ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
IDIdea
Similarity Score
ClusterCategory
2
Jaunrah"The proposal specifies that the OpCo would only affect operational efficiency, not the strategic goals of the DAO; however, there is a risk of centralizing decision-making if not enough transparency is given. I believe that the OAT role would be key to make this function properly so there would need to be adequate mechanisms for it to be transparent, accountable and with well-defined roles and responsibilities. It should also be subject to checks and balances, with clear guidelines, so that there is no concentration of authority that could potentially undermine the DAO’s decentralization focus. If I understood correctly, the OAT will be responsible for the OpCo to operate with adequate checks on spending, staffing, and project prioritization so it will become a major position within the DAO structure. I am not sure how complex it would be for five persons to oversight every project and maintain a clear boundary between OpCo’s role and the DAO’s mission."0.571224045
Decentralization Concerns
3
Argonaut"It is true that the structure Arbitrum DAO currently has leads to so much friction and this needs to be addressed, yet we believe that we should avoid centralization when it comes to proposal of this kind. We do recognize the OpCo comes to help and facilitate the solving of these issues, but under the new structure we see a potential centralization that at least every single proposal that has to fall under OpCo’s scope should have OpCo’s members in between the proposer and the proposal itself. That’s why we would like to know if the incorporation of Opco will be mandatory in all the processes mentioned, or if it could be optional?"0.52281258673
Operational Efficiency
4
duokongcrypto
"From this, we can see that the proposal is well-intentioned, aiming to improve the operational efficiency of DAOs and enhance their attractiveness and competitiveness. However, in actual operation, if the management of OpCo is not in place or the use of funds is not transparent, resources may be wasted. Seeing the above comments, people are most concerned about the management of OpCo’s funds. The proposal plans to allocate 34 million ARBs to OpCo, of which 10 million ARBs will be released first and the remaining 24 million will be distributed gradually over the next 24 months. While the DAO can oversee OpCo, OpCo has a high degree of autonomy, particularly in recruiting and contracting personnel. This raises concerns as to whether OpCo will be able to use the funds efficiently and transparently. If the market fluctuates, will OpCo be able to operate in a stable manner?"0.50900023743
Operational Efficiency
5
Argonaut"We appreciate this OpCo tool finally being pushed forward since counting on a legal entity is quite valuable for the DAO and something we consider should have been part of the DAO for a while as to prevent us all from legal issues tha may arise. We like to see that the OpCo also intends to fill gaps after proposals are passed and executed, nevertheless we have certain reservations about what it seems to be a centralization of proposals if they fall under an OpCo’s mandate scope (Financial Management and Ecosystem Support). We see some other delegates have also shared this concern and so we line-up with them to manifest our preoccupation about this."0.5054283673
Operational Efficiency
6
Pablo"the Arbitrum constitution could be enhanced to authorize the Foundation or OpCo (or both) to act on the DAO’s behalf and clarify the DAO’s role in funding or indemnifying legal action. Launching an OpCo could be an opportune moment to address these gaps and define the OpCo’s role relative to the DAO."0.49543055895
Decentralization Concerns
7
Pablo"DAO contributors and delegates are legally exposed, a risk that exists across most DAOs. To address this, I developed the Legal Defence scope with Layer Zero at Maker DAO to protect ecosystem participants. Even if we can’t extend that level of coverage to Arbitrum DAO participants, consider how similar protections might apply to the OpCo. This goes beyond E&O insurance; it’s about anticipating legal risks for the entire DAO, with a specific focus on the OpCo."0.42863003365
Decentralization Concerns
8
JoJo"While you explain the why of this narrowed choice, i honestly see opco being able to help in other sectors as well. Do you think it would be possible to insert some degree of flexibility for which, if the dao really wants it, OpCo would be able to tap and help/manage specific initiatives outside the 2 categories above?"0.40368154053
Operational Efficiency
9
immutablelawyer
