2020 Watermark Engage Evaluation Rubric
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

View only
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
54321
Score/Level
2
Presenter(s) background/experiencePresenter's background represents advanced knowledge and proficient experience in the proposed topic area. Presenter's background represents requisite knowledge and direct experience in the proposed topic area. Presenter's background represents knowledge and moderate experience in the proposed topic area. Presenter's background suggests some knowledge of proposed topic area, but is limited in scope or length of experience.Presenter's background represents limited to no knowledge of the proposed topic area.
3
Session OutcomesProposal has clearly identified session outcomes, related to the focus area, that are attainable given the session format and time allotted, and/or may even challenge the audience. Proposal has identified session outcomes, related to the focus area and attainable given the session format and time allotted. Proposal has some session outcomes related to the focus area and seem generally attainable given the session format and time allotted. Proposal has session outcomes generally tied to the focus area but may not be reasonably attainable given the session format and time allotted. Proposal has outcomes unrelated to the focus area and/or that may not be attainable given the session format and time allotted.
4
Engagement of Audience
Proposal includes specific audience engagement strategies to facilitate interaction and dialogue, and has indicated sharing additional media/handouts with session attendees.Proposal includes specific audience engagement strategies to facilitate interaction and dialogue.Proposal includes some audience engagement strategies to facilitate interaction and dialogue.Proposal includes limited audience engagement strategies to facilitate interaction and dialogue.Proposal includes no audience engagement strategies to facilitate interaction and dialogue.
5
Content OrganizationThis session is comprehensive, clearly sequenced, and directly related to the proposed topic. Delivery methods for the time allotted, audience, and level are appropriate and most likely effective.This session is comprehensive and related to the proposed topic. Delivery methods for the time allotted, audience, and level are appropriate.This session is generally comprehensive, and in many ways are related to the proposed topic. Delivery methods for the time allotted, audience, and level seem attainable and effective.This session is more general in scope and loosely related to the proposed topic. Delivery methods for the time allotted, audience, and level may be difficult to attain and/or may not be effective.This session does not seem clearly organized or structured in a way that relates to the proposed session. Delivery methods for the time allotted, audience, and level are likely not attainable and may be ineffective.
6
Reviewer Recommendation
This session will be of interest to the majority of conference attendees and will most likely offer unique and innovative perspectives that will stimulate dialogue well after the session has concluded. This session will be of interest to many conference attendees and will offer unique perspectives that will stimulate dialogue. This session will be of interest to conference attendees, providing perspectives that may stimulate dialogue. This session may offer interest to a limited number of attendees and could provide perspectives that stimulate dialogue. This session will likely not provide content of interest to attendees and/or provide limited or redundant perspectives.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...