A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Uduma countries of operation | ||||||||||
2 | unit | type | Overall | Mali | Burkina Faso | Cote d'Ivoire | |||||
3 | Simple CEA | ||||||||||
4 | |||||||||||
5 | Grant | ||||||||||
6 | Grant size (GiveWell costs over 10 years) | $ | input | - | $2,302,140 | $2,059,455 | $4,700,877 | ||||
7 | |||||||||||
8 | Under-five mortality benefits | ||||||||||
9 | Annual cost per child under five targeted by the program | $ | input | - | $7.80 | $7.69 | $8.69 | ||||
10 | Increase in the proportion of targeted children drinking treated water as a result of the program (pp) | % | input | - | 49% | 57% | 53% | ||||
11 | Annual cost per additional child drinking treated water as a result of the program | $ | calc | - | $15.80 | $13.58 | $16.32 | ||||
12 | Additional children drinking treated water as a result of the program | # | calc | - | 145,705 | 151,669 | 288,067 | ||||
13 | Annual all-cause mortality rate among children under five | % | input | - | 2.1% | 1.3% | 1.4% | ||||
14 | Effect of chlorination on under-five all-cause mortality among children treated, from RCTs | % | input | 24% | - | - | - | ||||
15 | Internal validity adjustment | % | input | -25% | - | - | - | ||||
16 | Adjustment for proportion of deaths linked to water quality in program vs RCT contexts | % | input | - | -2% | 10% | -12% | ||||
17 | Plausibility cap on mortality effect size among children drinking treated water as a result of the program | % | input | - | |||||||
18 | Effect of chlorination on under-five all-cause mortality, adjusted | % | calc | - | 18% | 20% | 16% | ||||
19 | Number of deaths averted among children under five | # | calc | - | 560 | 394 | 659 | ||||
20 | |||||||||||
21 | Initial cost-effectiveness estimate | ||||||||||
22 | Cost per under-five death averted | $ | calc | - | $4,108 | $5,231 | $7,130 | ||||
23 | Moral weight placed on averting the death of a child under age five (adjusted for age profile of population) | UoV | input | - | 114 | 113 | 112 | ||||
24 | Initial cost-effectiveness in terms of multiples of GiveDirectly's unconditional cash transfer program | xcash | calc | - | 8.2 | 6.4 | 4.7 | ||||
26 | Units of value per $ generated by GiveDirectly's program | 0.00335 | |||||||||
28 | |||||||||||
29 | Percentage of program impact coming from different benefits | ||||||||||
30 | Deaths averted among children under age five | % | input | - | 56% | 55% | 57% | ||||
31 | Deaths averted among people over age five | % | input | - | 27% | 28% | 25% | ||||
32 | Morbidity reductions | % | input | - | 2% | 2% | 3% | ||||
33 | Long-term income increases | % | input | - | 15% | 15% | 15% | ||||
35 | |||||||||||
36 | Supplemental adjustments | ||||||||||
37 | Adjustment for grantee-level factors | % | input | 0% | - | - | - | ||||
38 | Adjustments for additional program benefits and downsides | % | input | 25% | - | - | - | ||||
39 | Adjustment for diverting other actors' funding into the program (leverage) and out of the program (funging) | % | input | - | -27% | -35% | -53% | ||||
40 | |||||||||||
41 | Final cost-effectiveness estimate | ||||||||||
42 | Final cost-effectiveness in terms of multiples of GiveDirectly's unconditional cash transfer program | xcash | calc | - | 13.4 | 9.5 | 4.8 | ||||
43 | Difference between estimate and estimate in main CEA | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |