ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Institution: San Diego State UniversitySecond Review FindingSecond Review
2
Program(s) and Pathway(s): Education Specialist ECSE Traditional and Intern Pathways
3
Link to Submission: https://education.sdsu.edu/cctc-accreditation/program-documents
4
Initial Review
5
Table 3.1 - 7.5/U7.5 Foundational Skills

Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE)
IntroducedPracticedAssessed
6
The information provided in 3.1 indicates that the concepts are clearly introduced/included in coursework
(Indicate Y or N)
The information provided in 3.1 indicates that the concepts are clearly practiced by candidates in coursework or clinical practice
(Indicate Y or N)
The information provided in 3.1 indicates that candidates are assessed on these concepts
(Indicate Y or N)
If no is indicated on any of the previous three columns, please comment on what is missing or unclear.Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column G to provide additional feedback.
Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, please review institution's response and indicate if the response addresses the feedback. If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.
7
Develop children’s foundational skills according to the standards and expectations specified for children’s age and grade incorporating the accommodations and modifications needed to address children’s identified disabilities.YesYesYesI: I:
8
P: P:
9
A: A:
10
Create literacy environments that are print rich and that foster interest in print;NoNoNoI: The lack of specific assignment details made it difficult to determine how the program ensures this element of the standard is addressed.YesI:
11
P: The lack of specific practice details made it difficult to determine how the program ensures this element of the standard is addressedYesP:
12
A: The lack of specific assessment details made it difficult to determine how the program ensures this element of the standard is addressed.YesA:
13
Engage children actively and deliberately with games, books, poetry, and oral or visual storytelling and songs that draw their attention to print, the manipulation of sounds, and alphabet letters.YesYesNoI: I:
14
P: P:
15
A: The lack of specific assessment details made it difficult to determine how the program ensures this element of the standard is addressed.YesA:
16
Develop children’s skills in transitional kindergarten and kindergarten in the following:
17
a. print concepts, including letters of the alphabetYesYesYesI: I:
18
P: P:
19
A:A:
20
b. phonological awareness, including phonemic awarenessYesYesYesI: I:
21
P: P:
22
A:A:
23
c. phonics, spelling, and word recognition, including letter-sound, spelling-sound, and sound-symbol correspondences and orthographic awarenessYesYesYesI: I:
24
P: P:
25
A:A:
26
d. decoding and encodingNoNoNoI:Reviewers found evidence for decoding. Evidence needed for encoding.YesI:
27
P: Reviewers found evidence for decoding. Evidence needed for encoding.YesP:
28
A: The lack of specific assessment details made it difficult to determine how the program ensures this element of the standard is addressed.YesA:
29
e. morphological awareness through instruction that is structured and organized as well as direct, systematic, and explicit. As children learn letter-sound correspondences and simple sight words, provide practice in connected, decodable text.YesYesYesI: I:
30
P: P:
31
A: A:
32
Standard 7a. Foundational Skills: English Learners

Reviewers may find information on 7a in Section 3.2 of the institution's submission.
The evidence contained in the literacy coursework indicates program is aligned to standard 7a as it relates to multilingual and English Learner students. (Indicate Y or N)If the response in the previous column is no, please indicate what is missing or unclear related to this aspect of standard 7a.Reviewer Instructions
For any element that was not addressed in the initial review, review institution's response.

Select Yes or No from the drop down menu. If feedback is fully addressed, select Yes. If additional information is needed, select No and use Column G to provide additional feedback.
Reviewer Instructions
If the response is not sufficient, please provide additional feedback.

If the response addresses the feedback, no additional feedback is needed.
33
Standard 7a: The program also includes evidence-based means of teaching foundational skills to multilingual and English learner children while they are simultaneously developing English language proficiency, and in some cases literacy skills in an additional language. The program teaches candidates to plan foundational skills instruction based on children’s communication needs as well as previous literacy experiences in their home languages and to differentiate instruction using guidance from the ELA/ELD Framework, including knowledge of cross-language transfer between the home languages and English. Yes
34
The feedback on this sheet is provided for all programs and pathways listed on Row 2 of this sheet.The feedback above is for all programs and pathways (Indicate Y or N)
35
Yes
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100