ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
2
Republic of the Philippines
3
PALAWAN STATE UNIVERSITY
4
Puerto Princesa City, Palawan
5
CONTRACTOR 'S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
6
DATE OF EVALUATION
7
CONTRACTOR
8
PROJECT TITLE
9
PROJECT ADDRESS
10
CONTRACT AMOUNT
11
CALENDAR DAYS
12
CONTRACT EXPIRY
13
14
INSTRUCTIONS: Rate the Contractor's performance on their Project using the details below:
15
5-
EXCELLENT
=
93% to 100%
16
4-GOOD=
86% to 92%
17
3-
SATISFACTORY
=
81% to 85%
18
2-
MARGINAL
=
70% to 80%
19
1-
UNSATISFACTORY
=
50% to 69%
20
* The weighted average score for each criterion will be calculated by multiplying its respective rating by its assigned weight (expressed as a percentage). The weighted scores will then be summed to obtain the final total score.
21
22
23
24
WORKMANSHIP (40%)Rating
25
1Did the contractor deliver a high level of craftsmanship in the work performed?
26
27
2Were there any noticeable defects, errors, or rework required due to poor workmanship?
28
29
3Was the quality of workmanship consistent across all phases of the project?
30
31
4Did the contractor ensure proper alignment, measurements, and finishes?
32
33
5Were joints, seams, and connections properly sealed and secured?
34
35
6Was the contractor proactive in identifying and correcting minor defects before completion?
36
37
Total Score
38
39
TIME (35%)Rating
40
1Was the necessary labor force available and scheduled appropriately?
41
42
2Did the contractor ensure materials and equipment were on-site when needed to prevent downtime?
43
44
3Were there any productivity issues that impacted project timeliness?
45
46
4Did the contractor start work on time each day and maintain steady progress?
47
48
5How effectively did the contractor implement recovery plans to get back on schedule?
49
50
6Did the contractor suggest feasible solutions to accelerate progress when needed?
51
52
7Did the contractor complete work within the agreed-upon timeframe?
53
54
8Were key project milestones met as scheduled?
55
56
9Did the contractor provide timely updates on progress and potential schedule risks?
57
58
Total Score
59
60
61
MATERIALS (20%)Rating
62
1Were the materials used in line with project specifications and industry standards?
63
64
2Were materials properly stored to prevent damage, contamination, or deterioration?
65
66
3Did the contractor follow proper handling procedures to maintain material integrity?
67
68
4Were any materials wasted due to mishandling or improper storage?
69
70
5Did the materials meet durability and performance expectations?
71
72
Total Score
73
74
ENVI SAFETY & HEALTH (5%)Rating
75
1Did the contractor follow building codes, regulations, and project requirements?
76
77
2Were the proper construction techniques and best practices applied?
78
79
3Were any shortcuts taken that compromised the integrity or longevity of the work?
80
81
4Did the contractor maintain a clean and organized worksite throughout the project?
82
83
5Were construction debris and materials managed properly to avoid damage or safety hazards?
84
85
Total Score
86
87
WORKMANSHIP (40%)
88
TIME (35%)
89
MATERIALS (20%)
90
ENVI SAFETY & HEALTH (5%)
91
Total Score0.00
92
93
EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS:
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
EVALUATED BY:CHECKED AND VERIFIED BY: