ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABAC
1
NameEmailVersion numberLine numberComment typeCommentStatus
2
Guang Yang, Misha Smirnov, Jiajie Ling, Zhuojun Hu
gyang9@berkeley.edu
1359ContentIn addition to the radioactive source, Jinping is capable of deploying a DAR measurement. Jinping is mentioned but the reference is missing: Eur. Phys. J. C (2020) 80:609DONE
3
Felix Kling1Table 2ContentFPF detectors should have been on the upper row, together with SBN.DONE
4
Felix Kling1ContentAdd references to FASERnu and FLArEDONE
5
Kendal Mahn1ContentAdd statement about reliance on data-tuned generators and need for first principles xsec predicitonsDONE
6
Matt Toupstoups@fnal.gov186Typodouble beta decay listed twiceDONE
7
Matt Toupstoups@fnal.gov1149TypoThese includeDONE
8
Matt Toupstoups@fnal.gov1178TypoaspectsDONE
9
Matt Toupstoups@fnal.gov1181Typoof theseDONE
10
Matt Toupstoups@fnal.gov1220ContentThe sentence is good but should be moved before the sentence describing CCM, as the proposed experiment, PIP2-BD (which should be named and cited), uses NC disapperance in exactly the same way as the COHERENT experiment to test the sterile neutrino hypothesis.DONE
11
Matt Toupstoups@fnal.gov1235ContentKPipe is (now) proposed for a future SBN beam dump driven by the PIP-II linac not at JPARC-MLF. Please see and cite https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.08102.pdf.DONE
12
Matt Toupstoups@fnal.gov1438Typoscope: the range of BSM physics --> scope beyond the range of BSM physicsDONE
13
475Typobroken linkDONE
14
Conveners1replace 3+1 with 3+N in papers, text, as applicableDONE
15
Conveners1Add list of LOIs as appendixDONE
16
ConvenersHighlight NF02-wide white paper as contextDONE
17
ConvenersIdentify high priority: full exploitation of investments, ongoing programsDONE
18
ConvenersConvey: upcoming experiments sufficiently probe all proposed interpretations, and expect resolution in early phase of P5DONE
19
ConvenersEmphasize path to convergenceDONE
20
ConvenersBullet 2: Under the assumption if single interpretationDONE
21
Kendall Mahn1Contentadd T2k and Nova to current long baseline categories, both make sterile measurementsDONE
22
Jon Linkjmlink@vt.eduTable 11TypovSTORM should be nuSTORMDONE
23
ToupsI think SBN-BD (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.08102.pdf) should be added to the list of Pion/Kaon decay-at-rest experiments under the “Dark-particle-induced upscattering column”.DONE
24
Georgia Karagiorgi & Lisa Koerner, from 0.1-10's of GeV cross-cutting parallel at NF Workshop
georgia@nevis.columbia.edu
1ContentAdd near detectors (T2K, NOvA) to short-baseline, or long-baseline (whatever the convention is)DONE
25
Georgia Karagiorgi & Lisa Koerner, from 0.1-10's of GeV cross-cutting parallel at NF Workshop
georgia@nevis.columbia.edu
1ContentInclude supporting experiments (e.g. cross section and flux in particular). Improved flux predicitons are arguably more important for NF02 than NF01. Coordinate with NF06 on this. Add also text on non-reliance on other neutrino measurements (for xsec models). DONE
26
Georgia Karagiorgi & Lisa Koerner, from 0.1-10's of GeV cross-cutting parallel at NF Workshop
georgia@nevis.columbia.edu
1ContentHave someone look over Theory WP to make sure nothing missing in theory modelsDONE?
