ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Structure allowed you to contributeExercise or pres that was effectiveExercise or pres less effectiveContent or pres most valuableHow to re-structure workshop more effectiveContent - like to be added
2
- Yes- Exercise discussing social capital, capacity, org culture, infrastructure
- More opportunity to move groups would have been good (cover more than one topic		- Not really- Discussions around current-state, potential resources- More opportunity to work with others to capture concrete challenges and potential solutions- Practical examples
3
- Yes, there were plenty of opportunity to contribute- The exercise at the start (categorizing closed, shared, open data within our organizations to get the ball rolling- No- The activities were great- Nothing- Nothing
4
- Yes- The breakout sessions - topics ere specific enough that allowed participants to select the topic that meant the most to them- It was good - participants make a huge difference- The introductory sessions- I would almost want to see 2 workshops - 1 for the person who knew zip about open data and 1 for the person who was up the learning curve- Really dumb it down for people like me
5
- Yes- First discussion- I was pretty tired after lunch- Denser - towards the end the discussion got a bit long and wandered quite a bit- How to do data privacy
6
- Yes, I liked the balance of presentations & activity & collaborating- Solutions tables were a great way to facilitate change thinking- No - The 5 stages and the activities around problem / solutions- Food options did not take into consideration issues other than gluten & vegetarian. Dairy / wheat free would be appreciated- Planning data collection activities, going through steps and viable options
7
- Yes, facilitated discussions allowed me to express my thoughts and concerns- The part with closed, shared and open data sticky notes
8
Yes, working in small groups and then broadening the scope of the discussions to include the whole group allowed for a sense of trust and allowed for more in-depth conversation- Whole day stimulated valuable conversation- Plenary discussion- Shorter lunchtime - 30 to 45 minutes
9
- I like how the workshop was structured around the key themes or areas needed to support open data- I was really interesting to hear about the Alberta non-profit data strategy. It would have been good to hear even more on this,- To some extent it was difficult to focus on non-profits rather than public sector. Might have been better to make sure you had a balance of stakeholders at each table and help facilitate the inter sector conversations.- Electronic surveys, snapchat, geofilter
10
- Yes - Breakouts into 5 influencing factors- At the end of the day, asking for participation from a tired room- Breakout sections- Shorter - Talking about how the culture / world view of the data collectors and analyts create unintentionally biased data
11
- Yes- Actually all were good. The best one may have been redundant- Last one may have been redundant - or maybe everyone was just overly tired- All were good- I think I would have framed entire workshop around key questions to be answered leading all to last segment of agenda- Policy and evidence-based decision making
- Moving beyond open data to what its use will be
12
- YesYes, 5 factors- Available open data sources at various government levels- Case studies, some success stories- Available IT tools or open source software / databases
13
- Yes- Data Spectrum
- 5 factors that influence data use and sharing 		- No - Data Spectrum and Data Lifecycle- Current structure is good- Data Governance
14
- Yes, I like the interactive session where tables are shuffled. Good networking- I like the mindset, capacity …. Discussion
- It is good to see that there are potentially solutions to the problems we most of the time have in common		- No that I see - people are involved- Your survey was interesting. Live survey is also very fun to do although technology hard to do- Open data in action - cases where it is really beneficial
- Data stories
15
- Yes- Yes, the one in the afternoon- First hour or so in the morning- The content about mindset, org, etc.- I would add an hour or so on the benefits (tangible) of open data- Benefints, benefits, benefits … its then easy for government to get on-board
16
- It was well done - I like the mix of discussion and formal slides- I enjoyed being able to move table to table- The data lifecycle was valuable- Keep it as is
17
- Definitely- Group exercises were good - teams / tables wored well- Data continuum exercise (notes on sheet of paper)- Examples of existing initiatives
- Maturity model		- More small exercises
- Maybe a problem solving exercise
18
- Yes- The review of the various facets of open data; capacity, org, etc.- No - The perspectives of the other participants during the exercises- Thought it was structured well - wouldn't change anything except perhaps encouraging folks to use the mike when speaking- Big vs. little orgs, their data and how big can better support little while having mutual trust
