ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY
1
Visa OfficeType of Temporary Resident Application (SP, WP, TRV)Date Decision RenderedCountry of Citizenship of Applicant(s)@dropdownOption 1
2
Ihttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugLOGxvou1I have reviewed the application. I am not satisifed that the applicant would leave Canada at the end of their stay as a temporary resident, I note that: -the client has strong family ties in Canada -the client is divorced and mobile. The purpose of the visit does not appear reasonable given the applicant's socioeconomic situation and therefore I am not satisified that the applicant would leave Canada at the end of the period of authorized stay. Taking the applicant's current employment situation into consideration, the employment does not demonstrate that the applicant is sufficiently well established that the applicant would leave Canada at the end of the period of authorized stay. The applicant's travel history is not sufficient to count as a positive factor in my assessment. Weighing all the factors in this application, I am not satisified that the applicant will depart Canada at the end of the period authorized for their stay.Abu DhabiTRV03/01/2022Pakistan
3
Abu DhabiStudy Permit01/01/2022UAE
4
I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay as required byAbu dhabiStudent VisaApril 21, 2023Philippines
5
AccraSPTogo
6
GCMS NOTES -Proof of Previous educationnot provided. Study plan not submitted, Insufficient explnationhas been given on how the sought educational program would be of benefit. ( while all educational documets , Statement of purpose were on the file and duly submitted )AnkaraStudy Permit03/01/2022IRAN
7
I have review the application. The study plan does not seem reasonable given the availability of grade level studies at country of residence at a fraction of the cost. I am not convince the applicant will leave the country at the end of the authorized stay.AnkaraStudy Permit01/10/2022Turky
8
Reapplcation: I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on your personal assets and financial status.
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on your family ties in Canada and in your country of residence.
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on the purpose of your visit.
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on your current employment situation.
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on your travel history.
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on the limited employment prospects in your country of residence.		Ankara, TurkeyStudy Permit 11/08/2021Cameroon
9
Applicants are a family of three Venezuelan nationals residing in Chile since 2016. I note PA's
spouse has not declared complete 10 years of past education/employment history as required. PA
has been accepted to Red River College for ESL pathway program. Cost of first year of studies is
approximately CAD$37,000, including tuition per LOA, and cost of living expenses in Winnipeg.
Tuition for the following year is approximately $15,000. Applicants have demonstrated some funds in
the form on bank statements but I note recent large and unexplained deposits. Not satisfied funds
are in place. I have concerns that the applicants are using the SP process as a means to enter
Canada given their weak establishment to Chile and weak ties to Venezuela. Both countries have
been impacted by instability in recent years. On balance, I am not satisfied re: BFs. Refused.		Chile (Santiago)SP02/02/2021Venezuela
10
Text: Client does not meet SDS eligibility. Client is still a minor at time of application. Application referred to New Delhi. CPC EdmontonSP - SDS12/16/2021INdia
11
On review of all information including PA’s previous employment and educational history, their motivation to pursue studies in Canada at this point doesn’t seem reasonable. Client submitted transcripts in order to substantiate academic proficiency. Transcripts indicate low average marks. I am not satisfied that the applicant’s proposed education path makes sense and, as such, that pursuing studies in Canada reasonable at this time. Given the aforementioned, I am not satisfied, on balance, that the PA meets R216 (1) (b) of the IRPR. Application refused.CPC EdmontonSP - SDS11/12/2021India
12
I have reviewed the application. I have considered the positive factors outlined by the applicant, including statements or other evidence. However, I have given less weight to the positive factors, for the following reasons: -the client's previous studies were in an unrelated field. The client's previous employment and educational history demonstrate an inconsistent career progression. I am not satisfied that the applicant would leave Canada at the end of their stay as a temporary resident, I note that: -the client is single, mobile, is not well established and has no dependents. Additionally, based on the applicant's limited employment prospects in their country of residence/citizenship, I have accorded less weight to their ties to their country of residence/citizenship. For the reasons above, I have refused this application.CPC-OttawaSPMay 4, 2021Iran
13
I have reviewed all the documentation provided for this application. Taking the applicant's plan of studies into account, the applicant does not appear to be sufficiently well established that the proposed studies would be a reasonable expense. The applicant's immigration status in their country of residence appears to be temporary, which may reduce their ties to that country. Therefore, I am not satisfied that the applicant would be a bonafide student who will leave Canada by the end of the period authorized for their stay. Application refused.CPC-OttawaSPApril 13, 2021Nigeria
14
Thank you for your interest in coming to Canada. I have reviewed your temporary resident visa (visitor visa) application and supporting documentation to assess whether you meet the requirements for a visitor visa (https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/visit-canada/eligibility.html). This includes assessing whether you are coming to Canada temporarily for the reason(s) you describe in your application. I have determined that your application does not meet the requirements of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-2.5/index.html) and Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR) (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-2002-227/index.html). I am refusing your application.
