| A | B | C | D | E | F | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ANNEX A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT POLICY BOARD | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Agency Procurement Compliance and Performance Indicator (APCPI) Self-Assessment Form | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Name of Agency: University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines | Name of Evaluator: Melanie A. Jalover | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Date of Self Assessment: March 25, 2019 | Position: Head, Procurement Services | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | No. | Assessment Conditions | Agency Score | APCPI Rating* | Comments/Findings to the Indicators and SubIndicators | Supporting Information/Documentation (Not to be Included in the Evaluation Form Submitted to GPPB) | |||||||||||||||||||
12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | PILLAR I. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Indicator 1. Competitive Bidding as Default Method of Procurement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 1 | 1.a | Percentage of competitive bidding and limited source bidding contracts in terms of amount of total procurement | 88.81% | 2.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
16 | 2 | 1.b | Percentage of competitive bidding and limited source bidding contracts in terms of volume of total procurement | 100.00% | 3.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | Indicator 2. Limited Use of Alternative Methods of Procurement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 3 | 2.a | Percentage of shopping contracts in terms of amount of total procurement | 0.65% | 3.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
20 | 4 | 2.b | Percentage of negotiated contracts in terms of amount of total procurement | 10.53% | 2.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
21 | 5 | 2.c | Percentage of direct contracting in terms of amount of total procurement | 0.00% | 3.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
22 | 6 | 2.d | Percentage of repeat order contracts in terms of amount of total procurement | 0.00% | 3.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
23 | 7 | 2.e | Compliance with Repeat Order procedures | n/a | n/a | Procurement documents relative to conduct of Repeat Order | |||||||||||||||||||
24 | 8 | 2.f | Compliance with Limited Source Bidding procedures | n/a | n/a | Procurement documents relative to conduct of Limited Source Bidding | |||||||||||||||||||
25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Indicator 3. Competitiveness of the Bidding Process | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 9 | 3.a | Average number of entities who acquired bidding documents | 1.50 | 0.00 | Agency records and/or PhilGEPS records | |||||||||||||||||||
28 | 10 | 3.b | Average number of bidders who submitted bids | 1.54 | 0.00 | Abstract of Bids or other agency records | |||||||||||||||||||
29 | 11 | 3.c | Average number of bidders who passed eligibility stage | 1.17 | 1.00 | Abstract of Bids or other agency records | |||||||||||||||||||
30 | 12 | 3.d | Sufficiency of period to prepare bids | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Agency records and/or PhilGEPS records | |||||||||||||||||||
31 | 13 | 3.e | Use of proper and effective procurement documentation and technical specifications/requirements | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Cost Benefit Analysis, Work Plans, Technical Specifications included in bidding documents | |||||||||||||||||||
32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | Average I | 2.09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | PILLAR II. AGENCY INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND MANAGEMENT CAPACITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | Indicator 4. Presence of Procurement Organizations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | 14 | 4.a | Creation of Bids and Awards Committee(s) | Substantially Compliant | 2.00 | Verify copy of Order creating BAC; Organizational Chart; and Certification of Training | |||||||||||||||||||
37 | 15 | 4.b | Presence of a BAC Secretariat or Procurement Unit | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Verify copy of Order creating BAC Secretariat; Organizational Chart; and Certification of Training | |||||||||||||||||||
38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | Indicator 5. Procurement Planning and Implementation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | 16 | 5.a | An approved APP that includes all types of procurement | Compliant | 3.00 | Copy of APP and its supplements (if any) | |||||||||||||||||||
41 | 17 | 5.b | Preparation of Annual Procurement Plan for Common-Use Supplies and Equipment (APP-CSE) and Procurement of Common-Use Supplies and Equipment from the Procurement Service | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | APP, APP-CSE, PMR | |||||||||||||||||||
42 | 18 | 5.c | Existing Green Specifications for GPPB-identified non-CSE items are adopted | Compliant | 3.00 | ITBs and/or RFQs clearly indicate the use of green technical specifications for the procurement activity | |||||||||||||||||||
43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | Indicator 6. Use of Government Electronic Procurement System | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | 19 | 6.a | Percentage of bid opportunities posted by the PhilGEPS-registered Agency | 100.00% | 3.00 | Agency records and/or PhilGEPS records | |||||||||||||||||||
46 | 20 | 6.b | Percentage of contract award information posted by the PhilGEPS-registered Agency | 100.00% | 3.00 | Agency records and/or PhilGEPS records | |||||||||||||||||||
47 | 21 | 6.c | Percentage of contract awards procured through alternative methods posted by the PhilGEPS-registered Agency | n/a | n/a | Agency records and/or PhilGEPS records | |||||||||||||||||||
48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | Indicator 7. System for Disseminating and Monitoring Procurement Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | 22 | 7.a | Presence of website that provides up-to-date procurement information easily accessible at no cost | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Identify specific procurement-related portion in the agency website and specific website links | |||||||||||||||||||
51 | 23 | 7.b | Preparation of Procurement Monitoring Reports using the GPPB-prescribed format, submission to the GPPB, and posting in agency website | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Copy of PMR and received copy that it was submitted to GPPB | |||||||||||||||||||
52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | Average II | 2.89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | PILLAR III. PROCUREMENT OPERATIONS AND MARKET PRACTICES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | Indicator 8. Efficiency of Procurement Processes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | 24 | 8.a | Percentage of total amount of contracts signed within the assessment year against total amount in the approved APPs | 80.37% | 3.00 | APP (including Supplemental amendments, if any) and PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
