ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAA
1
THIS IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT. IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE EDITING IT, SEND AN EMAIL TO SKITTER@DESIGNJUDGES.COM@dropdown@dropdown@dropdown
2
FOR SAE USE ONLY
3
2027 SES Concerns
4
Mono Or All Steel TubeVersionWorksheet NameLocation Of CellsConcernFixed at VersionResponse
5
6
All Steel Tube1.0F.5.12 Bolted MembersC4The INDIRECT command within the cell appears to point at the old location of the referenced cell in the 2026 version of SES, "'F.3.4 Steel Tube"&"'!BO133". I think the cell should now point at “'F.3.4 Steel Tube'!BY133”, but I might be wrong. Additionally, I believe the F.3.4.3 Welded Inserts sheet has a similar if not the same error. v1.1Fixed in Steel Tube and Mono. Also updated driver harness activation of welded insert requirement.
7
Mono 1.0F.7.6-9 Mono AttachmentsBG51Entered values for fastener diameter change to date. For example, entered 0.3125 for 5/16 bolt, sheet returned "1/0/1900 7:30:00 AM"N/AI think one of your teammates put in 5/16.
Entering a fraction with a / turns it into a date format and breaks everything.
You can save it by entering in scientific 3.125E-1, and it will go back to a number, just in scientific.
If that fails, try entering 1 1/2. Then it will display a (probably wrong) fraction but work correctly for new values entered.
8
All Steel Tube1.0F.3.4.3 Welded InsertsC10See row 6 of this sheet. Cell should reference "F.3.4 Steel Tube'!BY134" rather than BO133v1.1
9
All Steel Tube1.0F.3.4.3 Welded InsertsC9Cell should reference BW136, not BM136v1.1
10
All Steel Tube1.0F.10.1-4 Modules and ContainerCF130When "Vector From Hole To Firewall-Seat" is selected in CG130, the rule referenced is incorrect v1.1
11
All Steel Tube1.0F.3.4.3 Welded InsertsC14Similar issue to row 6 and 8, should reference cell BY135 not BO135v1.1
12
Mono 1.0F.4.2 CompositeO47, H62:H67, M62:M67Divide by zero issue when "Sheet Metal" skin type is selected causes CHECK in fiber mass estimate and REJECT in fiber directional checks (which I believe are not intended to be applied to sheet metal skins)v1.1
13
Mono 1.0F.4.2 CompositeN6, N7, N9"Metallic" skin type is referenced in the cell formulas, but only "Sheet Metal" is available in the skin type dropdown, preventing "N/A" condition from triggeringv1.1
14
All Steel Tube1.1F.8.5.3.b Front ProtectionAX44, AY44, AZ44N/AWorking fine in submitted documents. Never CUT in the SES, only CTRL+SHIFT+V paste special, values only.
15
All Steel Tube1.0F.10.1-4 Modules and ContainerCK72, CK102, CK133Aluminum and Steel selection for tractive battery container is reject regardless of material thickness. N/ACould not replicate. Make sure auto-calculation is on, make sure not to use web Excel.
16
All Steel Tube1.0F.3.4 Steel TubesBY133Where can I find V1.1?N/Afsaeonline 10/8
17
Mono 1.1F.3.4-5 Tube ChassisQ91, Q92, S100Q91, Q92, S100v1.2S_Yield is the appropriate comparison for 6061 T6 Unwelded
18
All Steel Tube1.1F.10.1-4 Modules and ContainerAW64:67SES requiring modulus and Sy values even when Module Test >=60C selected.v1.2Enter material on Module test tab to fulfull most similar material dropdown.
19
All Steel Tube1.1F.8 Front ProtectionA25In cell A25 of the “F.3.4 Steel Tube” sheet, the unit “mm” is selected, but the "F.8 Front Protection" sheet
cannot retrieve it through the INDIRECT reference. This causes the units to appear as #BLOCKED, resulting
in incorrect or missing units throughout the spreadsheet and triggering rejections for multiple front-protection
criteria.		N/Aformula is identical on all tabs
this problem manifests in online excel, rather than desktop
or if automatic recalculate is turned off
20
All Steel Tube1.1Pullout and Tearout for Offset MountsAR-AZ 104I ran into an interesting reject error when entering data in the Front Protection tab. In 2026, SES section F.8 in cell AX106 (FB), the end of the equation says AX103*2* , while in 2027, SES section F.8cell AX110 (FB), the end of the equation says AX107*2*AX109. The difference is that in 2027, the equation adds the multiplication of the tearout value, drastically reducing our percentage from 181% to 29.99%, causing us to fail.N/ANote the second line of the equation.
Check your inputs for spacing, as well as the 2027 skin thicknesses and shear value.
The function appears to be identical except for the location of the cell.
21
All Steel Tube1.1Pullout and Tearout for Offset MountsAR-AZ 104Same as aboveN/ANote the second line of the equation.
Check your inputs for spacing, as well as the 2027 skin thicknesses and shear value.
The function appears to be identical except for the location of the cell.
22
All Steel Tube1.1F10.3.5 Module TestZ55/Z68I believe the units for this should be MPa, not GPa, affects cells belowv1.2Factor of .001 added to output GPa instead of MPa
23
Mono 1.1F.4.2 CompositeAY61When Inner BOTTOM Second Peak Thickness (AY56) is zero, the perimeter shear calculation results in a divide by zero error, even when selecting No Core in cell F34v1.2logic for 0 thickness core added to ELSE statement
24
​
25
​
26
​
27
​
28
​
29
​
30
​
31
​
32
​
33
​
34
​
35
​
36
​
37
​
38
​
39
40
​
41
​
42
​
43
​
44
​
45
​
46
​
47
​
48
​
49
​
50
​
51
​
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100