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay as required by paragraph 179(b) of the IRPR (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2002-227/section-179.html). I am refusing your application because you have not established that you will leave Canada, based on the following factors:
• Your assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel for yourself (and any accompanying family member(s), if applicable).
• The purpose of your visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given the details you have provided in your application.		Delhi, IndiaTRVFebruary 14, 2023India
15
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR,
based on your family ties in Canada and in your country of residence.
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in
subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on the purpose of your visit.		Istanbul, TurkeyStudy Permit 22.nov.2021Iran
16
Taking the applicants plan of studies into account, the documentation provided in support of the applicant's finanical situaiton does not demonstrate that th funds would be sufficent or available. I am not satisfied that the proposed studies would be a reasonble expense. Applicant would need to use the entirely of her savings to pay for tution and living expenses. At this stage in her career, I am not satisfied proposed studies would improve career prospects at home to a degree that would offset the costs of studying abroad. Moreover, applicant has husband and two children, who would be left without any financial savings to live off of . The study plan does not appear reasonable given the applicant's employment and education history. the client proposed studies are not reasonble given their career path; Weighting the factors in this application. I am satisfied that the applicant will depart Canada at the end of the period authorized for their stay. I have refused this applicationJamaica Study Permit03/05/2022
17
Integrated search noted. HOF does not have the qualifications typically required per LMIA requirements for applied position - a university degree or college diploma in a program related product or serviced. Based on the foregoing, I am not satisfied the HOF has the education and work experience as per LMIA requirements to perform in the offered position. PA does not meet requirements under R200(3)(a). Refused. Accompanying spouse and dependent accordingly refused. Biometrics exempted due to COVID-19 travel limitations.Kingston (Jamaica)WPNovember 16, 2020South Africa
18
MexicoStudy Permit04/27/2022El Salvador
19
PA appears to be offered 9000 CAD scholarship by school . Tution for first year is 15 000 CAD. PA holds bank accounts with over 25 000. I note PA appears to hold sufficient funds, she's a lawyer, scholarship noted study progression noted. However I'm not statisfied PA was truthful re: five US visa refusals (2015, 2014, 2014, 2008 2007). She disclosed 2017 Canada TRV refusal. She was refused also because she had not been truthful about USA visa refusals. Based on the information provided, I am not satisfied PA was truthful as obligated by IRPA. refused a16MexicoSPJune 10 2021Haiti
20
I have reviewed the application

Taking the applicant's plan of study into account, documents submitted show some funds seem available, but there are concerns that company funds would be sufficient and available for the whole course. I am not satisfied that proposed studies would be a reasonable expense .