27
Jon Link1The nuSTORM whitepaper is now available. It doesn't look like they directly addressed it to NF02, so I'm sending you a link: https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:2203.07545DONE
28
Maury Goodman
maury.goodman@anl.gov
150Styletheory -> theoreticalDONE
29
Maury Goodman"159styleto -> to the; and -> and theDONE
30
Maury Goodman181stylein particular -> such as (because there is also J-PARC, ESS, etc.)DONE
31
Maury Goodman1106styleremove "of"DONE
32
Maury Goodman1134stylefor -> for aDONE
33
Maury Goodman1135,156,157,255typohyphen in short-baseline when use as an adjectiveDONE
34
Maury Goodman1160typosensitivity -> sensitiveDONE
35
Maury Goodman1164styleon -> byDONE
36
Maury Goodman1178styleaspect -> aspectsDONE
37
Maury Goodman1177stylestart a new sentence "In other..."No, as it depends on previous clause
38
Maury Goodman1183styleaspect -> aspect ofDONE
39
Maury Goodman1222typoneeds periodDONE
40
Maury Goodman1244styleexemplary illustrators -> examples (it is overly flowery as isDONE
41
Maury Goodman1260 261style(left) and (right) after Fig. 2DONE
42
Maury Goodman1301stylean -> aDONE
43
Maury Goodman1324typodataset -> datasetsDONE
44
Maury Goodman1339styleat -> with an; phase -> the phaseDONE
45
Maury Goodman1356styledrop "the"DONE
46
Maury Goodman1374styleeach various experiments -> each experimentDONE
47
Maury Goodman1372styleexperiment -> experimentsDONE
48
Maury Goodman1421styleabove -> listed aboveDONE
49
Maury Goodman`470stylenext -> the nextDONE
50
Maury Goodman1468typolight -> light of; rop "that aim"DONE
51
Maury Goodman1471typodeepend -> deepenDONE
52
Maury Goodman1475typomissing refenenceDONE
53
Maury Goodman1479stylebu as well as -> andDONE
54
Bill Louis288ContentIsoDAR is a cyclotron-based neutrino oscillation experimentExplicitly mention the neutrino source is cyclotron-based
55
Bill Louis2ContentIt should be emphasized that IsoDAR would have the world's best sensitivity to short-baseline oscillations and could be performed this decade in conjunction with SBN and JSNS2.Text Revised to Accommodate, figure added.
56
Josh Spitz2.187-88Content"beta decay and electron capture", "isotope decay at rest sources", "radioactive source experiments" are all the same thing. For "isotope decay at rest sources", you mean IsoDAR, so I would change it to "novel isotope decay at rest sources (e.g. IsoDAR)".The former and latter don't refer to IsoDAR, but to things like HUNTER (former) and BEST-II (latter). Conveners thought if we put (e.g. 'IsoDAR'), we would be calling out a single experiment in this part, but not for other source types.
57
Carlos Argüelles 2.1sec. 3.2.1/3.2.2ContentIceCube current and next-generation can also do dipole up-scattering, which is also a candidate for solution of the anomalies. Only taus are mentioned. This capability is already noted in Table 2; at L493, an example of dark-sector capabilities (not tau production) of IceCube is also already highlighted.
58
Janet Conrad82Typovalue-->valuableDONE
59
Janet Conrad2.2throughoutContentI think it would be good to find a place in tthe document to recognize the value of NSF and give a nod to uniquely-NSF supported programs. NSF allows experiments to be developed by and at universities that are very valuable to the field-- IceCube and IsoDAR are two examples.At present, the text gives no reference to the source of funding for any of the efforts. NSF, as well as DOE and other funding agencies, are not mentioned, and this seems appropriate.
60
Daniel Winklehner
2.277-93ContentThis paragraph is full of "could", "might" , etc. whereas other paragraphs are more decisive. This, in my opinion does not fully reflect the mature state and well-motivated physics reach of, e.g. IsoDAR. It doesn't sound like an endorsement to pursue (and fund) these types of experiments, but merely a listing of "what else is there" (or has been worked on in the past decade).Agree. Changed 'could potentially' to 'can' to be more concrete.
61
Daniel Winklehner
2.2101-102Contentis first half of upcoming P5 a little optimistic? Are all experiments meant, also the vaguely described ones in 77-93? Could that be made more specific, that they are needed to have such an optimistic outlook?An optimistic -- but very plausible -- scenario is that one of the experiments we've built to address the anomalies (SBN, etc) will provide game-changing info in the next 5 years. Hence the 'potentially as early as the first half of the coming P5 period' phrase. This sentence also encompasses the less-but-still-optimistic scenario that one of the high-precision experiments, like IsoDAR, provides that home-run prior to the end of the next P5 period. Added 'three previous paragraphs' instead of 'above' to clarify what's meant here.
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100