Kaggle results

	A	B	C	D	E	F
1	Student	Team	accuracy score	presentation score	final score	presentation comments
2			(<final accuracy>-0,55111)/(0,67244-0,55111)	(quality of presentation, availability of all items mentioned in the rules section of the competition)	(<accuracy score>+<presentation score>)/2
3	Tsolak Ghukasyan	Tsolak Ghukasyan \| Hayk Marikyan \| Samat Gayazov	0.83	1	0.915
4	Hayk Marikyan	Tsolak Ghukasyan \| Hayk Marikyan \| Samat Gayazov	0.83	1	0.915
5	Samat Gayazov	Tsolak Ghukasyan \| Hayk Marikyan \| Samat Gayazov	0.83	1	0.915
6	Artur Grigorev	Grigorev Artur / Lukyanov Dmitry / Semenov Dmitry	0.87	0.9	0.885	No comparative accuracy results for the best solution and each alternative solution.
7	Dmitry Lukyanov	Grigorev Artur / Lukyanov Dmitry / Semenov Dmitry	0.87	0.9	0.885
8	Dmitry Semenov	Grigorev Artur / Lukyanov Dmitry / Semenov Dmitry	0.87	0.9	0.885
9	Богданова Анна	¯\_(ツ)_/¯	0.75	0.8	0.775	too few methods tried
10	Шевлюк Даниил	¯\_(ツ)_/¯	0.75	0.8	0.775
11	Гнедин Павел	Gnedin/Litovchenko/Pestova	0.89	0.9	0.895	No comparative accuracy results for the best solution and each alternative solution.
12	Пестова Анастасия	Gnedin/Litovchenko/Pestova	0.89	0.9	0.895
13	Литовченко Александр	Gnedin/Litovchenko/Pestova	0.89	0.9	0.895
14	Свередюк Алексей	CodExpress	0.88	1	0.939
15	Почтвина Дарья	CodExpress	0.88	1	0.939
16	Артамонов Кирилл	CodExpress	0.88	1	0.939
17	Евстропов Евгений	DreamWorld	0.93	0.9	0.9130759085	no data analysis/insights visualization
18	Жадобин Юрий	DreamWorld	0.93	0.9	0.9130759085
19	Борисов Михаил	DreamWorld	0.93	0.9	0.9130759085
20	Антон Ложков	Anton Lozkov	1.00	1	1.2	plus 10% for winning alone, +10% for exceptional quality presentation and breadth of exploration
21	Владислав Орлов	CoupleData	0.61	1	0.802522
22	Ксения Давыдова	CoupleData	0.61	1	0.802522
23	Майорова Наталья	NikolayChuykin	0.81	0.8	0.816	Too few methods tried. Hope next time you begin making you projects earlier. Plus 1% for nice cats.
24	Чуйкин Николай	NikolayChuykin	0.81	0.8	0.816
25	Коновалов Антон	3 гуся	0.30	0.7	0.4986855	Too few methods tried. No accuracy results for different approaches
26	Санжаров Вячеслав	3 гуся	0.30	0.7	0.4986855
27	Смирнов Ростислав	3 гуся	0.30	0.7	0.4986855
28	Рябуха Артем	Ryabukha/Shulga/Potapoff	0.06	1	0.5311545
29	Потапов Алексей	Ryabukha/Shulga/Potapoff	0.06	1	0.5311545
30	Шульга Михаил	Ryabukha/Shulga/Potapoff	0.06	1	0.5311545
31	Бибик Платон	c.f.g	0.77	1	0.886136982
32	Сапрыкин Александр	Выездной технодром Крэнка	0.88	0.6	0.7407815	Only one method presented - no comparisons with other methods. No data exploration presented.
33	Скоков Владислав	Выездной технодром Крэнка	0.88	0.6	0.7407815
34	Холодняк Максим	Выездной технодром Крэнка	0.88	0.6	0.7407815
35	Ендальцев Никита	Alexey Petrov \| Nikita Endaltsev \| Anastasia Loginova	0.62	0.8	0.7116705	No details in presentation. No evaluations of different methods, no data insights.
36	Логинова Анастасия	Alexey Petrov \| Nikita Endaltsev \| Anastasia Loginova	0.62	0.8	0.7116705
37	Петров Алексей	Alexey Petrov \| Nikita Endaltsev \| Anastasia Loginova	0.62	0.8	0.7116705
38	Александр Карпов	Karpov/Cherepanov	0.39	0.9	0.6459943955	No quantitive comparisons of different methods. Very few visualizations.
39	Черепанов Кирилл	Karpov/Cherepanov	0.39	0.9	0.6459943955
40	Никитина Наталья	Принцессы	0.41	0.6	0.506668	No visualizations, no data insights, few models, no details.
41	Рубцова Екатерина	Принцессы	0.41	0.6	0.506668
42	Гималетдинова Альбина	Принцессы	0.41	0.6	0.506668	No comparative accuracy results for the best solution and each alternative solution.
43	Dmitry Obydenkov	Obydenkov Dmitry \| Sergey Chernov \| Anna Nesterkina	0.75	0.9	0.82637
44	Sergey Chernov	Obydenkov Dmitry \| Sergey Chernov \| Anna Nesterkina	0.75	0.9	0.82637
45	Anna Nesterkina	Obydenkov Dmitry \| Sergey Chernov \| Anna Nesterkina	0.75	0.9	0.82637
46	Галимов Тимур	kekkle	0.57	0.8	0.686656227	No visualizations, no quantitive comparisons presented.
47	Макаров Кирилл	kekkle	0.57	0.8	0.686656227
48	Перевощиков Иван	2 гуся	0.33	0.7	0.514551	No visualizations, no quantitive comparisons presented. How were model parameters tuned?
49	Лавренов Виталий	2 гуся	0.33	0.7	0.514551
50	Завьялов Никита	Nikita Zavyalov	0	0.6	0.3	Only one method presented - no comparisons with other methods. No visualizations.
51	Вадим Дробинин,	0 km	0.87	1	0.935012
52	Александр Зимин	0 km	0.87	1	0.935012
53	Чиркова Екатерина	Chirkova Ekaterina \| Gordenko Maria \| Serousov Vitaly	0.67	0.7	0.687303	Only linear models tested. No data insights, no visualizations.
54	Горденко Мария	Chirkova Ekaterina \| Gordenko Maria \| Serousov Vitaly	0.67	0.7	0.687303
55	Сероусов Виталий	Chirkova Ekaterina \| Gordenko Maria \| Serousov Vitaly	0.67	0.7	0.687303
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100