| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Overview of Measures | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Date | Measure | Name | Pass/Fail | Ballot Question | Yes Vote | No Vote | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | 11/5/2024 | U | Lone Pine Unified School District Improvement Measure | Pass | To replace HVAC systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; and make health, safety and security improvements, shall the Lone Pine Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $7,500,000 in bonds, at legal rates, raising on average $434,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately $27.50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money spent locally? | A “BONDS-YES” vote on the measure is a vote to authorize the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $7.5 million and allow the imposition of the tax. | A “BONDS-NO” vote on the measure is a vote against the issuing of bonds and imposition of the tax. | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | 11/5/2024 | T | Owens Valley Unified School District Improvement Measure | Pass | To replace leaky roofs; construct/modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities,· and make health, safety and security improvements; shall the Owens Valley Unified School District measure be adopted authorizing $7,500,000 .of bonds, at legal rates, raising on average $402,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of approximately 4.900 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for administrator salaries and all money spent locally? | A “BONDS-YES” vote on the measure is a vote to authorize the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $7.5 million and allow the imposition of the tax. | A “BONDS-NO” vote on the measure is a vote against the issuing of bonds and imposition of the tax. | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | 11/5/2024 | S | Bishop Elementary School Repair Bond | Pass | Bishop Elementary School Repair Bond. With funds that cannot be taken by the State and spent elsewhere, shall Bishop Unified School District’s measure to replace leaky roofs; repair/replace inefficient heating and air-conditioning systems; renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and improve student safety be adopted, authorizing $14.2 million with legal rates, audits, average levies below $18 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $873,900 annually) while outstanding, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries and full disclosure of all spending? | A “BONDS-YES” vote on the measure is a vote to authorize the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $14.2 million and allow the imposition of the tax. | A “BONDS-NO” vote on the measure is a vote against the issuing of bonds and imposition of the tax. | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | 11/5/2024 | R | Bishop Union High School and Home Street Middle School Repair Bond | Pass | Bishop Union High School and Home Street Middle School Repair Bond. With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Bishop Unified School District's measure to repair/ replace deteriorating plumbing, roofs, electrical heating and air- conditioning systems and update career training facilities classrooms, and Bishop Union High School's historic main building be adopted authorizing $46.3 million with legal rates audits, average levies below $52 per $100 000 of assessed valuation (raising $2.9 million annually) while outstanding, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries 'and full disclosure of spending? | A “BONDS-YES” vote on the measure is a vote to authorize the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $46.3 million and allow the imposition of the tax. | A “BONDS-NO” vote on the measure is a vote against the issuing of bonds and imposition of the tax. | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 11/8/2022 | Q | Transient Occupancy Tax Equal Share Act Ordinance | Fail | Shall the Transient Occupancy Tax Equal Share Act Ordinance, which will authorize ongoing collection of a Transient Occupancy Tax on all short-term rental activities within the unincorporated area of the County at the same rate of twelve percent of the rent charged by the operator as currently collected by hotels, estimated to raise an additional $135,000 annually, be adopted? | Approves the Transient Occupancy Tax Equal Share Act Ordinance | Disapproves this tax | |||||||||||||||||||
9 | 11/3/2020 | P | Bishop Community Safety and Essential Services | Pass | To provide the City of Bishop with funding to maintain essential services such as police, fire, street maintenance, and parks and recreation, shall an ordinance creating a one-cent transactions (sales) and use tax be adopted, providing approximately $1.8 million annually until repealed by the voters, with all funds locally controlled and independently audited? | Approves the measure and authorizes the proposed tax | Rejects the measure and proposed tax | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | N & O | Deliberately skipped | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 3/3/2020 | M | Lone Pine USD General Obligation Bond Election | Fail | To improve the quality of local schools; repair/replace outdated heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems; modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health and safety improvements; shall Lone Pine Unified School District’s measure be adopted authorizing $14,000,000 in bonds at legal interest raters, generating approximately $813,000 annually while bonds are outstanding with levies of approximately 4.5 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens’ oversight, no money for salaries and all money for local projects? | Authorize issue of general obligation bonds up to $14 million, allow imposition of the tax | Against issuing of bonds and imposition of the tax | |||||||||||||||||||
