tennessee 2012 sen-by-hd

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G
1	HD	County	Clayton	Corker	Total	Clayton%	Corker%
2	1	Sullivan (pt.)	4,350	15,027	20,206	21.53%	74.37%
3	1 Total		4,350	15,027	20,206	21.53%	74.37%
4	2	Sullivan (pt.)	4,905	18,878	24,668	19.88%	76.53%
5	2 Total		4,905	18,878	24,668	19.88%	76.53%
6	3	Carter (pt.)	477	2,774	3,403	14.02%	81.52%
7		Johnson	1,009	4,456	5,733	17.60%	77.73%
8		Sullivan (pt.)	2,470	9,424	12,373	19.96%	76.17%
9	3 Total		3,956	16,655	21,509	18.39%	77.43%
10	4	Carter (pt.)	2,630	12,100	15,377	17.10%	78.69%
11		Unicoi	1,247	4,939	6,506	19.17%	75.91%
12	4 Total		3,877	17,039	21,883	17.72%	77.86%
13	5	Greene (pt.)	3,730	15,707	20,371	18.31%	77.10%
14	5 Total		3,730	15,707	20,371	18.31%	77.10%
15	6	Washington (pt.)	5,125	18,347	24,552	20.88%	74.73%
16	6 Total		5,125	18,347	24,552	20.88%	74.73%
17	7	Washington (pt.)	4,744	14,290	20,166	23.52%	70.86%
18	7 Total		4,744	14,290	20,166	23.52%	70.86%
19	8	Blount (pt.)	4,102	17,940	23,321	17.59%	76.93%
20	8 Total		4,102	17,940	23,321	17.59%	76.93%
21	9	Hancock	291	1,456	1,822	15.97%	79.91%
22		Hawkins	4,042	14,344	19,068	21.20%	75.23%
23	9 Total		4,333	15,800	20,890	20.74%	75.63%
24	10	Hamblen	3,612	14,547	18,789	19.22%	77.42%
25	10 Total		3,612	14,547	18,789	19.22%	77.42%
26	11	Cocke	1,706	8,396	10,505	16.24%	79.92%
27		Greene (pt.)	455	1,907	2,479	18.37%	76.95%
28		Jefferson (pt.)	997	4,233	5,465	18.25%	77.45%
29	11 Total		3,159	14,536	18,449	17.12%	78.79%
30	12	Sevier (pt.)	3,795	18,687	23,439	16.19%	79.73%
31	12 Total		3,795	18,687	23,439	16.19%	79.73%
32	13	Knox (pt.)	6,276	12,122	20,556	30.53%	58.97%
33	13 Total		6,276	12,122	20,556	30.53%	58.97%
34	14	Knox (pt.)	5,796	25,444	32,730	17.71%	77.74%
35	14 Total		5,796	25,444	32,730	17.71%	77.74%
36	15	Knox (pt.)	6,828	6,180	14,715	46.40%	42.00%
37	15 Total		6,828	6,180	14,715	46.40%	42.00%
38	16	Knox (pt.)	4,361	18,564	24,229	18.00%	76.62%
39	16 Total		4,361	18,564	24,229	18.00%	76.62%
40	17	Jefferson (pt.)	1,994	8,578	11,070	18.01%	77.49%
41		Sevier (pt.)	1,501	7,579	9,476	15.84%	79.98%
42	17 Total		3,495	16,157	20,546	17.01%	78.64%
43	18	Knox (pt.)	6,246	17,121	25,140	24.85%	68.10%
44	18 Total		6,246	17,121	25,140	24.85%	68.10%
45	19	Knox (pt.)	3,762	16,822	21,723	17.32%	77.44%
46	19 Total		3,762	16,822	21,723	17.32%	77.44%
47	20	Blount (pt.)	4,193	17,906	23,356	17.95%	76.67%
48	20 Total		4,193	17,906	23,356	17.95%	76.67%
49	21	Loudon (pt.)	2,398	12,256	15,325	15.64%	79.98%
