rubric_FinalProject_EDL-550-jan12
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
Still loading...
ABCDEF
1
Rubric for Final Project
2
4321 or 0
3
CriterionExceptionalAcceptableMarginalUnacceptableScore
4
Choice of topicProject is especially well-chosen in terms of subject, area of concentration, and level of treatmentProject chosen is appropriate in terms of subject, area of concentration, and level of treatmentProject chosen is somewhat appropriate but may be off-topic, poorly focused, or at the wrong levelProject is poorly chosen and is inappropriate in terms of subject, area of concentration, or level of treatment
5
DescriptionDescribes project and the writer's role in it clearly and effectively; reader grasps immediately the purpose of the project and the writer's roleDescribes project and the writer's role in it adequately, though some details or processes may be somewhat vague; reader can grasp the purpose of the project and the writer's role in itDescribes project and the writer's role in it in a confusing or roundabout way; reader has a difficult time grasping the purpose of the project and the writer's role in itDescribes project and the writer's role in it inadequately or the description is missing entirely; reader cannot tell what the project's purpose is or what role the writer had in it
6
Inlcusion of examples and artifactsExamples and artifacts of the writer's participation are well-chosen and effectively presentedExamples and artifacts of the writer's participation are adequately chosen and presentedExamples and artifacts of the writer's participation are meager, poorly chosen, or inappropriateExamples and artifacts of the writer's participation are missing
7
OrganizationArranges ideas clearly and logically; ideas flow smoothly and are effectively linked; reader can follow the line of reasoningArranges ideas adequately; links between ideas are generally clear; reader can follow the line of reasoning for the most partArranges ideas adequately, in general, although ideas sometimes fail to make sense together; reader remains fairly clear about what writer intendsArranges ideas illogically; ideas frequently fail to make sense together; reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and becomes frustrated or loses interest
8
Writing mechanicsWriting demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctnessWriting is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errorsWriting lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errorsWriting is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors
9
APA formatUses APA format accurately and consistentlyUses APA format with minor violationsReflects incomplete knowledge of APA formatDoes not use APA format
10
Total:
11
Copyright © 2012 by Thomas Edison State College. All rights reserved.
12
Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0-100 scale.
13
Scale: 23-24 = A (93-100); 22 = A- (90-92); 21 = B+ (88-89); 17-20 = B (83-87); 16 = B- (80-82); 15 = C+ (78-79); 11-14 = C (73-77); 10 = C- (70-72); 5-9 = D (60-69); 0-4 = F (below 60).
Loading...
 
 
 
Rubric for Final Paper