"The proposal includes hiring a full-time, in-house legal counsel. If this is to count as one of the 10 employees, what do the Year 2 legal costs entail? Moreover, we feel that a retainer model for legal counsel might be more cost-effective and prevent under-utilisation in this regard. In the immediate, OpCo will definitely not need a full-time legal counsel and this would be something that’d be more ideal in Y2 when we have initiatives potentially plugging into OpCo (although the ‘Why?’ of Why should initiatives even plug-in to OpCo is still very much up in the air)."0.40299391563
Operational Efficiency
10
raam"Hi @immutablelawyer - The exploratory work that Entropy conducted with the Arbitrum Foundation is still in its early stages. While the legal entity will provide the DAO with necessary oversight, we believe this is not the core focus of this proposal at this stage. Rather, we believe that it should be on the mission statements and goal of the OpCo, to make sure it realizes the vision of what the DAO needs."0.40195563315
Decentralization Concerns
11
duokongcrypto
"his proposal is a good idea, through the creation of a company called OpCo, to solve some of the “stuck points” in the implementation of the DAO, such as the lack of a clear person in charge, the decision-making chain is too long, and it is difficult for external contributors to join in a timely manner, etc. OpCo’s role is to make these processes smoother, so that the DAO can be more efficient in the implementation, negotiation, contracting, etc., to ensure the smooth implementation of the strategy. The role of OpCo is to make these processes smoother, so that DAOs can be more efficient in execution, negotiation, contracting, etc., and ensure the smooth implementation of strategies."0.39134726453
Operational Efficiency
12
duokongcrypto
"no rules, need to have KPi system, clear performance indicators, such as implementation progress, financial efficiency, etc., to facilitate the DAO members to assess the performance of OpCo, to avoid waste of resources, it is recommended that OpCo to achieve a specific goal or KPIs when the gradual release of funds to reduce the risk of funding to ensure that each step meets expectations!"0.37123707253
Operational Efficiency
13
seedgov"What if the DAO passes 20 such Snapshot proposals (i.e., mandating OpCo to facilitate an idea from scratch)?"0.36513849273
Operational Efficiency
14
Jaunrah"I suggest refining the plan around staffing and with ROI-focused metrics. A clear outline on the number of hires and specific roles, with justifications for each, would help avoid over-hiring risks, maintain cost-efficiency and foster transparency which would reinforce trust and ensure the OpCo team remains accountable to the DAO’s mission."0.36390443866Role Clarity
15
immutablelawyer
"Are there any plans to further scope out the mandate of OpCo? As is, the entity seems to be a catch-all of sorts aimed at taking up grass-roots initiatives within the Ecosystem. Naturally, we do see the element of centralisation that this could cause and also the chance of eliminating grass-roots initiatives and deterring smaller contributors w/various initiatives. Legal decentralisation is welcome, yet it could easily lead to progressive centralisation if the entities that are being spun up are not scoped out well. In this regard, reference is made to the recent Lido Alliance OpCo which was set up recently that was scoped out well by the proposers Organize the Lido Alliance Program as a Lido-DAO-Adjacent BORG - Proposals - Lido Governance"0.36092703743
Operational Efficiency
16
maxlomu"would love as a standard practice to have members of the opCo to also be rewarded in ARB based on project related KPIs. Ex: hitting a milestone by a specific date. We should start to reward accountability in everything that we do as a DAO."0.35511277593
Operational Efficiency
17
seedgov"How can we be confident that OpCo would be able to facilitate such a proposal, with all it entails?"0.35309569153
Operational Efficiency
18
Pablo"I’m a big advocate of KISS when it comes to an OpCo. Run it lean—these entities are internal service providers to the DAO."0.35022163935
Decentralization Concerns
19
jojo"First, the 6 months to set it up while true are also potentially optimistic. We have becoming good in the dao in setting up legal entities (with the foundation first, gcp kinda replicated that, I assume up to some degree opco will have similar structure); at the same time you need to first find, and then hire, the key personnel. This means it could take more than 6 months, and so spending this much just to create something that might run for only a few months is a waste of money."0.34947747985
Decentralization Concerns
20
duokongcrypto
" mentions that OpCo’s responsibilities cover a wide range of areas such as operational support, program management and resource allocation. So how can OpCo clearly differentiate its functions from other independent organizations within the existing ecosystem (e.g. foundations, existing DAO programs)? How can overlapping responsibilities or inefficiencies be avoided?"0.34869405623
Operational Efficiency
21
pedrob"Also, one area where the OpCO could also contribute is in the active management of the DAO’s IP. I can elaborate further on this point if needed."0.34722603835
Decentralization Concerns
22
seedgov"Suppose the DAO seeks a new long-term incentive program. With OpCo established, a delegate could propose a Snapshot vote stating, “Should OpCo work on a new incentive program for protocols?” without providing any notion of the execution strategy."0.34395682063
Operational Efficiency
23
immutablelawyer
"Firstly, we’re happy with the fact the OpCo proposal helps address the challenge relating to continuity. This mirrors practices in the public sector, where continuity is maintained by involving multiple individuals in processes and ensuring seamless transitions through comprehensive documentation. In our opinion, and based on the current proposal structure, OpCo is well-positioned to facilitate this. Additionally, it has the potential to conduct post-mortems for programs, enabling the DAO to systematically analyze both successes and failures."0.34306801143
Operational Efficiency
24
backbone"This should and can be facilitated by tying the OpCo’s mandate and certain decisions within its legal entity to the Arbitrum DAO Governance decisions in the legal entity’s founding documents. @immutablelawyer, please correct me if I am wrong. This is possible in most practical legal entities."0.33956120085
Decentralization Concerns
25
seedgov"While this statement partially addresses the above concern, the point is that OpCo’s assessment of whether an area is beneficial for the DAO may differ from the DAO’s own perspective as expressed through Snapshot."0.33286130785
Decentralization Concerns
26
Disruption Joe"How do you envision that the OpCo will expand the number of ecosystem contributors outside of OpCo?"0.33202188883
Operational Efficiency
27
Kuiclub"- Are the responsibilities of OpCo with the DAO, OAT and the Arbitrum Foundation clearly defined and how can conflicts of authority and responsibility be avoided?"0.32921926845
Decentralization Concerns
28
seedgov"Based on this example as a real scenario, monthly expenses per term are around $500,000 (approximately 1M ARB), while the monthly unlocks are 1M ARB (barely enough at current prices). We mention this because it may be worthwhile to review the unlocking rate to avoid situations like the one with AF, where the vesting unlocks were insufficient to cover committed expenses and/or support new initiatives. Our concern is that 1M ARB per month might restrict OpCo’s capacity to expand, creating an operational bottleneck. We understand that part of the initial 10M ARB disbursement could mitigate this situation during the first term and that costs are purposefully overestimated in this example (such as legal expenses, which considers the worst-case scenario), but we wanted to bring this up to avoid OpCo potentially being limited by a vesting scheme."0.32288407391
Budget Management
29
404dao"Most importantly, we would like more insight into Opco’s recruitment strategy, particularly regarding the selection of the two-person executive team (Chief of Coins and Chief Chaos Coordinator) and the 10 internal employees. Given the centralization risks posed by Opco, it’s essential that the executive team not only has strong operational expertise but is also well-versed in DAOs. Since this skill set is unique, we’re curious about the specific approach to recruiting such candidates."0.3206526173
Operational Efficiency
30
Kuiclub"- If OpCo’s proposed implementation program is rejected by DAO, is there a mechanism in place to ensure that subsequent adjustments are made?"0.31621921055
Decentralization Concerns
31
Pablo"The takeaway? Establish a legal defense and guardian strategy from the outset, and ensure Arbitrum DAO explicitly endorses it so the OpCo can act swiftly."0.31592142585
Decentralization Concerns
32
0xTALVO.ETH_MTY
"Supporting this makes sense because the OpCo, if implemented correctly, could enhance the DAO’s operational efficiency by providing structure and oversigh. However, to protect decentralization, transparency mechanisms must be robust to prevent power consolidation."0.31557237665