My prove of funds is my dad personal savings account with $100,000 balance . Tuition for whole course is less than $30,000 . I have challenged this and ircc request out of court settlement .		nairobistudy permitSept, 2021Nigeria
21
I have reviewed the application. Taking the applicant's plan of studies into account, documents submitted show some funds seem available; but with lump sum deposits. Concerns that these funds would be sufficient and available for the whole course. I am not satisfied that the proposed studies would be a reasonable expense. Weighing the factors in this application. I am not satisfied that the applicant will adhere to the terms and conditions imposed as a temporary resident. For the reasons above, I have refused this application.Nairobistudy permit11th August 2021Nigeria
22
I have reviewed the application. Taking the applicant's plan of studies into account, documents submitted show some funds seem available; but with lump sum deposits. Concerns that these funds would be sufficient and available for the whole course. I am not satisfied that the proposed studies would be a reasonable expense. Weighing the factors in this application. I am not satisfied that the applicant will adhere to the terms and conditions imposed as a temporary resident. For the reasons above, I have refused this application.NairobiSPJuly 22, 2021Nigeria
23
 NairobiSPJuly 5, 2021Nigeria
24
Refusal notes The applicant provided banks statements along with a sponsoring letter signed by his father. However, that the sponsor still has to cover his own expense plus two other children, added to the study in Canada of the applicant, the amount of money in the provided bank statement doesn’t seem to be sufficient. Taking the applicant's plan of studies into account, the documentation provided in support of the applicant's financial situation does not demonstrate that funds would be sufficient or available. For the reasons above, I have refused this application.
***DO NOT DISCLOSE*** The enclosed information is intended for use in the administration of the Immigration & Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and/or Citizenship Acts. The content of the information is exempt under section 16(1) (c) of the Access to Information Act as disclosure could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the enforcement of any law of Canada or a province or the conduct of lawful investigation. ***Thc DLI provided the following response for the verification: (For more details, see eDoc#xxxxxfor DLI’s response) Hello: This reply will serve to confirm that the letter of admission attached to your email is a true copy of the letter issued by the of Graduate and Verification Postdoctoral Studies to xxx. xxx has been admitted to the Master of Agriculture program for the 2020 Fall Term at the University of Saskatchewan. Additionally, the confirmation of enrolment attached to your message accurately represents xxx registration for the 2020 Fall Term. Please let me know of any further questions you may have regarding this individual’s admission. Regards, Jordan Heise, B.A. Graduate Programs Advisor College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies Thorvaldson Building, University of Saskatchewan 116-110 Science Place Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C9
**************************************
Verification Result: Non Adverse		NairobiSPJanuary 23, 2021Nigeria
25
LMIA is confirmed, valid, and lists applicant's name.
Application and submissions reviewed. Application for a LMIA WP under R203, NOC 6322 - Cook. Applicant's employment letters indicate a job title and do not list job duties completed. Pay slips not included. Salary deposits not seen on submitted bank statement. Based on the information before me I am unable to assess that the applicant has the required experience required to perform the duties for the position in Canada.
Refused as per R200(3)(a).		New DelhiWPNovember 17, 2020India
26
PA - W304945617 applying under T13 and states his intended occupation as occupation as Entrepreneur. Counsel has stated that applicant is applying under Manitoba Provincial Nominee Program Entrepreneur Program. However nomination certificate which indicates the intent of PA to open a Pet grooming business in Manitoba has expired on August 18, 2020. No indication in the system of the family having applied for a PR application before the expiry of the nomination or even till date,

Not satisfied that the family has stated purpose of visit. REFUSED.		New DelhiWP (in support of MB PNP Entrepreneur Class)October 4, 2020India
27
Applicant is applying to be a food service supervisor in Canada. Applicant's salary is 180 KWD/month, equaling approx. $800 CAD. Modest savings of 3.386 KWD seen, equaling $15 CAD. I note a Punjab National Bank certificate showing balance of 4k INR, though this was for 2018/10/30 and it is unclear if these funds are still available. Applicant is 27 years old and single. Based on the above, I am not satisfied the applicant is so well established nor has so many economic/familial ties as to compel departure at end of authorized stay.
