Union Mapping Regulation
Comments
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST
1
Short Link http://goo.gl/GWM4gUnion Mapping RegulationComments Of RER/Advocates
2
3
RER গণ অনুগ্রহপূর্বক নীতিমালার পয়েন্ট প্রস্তাব করুন বা প্রস্তাবিত নীতিমালার বিপরীতে মন্তব্য করুনAlamgirZamanHasanDawoodTanzilRiponTipu
4
CommentsCommentsCommentsCommentsCommentsCommentsComments
5
প্রস্তাবিত খসড়া নীতিমালা
6
1 ইউনিয়ন তৈরীর জন্য kml বানানো যাবে এই টিউটোরিয়াল মোতাবেক: http://goo.gl/BTlEaYes, I am agree with you. If somebody need .kml of Unions then I will try to provide them.Nice initiative Hasan vai. :)
7
2ইউনিয়নের ক্যাটাগরী হবে City/Town/Village
8
3একই নামে কোন City থাকলে তা Delete করে kml মোতাবেক নতুন ইউনিয়ন বানাতে হবে।
9
4ইউনিয়নের নামের শেষে ”Union” সাফিক্স বসানোর প্রয়োজন নেই যেহেতু ইউনিয়নগুলো বহুল প্রচলিত Town এর কাছাকাছিI agree that we should not put Union suffix after union name although previously I recommended it. That time I was not aware of name visibility on map.There are many villages & unions in Bangladesh are in same name. If we do not add Union after name of Union then it will create problem. Such as, in Debidwar Upazila : Barashalghar, Yousufpur, Rasulpur, Gunaighar, Elahabad, Dhamti, Rajameher, Sultanpur & others also name of Villages & Unions. As City/Town/Village & Locality both layer are visible in the map so I think it will create problem.I think union should be put in the suffix, as there are union and village with the same name, i some places. Thanks.Zaman vai added "Upazilla" Suffix on Upazilla regulation because they are not visible and also for searching comfortableness. But working on a visible layer like Union If we add Suffix "Union" there will be a mess over map! It'll seem like BD Map is Full of Union! Let me clear the point. We did not add "District" Suffix after all district. We did not add "City" suffix Like "Rangpur City" after their name. Even Google is discouraging to add category suffix after name. Then why should we add "Union" after name? On reply to Hasan vai: My personal observation says: Sadar Union or Pourasava Union Contains same name with existing City. In that Case we can replace the city boundary drawn over imagination with Union .kml resource.
10
5একই নামে কোন ওয়ার্ড/পাড়া মহল্লা থাকলে তা ডিলেট করার প্রয়োজন নেই।
11
6কোন শহর যদি ইউনিয়নের চাইতে বেশী জনপ্রিয় হয়, তবে আলাদা করে দুটোই বানানো যাবে। যেমন Rangpur শহর Rangpur Sadar ইউনিয়নের চাইতে বেশ জনপ্রিয় হওয়ায় ম্যাপারদের সুবিধার্থে দুটোই রাখা হয়েছে।
12
7ম্যাপারদের সুবিধার্থে বাংলাদেশের জন্য পলিটিক্যাল বাউন্ডারী সমূহ জানান হলঃ http://goo.gl/BpaJW
13
Google CategoryBangladeshi Category
14
Divisionবিভাগ
15
District/Countyজেলা
16
Minor Civil Divisionউপজেলা
17
City/Town/Villageইউনিয়ন
18
Localityওয়ার্ড/মৌজা/গ্রামের সমষ্টি
19
Sub-Localityগ্রাম/মহল্লা
20
Special Discussion On Point 4
21
22
Conversation on this regulation will be continue upto 6 Aug 2012RER's nameComment
23
Hasan Said:There are many villages & unions in Bangladesh are in same name. If we do not add Union after name of Union then it will create problem. Such as, in Debidwar Upazila : Barashalghar, Yousufpur, Rasulpur, Gunaighar, Elahabad, Dhamti, Rajameher, Sultanpur & others also name of Villages & Unions. As City/Town/Village & Locality both layer are visible in the map so I think it will create problem.
24
Dawood Said:I think union should be put in the suffix, as there are union and village with the same name, i some places. Thanks.
25
Tanzil Replied:Zaman vai added "Upazilla" Suffix on Upazilla regulation because they are not visible and also for searching comfortableness. But working on a visible layer like Union If we add Suffix "Union" there will be a mess over map! It'll seem like BD Map is Full of Union! Let me clear the point. We did not add "District" Suffix after all district. We did not add "City" suffix Like "Rangpur City" after their name. Even Google is discouraging to add category suffix after name. Then why should we add "Union" after name? On reply to Hasan vai: My personal observation says: Sadar Union or Posrasava Union Contains same name with existing City. In that Case we can replace the city boundary with Union .kml resource.
26
27
Hasan Replied :Tanzil Bhai, you are right that whole BD map will be full of Unions if we add "Union" suffix. As City/Town/Village & Locality both layer are visible so how maps users can understand the difference of Unions & Villages. User will see one name twice in the map.
28
Tanzil RepliedThank you for your understanding Hasan vai. Please provide more suggestions to enhance this regulation
29
Hasan Replied :Tanzil Bhai, We need valuable comments of our Advocates Zaman Bhai & Alamgir Bhai.
30
Tanzil Repliedyes I've invited them. Please add new point of regulation if you've some
31
AlamgirI agree that we should not put Union suffix after union name although previously I recommended it. That time I was not aware of name visibility on map.
32
Hasan Replied :Alamgir Bhai, one name will be visible twice (one for Union & other for Village) in map. So what will be the solution?
33
Tanzil RepliedHasan vai, Unions are big feature and name will be seen when user is in Zoom out status. On the other hand Sub-locality/Village name will be Shown only in Zoom in. So it will not create a problem at all. If still problem remains you can search for official name which may contain some different suffix for village.
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Sheet1