12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 6/5/2018 | L | Owens Valley USD General Obligation Bond Election | Fail | To renovate and upgrade classrooms, repair old facilities, make health, safety and security improvements for students, and improve energy efficiency to reduce operating costs, shall Owens Valley Unified School District issue $4.8 million in bonds at legal interest rates, projected tax rates of 6.0¢ per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (generating on average approximately $325,000 annually), and requiring audits, citizens’ oversight, ALL funds spent on Owens Valley schools and NO money for administrator salaries or pensions? | Authorize issue of general obligation bonds up to $4.8 million, allow imposition of the tax | Against issuing of bonds and imposition of the tax | |||||||||||||||||||
14 | 6/5/2018 | K | Lone Pine USD General Obligation Bond Election | Fail | To improve school facilities, upgrade fire alarms and student safety and security, replace old windows, and repair restrooms and other facilities, shall Lone Pine Unified School District issue $6 million in bonds at legal interest rates, projected tax rates of 6¢ per $100 of taxable value while bonds are outstanding (averaging approximately $400,000 annually), and requiring responsible repayment costs, citizens’ oversight and audits to ensure funds are ONLY spent for Lo-Inyo Elementary School and Lone Pine High School, and NOT for any other purpose? | Authorize issue of general obligation bonds up to $6 million, allow imposition of the tax | Against issuing of bonds and imposition of the tax | |||||||||||||||||||
15 | 4/10/2018 | J | Southern Inyo Healthcare District Special Parcel Tax Election | Pass | To provide funds to pay the obligations in accordance with the chapter 9 bankruptcy confirmed plan for the adjustment of debt, fund the construction and equipping of future facilities, including, but not limited to, improvements to insure seismic safety, and fund ongoing operating requirements, shall the Southern Inyo Healthcare District establish a parcel tax of $215 per year, expected to raise approximately $602,000 annually for 15 years, with independent citizens’ oversight, mandatory audits? | To enact the special tax | To not enact the special tax | |||||||||||||||||||
16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 11/8/2016 | I | Cannabis Business Tax | Pass | Shall the County ordinance adding Chapter 3.50 to the Inyo County Code imposing a 5% gross receipts tax on COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses (but no less than $1,250 per growing cycle for cultivation BUSINESSES) in the unincorporated area of Inyo County, and authorizing the Board of Supervisors to increase the tax to a minimum of 12.5% over time, be adopted? | In favor of imposing a tax on commercial cannabis businesses in the unincorporated areas of Inyo County. | Against imposing a tax on commercial cannabis businesses in the unincorporated areas of Inyo County. | |||||||||||||||||||
18 | 11/8/2016 | H | Advisory Vote Regarding Recreational Cannabis | Pass | If Proposition 64, the California Marijuana Legalization Initiative Statute, passes, should the County of Inyo adopt regulations which would allow COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses within the County, including but not limited to, cultivation, processing, manufacturing, sales, distribution, warehousing and transportation of RECREATIONAL cannabis? | Develop laws (regulations) authorizing commercial recreational cannabis businesses within the unincorporated areas of the County | Oppose developing laws (regulations) authorizing commercial recreational cannabis businesses within the unincorporated areas of the County | |||||||||||||||||||
19 | 11/8/2016 | G | Advisory Vote Regarding Medical Cannabis | Pass | Should the County of Inyo adopt regulations which would allow COMMERCIAL cannabis businesses with the County, including but not limited to, cultivation, processing, manufacturing, sales, distribution, warehousing and transportation of MEDICAL cannabis? | Develop laws (regulations) authorizing commercial medial cannabis businesses within the unincorporated areas of the County | Oppose developing laws (regulations) authorizing commercial medial cannabis businesses within the unincorporated areas of the County | |||||||||||||||||||
20 | 11/8/2016 | F | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Supplemental Special Emergency Response Services Tax | Pass | Shall the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District impose and levy a Supplemental Special Emergency Response Services tax upon fee simple interests in real property within the District? | To approve the imposition of the tax | Not to approve the imposition of the tax | |||||||||||||||||||
21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 11/3/2015 | E | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Supplemental Special Emergency Response Services Tax | Pass | Shall the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District impose and levy a Supplemental Special Emergency Response Services tax upon fee simple interests in real property within the District? | To approve imposing and levying a Supplemental Special Emergency Response Services Tax upon real property within the District, which includes an annual cost of living increase to be applied to their Measure E and Measure J passed in 2001 | Against imposing and levying a Supplemental Special Emergency Response Services Tax upon real property within the District, in which event Measure J will remain in effect without augmentation | |||||||||||||||||||
23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 11/4/2014 | D | Lone Pine Fire Protection District Special Emergency Response Services Tax | Pass | Shall the Lone Pine Fire Protection District impose and levy a Special Emergency Response Services tax upon secured parcels of taxable real property within the District? | |||||||||||||||||||||
25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | 11/2/2010 | C | Keeping of chickens and rabbits in the City of Bishop | Pass | Should Ordinance No. 530 relating to keeping chickens and rabbits be approved? | Allows the keeping of chickens and rabbits, for non-commercial purposes, on any single-family residential lot and under the conditions, within the City of Bishop | To not change the existing City law. | |||||||||||||||||||
27 | B | Deliberately skipped | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 6/8/2010 | A | Big Pine Unified School District General Obligation Bond | Pass | To acquire, construct, and improve classrooms and facilities, including repairing, upgrading, and modernizing Big Pine schools, improving student access to computers and energy improvements and improving efficiency to reduce costs and put more money in the classroom, shall the Big Pine Unified School District be authorized to issue $4,100,000 in bonds a legal interest rates with annual audits, an independent citizens’ oversight committee, and no money for administrator salaries? | Authorizes the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,100,000 to make improvements and repairs, and maintain, furnish and equip existing school facilities | Against the District issuing bonds for this purpose | |||||||||||||||||||
29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | 11/4/2008 | A | Bishop Union Elementary School District Bonds | Pass | To acquire, construct, and improve Bishop elementary school facilities, including renewable energy improvements and funding major repairs so more money can be used in the classroom, shall the Bishop Union Elementary School District be authorized to issue $3,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates with annual audits, a citizens’ oversight committee, and no money for administrative salaries? | Authorizes the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $3 million to make improvements, repairs, and furnish and equip existing school facilities | Against the District issuing bonds for this purpose | |||||||||||||||||||
31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | 11/7/2006 | B | The Tourists’ Fair Share Act | Pass | Shall the County ordinance entitled “The Tourists’ Fair Share Act” which increases the transient occupancy tax to 12% be approved? | To increase the County’s Transient Occupancy Tax from 9% to 12% | Against increasing this tax | |||||||||||||||||||
33 | 6/6/2006 | A | Transient Occupancy Law Enforcement Support Tax | Pass | Shall the County ordinance entitled “Transient Occupancy Law Enforcement Support Tax” which imposes an additional transient occupancy tax at the rate of 3% for the specific purpose of funding law enforcement services provided by Inyo County, be approved? | Approves the Transient Occupancy Law Enforcement Support Tax | Disapproves this tax | |||||||||||||||||||
34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | 11/8/2005 | B | Owens Valley Unified School District Bonds | Pass | To improve the quality of education, shall Owens Valley Unified School District upgrade and modernize old and outdated classrooms, replace deteriorating roofs, make health and safety improvements, upgrade inadequate electrical systems, improve student access to computers and modern technology, and construct a multipurpose room/cafeteria for school and community use by issuing $2,600,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed 12%, with a citizens’ oversight committee, financial and performance audits, and NO money for administrator salaries? | Authorizes the District to issue general obligations bonds in an amount not to exceed $2.6 Million for the purposes specified | Against the District issuing the bonds for these purposes | |||||||||||||||||||
36 | 11/8/2005 | A | Save Southern Inyo Hospital Parcel Tax | Pass | In order to maintain healthcare services, shall the “Save Southern Inyo Hospital Parcel Tax” be approved? | Approves the special tax for the purposes specified | Disapproves the special tax for these purposes | |||||||||||||||||||
37 | 6/7/2005 | H | Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District Bonds | Pass | To improve the quality of healthcare services provided locally, shall the Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District be authorized to construct a new hospital facility to conform to earthquake safety standards, expand emergency care services, modernize operatizing facilities for patients, upgrade medical technology and facilities and improve outpatient services including radiology, chemotherapy, and surgery by issuing $29,500,00 in bonds at interest rates not to exceed 12% with specified accountability measures? | Authorizes the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $29.5 Million for the purposes specified | Against the District issuing the bonds for these purposes | |||||||||||||||||||
38 | 3/8/2005 | B | Big Pine Unified School District Bonds | Pass | To improve the quality of education, shall Big Pine Unified School District upgrade and modernize classrooms, replace roofs, improve health and safety, repair restrooms and plumbing, renovate electrical systems, improve student access to computers and technology, replace outdated portables with new classrooms, and qualify the District for over $500,000 in State-matching grants by issuing $2,200,000 in bonds at an interest rate not to exceed 12%? | Authorizes the District to authorize general obligations bond in an amount not to exceed $2.2 Million for the purposes specified | Against the District issuing the bonds for these purposes | |||||||||||||||||||
39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | 11/2/2004 | U | Fail | |||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | 11/2/2004 | O | The Tourists’ Fair Share Act | Fail | Shall the County ordinance entitled “The Tourists’ Fair Share Act” which increases the transient occupancy tax to 12% and expands it to cover spaces at campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks, be approved? | Approves the Transient Occupancy Tax rate increase and expansion provided by the Tourists’ Fair Share Act | Disapproves the Transient Occupancy Tax rate increase and expansion | |||||||||||||||||||
42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 3/5/2002 | B | Tobacco Settlement Funds from County to Northern Inyo and Southern Inyo County Local Health Care District | Shall the Ordinance requiring transfer of all Tobacco Settlement Funds to Northern Inyo and Southern Inyo Hospital Districts be approved? | Requires the County to transfer all tobacco settlement funds to Northern Inyo and Southern Inyo County Local Health Care District | Against requiring the County to transfer all tobacco settlement funds to Northern Inyo and Southern Inyo County Local Health Care District | ||||||||||||||||||||
44 | 3/5/2002 | A | Tobacco Settlement Funds used for Countywide Health Grant Program | Shall the Ordinance using Tobacco Settlement Funds to create a Countywide Health Grant Program be approved? | Requires the County to use tobacco settlement funds to provide a variety of essential healthcare services to residents of Inyo County | Against requiring the County to use tobacco settlement funds to provide a variety of essential healthcare services to residents of Inyo County | ||||||||||||||||||||
45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | 11/6/2001 | J | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Special Emergency Response Services Tax | Pass | Shall the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District impose and levy a Special Emergency Response Services Tax upon fee simple interests in real property within the District? | Approves imposing and levying a Special Emergency Response Services Tax upon real property within the District | Against imposing and levying a Special Emergency Response Services Tax upon real property within the District | |||||||||||||||||||
47 | 6/5/2001 | I | Formation of the Independence Community Services District | Pass | Shall the Independence Community Services District, as described in Resolution No. 2001-07 of the Inyo County Board of Supervisors, be created? | In favor of the formation of the ICSD | Not in favor | |||||||||||||||||||
48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | 11/7/2000 | G | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Appropriations Limit Increase | Pass | Shall the annual appropriations limit of the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District be increased to $200,000 for the fiscal years July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2004? | Increases the appropriations limit of the District to $200,000 per fiscal year to allow the District to spend the proceeds which may be received from a Special Fire Protection Tax | Against increasing the appropriations limit of the District | |||||||||||||||||||
50 | 11/7/2000 | F | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Special Fire Protection Tax | Pass | Shall the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District impose and levy a Special Fire Protection Tax upon fee simple interests in real property within the District? | Approves imposing and levying a Special Fire Protection Tax upon real property within the District | Against imposing and levying a Special Fire Protection Tax upon real property within the District | |||||||||||||||||||
51 | 11/7/2000 | C | A Bed and Breakfast Initiative | Pass | Shall the ordinance allowing bed and breakfast inns in R-1 residential zones under certain conditions be adopted? | In favor of passing this Bed and Breakfast Initiative Measure | Against passing this Bed and Breakfast Initiative Measure | |||||||||||||||||||
52 | 5/9/2000 | H | Bishop Joint Union High School District Bonds | Pass | To make repairs/upgrades and improvements to Bishop Union High School including site acquisition for and construction of science classrooms, heating and cooling upgrades, new fire alarm and security systems, wiring and cabling needed to support classroom computers, and general renovation where needed for the campus, shall the Bishop Joint Union High School District issue $4,100,000 of bonds at an aggregate interest rate not to exceed 7.5%? | Authorizes the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $4.1 Million to acquire, construct, and make improvement to, school facilities | Against the District issuing bonds for this purpose | |||||||||||||||||||
53 | 5/9/2000 | E | Bishop Union Elementary School District Bonds | Pass | To make repairs/upgrades and improvements to serve the children from Elm, Pine and Home Street Schools including construction of new cafeteria/multipurpose building, a new permanent classroom building on the Home Street Middle School campus, general renovation of all schools, installation of the wires and cabling needed to support classroom computers, shall the Bishop Union Elementary School District issue $3,100,000 of bonds at an aggregate interest rate not to exceed 7.5%? | Authorizes the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $3.1 Million to construct, and make improvement to, school facilities | Against the District issuing bonds for this purpose | |||||||||||||||||||
54 | 3/7/2000 | B | Olancha Community Service District Appropriations Limit Increase | Pass | Shall the Olancha Community Service District annual appropriations limit be adjusted to $200,000 per year for a period of four years, beginning in fiscal year 2000-2001 and concluding in fiscal year 2003-2004, for necessary operations and improvements? | Increases the appropriations limit of the District to $200,000 for a four year period beginning with Fiscal year 2000-2001 | Against increasing the appropriations limit of the District | |||||||||||||||||||
55 | 3/7/2000 | A | Creating, eliminating, combining, reorganizing County offices | Pass | Shall the ordinance which requires voter approval of County ordinances creating, eliminating, combining or otherwise reorganizing offices or departments be adopted? | Rescind certain reorganizing or restructuring ordinances already enacted by the Board of Supervisors and to require voter approval of all future ordinances restructuring or re-organizing County government | Continue to allow the Board of Supervisors to enact ordinances restructuring or reorganizing County government as currently authorized by state law and County resolution | |||||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | 11/2/1999 | E | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Appropriations Limit Increase | Pass | Shall the annual appropriations limit of the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District be increased from $0 to $200,000 for the fiscal years July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2003? | |||||||||||||||||||||
58 | 11/2/1999 | D | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Special Fire Protection Tax | Fail | Shall the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District impose and levy a Special Fire Protection Tax upon fee simple interests in real property within the District? | |||||||||||||||||||||
59 | 11/2/1999 | A | Round Valley Elementary School District Bond Measure | Pass | In order to improve education provided to students, to modernize classrooms, plumbing, ventilation and electrical systems, to complete health and safety improvements, to make the District eligible to receive state matching funds, and to acquire, construct and improve school facilities, shall the Round Valley School District be authorized to issue $1,200,000 of bonds at an interest rate not to exceed 12 percent? | Authorizes the District to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $1.2 Million to acquire and make improvements to school facilities | Against the District issuing bonds for this purpose | |||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | 11/3/1998 | B | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Appropriations Limit Increase | Pass | Shall the annual appropriations limit of the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District be increased from $0.00 to $100,000 for the fiscal years July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2002? | Increases the appropriations limit of the District to $100,000 per fiscal year to allow the District to spend the proceeds which may be received from a Special Fire Protection Tax | Against increasing the appropriations limit of the District | |||||||||||||||||||
62 | 11/3/1998 | A | Southern Inyo Fire Protection District Special Fire Protection Tax | Fail | Shall the Southern Inyo Fire Protection District impose and levy a Special Fire Protection Tax upon fee simple interests in real property with the District as follows? | Approves imposing and levying a Special Fire Protection Tax upon real property with the District | Against imposing and levying a Special Fire Protection Tax upon real property within the District. | |||||||||||||||||||
63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | 11/5/1996 | B | Pass | If the offices of County Auditor-Controller and County Treasurer-Tax Collector are to be consolidated into a single office of County Director of Finance, shall the Board of Supervisors establish the position of County Director of Finance as an elective office? | Requires the county office of director of finance, if established, to be an elective office | Requires the county office of director of finance, if established, to be an appointive office | ||||||||||||||||||||
65 | 11/5/1996 | A | Fail | Shall the Board of Supervisors establish the consolidated office of the Director of Finance to perform the duties of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector for Inyo County? | Approves consolidation of the county offices of auditor-controller and treasurer-tax collector into a single office of director of finance | Disapproves consolidation of the county offices of auditor-controller and treasurer-tax collector into a single office of director of finance | ||||||||||||||||||||
66 | 3/26/1996 | A | Olancha Community Service District | Pass | Shall the Olancha Community Service District annual appropriations limit be adjusted to $150,000 for a period of four years beginning in fiscal year 1996-97 and concluding the fiscal year 1999-2000 for necessary operations and improvements? | To increase the appropriations limit of the Olancha Community Services District to $150,000 for a four year period beginning with Fiscal year 1996-1997. | Against increasing the appropriations limit of the Olancha Community Services District. | |||||||||||||||||||
67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | 11/8/1994 | A | Proposed Advisory Ballot Measure | Pass | Should the California Constitution be amended to give local government jurisdictions the legal authority to (a) decline to implement a program mandated by the State of federal government without the full funding necessary to perform the mandated service, and (b) discontinue a program mandated by the State of federal government when all funds provided by the State or federal government for such a mandate have been expended? | In favor of the Legislature placing on the statewide ballot a proposed amendment to the California Constitution to give local government jurisdictions the legal authority to (a) decline to implement a program mandated by the State or Federal government without the full funding necessary to perform the mandated service, or (b) discontinue a program mandated by the State or Federal Government when all funds provided by the State or Federal government for such a mandate have been expended. | Against the Legislature placing such a constitutional amendment on the statewide ballot. | |||||||||||||||||||