50		Monroe (pt.)	2,295	7,873	10,591	21.67%	74.34%
51	21 Total		4,693	20,129	25,916	18.11%	77.67%
52	22	Bradley (pt.)	1,804	11,210	13,425	13.44%	83.50%
53		Meigs	799	2,799	3,705	21.57%	75.55%
54		Polk	1,513	4,143	5,865	25.80%	70.64%
55	22 Total		4,116	18,152	22,995	17.90%	78.94%
56	23	McMinn	3,139	13,422	17,186	18.26%	78.10%
57		Monroe (pt.)	891	3,972	5,059	17.60%	78.51%
58	23 Total		4,030	17,394	22,245	18.11%	78.19%
59	24	Bradley (pt.)	3,495	16,976	21,132	16.54%	80.33%
60	24 Total		3,495	16,976	21,132	16.54%	80.33%
61	25	Cumberland	4,483	17,900	23,571	19.02%	75.94%
62		Putnam (pt.)	389	1,060	1,551	25.08%	68.34%
63		Van Buren	624	1,321	2,016	30.95%	65.53%
64	25 Total		5,496	20,281	27,138	20.25%	74.73%
65	26	Hamilton (pt.)	6,600	22,987	30,585	21.58%	75.16%
66	26 Total		6,600	22,987	30,585	21.58%	75.16%
67	27	Hamilton (pt.)	7,190	24,997	33,326	21.57%	75.01%
68	27 Total		7,190	24,997	33,326	21.57%	75.01%
69	28	Hamilton (pt.)	14,161	5,965	20,812	68.04%	28.66%
70	28 Total		14,161	5,965	20,812	68.04%	28.66%
71	29	Hamilton (pt.)	6,190	18,019	24,907	24.85%	72.34%
72	29 Total		6,190	18,019	24,907	24.85%	72.34%
73	30	Hamilton (pt.)	7,429	19,529	27,909	26.62%	69.97%
74	30 Total		7,429	19,529	27,909	26.62%	69.97%
75	31	Bledsoe	961	3,069	4,167	23.06%	73.65%
76		Rhea	1,705	7,989	10,013	17.03%	79.79%
77		Roane (pt.)	466	1,481	2,037	22.88%	72.70%
78		Sequatchie	963	3,652	4,791	20.10%	76.23%
79	31 Total		4,095	16,191	21,008	19.49%	77.07%
80	32	Loudon (pt.)	876	4,759	5,902	14.85%	80.63%
81		Roane (pt.)	3,752	13,594	18,147	20.68%	74.91%
82	32 Total		4,628	18,353	24,049	19.25%	76.31%
83	33	Anderson (pt.)	5,985	16,888	24,327	24.60%	69.42%
84	33 Total		5,985	16,888	24,327	24.60%	69.42%
85	34	Rutherford (pt.)	6,983	17,926	26,134	26.72%	68.59%
86	34 Total		6,983	17,926	26,134	26.72%	68.59%
87	35	Claiborne	1,808	7,219	9,441	19.15%	76.46%
88		Grainger	1,187	5,318	6,785	17.49%	78.38%
89		Union (pt.)	323	1,318	1,709	18.89%	77.10%
90	35 Total		3,318	13,855	17,935	18.50%	77.25%
91	36	Anderson (pt.)	713	2,716	3,626	19.65%	74.91%
92		Campbell	2,411	8,336	11,255	21.42%	74.06%
93		Union (pt.)	666	2,775	3,585	18.58%	77.42%
94	36 Total		3,790	13,828	18,466	20.52%	74.88%
95	37	Rutherford (pt.)	6,956	14,932	23,143	30.06%	64.52%
96	37 Total		6,956	14,932	23,143	30.06%	64.52%
97	38	Clay	714	1,676	2,493	28.64%	67.23%
98		Fentress (pt.)	551	2,433	3,079	17.90%	79.01%
99		Macon	1,050	4,854	6,170	17.02%	78.67%
100		Pickett	492	1,740	2,308	21.32%	75.39%