A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Against Malaria Foundation | ||||||||||
2 | DRC | Guinea | Togo | Uganda | Nigeria (PMI states) | Nigeria (Global Fund states) | Chad | South Sudan | |||
3 | 2023 GiveWell cost-effectiveness analysis — version 2 | ||||||||||
4 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10JFJaWnFAEKmsv5XjXqGqEoMUx0eM7x3WYwu_vC7FRw/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
5 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 9.9 | 17.3 | 7.6 | 15.3 | 11.7 | 12.4 | 4.8 | 6.7 | ||
6 | Change 1: Correcting errors in the leverage and funging calculations in our Sightsavers CEA | ||||||||||
7 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S0vQFhanszLPYhG3Ez7aLDfBSOhvctTwgxEYPWCL3hc/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
8 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
9 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
10 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 9.9 | 17.3 | 7.6 | 15.3 | 11.7 | 12.4 | 4.8 | 6.7 | ||
11 | Change 2: Updating our supplemental adjustment for medical costs averted by life-saving interventions | ||||||||||
12 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kwtLDn8zNcH3U4wIz3iLWqAxO5ITGGtcVetIratb9Rw/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
13 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.0 | ||
14 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 13% | 10% | 7% | 10% | 13% | 9% | 6% | 14% | ||
15 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 11.2 | 19.1 | 8.2 | 16.8 | 13.3 | 13.6 | 5.1 | 7.7 | ||
16 | Change 3: Updating the leverage and funging adjustment in our AMF CEA for DRC | ||||||||||
17 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VaynNQz-gIF_Lykp8-n9f1j-U73N-M_pIDOeRbVk0o8/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
18 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
19 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
20 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 12.1 | 19.1 | 8.2 | 16.8 | 13.3 | 13.6 | 5.1 | 7.7 | ||
21 | Change 4: Updating the counterfactual net spacing adjustment for DRC in our AMF CEA | ||||||||||
22 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WOvYFhpBctSa67v_hr0ZGenhTYdAMw9CVacueegw0Qo/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
23 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
24 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
25 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 13.2 | 19.1 | 8.2 | 16.8 | 13.3 | 13.6 | 5.1 | 7.7 | ||
26 | Change 5: Updating our cost per net analysis and the insecticide resistance adjustment for our AMF CEA for DRC | ||||||||||
27 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oEBscpn0yevU-gqUpneagZDy6i23S6DaPp5J02gbM88/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
28 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 0.8 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | ||
29 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 6% | 17% | 24% | 9% | 26% | 25% | 13% | 4% | ||
30 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 14.1 | 22.4 | 10.1 | 18.3 | 16.7 | 16.9 | 5.7 | 8.0 | ||
31 | Change 6: Adding Madagascar to the Helen Keller International CEA | ||||||||||
32 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10vMnejdRnKmgq9pMMW_uQAol4EGNXZLB0OdkeZ8uXPk/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
33 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
34 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
35 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 14.1 | 22.4 | 10.1 | 18.3 | 16.7 | 16.9 | 5.7 | 8.0 | ||
36 | Change 7: Fixing errors excluding certain supplemental adjustments from our cost per life saved estimates | ||||||||||
37 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_-EBJ-vjz0WSQwEEuKXiaECvVbDrBbwJRqQRbMKI7vw/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
38 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
39 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
40 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 14.1 | 22.4 | 10.1 | 18.3 | 16.7 | 16.9 | 5.7 | 8.0 | ||
41 | Change 8: Updating our malaria mortality calculations and people per net estimates in the AMF CEA | ||||||||||
42 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pae_Iygn-aUu9ek4nxUjVLRgsw1vaPc09pMT3tCGttc/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
43 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 3.9 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | ||
44 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 27% | 21% | 12% | 16% | 8% | 9% | 4% | 9% | ||
45 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 17.9 | 27.2 | 11.3 | 21.3 | 18.1 | 18.4 | 6.0 | 8.7 | ||
46 | Change 9: Splitting the Sightsavers CEA for DRC into province-level columns and updating their worm burden and funging adjustments | ||||||||||
47 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sddGdYbe0-f5G11THhda8ubycCX1Uz5nkwbwbo68Vtk/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
48 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
49 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
50 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 17.9 | 27.2 | 11.3 | 21.3 | 18.1 | 18.4 | 6.0 | 8.7 | ||
51 | Change 10: Fixing an error in the cost per life saved calculation in the New Incentives CEA | ||||||||||
52 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s__P0jU_MY1UqH9n2Kowz3xxZmkvH3Cu5jwnypRebLk/edit?usp=sharing | |||||||||
53 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
54 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
55 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 17.9 | 27.2 | 11.3 | 21.3 | 18.1 | 18.4 | 6.0 | 8.7 | ||
56 | Change 11: Reconciling the population estimates for 1-59-month-olds in Nigeria | ||||||||||
57 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qGy9OTJ-_ZnFMngtYlCjmUMvehbXluw1iqP9SlQy2_8/edit#gid=1377543212 | |||||||||
58 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (x cash) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
59 | Change in cost-effectiveness from previous version (percentage) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | -1% | 1% | 0% | 0% | ||
60 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 17.9 | 27.2 | 11.3 | 21.3 | 17.9 | 18.5 | 6.0 | 8.7 | ||
61 | 2023 GiveWell cost-effectiveness analysis — version 3 | ||||||||||
62 | URL: | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1otZFJSMM8yH5R6DkBIYmlsWy5T7VHsX_E7wDF7HSLaM/edit#gid=1377543212 | |||||||||
63 | Total change in cost-effectiveness from 2023 GiveWell cost-effectiveness analysis — version 1 (x cash) | 64% | 49% | 43% | 35% | 46% | 43% | 22% | 27% | ||
64 | Cost-effectiveness in multiples of cash transfers, after all adjustments | 17.9 | 27.2 | 11.3 | 21.3 | 17.9 | 18.5 | 6.0 | 8.7 |