rubric_ScenarioPaper_EDL-660-apr12
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Rubric for Scenario Paper
2
4321 or 0
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
Understanding of issue(s)Identifies and demonstrates a clear and deep understanding of all pertinent issues and problemsIdentifies and demonstrates a deep understanding of most pertinent issues and problemsIdentifies and demonstrates a limited understanding of issues and problemsIdentifies and demonstrates a superficial understanding of issues and problems
5
ResearchSupplements scenario assessment with relevant and extensive research into the scenario situation; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of informationSupplements scenario assessment with relevant research into the scenario situation; documents all sources of informationSupplements scenario assessment with limited research into the scenario situation; provides limited documentation of sources consultedSupplements scenario assessment, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation
6
Analysis and evaluation 1Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identifiedPresents a thorough analysis of most issues identifiedPresents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identifiedPresents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified
7
Analysis and evaluation 2Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the concepts studiedMakes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the concepts studiedMakes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues identified and the concepts studiedMakes little or no connection between the issues identified and the concepts studied
8
Analysis and evaluation 3Supports diagnosis and opinions with logical arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view drawn from multiple sources of knowledge; interpretation is both reasonable and objectiveSupports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view drawn from multiple sources of knowledge; interpretation is both reasonable and objectiveSupports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argumentSupports diagnosis and opinions with few reasons and little evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective
9
Recommendations (action plan)Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the texts; recommendations address all issues and problems identified and analyzed and follow logically from the analysisPresents specific, realistic, and appropriate recommendations adequately supported by the information presented and concepts from the texts; recommendations address most issues and problems identified and analyzed and follow logically from the analysisPresents realistic or appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the texts; recommendations address some of the issues and problems identified and analyzedPresents realistic or appropriate recommendations with little, if any, support from the information presented and concepts from the texts
10
Overall presentationWell-written and insightful (writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness); includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organizedWell-written (writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors); includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organizedCarelessly written (writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors); gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organizationPoorly written (writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors); lacks detail and relevant data and information; poorly organized
11
APA guidelinesUses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources and format paperUses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources and format paperReflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelinesDoes not use APA guidelines
12
Total:
13
Thomas Edison State College
14
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
15
Scale: 30–32 = A (93–100); 29 = A– (90–92); 28 = B+ (88–89); 23–27 = B (83–87); 22 = B– (80–82); 21 = C+ (78–79); 15–20 = C (73–77); 14 = C– (70–72); 7–13 = D (60–69); 0–6 = F (below 60).
Loading...
 
 
 
Written Assignment Rubric