Account Options>

  1. Sign in
rubric-WritAssgnt1_msp-530-jan12
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Rubric for Written Assignment 1
2
4321 or 0
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
Completeness of responseSuperior in completeness; student has addressed every element of the question in a throrough mannerEssentially complete; student has addressed all elements of the question in an effective mannerIncomplete in some respects; student fails to address a part of the assignment or addresses one or more in a cursory mannerIncomplete in most respects; student does not address most elements of the assignment
5
Mastery of climate change issueStudent demonstrates a systematic and methodical grasp of climate change mitigation; sets the issue in context successfullyStudent demonstrates a good grasp of the climate change mitigation issue and includes relevant context in the presentationStudent grasps elements of the issue and provides some context but the treatment lacks depth and breadthStudent presents only an emerging awareness of the climate change mitigation issue
6
Comparison and contrast of different opinionsCompares and contrasts different views and opinions clearly, offering specific examples to illustrate the comparison
Compares and contrasts views and opinions clearly, but the supporting information is general; may fail to include foundational contextual informationCompares and contrasts views and opinions, but the supporting information is incomplete; may include information that is not relevant to the comparisonPresentation either compares or contrasts, but does not do both; there is no supporting information or support is incomplete or not valid
7
Evaluation of approachDraws clear and insightful conclusions in evaluating the city's approachDraws clear and well-supported conclusions in evaluating the city's approachConclusions about the city's approach are poorly supported or vagueFails to draw conclusions about the city's approach or suggests false conclusions
8
Research and documentationPerforms thorough and appropriate research and documents all sources correctlyPerforms adequate and illuminating research and makes only minor errors in documentation (if any)Performs research but it is incomplete; documentation is incompleteDoes not perform necessary research or displays lack of familiarity with documentation procedures
9
Proposal of opportunities and challengesProposes clear and insightful ideas about opportunities and challenges for the municipalitySuggests clear and well-supported conclusions about opportunities and challenges for the municipalityProposed opportunities and challenges are poorly supported or vagueFails to propose supportable opportunities or challenges
10
Total:
11
Copyright © 2012 by Thomas Edison State College. All rights reserved.
12
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
13
Scale: 23-24 = A (93-100); 22 = A- (90-92); 21 = B+ (88-89); 17-20 = B (83-87); 16 = B- (80-82); 15 = C+ (78-79); 11-14 = C (73-77); 10 = C- (70-72); 5-9 = D (60-69); 0-4 = F (below 60).
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Loading...
 
 
 
Rubric for Final Paper