Refused pursuant to R200(1 )b).		New DelhiWPJune 26, 2020India
28
Applicant submits bank statement from Kotak Mahindra Bank which indicates he has 89984 INR equivalent to 1615 Canadian and I am not satisfied he has sufficient funds to travel and temporarily live off of. Given family ties or economic motives to remain in Canada, the applicant's incentives to remain in Canada may outweigh their ties to their home country. Weighing the factors in this application. I am not satisfied that the applicant will depart Canada at the end of the period authorized for their stay. For the reasons above, I have refused this application. Eligibility failed, BF for biometrics.New DelhiWPJune 24, 2020India
29
Assessment note prepared by New Delhi officer and entered into GCMS by OSC. I have reviewed the application. The applicant's purpose of visit appears vague and poorly documented. Weighing the factors in this application. I am not satisfied that the applicant will depart Canada at the end of the period authorized for their stay.
For the reasons above, I have refused this application.		OSC - Operations Support CentreTRV (parents traveling alone, leaving children in the grandparents' care)September 4, 2019India
30
I have reviewed all the documentation on file and the applicant's proposed plan of study. I have reviewed the applicant's previous study and work experiences, and not satisfied that the applicant's plan of study is reasonable in relation to these experiences as well as to locally available alternatives. Given overall reasonableness of PA's plan of study and limited economic opportunites in country of residence, as well as limited personal ties to country of current residence and limited previous travel history supported on the application, not satisfied PA is bona fide student to Cda. Refused R216.ParisSPJune 2021Republic of Camerron
31
Based on the documents provided. Not satisfied that the applicant will leave Canada at the end of his period of stay under subsection 216 (1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, given the reason for his visit.
The applicant received an offer of enrollment for a program which does not appear credible in relation to his previous academic background. PS: (it looks from the refusal letters but it's from the GCMS notes. If someone intrested i can send him the original GCMS) (E-mail: is-18@hotmail.fr)		Paris (Ho Chi Minh)SPDec 12 2020Algeria
32
Initial Application: • Pursuant to paragraph 220(a) of the IRPA, I am not satisfied that you have sufficient and
available financial resources, without working in Canada, to pay the tuition fees for the course or
program of studies that you intend to pursue.		Paris, FranceStudy Permit 08/17/2021Cameroon
33
Thank you for your interest in working in Canada. After careful review of your work permit application and supporting documentation under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program, I have determined that your application does not meet the requirements of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR). I am refusing your application on the following grounds: I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay as required by paragraph 200(1)(b) of the IRPR (https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2002-227/section-200.html). I am refusing your application because you have not established that you will leave Canada, based on the following factors: The purpose of your visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given the details you have provided in your application. • You have limited employment possibilities in your country of residence.
• Your current employment situation does not show that you are financially established in your country of residence. You had provided insufficient, third-party proofs of your stated business venture and the ncome derived from this		PhilippinesWork PermitNovember 2, 2022
34
I have reviewed the application. Taking the applicant's plan of studies into account, the documentation provided in support of the applicant's financial situation does not demonstrate that funds would be sufficient or available. I am not satisfied that the proposed studies would be a reasonable expense. I am not satisfied that the applicant would leave Canada at the end of their stay as a temporary resident, I note that: -the client is divorced and has two children who are accompanying her. Client is not sufficiently established in CoR. -client is actively in an express entry pool. Taking the applicant's current employment situation into consideration, the employment does not demonstrate that the applicant is sufficiently well established that the applicant would leave Canada at the end of a period of authorized stay. Weighing the factors in this application. I am not satisfied that the applicant will adhere to the terms and conditions imposed as a temporary resident. For the reasons above, I have refused this application.PretoriaSPJuly 15, 2021Parent - Lesotho (PR of South Africa & residing there when application made); Children - South African
35
