QFD Mesin DUSLIC.xlsx

	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N
1
2
3
4
5
6									Correlation :	+	.	-
7	Quality Function Deployment Mesin DUSLIC									Positive	No correlation	Negative
8	Quality Function Deployment Mesin DUSLIC
9									Relationships	9	3	1
10										Strong	Moderate	Weak	None
11			Desired direction of improvement (↑,0,↓)	↑	↑	0	↑	0
12		1:low, 5:high	Functional Reqirements (How) →	Material	Working Mechanism	Control System	Durability	Energy Efficiency	Weighted Score	Competitive evaluation (1:low, 5:high)
13	No	Customer importance rating	Customer Importance rating ↓	Material	Working Mechanism	Control System	Durability	Energy Efficiency	Weighted Score	DUSLIC	Competitor 1	Competitor 2	Competitor 3
14	1	3	The tool is easy to operate	1	9	3			39	5	3	3	4
15	2	5	Can be used by many people		3	9		1	65	5	2	3	4
16	3	4	the tool is not easily damaged / broken	9		1	3		52	3	2	3	3
17	4	4	fast and precise in cutting	1	3			9	52	4	3	3	3
18	5	5	Power of Cutting	3	9		1		65	2	5	4	4
19	6	3	does not drain a lot of energy / effective		3	1		9	39	4	3	3	3
20	7	2	Tools are easy to interpret	3		1	9		26	3	5	4	3
21	8	3	economical tool price	9	1	3			39	5	2	3	2
22			Technical importance score	91	111	72	35	68	377	3,875	3,125	3,25	3,25
23			Importance %	24%	29%	19%	9%	18%	100%	29%	23%	24%	24%
24			Priorities rank	2	1	3	5	4
25			Current performance	4	5	3	4	6
26			Target	4	4	5	4	4
27			Benchmark	4	5	3	2	1
28			Difficulty	3	4	3	1	1	1 : very easy, 5 : very difficult
29			Cost an time	5	3	2	1	2	1 : low, 5 : high
30			Priority to improve	2	1	5	4	3
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100