ABCDEF
1
Total BudgetETH/OP Rate (July 15)4580
2
S8S9
3
FInal Reviewer Stipend (5)292000292000
4
Lead Stipend (1)102200102200
5
OPs Stipend (Total)5110051100
6
Platform stipend4000040000
7
Total:485300485300
8
9
Total Proposed S8/9 Budget:970600
10
High Level Changes to arrive at this number:
- Repricing budgets using historical ETH/OP rates (similar to approved Budget Board's proposed budget's logic)
11
12
13
14
15
Reviewer Stipend
16
Vote PassedStipend (OP)ETH/OP RateStipend (ETH)
17
S5Nov 15, 2023300001102.527.21
18
S6Jun 19, 2024300001873.516.01
19
S7Dec 22, 2024300001886.515.90
20
21
ETHOP (Current Rate)
22
S5/S6/S7 Average19.7190266
23
S6/S7 Average15.9673086
Rounded down to nearest 100 to get final reviewer stipend
24
25
Proposed Reviewer Stipend:73000
26
- This ETH/OP rate logic is similar to the Budget Board’s recently passed vote. Basically, we used average ETH values of the prior approved seasonal budgets on the day the vote succeeded for this season's budget.
- Using the ETH average for S5/S6/S7 (19.71 ETH) and the current ETH/OP rate would equal >90k OP/reviewer. This seems a bit too high. Instead, using just the ETH average for just S6/S7 (15.96 ETH), we get ~73k OP, which we think makes sense. Given current prices, we think its a good balance to attract reputable talant but not overpay
27
28
29
30
31
Lead Stipend
32
Lead/Reviewer RatioOP
33
S51.4
34
S61.4
35
S71.4
36
Proposed S81.4102200
Reviewer stipend times 1.4, rounded down
37
38
Proposed Lead Stipend:102200
39
In all prior seasons of the GC, the Lead's stipend was set as 40% more than a reviewer's stipend. Factoring in the repricing, this proposed lead stipend is in line with the prior budgets.
40
41
42
OPs
43
Ratio
44
S50.5
45
S60.5
46
S70.5
47
Proposed S80.551100
Lead stipend times 0.5, rounded down
48
49
Proposed Bridge Budget:51100
50
In all prior seasons of the GC, the OPs stipend was set as 50% than a lead stipend. Factoring in the repricing, this proposed ops stipend is in line with the prior budgets.
51
52
53
54
55