Rev app - As per LMIA duties listed as follows: • Production welding of specialized racks for the Automotive industry with MIG (GMAW)• Repetitive welding• Welding of steel• Set-up MIG welding machines Welders perform some or all of the following duties:/ Read and interpret blueprints or welding process specifications/ Operate manual or semi-automatic welding equipment to fuse metal segments using processes such as gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), gas metal arc welding (GMAW), flux-cored arc welding (FCAW), plasma arc welding (PAW), shielded metal arc welding (SMAW), oxy-acetylene welding (OAW), resistance welding and submerged arc welding (SAW)/ Operate manual or semi-automatic flame-cutting equipment/ Operate brazing and soldering equipment/ Operate metal shaping machines such as brakes, shears and other metal straightening and bending machines/ Repair worn parts of metal products by welding on extra layers./ Welders may specialize in certain types of welding such as custom fabrication, ship building and repair, aerospace precision welding, pressure vessel welding, pipeline construction welding, structural construction welding, or machinery and equipment repair welding./ Welding, brazing and soldering machine operators perform some or all of the following duties:/ Operate previously set up welding machines such as spot, butt and seam resistance or gas and arc welding machines to fabricate or repair metal parts / Operate previously set up brazing or soldering machines to bond metal parts or to fill holes, indentations and seams of metal articles with solder/ Start up, shut down, adjust and monitor robotic welding production line/ Assist with the maintenance and repair of welding, brazing and soldering equipment/ May adjust welding heads and tooling according to work specifications. Pa has submitted 3 references - Signco who is pa's current er since 2012 confirms pa's position as welder and fabricator - this is a signage and vehicle branding company. Reference states that pa's duties include welding metal frameworks for signane and onsite welding, sign frames and pylons - however it does not specify the type of welding pa has expertise/experience in or uses to complete his tasks at his employmt. Prior to this pa was employed at Eskom as - Learnership-Technical - no duties listed- reference submitted from Remote Off-site Monitoring as an asst technician. Based on the infor provided I am not satisfied that pa has submitted sufficieitn evidence of his experience nor meets duties listed in LMIA. WP refused. PretoriaWPMarch 12, 2020South Africa
36
I have reviewed the application. Given family ties or economic motives to remain in Canada, the applicant's incentives to remain in Canada may outweigh their ties to their home country. The applicant's purpose of visit appears vague and poorly documented. The applicant's immigration status in their country of residence appears to be temporary, which may reduce their ties to that country. According to the applicant's employment prospects, I have accorded less weight to their prospective employment ties to their country of residence.Weighing the factors in this application. I am not satisfied that the applicant will depart Canada at the end of the period authorized for their stay. For the reasons above, I have refused this application.RiyadhVisitor Visa10/15/2019Pakistan
37
Description of decisionVisa OfficeType of Temporary Resident Application (SP, WP, TRV)Date Decision RenderedCountry of Citizenship of Applicant(s)@
38
I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 200(1) of the IRPR, based on your family ties in Canada and in your country of residence.
I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 200(1) of the IRPR, based on the limited employment prospects in your country of residence. 		Open Work Permit (Studen't wife)09/22/2021Iran
39
40
paragraph R216(1)(b) of the IRPR (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-2002-227/
41
section-216.html). I am refusing your application because you have not established that you will
42
leave Canada, based on the following factors:
43
• The purpose of your visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given the
44
details you have provided in your application.
45
I have reviewed the application.
I have considered the following factors in my decision.
The applicant's assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel for themselves and any accompanying family members.
The applicant does not have significant family ties outside Canada.
pplication to accompany spouse on a Study Permit. Applicant's spouse did not qualify for a Study Permit and was refused for their application, therefore applicant no longer has valid purpose of visit.
Weighing the factors in this application, I am not satisfied that the applicant will depart Canada at the end of the period authorized for their stay.
For the reasons above, I have refused this application.		RROC
Primary Office: RROC
Secondary Office: London 		TRV (Student spouse)2023/07/04Nigeria
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100