Decentralization Concerns
33
danielo"Copying the functional-division structure suggested in the OpCo proposal for reference:"0.31557237663
Operational Efficiency
34
Euphoria"On coordination with Offchain Labs and the Arbitrum Foundation, it might be useful to discuss role definitions before finalizing the OpCo committee. Clear role allocation upfront would help prevent overlaps and keep the community informed about the distinct responsibilities of each entity."0.31471530016Role Clarity
35
Jaunrah"This proposal would be very important for the DAO. It would potentially change its dynamics in a variety of ways, mostly I think for the better. While reading the proposal some things crossed my mind which I believe are important to discuss."0.31263937046Role Clarity
36
Disruption Joe"It’s really about creating a structure which solves the “holistic approach” to delivering outcomes problem. I believe workstreams with repeatable governance processes and a few key governance principles could do this as well as the OpCo. I do think we need an entity though to hire the people in and supporting the neccessary roles."0.31107576316Role Clarity
37
duokongcrypto
"The DAO community needs to keep a watchful eye on OpCo’s operations to ensure that it is delivering the value it is intended to deliver, rather than becoming a “black hole” for funds."0.3088559765
Decentralization Concerns
38
duokongcrypto
"OpCo has a high degree of independence, especially in recruitment and contracting, and it will be important for DAO to monitor and audit key positions. Need to have a system of rules"0.30485619435
Decentralization Concerns
39
JoJo"It poses, tho, the question: if the dao feels like this type of internalization is the way forward, for grants or other operation outside the opco structure, what would be the way forward? Enlarge this structure, or create a parallel one?"0.30320132576Role Clarity
40
JoJo"This is one of the key reason why we need the OpCo"0.30132530263
Operational Efficiency
41
Euphoria"While the proposed KPIs include operational metrics, we suggest adding specific outcome-based KPIs that capture the value OpCo brings to the DAO, such as ROI on OpCo-managed initiatives or the speed of implementing strategies compared to previous methods."0.2978530723
Operational Efficiency
42
pedrob"“The OpCo will only enter into legal agreements with service providers for strategies approved by the DAO, provided the following requirements (insert requirements) are met.”"0.29575395065
Decentralization Concerns
43
pedrob"I’m still not entirely clear on this structure—I need to digest the proposal a bit more to fully understand the concept. On one hand, I find the idea of an entity dedicated to the project management of the DAO’s initiatives valuable; on the other hand, doesn’t adding another layer of control over ecosystem actors already fulfilling this role (e.g., SEED Gov) somewhat defeat the purpose?"0.29437825136Role Clarity
44
Euphoria"This proposal is essential for the DAO, as it presents many possible changes, most of which would likely be beneficial."0.29280670516Role Clarity
45
JoJo"This is definitely the biggest risk of the OpCo: becoming an entity that just sucks everything internally. To me, the biggest work will be not to make it work, but to establish the right boundaries for it to not become the decision maker/executor in place of the DAO."0.29279041365
Decentralization Concerns
46
Kuiclub"- Although the OpCo proposal includes a buffer, the high budget may lead to excessive initial expenditure, can more funds be released in stages?"0.29137347711
Budget Management
47
seedgov"Despite the bonus, OAT members’ compensation seems low. This is a critical role for both the DAO and OpCo, effectively overseeing all operations and requiring candidates to forgo other jobs/positions for full-time commitment. The opportunity cost for joining the OAT is high, and we worry that a low base compensation might deter potential applicants (who must also have a seniority level commensurate with the role)."0.28900115945
Decentralization Concerns
48
immutablelawyer
"The structure underlying the Oversight and Transparency Committee (OAT) is well thought out and naturally an integral part of this OpCo proposal. While some members have identified that the monthly contribution for these members is on the low side, we feel that is in part addressed by the bonus being proposed. We generally are in favour of this as it helps to align incentives and ensure long-term commitment and accountability. In this regard however, you should establish parameters of what factors would lead to these bonus payments being triggered in detail so that expectations are fully set."0.28787438546Role Clarity
