Adhikari, A., Hashemian, A. M., Nguyen-Vo, T., Kruijff, E., Heyde, M. von der, & Riecke, B. E. (2021). Lean to Fly: Leaning-Based Embodied Flying can Improve Performance and User Experience in 3D Navigation. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, 1–22. doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.730334

enhancement in some conditions

Amemiya, T., K. Hirota, and Y. Ikei. 2013. “Tactile Flow on Seat Pan Modulates Perceived Forward Velocity.” Pp. 71–77 in 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

Amemiya, T., K. Hirota, and Y. Ikei. 2013. “Tactile Flow on Seat Pan Modulates Perceived Forward Velocity.” Pp. 71–77 in 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

enhancement in some conditions

Amemiya, T., Hirota, K., & Ikei, Y. (2016). Tactile Apparent Motion on the Torso Modulates Perceived Forward Self-Motion Velocity. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 9(4), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2016.2598332

Aruga, A., Bannai, Y., & Seno, T. (2019). Investigation of the Influence of Scent on Self-Motion Feeling by Vection. 9.

enhancement in some conditions

visuals + head movements > visuals (head stationary) * when visual display oscillation is inphase with head movements

Ash, A., Palmisano, S., & Kim, J. (2011). Vection in depth during consistent and inconsistent multisensory stimulation. Perception, 40(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6837

Ash, A., Palmisano, S., Apthorp, D., & Allison, R. S. (2013). Vection in Depth during Treadmill Walking. Perception, 42(5), 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7449

Bles, W. (1981). Stepping around: Circular vection and Coriolis effects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 47–61). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Colley, M., Jansen, P., Rukzio, E., & Gugenheimer, J. (2022). SwiVR-Car-Seat: Exploring Vehicle Motion Effects on Interaction Quality in Virtual Reality Automated Driving Using a Motorized Swivel Seat. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 5(4), 150:1-150:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494968

Costes, A., & Lécuyer, A. (2022). The “Kinesthetic HMD”: Inducing Self-Motion Sensations in Immersive Virtual Reality With Head-Based Force Feedback. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frvir.2022.838720

electrical vestibular stimulation

enhancement in some conditions

Cress, J. D., Hettinger, L. J., Cunningham, J. A., Riccio, G. E., Haas, M. W., & McMillan, G. R. (1997). Integrating vestibular displays for VE and airborne applications. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 17(6), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.626969

D’Amour, S., Bos, J. E., & Keshavarz, B. (2017). The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness. Experimental Brain Research, 235, 2811–2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5009-1

Danieau, F., Fleureau, J., Cabec, A., Kerbiriou, P., Guillotel, P., Mollet, N., Christie, M., & Lécuyer, A. (2012). Framework for enhancing video viewing experience with haptic effects of motion. 2012 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2012.6183844

enhancement in some conditions

Farkhatdinov, I., Ouarti, N., & Hayward, V. (2013). Vibrotactile inputs to the feet can modulate vection. World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2013, 677–681. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2013.6548490

enhancement in some conditions

Feng, M., Dey, A., & Lindeman, R. W. (2016). An initial exploration of a multi-sensory design space: Tactile support for walking in immersive virtual environments. 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2016.7460037

Freiberg, J., Grechkin, T., & Riecke, B. E. (2013). Do walking motions enhance visually induced self-motion illusions in virtual reality? IEEE Virtual Reality.

Harrison, W. J., Thompson, M. B., & Sanderson, P. M. (2010). Multisensory Integration With a Head-Mounted Display: Background Visual Motion and Sound Motion. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810367790

Hashemian, A. M., & Riecke, B. E. (2017). Leaning-Based 360° Interfaces: Investigating Virtual Reality Navigation Interfaces with Leaning-Based-Translation and Full-Rotation. In S. Lackey & J. Chen (Eds.), Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (VAMR 2017) (Vol. 10280, pp. 15–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57987-0_2

Hashemian, A., Lotfaliei, M., Adhikari, A., Kruijff, E., & Riecke, B. E. (2020). HeadJoystick: Improving Flying in VR using a Novel Leaning-Based Interface. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3025084

Hashemian, A. M., Adhikari, A., Kruijff, E., Heyde, M. von der, & Riecke, B. E. (2021). Leaning-based interfaces improve ground-based VR locomotion in reach-the-target, follow-the-path, and racing tasks. IEEE Transaction on visualization and computer graphics TVCG, 1–22. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2021.3131422

