Top charities' funding gaps, November 2016
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Current recommended funding gaps for individual donors
2
Current next-best funding gaps for individual donors
3
51
4
PriorityCharityAmountGap typeCumulative amountFrom Good Ventures (and $1 million in GiveWell discretionary funds)
From Individuals
Notes
5
1Deworm the World2.5Incentive2.52.50Incentives
6
1SCI2.5Incentive5.02.50Incentives
7
1Sightsavers2.5Incentive7.52.50Incentives
8
1AMF2.5Incentive10.02.50Incentives
9
1GiveDirectly2.5Incentive12.52.50Incentives
10
1END Fund2.5Incentive15.02.50Incentives
11
1Malaria Consortium2.5Incentive17.52.50Incentives
12
1Second-tier charities1.5Incentive19.01.50Incentives
13
3SCI6.5Fills rest of execution level 125.56.50Fully fills SCI's large, cost-effective execuation level (EL) 1 gap
14
4AMF8.53First part of execution level 134.08.530Gives AMF $11.03m. This is the first and most obvous tranche in its EL1.
15
5END Fund2.5Middle part of execution level 136.52.50Covers 50% of the END Fund's EL1 gap.
16
6Sightsavers0.45Fills rest of execution level 137.00.450Covers Sightsavers' full gap.
17
7Deworm the World1.97Fills execution level 239.01.970Closes out their plausible funding needs.
18
8SCI4.5First part of execution level 243.54.5050% of SCI EL 2
19
9Malaria Consortium2.5Part of execution level 146.02.50.0-
20
10AMF18.6Part of execution level 164.65.113.6Keeps SCI at EL2 while filling more AMF EL1
21
11SCI4.45Fills execution level 269.00.004.5Fills SCI's EL2
22
12AMF48.8Fills Execution Level 1117.80.0048.8We think that filling each of these gaps is equally valuable. If the gaps above these are filled, we plan to recommend that donors allocate their donations at a ratio of 48.77/5.1/5.1 (or, simplified, 8.6/1/1) in order to fill these three gaps at the same rate.
23
12END Fund5.1Fills Execution Level 1122.90.005.1
24
12Malaria Consortium5.1Fills Malaria Consortium at the same rate as the END Fund128.00.005.1
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Funding gaps