49
seedgov"Where is the limit to OpCo’s operational capacity?"0.28728821033
Operational Efficiency
50
Jaunrah"I would like to add that this proposal is a way of institutionalizing work that is already being done by entities such as Entropy and others. By institutionalizing, could there be a risk of creating a pseudo-centralized structure, undermining Arbitrum’s decentralization?"0.28465851616Role Clarity
51
Disruption Joe"Overall, thanks for your time. I know my comments may be tough, but they are good hearted. If we can answer those questions, I am supportive. I’m also willing to commit to the success of OpCo if the DAO votes for it, even if I do not."0.28376339855
Decentralization Concerns
52
pedrob"If the idea is for the OpCo to be the PM and facilitator of initiatives, I think it should replace entities like SEED rather than simply oversee them (although SEED, for example, could later be contracted as a service provider to carry out specific tasks within the program)."0.28357021243
Operational Efficiency
53
immutablelawyer
"Re. the request for community feedback on KPIs some additional metrics that could be considered include (i) budget variance i.e. deviation between projected and actual expenditures, (ii) % of funds returned to the DAO (iii) runway project accuracy (iv) attrition rate analysis i.e. reasons for internal employees hired or service provider departing… Moreover, KPIs could be reviewed and adjusted periodically (ex: every 6 months) based on feedback from the DAO to ensure alignment with evolving priorities."0.28142241811
Budget Management
54
Disruption Joe"The number of people who can be hired should really be explicit. For example, you could say that a new strategy would require a paid steward, but no more than one without the DAO explicitly voting to add another role."0.27937074186Role Clarity
55
pedrob"Especially considering this point. It’s not clear when the OpCo should be involved and when it shouldn’t, leaving it up to the discretion of the delegates. Ideally, this should be more clearly defined, in my opinion, to prevent a repeat of what happened with the ARDC (which led the DAO Advocate to proactively make decisions on resource usage)."0.27860755935
Decentralization Concerns
56
duokongcrypto
"2、 Set up a conflict resolution mechanism: If OpCo disagrees with other entities in the ecosystem (e.g., foundations) on resource allocation or decision-making, is there a need to set up a clear conflict resolution process?"0.27840152093
Operational Efficiency
57
pedrob"I think this is a key issue to address. I’m thrilled with the idea of an organization that coordinates the DAO’s initiatives to promote efficiency in resource management and align initiatives towards consolidating the DAO’s mission, vision, and objectives."0.27806123375
Decentralization Concerns
58
jameskbh". The opCo is a very important topic! While I’m still digesting the concept, I would like to ask:"0.2769541023
Operational Efficiency
59
Kuiclub"Introduce a stage-by-stage review system: OpCo can be set up to conduct a stage-by-stage review every six months to report back to the community on the progress of the current program and the use of funds, and allow the community to make adjustments based on feedback. This flexible adjustment mechanism will allow OpCo to adjust its direction in a timely manner when it encounters bottlenecks and avoid wasting funds."0.27650891483
Operational Efficiency
60
Jaunrah"On a positive manner, I would like to add that this is overall a good proposal as it would make strategy execution more efficient and it would also likely attract enhanced talent to improve contributor quality."0.27575836096Role Clarity
61
seedgov"That said, and while we acknowledge our position may be biased since we are currently Service Providers for the DAO, we believe OpCo should only manage programs when no viable service provider or clear ownership exists and it should supervise those that do."0.27530064475
Decentralization Concerns
62
seedgov"We are slightly concerned that this option might create an incentive for “lazy” proposals that rely on OpCo to fill in the details. Don’t get us wrong—we understand the rationale behind including this option. However, it might be better to establish clearer boundaries on what can be requested from OpCo. To better illustrate our point, let’s take an example:"0.26993118123
Operational Efficiency
63
Disruption Joe"I’m here to get rid of most government and replace it with better onchain systems. What impetus will we have to drive DAO towards continued decentralization? How will the CEO of OpCo be more incentivized to ensure that a cartel cannot rug builders than they are to follow the normal path which pressures government entities?"0.26950887964
Legal Frameworks
64
Euphoria"Regarding legal needs, is a full-time, in-house legal counsel necessary? Clarifying the specific responsibilities they would cover would help assess the need for a full-time position."0.26879519326Role Clarity
65
maxlomu"Would also love @SEEDGov feedback as they have been running a similar initiative for the Everclear DAO and I’m sure they learned a lot from it"0.26598019986Role Clarity
66
Euphoria"In general, we acknowledge the work done for drafting this proposal and support the direction of this initiative, as it aims to build a more structured and operational approach for the DAO."0.26575822646Role Clarity
67
404dao"Our team is generally pleased with the overall design of Opco. While we recognize that it introduces some centralization risk for the DAO, we believe the resulting improvements in execution and efficiency will bring benefits that outweigh the risk. We’re also glad to see that the model preserves a decentralized, bottoms-up approach to working group creation, continuing to empower individuals."0.26551103385
Decentralization Concerns
68
404dao"Furthermore, what happens if the DAO cannot secure the ideal candidates? Specifically, for the executive roles, will the Opco’s initiation be delayed, or will the OAT step in to manage executive responsibilities temporarily if these positions are unfilled?"0.26438871475
Decentralization Concerns
69
immutablelawyer
"Monthly salaries for the other 10 employees ($9,000–$16,000), combined with an annual bonus pool of $810,000, seem substantial. While it is acknowledged that this is a preliminary budget i.e. “this is not an official budget, meaning that capital may be budgeted and allocated differently once the entity is stood up”, has there been any effort to identify the roles being considered or benchmark salaries against similar DAO initiatives? If so, a high-level overview of this would be appreciated."0.26420280416Role Clarity
70
immutablelawyer
"While bi-annual oversight and financial reports are mentioned, the significant funding involved warrants more frequent reporting calls, such as on a monthly basis or a dashboard updated in real-time. These could include, projections and any deviations (e.g., budget overruns, missed deadlines), explanations for variances and remedial actions being undertaken, among several others. Ideally the reports are published on a quarterly basis in our opinion to ensure that the DAO has sufficient oversight over financial standings (especially since a part of the funds may be off boarded and thus are off-chain w/the DAO not having the ability to track these). With the current proposed budget (which in our opinion is too high in and of itself, bi-annual reporting definitely does not cut it)."0.26285838521
Budget Management
71
JoJo"it is expected that delegates vote against such a proposal if it can be better executed via OpCo’s involvement."0.26179740983
Operational Efficiency
72
backbone"I am Valentin, currently director and team lead of the dYdX Operations subDAO - a similar entity within the dYdX DAO. I have been leading the operational setup of the Ops subDAO, the reorganization of the legal structure, and getting the entities operational (Bank account, admin infrastructure, and initial SOPs)."0.26152054224
Legal Frameworks
73
404dao"Lastly, the proposal states, “The OpCo is a legal entity that delegates and key stakeholders can leverage to achieve DAO-defined goals.” Is it correct to assume that these goals have not been started yet but will be worked on in phase 1, as per the the mission, vision, and purpose post?"0.25943918823
Operational Efficiency
74
Argonaut"On the other hand, , should’n we consider some kind of pilot before starting with this program for a total amount of 30 months? We know it’s been stated that 6 months will be for the setup and the next 24 for operations from the entity, but most of what we see here is an oficial launching for something that haven’t been tested yet and considering everything that implies and the funds it requires, Maybe 1 year which is not a long period of time but it is also not a short period as well, and 6 months for setting up while the next 6 for operations and then and only then if the OpCo demonstrates that it is really useful then require for an extension up to 20 more months"0.25738310631
Budget Management
75