Hashemian, A. M., Adhikari, A., Kruijff, E., Heyde, M. von der, & Riecke, B. E. (2021). Leaning-based interfaces improve ground-based VR locomotion in reach-the-target, follow-the-path, and racing tasks. IEEE Transaction on visualization and computer graphics TVCG, 1–22. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2021.3131422

Hashemian, A. M., Adhikari, A., Kruijff, E., Heyde, M. von der, & Riecke, B. E. (2021). Leaning-based interfaces improve ground-based VR locomotion in reach-the-target, follow-the-path, and racing tasks. IEEE Transaction on visualization and computer graphics TVCG, 1–22. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2021.3131422

enhancement in some conditions

Hashemian, A. M., Adhikari, A., Aguilar, I. A., Kruijff, E., von der Heyde, M., & Riecke, B. E. (2023). Leaning-Based Interfaces Improve Simultaneous Locomotion and Object Interaction in VR Compared to the Handheld Controller. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (accepted), 1-17.

Hayashizaki, T., Fujita, A., Nozawa, J., Ueda, S., Hirota, K., Ikei, Y., & Kitazaki, M. (2015). Walking Experience by Real-scene Optic Flow with Synchronized Vibrations on Feet. Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference, 183–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/2735711.2735803

enhancement in some conditions

Horie, Arata, Hikaru Nagano, Masashi Konyo, and Satoshi Tadokoro. 2018. “Buttock Skin Stretch: Inducing Shear Force Perception and Acceleration Illusion on Self-Motion Perception.” Pp. 135–47 in Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by D. Prattichizzo, H. Shinoda, H. Z. Tan, E. Ruffaldi, and A. Frisoli. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Keshavarz, Behrang, and Heiko Hecht. 2012. “Stereoscopic Viewing Enhances Visually Induced Motion Sickness but Sound Does Not.” Presence 21(2):213–28.

Keshavarz, B., & Hecht, H. (2012). Visually induced motion sickness and presence in videogames: The role of sound. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 1763–1767. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561354

Keshavarz, B., Hettinger, L. J., Kennedy, R. S., & Campos, J. L. (2014). Demonstrating the Potential for Dynamic Auditory Stimulation to Contribute to Motion Sickness. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e101016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101016

Keshavarz, B., Hettinger, L. J., Vena, D., & Campos, J. L. (2014). Combined effects of auditory and visual cues on the perception of vection. Experimental Brain Research, 232(3), 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3793-9

vection duration was shortest in the trimodal condition, vection intenstiy did not change across sensory conditions

Keshavarz, B., Ramkhalawansingh, R., Haycock, B., Shahab, S., & Campos, J. L. (2018). Comparing simulator sickness in younger and older adults during simulated driving under different multisensory conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.007

Kim, J., & Palmisano, S. (2008). Effects of active and passive viewpoint jitter on vection in depth. Brain Research Bulletin, 77(6), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.09.011

Kim, J., Chung, C. Y. L., Nakamura, S., Palmisano, S., & Khuu, S. K. (2015). The Oculus Rift: A cost-effective tool for studying visual-vestibular interactions in self-motion perception. Perception Science, 6, 248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00248

enhancement in some conditions

visual + biomechanical > visual-only*when direction of radial flow was opposite (backward) to direction of walking (forward)

Kitazaki, M., Onimaru, S., & Sato, T. (2010). Vection and Action are Incompatible. 22–23.

Kitazaki, M., Hirota, K., & Ikei, Y. (2016). Minimal Virtual Reality System for Virtual Walking in a Real Scene. In S. Yamamoto (Ed.), Human Interface and the Management of Information: Information, Design and Interaction (pp. 501–510). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40349-6_48

enhancement in some conditions

Kitazaki, M., Hamada, T., Yoshiho, K., Kondo, R., Amemiya, T., Hirota, K., & Ikei, Y. (2019). Virtual Walking Sensation by Prerecorded Oscillating Optic Flow and Synchronous Foot Vibration. I-Perception, 10(5), 2041669519882448. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519882448

visuals + joystick = visuals + navichair, visuals + Muvman, visuals + head-directed, visuals + swivel chair

Kitson, A., Hashemian, A. M., Stepanova, E. R., Kruijff, E., & Riecke, B. E. (2017). Comparing Leaning-Based Motion Cueing Interfaces for Virtual Reality Locomotion. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces 3DUI, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2017.7893320

Koge, M., Hachisu, T., & Kajimoto, H. (2015). VisuaLift Studio: Study on motion platform using elevator. 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2015.7131753

Kooijman, L., Asadi, H., Arango, C. G., Mohamed, S., & Nahavandi, S. (2023). Investigating the influence of neck muscle vibration on illusory self-motion in virtual reality. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/853ch

Kruijff, Ernst, Bernhard E. Riecke, Christina Trepkowski, and A. Kitson. 2015. “Upper Body Leaning Can Affect Forward Self-Motion Perception in Virtual Environments.” Pp. 103–12 in. Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM.

enhancement in some conditions

Kruijff, Ernst, Bernhard E. Riecke, Christina Trepkowski, and A. Kitson. 2015. “Upper Body Leaning Can Affect Forward Self-Motion Perception in Virtual Environments.” Pp. 103–12 in. Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM.