57 | 25 | 8.b | Percentage of total number of contracts signed against total number of procurement projects done through competitive bidding | 68.75% | 0.00 | APP(including Supplemental amendments, if any)and PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
58 | 26 | 8.c | Planned procurement activities achieved desired contract outcomes and objectives within the target/allotted timeframe | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Agency Procedures/Systems for the conduct of needs analysis or market research, monitoring of timely delivery of goods, works, or services Contracts with amendments and variations to order amount to 10% or less | |||||||||||||||||||
59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | Indicator 9. Compliance with Procurement Timeframes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | 27 | 9.a | Percentage of contracts awarded within prescribed period of action to procure goods | 100.00% | 3.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
62 | 28 | 9.b | Percentage of contracts awarded within prescribed period of action to procure infrastructure projects | 100.00% | 3.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
63 | 29 | 9.c | Percentage of contracts awarded within prescribed period of action to procure consulting services | 100.00% | 3.00 | PMRs | |||||||||||||||||||
64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | Indicator 10. Capacity Building for Government Personnel and Private Sector Participants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | 30 | 10.a | There is a system within the procuring entity to evaluate the performance of procurement personnel on a regular basis | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Samples of forms used to evaluating procurement performance on top of or incorporated within the regular assessment for Procurement Personnel | |||||||||||||||||||
67 | 31 | 10.b | Percentage of participation of procurement staff in procurement training and/or professionalization program | 75.00% | 1.00 | Ask for copies of Office Orders, training modules, list of participants, schedules of actual training conducted | |||||||||||||||||||
68 | 32 | 10.c | The procuring entity has open dialogue with private sector and ensures access to the procurement opportunities of the procuring entity | Compliant | 3.00 | Ask for copies of documentation of activities for bidders | |||||||||||||||||||
69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | Indicator 11. Management of Procurement and Contract Management Records | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | 33 | 11.a | The BAC Secretariat has a system for keeping and maintaining procurement records | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Verify actual procurement records and time it took to retrieve records (should be no more than two hours) Refer to Section 4.1 of User's Manual for list of procurement-related documents for record-keeping and maintenance. | |||||||||||||||||||
72 | 34 | 11.b | Implementing Units has and is implementing a system for keeping and maintaining complete and easily retrievable contract management records | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Verify actual contract management records and time it took to retrieve records should be no more than two hours | |||||||||||||||||||
73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | Indicator 12. Contract Management Procedures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | 35 | 12.a | Agency has defined procedures or standards in such areas as quality control, acceptance and inspection, supervision of works and evaluation of contractors’ performance | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Verify copies of written procedures for quality control, acceptance and inspection; CPES evaluation formsz | |||||||||||||||||||
77 | 36 | 12.b | Timely Payment of Procurement Contracts | On or before 30 days | 3.00 | Ask Finance or Accounting Head of Agency for average period for the release of payments for procurement contracts | |||||||||||||||||||
78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | Average III | 2.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | PILLAR IV. INTEGRITY AND TRANSPARENCY OF AGENCY PROCUREMENT SYSTEM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | Indicator 13. Observer Participation in Public Bidding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | 37 | 13.a | Observers are invited to attend stages of procurement as prescribed in the IRR | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Verify copies of Invitation Letters to CSOs and professional associations and COA (List and average number of CSOs and PAs invited shall be noted.) | |||||||||||||||||||
84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | Indicator 14. Internal and External Audit of Procurement Activities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | 38 | 14.a | Creation and operation of Internal Audit Unit (IAU) that performs specialized procurement audits | Not Compliant | 0.00 | Verify copy of Order or show actual organizational chart showing IAU, auidt reports, action plans and IAU recommendations | |||||||||||||||||||
87 | 39 | 14.b | Audit Reports on procurement related transactions | Above 90-100% compliance | 3.00 | Verify COA Annual Audit Report on Action on Prior Year's Audit Recommendations | |||||||||||||||||||
88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | Indicator 15. Capacity to Handle Procurement Related Complaints | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | 40 | 15.a | The Procuring Entity has an efficient procurement complaints system and has the capacity to comply with procedural requirements | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Verify copies of BAC resolutions on Motion for Reconsiderations, Protests and Complaints; Office Orders adopting mesures to address procurement-related complaints | |||||||||||||||||||
91 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | Indicator 16. Anti-Corruption Programs Related to Procurement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | 41 | 16.a | Agency has a specific anti-corruption program/s related to procurement | Fully Compliant | 3.00 | Verify documentation of anti-corruption program | |||||||||||||||||||
94 | Average IV | 2.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | GRAND TOTAL (Avarege I + Average II + Average III + Average IV / 4) | 2.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
101 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
102 | Summary of APCPI Scores by Pillar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
103 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
104 | APCPI Pillars | Ideal Rating | Agency Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
105 |