danielo"let’s assume the functional-division is implemented, and we have grants on one Unit, investments on the Unit, and operations all housed under different Units. If say we wanted to coordinate a strategy that focuses on REWA (or CollabTech or DePin, or whichever) we would then need to coordinate changes to the work across 4 different Units, each with different priorities, mandates, and KPIs. It would likely take months to coordinate and launch a cohesive REWA strategy. On the other hand, an organisation design that is focused on customer-segments as the key success driver would create Units around each customer segment (like the Gaming Catalyst), and each Unit would then structure ecosystem support, investments, grants, etc as needed for that specific vertical. If Arbiturm wanted to tackle a new vertical (e.g. REWA, DePin, dAI, etc.) it would be more effective to give agency to a group that can define the right mix of strategies for said segment than try to coordinate 3-4 Units that operate across multiple segments to prioritise the new initiative. Low speed of coordination is what makes corporations unable to do innovation and leads to their demise."0.2555148486Role Clarity
76
deelabs"We find this proposal to be a comprehensive and well-thought-out framework for establishing an operational entity that could meaningfully enhance Arbitrum’s execution capabilities. The initiative is proficient in addressing current operational inefficiencies while maintaining appropriate governance oversight and control mechanisms."0.25377088856Role Clarity
77
Kuiclub"he advantage of this proposal is that it could help the Arbitrum DAO to deal more systematically with a number of important long-term projects, while avoiding the current fragmentation problem.OpCo provides a more structured framework for efficiently integrating and managing resources."0.25347181336Role Clarity
78
danielo"So I invite the DAO to explore a bit deeper whether a functional-division design is the right one before putting this proposal to a vote. A couple of weeks here could save months or even years of pure pain and operational ineffectiveness for Arbitrum."0.25313292246Role Clarity
79
Kuiclub"34m ARB is a significant amount of money, it is recommended that OpCo provide a detailed plan for the use of the funds after launch and set up stage by stage KPIs to ensure that the funds are used effectively, the budget includes a larger buffer, although this will allow for market volatility, how can we ensure that there is true transparency in the use of these funds? In addition to semi-annual reporting, is there more frequent reporting on the use of funds, or is real-time financial visualization provided?"0.24931999611
Budget Management
80
duokongcrypto
"1、For OAT members and the OpCo core team, regular public meetings and reports could be set up to show progress to the community and to receive questions and feedback."0.24863382963
Operational Efficiency
81
404dao"Will the Chief of Chaos oversee existing working groups that fall under the Opco’s mandate (Ecosystem Support & Financial Management). What exactly will their role be? Will it be to improve processes or something else?"0.24656393173
Operational Efficiency
82
backbone"The call for clear KPIs in this thread is completely understandable considering the amount of money proposed to be deployed. As mentioned above a crucial part of the OAT initial setup deliverables is to develop meaningful KPIs under which the OpCo will be held accountable. As this is a new initiative and the exact activities are dependent on a lot of different, still developing factors, developing KPIs in the proposal stage is not practical in my opinion."0.24521904821
Budget Management
83
0xTALVO.ETH_MTY
"Clear roles, reporting systems, and accountable oversight by the Operational Audit Team (OAT) will be essential for maintaining alignment with the DAO’s strategic direction without compromising decentralized principles."0.24401803656Role Clarity
84
Gabriel"Overall, I agree with the proposal and am inclined to vote in favor. However, I would prefer to see something smaller that can grow over time in terms of responsibilities, budget, and team members. I don’t think starting with such a large setup and expense from the beginning is the best approach."0.2410425686Role Clarity
85
Kuiclub"It is recommended that a stricter control mechanism be established in terms of governance and cost transparency, and that a more flexible adjustment space and exit plan be provided in order to adapt to future changes. A set of phased exit strategies should be formulated so that if OpCo fails to achieve the expected results, its responsibilities and budget can be gradually downsized, and its functions can eventually be transferred to other more suitable internal mechanisms of DAOs to ensure that funds and resources are not wasted."0.2404459281
Budget Management
86
