| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Continuous School Improvement Plan | |||||
2 | DISTRICT GOAL | The Pacific East District will improve student achievement through emphasizing 21st century Innovative Skills of (1) Collaboration Across Networks and Learning By Influence, (2) Creativity and Innovation, (3) Communication, and (4) Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving. | ||||
3 | SCHOOL NAME | Yokosuka Middle School | ||||
4 | Measurable Objective (Literacy) | |||||
5 | Exploratory Question | Data Sources | ||||
6 | How can we collect data to show the strengths and weaknesses in our students' writing? | Summative Assessment Data (Codes) | ||||
7 | Root Cause Analysis | Data Sources | ||||
8 | Learner Challenge | Students struggle with evidence based claims when forming written responses (writing across curriculum to include science and technical and historical) | Summative Assessment, common grade level writing assessments | |||
9 | Instructional Challenge | Embed rubrics as tools used to measure student progress on evidence-based writing to determine areas of growth. | Standards based rubrics, departmental discourse rubrics | |||
10 | Targeted Measurable Objective | Action Plan Link | DoDEA Blueprint Alignment | |||
11 | By the end of the 2021-2022 school year, the school average for the percentage of students who correctly respond to the writing standard will increase from 28.8% to 32% measured by the DoDEA Summative Assessment through the development and use of standards based rubrics and Departmental Discourse Rubrics to effectively develop a claim using text-based evidence. | CLICK HERE | CLICK HERE | |||
12 | Measurable Objective (Mathematics) | |||||
13 | Exploratory Question | Data Sources | ||||
14 | Why are our students struggling with reasoning and modeling? | Summative Assessment Data | ||||
15 | Root Cause Analysis | Data Sources | ||||
16 | Learner Challenge | Students are struggling with modeling and reasoning to construct viable arguments and justifying their conclusions. | Summative assessment results (SubClaim C Reasoning & SubClaim D Modeling and Application), anecdotal classroom evidence | |||
17 | Regular implementation of active participation and cognitive engagement activities where students must reason to construct viable arguments and justify their conclusions. | We continue to monitor progress with Interim assessment, departmental discourse rubrics and Learning Walk Throughs. | ||||
18 | Targeted Measurable Objective | Action Plan Link | DoDEA Blueprint Alignment | |||
19 | By the end of the 2021-2022 school year, the school average for the percentage of students who correctly respond to Subclaim C (Reasoning) and Subclaim D (Modeling & Application) will increase by 3% as measured by the DoDEA Summative Assessment through the implementation of active participation and cognitive engagement activities where students must reason to construct viable arguments and justify their conclusions. | CLICK HERE | CLICK HERE | |||