69 | 6/7/1994 | B | Advisory: Mosquito Abatement Program Service Charges | Pass | Should the board of Supervisors establish a Mosquito Abatement District for the purpose of generating funds to support a Mosquito Control Program within the Owens Valley? The proposed District will lie within boundaries consistent with the County line on the North and West, the USFS/BLM boundary on the East, and the South boundary of T19S in Olancha on the South. Annual District fees will not exceed $10 for single family dwellings; $2 per unit for motels; $5 for commercial and industrial parcels, and from $1 to $15 for land, depending on the size and use of the parcel. | Advises the Board of Supervisors of your desire to have Ordinance No. MA-1 repealed. | Advises the Board of Supervisors that you do not desire to have Ordinance MA-1 repealed. | |||||||||||||||||||
70 | 6/7/1994 | A | Northern Inyo Hospital District Bond | Fail | Shall the Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District incur a bonded indebtedness in a principal amount not to exceed $8,000,000 for the purpose of the acquisition and construction by said District of certain work and improvements, to wit: (i) the acquisition and construction of a skilled nursing facility and long-term care facility at Bishop, California; and (ii) the acquisition of all fixtures consisting of equipment, apparatus and other property to be attached or affixed to the skilled nursing facility and long-term care facility necessary therefor, and including authorized incidental expenses in connection therewith? | Authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in the principal sum of $8,000,000 by the Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District for the purpose of building and furnishing a skilled nursing facility and long term care facility. | Against the measure and denies the Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District authority to incur a bonded indebtedness at this time for the purposes set forth in the measure. | |||||||||||||||||||
71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | 1/5/1993 | B | Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District Appropriation Limit Increase | Pass | ||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | 11/3/1992 | B | Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District Appropriation Limit Increase | Pass | Shall the annual appropriations limit of the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District be increased from $188,484 to $1,500,000 for the fiscal years July 1, 1993 and ending June 30, 1997 be adopted? | Approves the increasing of the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District's California Constitution Article XIIIB (Proposition 4, Gann) appropriation limit. | Disapproves the increasing of the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District's Constitutional (Proposition 4, Gann) appropriation limit. | |||||||||||||||||||
75 | 11/3/1992 | A | Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District Special Tax Measure | Pass | Shall the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District be authorized to levy a special tax for a period of four years at the annual rate of $80 on all parcels of land within the District whether improved or unimproved. Plus an additional $80 for each additional dwelling unit more than one dwelling unit per parcel of land. Plus an additional $350 for each commercial enterprise which owns or uses commercial improvements within the District? | Approves imposing a special tax on all parcels of land within the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District each year for four years. | Disapproves imposing this special tax. | |||||||||||||||||||
76 | 6/2/1992 | C | Owens Valley Unified School District Bond | Fail | Shall the Owens Valley Unified School District incur bonded indebtedness and be authorized to issue and sell bonds in the amount of $1,400,000 at a rate of interest not to exceed 12% per annum, the bonds to be sold and the indebtedness incurred for, but not limited to, the following purposes (which are hereby united and shall be voted on as one single proposition): capital improvements, including the construction, renovation and modernization of existing and future school facilities of the District, as well as the prepayment of prior bonded indebtedness of the District issued to finance capital improvements? | Approves the Measure, and accordingly, to authorize Owens Valley Unified School District: a) to incur indebtedness by issuing by issuing and selling general obligation bonds in the amount, at the rate of interest, and for the School District's capital improvement purposes specified in the Measure, and; b) to increase the ad valorem taxes on real property within the District by an amount necessary to pay and otherwise retire the indebtedness caused by issuance of the bonds. | Against approval of the Measure and against authorizing the associated bond issuance and property tax increase. | |||||||||||||||||||
77 | 6/2/1992 | B | Advisory: Inclusion of Inyo County in New State | Pass | If California is split in two, would you want to join the new rural state? | This measure is advisory only: Indicates the voter's approval of including Inyo County in a new rural state, should such state be created. | This measure is advisory only: Indicates the voter's disapproval of including Inyo County in a new rural state, should such state be created. | |||||||||||||||||||
