InPhonDB_MAformat_old
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBEBFBGBHBIBJBKBLBMBNBOBPBQBRBSBTBUBVBWBXBYBZ
1
study_IDlong_citeshort_citepeer_reviewedcoderexpt_numexpt_conditionsame_infantresponse_modeexposure_phasemethoddependent_measureparticipant_designnative_langinfant_typegroup_name_1group_name_2n_1n_2mean_age_1mean_age_2x_1x_2x_difSD_1SD_2tFdd_varrcorrspecial_cases_measuresage_range_1age_range_2n_excluded_1n_excluded_2gender_1gender_2dependent_measure_2dependent_measure_2_x_diffdependent_measure_2_SD_1dependent_measure_2_SD_2n_excluded_fussersn_excluded_non_criterionexclusion_criteriatest_langcontrast_pseudoIPAcontrast_sampasampa_commentscounterbalancedbacknessheightnasalityroundnesstensenesslengthstimuli_notesF1_1F2_1F1_2F2_2duration_word_1duration_word_2duration_vowel_1duration_vowel_2frequency_1frequency_2frequency_sourceobject_typeobject_noobject_motion_word_coordinationobject_motionmethod_notesresults_extraMSDapproxgeneral_notessame_infant_dich
2
Trehub1973
Trehub, S. E. (1973). Infants Sensitivity to Vowel and Tonal Contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 91-96.
Trehub (1973)yesSho TsujiINA1behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control101073.573.5NANANANANANA17.43NANANANA5656NANANANANANANANANANA
parental interference, fussiness, failure to reach a priori sucking criterion
nativepa-pi_pA-pi_AEnglish1020000
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: male voice, stimuli matched in noncritical features visually "mingographic" [never seen this word before!!] then resynthesized .5s sound+ .5 s silence; 18dB above room noise level; exp 5-7 skipped because on non-speech; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 38; snr: 18; differ.in:
756130934323235005005005000.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:33;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
individual data was sucks converted to percentage of baseline;figures could be used to estimate means
no
3
Trehub1973
Trehub, S. E. (1973). Infants Sensitivity to Vowel and Tonal Contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 91-96.
Trehub (1973)yesSho TsujiIINA2behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control10106363NANANANANANA6.38NANANANA7777NANANANANANANANANANA
parental interference, fussiness, failure to reach a priori sucking criterion
nativeta-ti_tA-ti_AEnglish1020000
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f1: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: male voice, stimuli matched in noncritical features visually "mingographic" [never seen this word before!!] then resynthesizedײ呜ײ楠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ榀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ懀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ勠3¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ斠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ昀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ漠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ泀Џ字と小文字を区別する(&C)セル内容が完全に同一であるものを検索する(&O)半角と全角を区別する(&B)制御文字を区別する(&T)オプション(&T) >>すべて置換(&A)置換(&R)すべて検索(&I)
756130934323235005005005000.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:33;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
individual data was sucks converted to percentage of baseline;figures could be used to estimate means
no
4
Trehub1973
Trehub, S. E. (1973). Infants Sensitivity to Vowel and Tonal Contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 91-96.
Trehub (1973)yesSho TsujiIIINA3behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control10107070NANANANANANA5.9NANANANA7777NANANANANANANANANANA
parental interference, fussiness, failure to reach a priori sucking criterion
nativea-i_A-i_AEnglish1020000
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f2: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: male voice, stimuli matched in noncritical features visually "mingographic" [never seen this word before!!] then resynthesizedײ呜ײ楠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ榀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ懀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ勠3¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ斠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ昀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ漠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ泀Џ字と小文字を区別する(&C)セル内容が完全に同一であるものを検索する(&O)半角と全角を区別する(&B)制御文字を区別する(&T)オプション(&T) >>すべて置換(&A)置換(&R)すべて検索(&I)
756130934323235005005005000.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:33;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
individual data was sucks converted to percentage of baseline;figures could be used to estimate means
no
5
Trehub1973
Trehub, S. E. (1973). Infants Sensitivity to Vowel and Tonal Contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 91-96.
Trehub (1973)yesSho TsujiIVNA4behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control10104949NANANANANANA10.46NANANANA7070NANANANANANANANANANA
parental interference, fussiness, failure to reach a priori sucking criterion
nativei-u_i-M_AEnglish1200100
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f3: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: male voice, stimuli matched in noncritical features visually "mingographic" [never seen this word before!!] then resynthesizedײ呜ײ楠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ榀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ懀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ勠3¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ斠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ昀Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ漠Џ¸_x0008_က耀呜ײ呜ײ泀Џ字と小文字を区別する(&C)セル内容が完全に同一であるものを検索する(&O)半角と全角を区別する(&B)制御文字を区別する(&T)オプション(&T) >>すべて置換(&A)置換(&R)すべて検索(&I)
34323233809925005005005000.093461068430.08650814733
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:33;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
individual data was sucks converted to percentage of baseline;figures could be used to estimate means
no
6
Swoboda1976
Swoboda, P.J., Morse, P.A., & Leavitt, L.A. (1976). Continuous Vowel Discrimination in Normal and At Risk Infants. Child Development 47(2), 459-465.
