explains what work will be needed to remediate the issues found. - Use of custom components that are not usesable for screen reader users - Screens with an illogical reading and focus order - Images lacking textual alternatives - Screens lacking headigns and titles
19	Functional Areas	We uncovered a range of issues that are likely to significantly affect the ability of people with a range of visual, motor and cognitive disabilities from being able to successfully interact with the [company + application] application. These issues include: Severity (S) - Vision - Cognition - Mobility - Hearing
20	Effort to fix	The nature of the issues we found indicates that the accessibility of the [company + application] application can be significantly enhanced with high effort. The enhancements that this effort would introduce will help to ensure that the [company + application] application can be successfully used under a wide range of browsing circumstances.
21	Responsibility	Editor, UX, Design, Developer
22
23
24		Jake docs:
25		https://docs.google.com/document/d/19WVumvTHFagR-qU5lBjXoHn8sgHh3faxx7ad2mU_ejs/edit?usp=sharing
26		https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QzxtnPaBUtIZqQOFRDOg6FOp1EER27XHOH05b_LFF2Q/edit?usp=sharing
27		https://docs.google.com/document/d/14nBDekkEJl03oXJMk36EwzR3VYbuAP2IYhOtS46161A/edit?usp=sharing
28		https://docs.google.com/document/d/19qA8YBlhnjqO5SrC4qQxbsLqer_nUocnMZWJkxYCuPU/edit?usp=sharing
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100