Kruijff, Ernst, Bernhard E. Riecke, Christina Trepkowski, and A. Kitson. 2015. “Upper Body Leaning Can Affect Forward Self-Motion Perception in Virtual Environments.” Pp. 103–12 in. Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM.

Kruijff, Ernst, Alexander Marquardt, Christina Trepkowski, Robert W. Lindeman, Andre Hinkenjann, Jens Maiero, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2016. “On Your Feet!: Enhancing Vection in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli.” Pp. 149–58 in Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. Tokyo Japan: ACM.

Kruijff, Ernst, Alexander Marquardt, Christina Trepkowski, Robert W. Lindeman, Andre Hinkenjann, Jens Maiero, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2016. “On Your Feet!: Enhancing Vection in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli.” Pp. 149–58 in Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. Tokyo Japan: ACM.

Kruijff, Ernst, Alexander Marquardt, Christina Trepkowski, Robert W. Lindeman, Andre Hinkenjann, Jens Maiero, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2016. “On Your Feet!: Enhancing Vection in Leaning-Based Interfaces through Multisensory Stimuli.” Pp. 149–58 in Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. Tokyo Japan: ACM.

Lackner, James, and P. Dizio. 1983. “Some Efferent and Somatosensory Influences on Body Orientation and Oculomotor Control.” Pp. 281–301 in Sensory Experience, Adaptation and Perception. Psychology Press.

enhancement in some conditions

Lind, Stine, Lui Thomsen, Mie Egeberg, Niels Nilsson, Rolf Nordahl, and Stefania Serafin. 2016. “Effects of Vibrotactile Stimulation During Virtual Sandboarding.” IEEE Virtual Real. 219–20. doi: during virtual sandboarding. 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), 219–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504732.

Liu, P., Stepanova, E. R., Kitson, A. J., Schiphorst, T., & Riecke, B. E. (2022). Virtual Transcendent Dream: Empowering People through Embodied Flying in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–18). Presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans: ACM. doi:10.1145/3491102.3517677

Luu, W., Zangerl, B., Kalloniatis, M., Palmisano, S., & Kim, J. (2021). Vision Impairment Provides New Insight Into Self-Motion Perception. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 62(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.2.4

enhancement in some conditions

Maeda, T., H. Ando, and M. Sugimoto. 2005. “Virtual Acceleration with Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation in a Virtual Reality Environment.” Pp. 289–90 in IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005.

Melcher, G. A., and V. Henn. 1981. “The Latency of Circular Vection during Different Accelerations of the Optokinetic Stimulus.” Perception & Psychophysics 30(6):552–56. doi: 10.3758/BF03202009.

Mori, Masaki, and Takeharu Seno. 2018. “Inhibition of Vection by Grasping an Object.” Experimental Brain Research 236(12):3215–21. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5375-3.

enhancement in some conditions

Murata, Kayoko, Takeharu Seno, Yoko Ozawa, and Shigeru Ichihara. 2014. “Self-Motion Perception Induced by Cutaneous Sensation Caused by Constant Wind.” Psychology 05(15):1777–82. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.515184.

Murovec, Brandy, Julia Spaniol, Jennifer Campos, and Behrang Keshavarz. 2021. “Multisensory Effects on Illusory Self-Motion (Vection): The Role of Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Cues.” Multisensory Research 1(aop):1–22. doi: 10.1163/22134808-bja10058.