larva"I very hope OpCo can address this pain point."0.24032079353
Operational Efficiency
87
Jaunrah"It would be proper to expand on this assertion to make sure that it is kept that way. This is no easy task. It would need a very well-thought definition of the OpCos boundaries and their restrictions. It would also need frequent, profound reporting and transparent metrics for spending and audits."0.23748618326Role Clarity
88
backbone"If this is the case the question of which projects or initiatives are included in the mandate (which needs to be well-defined and approved by governance) is answered more quickly and as stated in the proposal initiatives outside of the mandate would require additional governance approvals."0.23467840786Role Clarity
89
404dao"Regarding the 10 employees mentioned in the sample budget, we’re wondering if this setup resembles a “bench” model, similar to consulting firms, where the DAO would have access to resources on demand for various initiatives. If that’s the case, we’re concerned about potential underutilization, a common challenge in consulting and agency models, where resources are hired without clear expectations around the scope or duration of their projects."0.23368881636Role Clarity
90
Disruption Joe"How will the CEO of OpCo be more incentivized to ensure that a cartel cannot rug builders than they are to follow the normal path which pressures government entities?"0.23273267484
Legal Frameworks
91
seedgov"Does this mean that once fully operational, OpCo will act as the PM for all initiatives, effectively replacing current SPs?"0.23181930573
Operational Efficiency
92
immutablelawyer
"Still have to read through the proposal - however, I noticed that the term DAO-Adjacent legal entity was used yet no clarity on the entity-type and jurisdiction was provided. Since you mentioned that this is already in process (which to be honest [I’m gonna be pedantic here] I do not like since the proposal first has to pass), can we get some clarity on this?"0.22897921544
Legal Frameworks
93
seedgov"Do you think it is possible to establish predefined salary ranges for the different roles? (beyond the chiefs). We understand that this isn’t easy, as the final salary for each position will depend on a variety of hard-to-predict factors, but it would be valuable for the DAO to have a sense of which roles warrant a $100k salary per year versus those that merit $200k (as an example)."0.22799226756Role Clarity
94
Disruption Joe"I just read the Ethereum Foundation report and I love this concise values statement at the beginning. What would be the core values of this OpCo?"0.22733535033
Operational Efficiency
95
Pablo"Arbitrum DAO’s decentralization is beneficial for transparency but not ideal for rapid off-chain legal response."0.224594625
Decentralization Concerns
96
JoJo"All in all i think the proposal is well thought. I am unsure about the categorization of grants outside of ecosystem growth, would dare to say it could fall into it, but maybe is just semantic."0.22457249136Role Clarity
97
Kuiclub"However, I personally feel that it is important to note that the creation of such an entity also brings certain administrative costs and risks, such as issues of trust in a small number of managers and whether it can be efficient in the long term, a point that has been echoed previously in the financial proposal 「[Non-Constitutional] Treasury Management v1.2 - #20 by kuiclub"0.22037139624
Legal Frameworks
98
duokongcrypto
"contingency measures need to be put in place to protect resources from being wasted. the structure needs to be very simplified and clear. the DAO should need to have the ability and constraints of a veto, and have contingency plans in place at all times if it doesn’t do a good job."0.21875078132
Governance Oversight
99
jameskbh"In the Budget we have an estimation of the team size (10 FTE) and their salary range. Is there a proposed internal organizational chart, so we can see the distribution between the areas OpCo will take care of?"0.21354437791
Budget Management
100
Bob-Rossi"It’s good to see projects learning from other projects mistakes, but if we know the cost in USD (or atleast, some of the expected costs) is there a reason to not just sell to USD right away to ensure funding? I say that fully understanding that a) 1m of it will be incentive based, so it makes sense to keep it in ARB and b) some costs aren’t fully know yet… but I think that sitting in ARB brings on market risks to a project that has a long runway. For example, if we know the oversight council will be $25,000 a month, why not just sell the $600,000 USD worth of ARB at the start?"0.21333125921
Budget Management