78 | 6/2/1992 | A | Advisory: Creation of 51st State | Pass | Should California be divided into two states? | This measure is advisory only: Indicates the voter's approval of the division of California into two separate states, thereby adding another state to the United States of America. | This measure is advisory only: Indicates the voter's disapproval of the division of California into two separate states. | |||||||||||||||||||
79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | 6/4/1991 | Owens Valley USD Annexation | Fail | Should the Owens Valley Unified School District be annexed by the Lone Pine Unified School District, allowing the two existing districts to become one unified district as of July 1, 1992? | Merges the Owens Valley Unified School District into the Lone Pine Unified School District. | The Owens Valley Unified School District and the Lone Pine Unified School District to remain separate and independent. | ||||||||||||||||||||
81 | 6/4/1991 | Lone Pine ESD Annexation | Pass (Failed b/c both had to pass) | Should the Owens Valley Unified School District be annexed by the Lone Pine Unified School District, allowing the two existing districts to become one unified district as of July 1, 1992? | Merges the Owens Valley Unified School District into the Lone Pine Unified School District. | The Owens Valley Unified School District and the Lone Pine Unified School District to remain separate and independent. | ||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | 11/6/1990 | A | Northern Inyo County Hospital District Bond Measure | Pass | Shall the Northern Inyo County Hospital District incur a bonded indebtedness in a principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000 for the purpose of the acquisition, construction, maintenance, and alteration by said District of certain work and improvements, to wit: (i) the acquisition and construction of certain improvements to the existing hospital building; (ii) the acquisition of all fixtures consisting of equipment, apparatus and other property to be attached or affixed to the hospital building necessary therefor, and including authorized incidental expenses in connection therewith? | Authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in the principal sum of $12,000,000 by the Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District for the purpose of constructing and equipping certain additions and alterations to the present hospital. | Against the measure and would deny the Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District authority to incur a bonded indebtedness at this time for the purposes set forth in the measure | |||||||||||||||||||
84 | 6/5/1990 | B | Northern Inyo County Hospital District Bond Measure | Fail | Shall the Northern Inyo County Hospital District incur a bonded indebtedness in a principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000 for the purpose of the acquisition, construction, maintenance, and alteration by said District of certain work and improvement, to sti: (i) the acquisition and construction of certain improvements to the existing hospital building; (ii) the acquisition of all fixtures consisting of equipment, apparatus, and other property to be attached or affixed to the hospital building necessary therefor, and including authorized incidental expenses in connection therewith? | Authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in the principal sum of $12,000,000 by the Northern Inyo county Local Hospital District for the purpose of constructing and equipping certain additions and alterations to the present hospital. | Against the measure and would deny the Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District authority to incue a bonded indebtedness at this time for the purposes set forth in the measure. | |||||||||||||||||||
85 | 6/5/1990 | A | School Unification Measure | Fail | Shall the proposal to unify the existing school districts of Round Valley Joint Elementary, Bishop Union Elementary and Bishop Joint Union High School into one district be approved? | To consolidate the three school districts | For the three districts to remain independent | |||||||||||||||||||
86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | 11/7/1989 | A | GANN Appropriations Limit Override | Pass | Shall the Inyo County General Fund Appropriations Limitation be adjusted for four years to allow for the implementation of the "Inyo County Jail Construction and Public Services Stabilization Act"? | Increases the appropriations limit of the County to allow the expenditure of revenue as set forth by the measure | Against increasing the appropriations limit of the County | |||||||||||||||||||
88 | 6/6/1989 | B | Increase of Southern Inyo County Local Hospital Appropriations Limit | Pass | Shall the annual appropriations limit of the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District be increased from $155,702 to $500,000 for the Fiscal Years July1, 1989 and ending June 30, 1993? | Approves the increasing of the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District's California Constitution Article XIIIB (Proposition 4, Gann) appropriation limit | Disapproves the increasing of the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District's Constitutional (Proposition 4, Gann) appropriation limit | |||||||||||||||||||
