240707X-Y data Job satisfaction and Job performance.xlsx

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	L	R	S	T	U
1	CaseID	ID	Author	Year	N	K	r	C-r	Note(特殊关系说明—一级分类)	Note(特殊关系说明—二级分类)	variance of correlation	the sampling error variance
2	1	1	Vroom	1964	3333	15	0.14				0.0107	0.0043
3	2	2	Petty	1984	3140	9	0.23	0.31	overall
4	3		Petty	1984	样本混杂无法计算	样本混杂无法计算	0.31	0.41	professional/supervisory/managerial group
5	4		Petty	1984	样本混杂无法计算	样本混杂无法计算	0.15	0.20	nonprofessional/ nonsupervisory/nonmanagerial group
6	5	3	Iaffaldano	1985	12192	74	0.15	0.17
7	6	4	Brown	1993	7621	29	0.13	0.15	注意：这里的关系是“performance—satisfaction
8	7	5	Judge	2001	54471	312	0.18	0.30	Overall
9	8		Judge	2001	21052	103	0.19	0.33	1. Source of correlation	a. Top-tier journal article
10	9		Judge	2001	11653	76	0.17	0.26		b. Other ranked journal article
11	10		Judge	2001	5953	41	0.16	0.25		c. Unranked journal article
12	11		Judge	2001	15813	92	0.19	0.31		d. Unpublished study-dissertation
13	12		Judge	2001	44518	242	0.18	0.3	2. Measure of job performance	a. Supervisory ratings
14	13		Judge	2001	5216	34	0.16	0.26		b. Objective records	x
15	14		Judge	2001	4737	36	0.18	0.36		c. Peer-subordinate ratings or other
16	15		Judge	2001	5561	44	0.22	0.35	3. Measure of job satisfaction	a. Global measure
17	16		Judge	2001	34707	176	0.18	0.3		b. Facet composite
18	17		Judge	2001	14203	92	0.18	0.28		c. Unknown-not specified
19	18		Judge	2001	51484	291	0.18	0.31	4. Research design	a. Cross-sectional
20	19		Judge	2001	2987	21	0.14	0.23	4. Research design	b. Longitudinal	x
21	20		Judge	2001		38	0.18	0.29	5. Job complexity	a. Low
22	21		Judge	2001		148	0.18	0.29		b. Medium
23	22		Judge	2001		24	0.26	0.52		c. High
24	23		Judge	2001	2344	18	0.19	0.45	6. Occupation	a. Scientists-engineers
25	24		Judge	2001	4384	22	0.19	0.28		b. Salespersons
26	25		Judge	2001	2019	8	0.2	0.33		c. Teachers
27	26		Judge	2001	4422	34	0.21	0.34		d. Managers and supervisors
28	27		Judge	2001	1240	7	0.17	0.26		e. Accountants
29	28		Judge	2001	3019	18	0.19	0.34		f. Clerical workers-secretaries
30	29		Judge	2001	3389	27	0.16	0.26		g. Laborers (unskilled-semiskilled)
31	30		Judge	2001	2129	13	0.12	0.19		h. Nurses
32	31		Judge	2001	31525	165	0.18	0.29		i. Miscellaneous-mixed
33	32	6	Bowling	2007	43141			0.19	Control variables	Five Factor Model traits
34	33		Bowling	2007	4082			0.21		Core self-evaluations
35	34		Bowling	2007	4350			0.09		Organization-based self-esteem
36	35		Bowling	2007	3808			0.09		General self-esteem and organization-based self-esteem
37	36		Bowling	2007	2522			0.23		Work locus of control
38	37		Bowling	2007	3150			0.22		Locus of control and work locus of control
39	38		Bowling	2007	2901			0.09		Organization-based self-esteem and work locus of control
40	39	7	Fried	2008	15749	64	0.16	0.19	performance	Self-rating of performance
41	40		Fried	2008	8796	50	0.16	0.25	performance	Supervisor-rating of performance	x
42	41	8	Harrison	2006	3251	23	0.17	0.28	1. Job satisfaction (A) with focal performance (B)	Predictive: A measured, then B
43	42		Harrison	2006	23045	130	0.18	0.3		Concurrent: A and B measured at same time; separate sources
44	43		Harrison	2006	8713	47	0.19	0.31		Postdictive: B measured, then A
45	44		Harrison	2006	807	4	0.22	0.27	2. Job satisfaction (A) with contextual performance (B)	Predictive
46	45		Harrison	2006	4492	14	0.26	0.32	2. Job satisfaction (A) with contextual performance (B)	Concurrent, separate sources
47	46	9	Whitman	2010	5849	60	0.28	0.34	Performance
48	47		Whitman	2010	3748	44	0.29	0.35	Performance	Productivity
49	48		Whitman	2010	1809	17	-0.21	-0.25		Withdrawal
50	49		Whitman	2010	1533	13	-0.19	-0.23		Withdrawal: Turnover
51	50		Whitman	2010	429	5	-0.37	-0.44		Withdrawal：Absenteeism
52	51		Whitman	2010	3102	22	0.25	0.3		Customer satisfaction
53	52		Whitman	2010	2454	19	0.34	0.42	OCB
54	53	10	Bowling	2015	19494	101	0.20	0.27
55	54	11	Katebi	2022		123	0.34
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100