Murovec, B., Spaniol, J., Campos, J. L., & Keshavarz, B. (2022). Enhanced vection in older adults: Evidence for age-related effects in multisensory vection experiences. Perception, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066221113770

enhancement in some conditions

Nilsson, Niels C., Rolf Nordahl, Erik Sikström, Luca Turchet, and Stefania Serafin. 2012. “Haptically Induced Illusory Self-Motion and the Influence of Context of Motion.” Pp. 349–60 in Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by P. Isokoski and J. Springare. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Nishimura, Takayuki, Takeharu Seno, Midori Motoi, and Shigeki Watanuki. 2014. “Illusory Self-Motion (Vection) May Be Inhibited by Hypobaric Hypoxia.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 85(5):504–8. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.3812.2014.

enhancement in some conditions

Nordahl, Rolf, Niels C. Nilsson, Luca Turchet, and Stefania Serafin. 2012. “Vertical Illusory Self-Motion through Haptic Stimulation of the Feet.” Pp. 21–26 in 2012 IEEE VR Workshop on Perceptual Illusions in Virtual Environments. Costa Mesa, CA, USA: IEEE.

enhancement in some conditions

Ogawa, Masaki, Takeharu Seno, Hiroyuki Ito, and Shoji Sunaga. 2011. “Consistent Wind Facilitates Vection.” I-Perception 2(8):868–868. doi: 10.1068/ic868.

Oishi, Erika, Masahiro Koge, Sugarragchaa Khurelbaatar, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2016. “Enhancement of Motion Sensation by Pulling Clothes.” Pp. 47–50 in Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, SUI ’16. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.

Ouarti, Nizar, Anatole Lecuyer, and Alain Berthoz. 2014. “Haptic Motion: Improving Sensation of Self-Motion in Virtual Worlds with Force Feedback.” Pp. 167–74 in. Houston, TX, USA: IEEE.

Ramkhalawansingh et al., 2016

Ramkhalawansingh, Robert, Behrang Keshavarz, Bruce Haycock, Saba Shahab, and Jennifer Campos. 2016. “Age Differences in Visual-Auditory Self-Motion Perception during a Simulated Driving Task.” Frontiers in Psychology 7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00595.

enhancement in some conditions

Rampendahl, Henrik, Stefan M. Grünvogel, and Arnulph Fuhrmann. 2019. “The Influence of Different Audio Representations on Linear Visually Induced Self-Motion.” Pp. 1–12 in Virtuelle und Erweiterte Realität - 16. Workshop der GI-Fachgruppe VR/AR. Fulda, Germany.

enhancement in some conditions

Riecke, B. E., & Feuereissen, D. (2012). To move or not to move: Can active control and user-driven motion cueing enhance self-motion perception (“vection”) in virtual reality? Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2338676.2338680

Riecke, B. E., Västfjäll, D., & Schulte-pelkum, J. (2005, January 1). Top-Down and Multi-Modal Influences on Self-Motion Perception in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of HCI International.

enhancement in some conditions

Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Influence of Auditory Cues on the visually-induced Self-Motion Illusion (Circular Vection) in Virtual Reality. 49–57. http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/vr/Projects/Presencia/Presence2005/presence2005.pdf

Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2005). Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005. IEEE, 131–138. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1492765

Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2005). Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005. IEEE, 131–138. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1492765

Riecke, B. E., Feuereissen, D., & Rieser, J. J. (2009). Auditory self-motion simulation is facilitated by haptic and vibrational cues suggesting the possibility of actual motion. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6(3), 20:1-20:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1577755.1577763

enhancement in some conditions

Riecke, B. E., Väljamäe, A., & Schulte-Pelkum, J. (2009). Moving sounds enhance the visually-induced self-motion illusion (circular vection) in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1498700.1498701

enhancement in some conditions

Riecke, B. E., Feuereissen, D., & Rieser, J. J. (2010). Spatialized sound influences biomechanical self-motion illusion (“vection”). Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization - APGV ’10, 158. https://doi.org/10.1145/1836248.1836280

Riecke, B. E., Feuereissen, D., Rieser, J., & McNamara, T. (2011). Spatialized sound enhances biomechanically-induced self-motion illusion (vection). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (p. 2802). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979356

Riecke, B. E., Freiberg, J., & Grechkin, T. Y. (2015). Can Walking Motions Improve Visually Induced Rotational Self-Motion Illusions in Virtual Reality? Journal of Vision, 15(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.2.3

Riecke, B. E., Trepkowski, C., & Kruijff, E. (2016). “Human Joystick”: Enhancing Self-Motion Perception (Linear Vection) by using Upper Body Leaning for Gaming and Virtual Reality. ISpaceLab Technical Report, 2016(1), 1–12.

Riecke, Bernhard E. 2006. “Simple User-Generated Motion Cueing Can Enhance Self-Motion Perception (Vection) in Virtual Reality.” P. 104 in Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology - VRST ’06. Limassol, Cyprus: ACM Press.

Rietzler, M., Hirzle, T., Gugenheimer, J., Frommel, J., Dreja, T., & Rukzio, E. (2018). VRSpinning: Exploring the Design Space of a 1D Rotation Platform to Increase the Perception of Self-Motion in VR. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196755

Rupert, A., & Kolev, O. (2008). The Use of Tactile Cues to Modify the Perception of Self-Motion. Technical Report ADA505849.

enhancement in some conditions

Sasaki, K., Seno, T., Yamada, Y., & Miura, K. (2012). Emotional sounds influence vertical vection. Perception, 41(7), 875–877.

enhancement in some conditions

visuals + walking > visual-only* when visual depicts expanding optic flow (but not contracting, vertical, lateral)

Seno, T., Ito, H., & Sunaga, S. (2011). Inconsistent locomotion inhibits vection. Perception, 40(6), 747.

enhancement in some conditions

Seno, T., Ogawa, M., Ito, H., & Sunaga, S. (2011). Consistent air flow to the face facilitates vection. Perception, 40(10), 1237–1240.

arthrokinetic - arm movements

Seno, T., Funatsu, F., & Palmisano, S. (2012). Virtual Swimming—Breaststroke Body Movements Facilitate Vection. Multisensory Research, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002402

enhancement in some conditions

Seno, T., Hasuo, E., Ito, H., & Nakajima, Y. (2012). Perceptually plausible sounds facilitate visually induced self-motion perception (vection). Perception, 41(5), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7184

Seno, T., FUJII, Y., & YOSHINAGA, T. (2018). Active Control of the Direction of Self-Motion by Head Movements and Vection Strength—The Comparison between the Virtual Driver and Virtual Passenger—. The Vision Society of Japan. https://doi.org/10.24636/vision.30.2_65

enhancement in some conditions

Seno, T. (2013). Music Modulates the Strength of Vection. Psychology, 04(07), 566–568. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.47081

Soave, F., Bryan-Kinns, N., & Farkhatdinov, I. (2020). A Preliminary Study on Full-Body Haptic Stimulation on Modulating Self-motion Perception in Virtual Reality (pp. 461–469). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58465-8_34

Tamada, Y., Hara, K., Fujii, Y., Seno, T., & Sato, M. (2017). EFFECTS OF FOOT-STIMULATION (VIBRATIONS AND A WATER-FLOW) ON VECTION. Proceedings of Fechner Day, 33.

Tamada, Y., Hara, K., Fujii, Y., Seno, T., & Sato, M. (2017). EFFECTS OF FOOT-STIMULATION (VIBRATIONS AND A WATER-FLOW) ON VECTION. Proceedings of Fechner Day, 33.

enhancement in some conditions

visual + auditory > auditory-only * when auditory was hotizontal& visual motion was horizontal sheering pattern: not on graph

Tanahashi, S., Ashihara, K., & Ujike, H. (2015). Effects of auditory information on self-motion perception during simultaneous presentation of visual shearing motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 749. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00749

enhancement in some conditions

Väljamäe, A., Larsson, P., Västfjäll, D., & Kleiner, M. (2006). Vibrotactile enhancement of auditory induced self-motion and spatial presence. Journal of the Acoustic Engineering Society, 54(10), 954–963.

Väljamäe, A., Alliprandini, P. M. Z., Alais, D., & Kleiner, M. (2009). Auditory Landmarks Enhance Circular Vection in Multimodal Virtual Reality. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 57(3), 111–120.

Van Doorn, G. H. V., Seno, T., & Symmons, M. (2012). The Inability of Supraliminal Tactile Stimuli to Influence Illusory Self-Motion. The Seventh International Workshop on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design, Lund, Sweden.

Weech, S., & Troje, N. F. (2017). Vection Latency Is Reduced by Bone-Conducted Vibration and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation. Multisensory Research, 30(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002545

enhancement in some conditions

visuals + chair rotation > visuals-only*when visual and chair motion were moving in opposite directions

Wong, S. C. P., & Frost, B. J. (1981). The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214278

compellingness and onset latency of perceived self-motion

The pattern of results shows that increasing levels of stimulation for both visual and inertial inputs reduces latencies

Wright, W. G., DiZio, P., & Lackner, J. (2005). Vertical linear self-motion perception during visual andinertial motion: More than weighted summation of sensory inputs. Journal of Vestibular Research - Equilibrium & Orientation, 15(4), 185–195.

enhancement in some conditions

Wright, W. G. (2009). Linear vection in virtual environments can be strengthened by discordant inertial input. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 1157–1160. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5333425

enhancement in some conditions

Yahata, R., Takeya, W., Seno, T., & Tamada, Y. (2021). Hot Wind to the Body Can Facilitate Vection Only When Participants Walk Through a Fire Corridor Virtually. Perception, 50(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006620987087