19
- Yes- Discussion on the 5 barriers to open data- Harder to find solutions to these 5 barriers- The theory & princiles behind open data- Not sure I saw what IMPACT open data has on end-users
20
- Yes, it was a good flow of individual presentations with a mix of group work
- More group work at the end of the day was better as it is harder to stay awake after lunch		- Breakout sessions to discuss how each of the 5 factors influence use and sharing of data- Open, shared, closed data- Discussion on the 5 factors- Some questions and maybe seeing how people vote on them
21
- Certainly- Changing tables according to topics- Sticky notes (somewhat)- Listening to each tables' summaries / conclusions- Nothing, humour is great, maybe some videos- Show concrete examples or tell us what organizations currently successfully share data
22
- Yes- Suggestions;
- make agenda available before
- better communication about location, address was not in program
23
- Yes- The 1st & last one. The middle one- The last plenary session felt repetitive- The intro presentation- Orient the agenda by goal and drive discussion to how the participants will use the info to take action- Ask participants to identify 2-3 challenges & successes in their open data initiatives to use in discussion & brainstorm how to address
24
- Yes- Exercise 2 was very engaging- Lots of time to discuss exercise 2, maybe less next time - Exercise 2 and the following discussion- Maybe change up exercis 1 a litte more, another discussion would be better- It was good
25
- Yes 100%- I liked the 5 key factors exercise because it allowed us to critically think about what needs to be tackled- No, all good- The lifecycle framework of data- I would add in an initial exercise to capture the existing understanding of open data to those who attended- More information on maybe current data success stories / examples of HOW they did it
26
- Yes- The solutions portion of the 5-factors that influence data- The exercise on examples of closed/shared/open data did not generate much discussion in my group- Alberta perspective, specifically what exists, info available- Mostly great, maybe add some physical movement mid-afternoon to wake us up - More focus on sensitive data / marginalized populations
27
- Yes- Talking solutions- A bit more presentation on good practice / insights to promote data sharing
- More detail on case studies and lessons learned		- How to deal with common issues with data sharing like getting consistent info and the 'right', 'relevant' info
28
- Yes, it was great- The afternoon session with brainstorming the 5 factors that influence data collections- No
29
- Absolutely- The 1st part of the 2nd exercise, having numerous points to discuss helped stimulate peoples minds & bring forward different interests- By the end people were communicating less on the different categories. Whether due to overlapping info or discussion or loss of focus- As someone new to data concerns & developmental ideas I found it all very valuable- I thought it was well done, timely, encouraged discussion, and thought provoking
30
- Yes- Small group discussion, afternoon format- Panel Q&A with thought leaders in the sector- Non-profit government relations
- Data literacy
31
- Yes- Whenever we drilled down on a particular idea- Categorizing data into open, shared, closed- Examples of effective projects and specific steps taken to make them happen
32
- Yes, and mingling between differenct groups allowed better perspective and sharing- Open discussion on factors- 2-minute discussion on things to stop, improve and create- Factors were good holistic way to think about issues and opportunities- Structure was good, no changes- Content was appropriate to the topic
33
- Yes, it was a respectful and open environment- The group discussion with a specific topic at the end (infrastructure for example)- No - The whole day - I wouldn't - None
34
- Yes, liked combo of lecture and exercises- Really liked groupwork on the 5 barriers- Group I was with for morning exercise were not joiners- 5 barriers / solutions- Not content specific, but didn't like logistics of workshop and conference in different places. Lots of people went to the wrong venue
35
- Yes, it was quite engaging- Table sessions on the Top 5 pillars of open data (culture, resources, etc.)- New trends- It was well done, good participation- Value of open data, focus on storytelling and case studies, sharing best practices
36
- Yes, the focus on group discussion followed by full room sharing worked well- The group discussion on the 5 factors worked really well- The group discussions
37
- YesYes, first one after lunch discussing 5-factors- Sticky notes on board, limited discussion after- Nothing specific, was all fairly engaging and useful
38