89 | 6/6/1989 | A | Special Tax for Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District | Pass | Shall the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District be authorized to levy a special tax for a period of four years at the annual rate of $80 on all parcels of land within the District whether improved or unimproved. Plus an addition$80 for each additional dwelling unit more than one dwelling unit per parcel of land. Plus an additional $350 for each commercial enterprise which owns or uses commercial improvements within the District? | Approves imposing a special tax on all parcels of land within the Southern Inyo County Local Hospital District each year for four years | Disapproves imposing this special tax | |||||||||||||||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | 11/8/1988 | C | Proposed Special Tax for the Starlite Community Service District | Pass | Shall the Starlite Community Service District be authorized to levy a special tax up to a maximum of $750 on each parcel of developed or undeveloped land within the District for one year commencing on July 1, 1989, and a special tax of up to $488 on each parcel of developed or undeveloped land within the District for each of the three consecutive years beginning on July 1, 1990 | Establishes a special tax on all parcels, except for four parcels which are specifically excluded from the special tax within the Starlite Community Service District | For no special tax imposed on the parcels in the Starlite Community Service District pursuant to this measure | |||||||||||||||||||
92 | 11/8/1988 | B | Big Pine Project Priorities Advisory | Swimming Pool, Ditch System, Ball Fields | Select three of the following mitigation projects you would most like to see in Big Pine: Ditch System to Provide Water to Every Parcel; Further Assistance to the Community Services District; Community Swimming Pool; Increased Trees on Public Property, Stream Through Mendenhall Park; Improvement of Ball Fields Adjacent to Mendenhall Park; Other Projects than those Listed Above | A vote for any one of the possible mitigation projects, up to three such projects, would indicate to the Board of Supervisors which projects are most favored by the voters. There is no "yes" or "no" vote, therefore, a decision not to vote for any of the projects would not necessarily indicate that a voter is against any or all mitigation projects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
93 | 11/8/1988 | A | Big Pine Enlarging The Ditch System Advisory | Pass | Shall Inyo County negotiate with the DWP to enlarge the ditch system in Big Pine to provide water to every parcel? | Favors the County negotiating with the Department of Water and Power to enlarge the Big Pine ditch system to provide water to every parcel | Against the County negotiating with the Department of Water and Power to enlarge the Big Pine ditch system to provide water to every parcel | |||||||||||||||||||
94 | 6/7/1988 | A | Transaction and Use Tax of .5% within the County of Inyo | Pass | Shall a transactions and use tax be imposed at the rate of one-half of one percent of the sales price of tangible personal property sold within Inyo County or purchased for storage, use or other consumption within Inyo County? | Approves imposing a transactions and use tax in Inyo County | Disapproves imposing the transactions and use tax | |||||||||||||||||||
95 | 6/7/1988 | 1 | Advisory: Only Specified Portion of Existing Taxes Dedicated to Counties, Schools, Cities and Special Districts | Pass | Should a California law be enacted to require that a specified portion of the existing taxes you now pay to the State hereafter be dedicated to counties, schools, cities and special districts to provide a stable source of funding for local services? | Favors a portion of State tax money being returned every year to local governments | Against the State returning a portion of State tax money every year to local governments | |||||||||||||||||||
96 | 6/7/1988 | 2 | Advisory: Only Budget Revenue Surplus Allocated to Local Services | Pass | Should the California State budget revenue surplus be allocated to fund essential local services such as provided by schools, counties and cities instead of being used for tax rebates? | Favors State revenue surplus being returned to local governments to pay for local services | Favors State budget revenue surplus being returned to the individual taxpayer in the form of a tax rebate | |||||||||||||||||||
97 | 6/7/1988 | 3 | Advisory: Only State Fully Fund All Programs Imposed on Local Governments | Pass | Should the California Constitution be amended to strengthen legal requirements that the State fully fund all programs it imposes upon local governments? | Favors a State Constitutional amendment to further require the State to fully pay for programs that the State requires local governments to provide | Against a State constitutional amendment to further require the State to fully pay for programs the State requires local governments to provide | |||||||||||||||||||
98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | 11/4/1986 | C | Advisory: Only State Assume Financial Responsibility for Priority Local Services | Pass | We the people of the County of Inyo, in order to more fully fund high priority local services such as police, fir and libraries, hereby petition the State of California to assume the total financial responsibility for state mandated welfare, health, and court and jail systems. | Advisory. In favor of the State buying out these systems | Advisory. Against the State assuming the financial responsibility for the above-mentioned programs | |||||||||||||||||||
100 | 11/4/1986 | B | Special Tax for Mt. Whitney Cemetery District | Fail | In order to keep the Mt. Whitney Cemetery open and provide a level of quality services which has benefitted all residents and citizens of the District, shall the Mt. Whitney Cemetery District be authorized to implement a special tax toward providing the following services? a) maintain the cemetery; b) provide improvements as necessary; and c) provide all services connected with a cemetery. Such a special tax to be up to the rate of $4 per parcel of developed or undeveloped land. | Authorizes the Mt. Whitney Cemetery District Board of Directors to impose an annual parcel tax in the district, not to exceed $4 per parcel | Against a parcel tax imposed in the Mt. Whitney Cemetery District | |||||||||||||||||||