10323 Wendy

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I
1						JUDGE:	Ida Norris	Link:	https://youtu.be/DUYweMII4g0?feature=shared
2			Note: Omitted compulsory elements receive a “0”. Judges Marks for Technical Execution must be given in half or full points (no tenths). All trot work must be done sitting.			RIDER #	10323	Notes:	requires extra
3						NAME:	Wendy Schonfeld
4						Max Pts:	360
5						Final Score:	56.806%
6
7
8	2023 USDF First Level Freestyle
9
10	TECHNICAL EXECUTION
11		COMPULSORY ELEMENTS	POINTS	*	TOTAL	REMARKS
12	1	Medium walk (20m continuous)	5.5		5.5	above the hand
13	2	Free walk (20m continuous)	6.5	2	13	sl. stretch, tracks up
14	3	10-meter circle in working trot RIGHT	5.5	6	5.5	above the bit
15	4	10-meter circle in working trot LEFT	5	5.5	5	hollow topline , not connected
16	5	Leg-yield RIGHT in working trot	6	2	12	, little crossing , nds impul
17	6	Leg-yield LEFT in working trot	5	2	10	above the bit
18	7	Lengthen stride in trot on a straight line	5.5		5.5	above the bit and quick
19	8	15-meter circle in working canter RIGHT	5		5	inverted
20	9	15-meter circle in working canter LEFT	5.5		5.5	not in connection above the bit
21	10	Change of lead through trot RIGHT	5.5	2	11	needs connection and balance
22	11	Change of lead through trot LEFT	5.5	2	11	needs prep and above the bit
23	12	Lengthen stride in canter on a straight line	5		5	above the bit, needs trans at end
24	13	Halt with salute on centerline, first and final	5.5		5.5	above the bit
25	Leave arena at A in a walk with looped or long reins.
26
27	ARTISTIC IMPRESSION
28		COLLECTIVE MARKS	POINTS		TOTAL	REMARKS
29	1	Rhythm, energy, and elasticity	6	4	24
30	2	Harmony Between Horse and Rider	5	4	20	unfortunately not meeting the requirements of the first level today to be reliably on the bit and connected back to front.
31	3	Choreography design cohesiveness, use of arena, balance, creativity	7	4	28	understandable pattern
32	4	Degree of Difficulty	5	2	10	unable to meet test requirements to day
33	5	Music suitability, cohesiveness, seamlessness	6	2	12	trot music too quick and canter music matching but also made horse appear more lateral in canter ( i.e. not enehanicing) could have used a fade in the editing to walk as it was a jarrin musical transition
34	6	Interpretation music expresses gaits, use of phrasing and dynamics	5.5	2	11	Whenever a technical performance does not do well it is not possible for the music and interpretation to express as the technical was not correct/clear today
35	thank you for your efforts with this musical Freestyle. the challenge in M. F. S. is that in order for the artistic scores to be fairly high you must meet the requirements of the Technical side. At level one the horse must be reliably on the bit and in connection. bend it be on outside aids and showing reliable and smooth transitions. With that happening then the artistic side of the program can come more correctly into play. I have made as many notes as I can in the artistic side but ultimately you must have a consistent program of the horse on the bit and exhibiting the movements correctly with accuracy in order for the Freestyle to be successful. work to get your technical program correct and then you r artistic evaluation can come more into play.
36
37
38
39
40		POINTS:	204.5
41		ERRORS:	0
42		SUBTOTAL:	204.5
43		SCORE:	56.806%
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100