- Yes- I liked the two step dive into the 5 factors- The last slide with the 3 sentences (stop, start, etc.) was hard to read, especially the last line with green on blue- The data presentation wasn't very useful. Also geospacial data was not discussed as a data type - Would be good to have more about examples of impact from open data- See last answer and ways to evaluate impact
39
- Yes, the small-group discussions helped, and I was fortunate to be at a table with a diverse group- I liked the group discussions of the 5 factors- I feel like more exploration could have been done on the Spectrum of Open Data. This may have helped to open up later discussion with respect to the 5 factors
40
- Yes, there was plenty of opportunity for discussion- I think delving into the potential hurdles of open data was beneficial- The last plenary discussion seemed almost superficial in comparison to the others- Thank you for giving a section on Alberta data- I would have loved a copy of the schedule for the day- Honestly, this was less non-profit structured than I originally envisioned
41
- Yes- Meeting new people and sharing experiences- Better coffee- More techy stuff, example how to normalize data, Excel best practices (non experts are curious, and can google/pursue a particular technology, but can easily get lost in the longo technically)
42
- Yes- I liked discussing the issures and strategies to address - Last one or maybe it was I was just tired by then - Jesss's and Geoff's - Maybe 1 hour shorter, I liked the 10am start - Planning a datathon or collaboration event, where to start, key strategies
43
- Yes- It was well facilitated - No - Not sure - There were many differenct levels of competancy / capacity in the room around this topic, not sure we were all speaking the same language - Data 101, using data to tell stories
44
- Yes, I had no background on the subject matter, but still felt my contributions were well received - I liked them all but the first one really helped to conceptualize the material - No - All of the above, great introduction to data in nonprofit sector but also very valuable to have so many experts in the room - A structured networking kind of activity
45
- Yes - Specialized topics (digging into details)
- The 5 factors 		- List of data sets closed/shared/open more individual, not really discussed - More on new areas to elaborate on
46
- Yes - All discussions were pretty good - Some audience questions / comments were not audible so I missed a few things - The social capital part - Not sure - Not sure
47
- Yes - The 5 dynamic conversations - The 5 dynamics and next steps - A chance for perspective sharing from differenct sectors - Prototyping solutions
48
- Yes - Five factors that influence data use and sharing - It was interesting to see all the sticky notes on the closed/shared/open poster, great ideas - This was an interesting day and a learning experience, the workshop is effective as is
49
- Yes - Didn't feel as though I learned as much from the afternoon exercise - Morning presentations - Presentations on innovative use of open data
50
- Yes - Both exercises were very informative, the open discussion and questions sessions - No - Both exercises being able to discuss the importance of data for all sectors
51
- Yes - I liked the 5 factors and solutions table discussions - Key components of Nonprofit Data Strategy including leadership, policy, standards, technology and skills / resources - The workshop was structured well
52
- Yes, but room not set up well to hear all participants sharing - 5 factor conversations - What's next - Providing a tool box - How to create capacity of organizations to evaluate and communicate their 'why'
- Provide tools, how to collect, find and use data
53
- Yes, the workshop allowed everyone to contribute their obstacles, their needs in terms of open data as well as understand others perspectives - Round table discussions about the 5 factors allowed information sharing and enhanced group discussion - Since we did the round table discussion 5 factors, don't see the need to spread out and do this discussion again. Rather focus on finding solutions to overcome these obstacles - 5 factor discussion - Add section on finding solutions - Applying solutions / open data obstacles and solutions
54
- The session where we broke up by topic areas seemed to generate great conversations - I felt the early presentations were content heavy and hard to understand - Get a base understanding of where everyone is in terms of understanding firm issues
55
- Yes - The 5 factors that affect data - The spectrum of closed/shared/open was less effective, goal and instructions were not clear - The table breakouts in the afternoon - User stories, provide more context
56
- Yes - 5 factor discussion - Initial presentation, examples of data initiatives worldwide - Maybe some pre-work on 5 factors, articles / prep to support in advance - Spectrum of data collections examples, ie. What are funders asking for, what data is collected in VIBRANT COMMUNITIES
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100