Swoboda, Morse, & Leavitt (1976)yesSho TsujionlyNA5behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishmixed
experimental
control202056.956.96.88-2.8NANANANANANANANA
20;5.83;;3;4.49
141445.1545.15NANANANANANA26.1876.321
fussiness, sleeping, criterion, eq error, exp error
nativei-I_i-I_
not_looked_up
1000010
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: 298/2226/2902 i3; F1/F2/F3.2: 336/2144/2776 i5; min.f0: 125; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 80; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: falling; other: synthesized (Pisoni), 240 ms long, 3 formants with terminal F0 that fell linearly from 125-80H. Four stim varied in equal log steps from I to I. First two were cat. As I by adults, second two as I. Presented with 65db against 45 dB noise; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 45; snr: 20; differ.in:
298222633621442402402402400.093461068430.1302692755
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:20;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
data was sucks per minute;using formula 5 for d (F between 3 cond) some of the infants were at risk for developmental problems, but no significant effects of that found
no
7
Swoboda1976
Swoboda, P.J., Morse, P.A., & Leavitt, L.A. (1976). Continuous Vowel Discrimination in Normal and At Risk Infants. Child Development 47(2), 459-465.
Swoboda, Morse, & Leavitt (1976)yesSho TsujionlyNA6behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishmixed
experimental
control202056.956.95.83-2.8NANANANANANANANANA141445.1545.15NANANANANANA26.1876.321
fussiness, sleeping, criterion, eq error, exp error
artificiali-I'_i-I'_
not_looked_up
1000010
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: 270/2300/3019 i1 or I7 374/2070/2666; F1/F2/F3.2: 298/2226/2902 i1 or I5 336/2144/2776; min.f0: 125; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 80; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: falling; other: synthesized (Pisoni), 240 ms long, 3 formants with terminal F0 that fell linearly from 125-80H. Four stim varied in equal log steps from I to I. First two were cat. As I by adults, second two as I. Presented with 65db against 45 dB noise; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 45; snr: 20; differ.in:
270230029822262402402402400.093461068430.1302692755
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:20;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
data was sucks per minute;note this control group is the same as in the previous line
no
8
Swoboda1978
Swoboda, P.J., Morse, P.A., & Leavitt, L.A. (1976). Continuous Vowel Discrimination in Normal and At Risk Infants. Child Development 47(2), 459-465.
Swoboda, Morse, & Leavitt (1976)yesSho TsujionlyNA7behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishmixed
experimental
control30NA59.959.9NANANANANANANANANANANA141445.545.5NANANANANANA17.53.5
fussiness, sleeping, criterion, eq error, exp error
nativei-I_i-I_
not_looked_up
1000010
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: 298/2226/2902 i3; F1/F2/F3.2: 336/2144/2776 i5; min.f0: 125; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 80; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: falling; other: synthesized (Pisoni), 240 ms long, 3 formants with terminal F0 that fell linearly from 125-80H. Four stim varied in equal log steps from I to I. First two were cat. As I by adults, second two as I. Presented with 65db against 45 dB noise; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 45; snr: 20; differ.in:
29822263362144606060600.093461068430.1302692755
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:20;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
Some statistics reported, but only on pre-post changes, as there is no control group. Not included in Tsuji&Cristia(2013), Developmental Psychobiology, bc difficult to compare to other HAS studies
no
9
Swoboda1978
Swoboda, P.J., Morse, P.A., & Leavitt, L.A. (1976). Continuous Vowel Discrimination in Normal and At Risk Infants. Child Development 47(2), 459-465.
Swoboda, Morse, & Leavitt (1976)yesSho TsujionlyNA8behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishmixed
experimental
control30NA59.959.9NANANANANANANANANANANA141445.545.5NANANANANANA17.53.5
fussiness, sleeping, criterion, eq error, exp error
artificiali-I'_i-I'_
not_looked_up
1000010
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: 270/2300/3019 i1 or I7 374/2070/2666; F1/F2/F3.2: 298/2226/2902 i1 or I5 336/2144/2776; min.f0: 125; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 80; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: falling; other: synthesized (Pisoni), 240 ms long, 3 formants with terminal F0 that fell linearly from 125-80H. Four stim varied in equal log steps from I to I. First two were cat. As I by adults, second two as I. Presented with 65db against 45 dB noise; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 45; snr: 20; differ.in:
27023002982226606060600.093461068430.1302692755
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:20;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
Some statistics reported, but only on pre-post changes, as there is no control group. Not included in Tsuji&Cristia(2013), Developmental Psychobiology, bc difficult to compare to other HAS studies
no
10
Trehub1976
Trehub, S. E. (1976).The Discrimination of Foreign Speech Contrasts by Infants and Adults. Child Development 47(2), 466-472.
Trehub (1976)yesSho TsujiINA9behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control101073.573.5NANANANANANA5.25NANANANA77778.258.25NANANANANANA47.5
fussiness, sleeping, criterion, eq error
nonnativepa-pã_pa-pa~_French1001000
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: male; .5s sound+.5s silence; matched visually on intensity contour and duration; 6 french native speakers okayed the stimuli; played at 62 dB (noise at infant's head was 38dB); voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 38; snr: 24; differ.in:
6781200692987500500500500NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:33;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
individual data was sucks converted to percentage of baseline;figures could be used to estimate means
no
11
Kuhl1982
Kuhl, P.K., & Miller, J.D. (1982). Discrimination of auditory target dimensions in the presence or absence of variation in a second dimension by infants. Perception & Psychophysics 31(3), 279-292.
Kuhl & Miller (1982)yesSho Tsujionlyno_variation10behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control81678.478.40.2-0.07NANANANANANANANA
8;0.21;;3;10.34
77772.152.15NANANANANANA04.3criterionnativea-i_A-i_
their vowel doesn't correspond to any of the formants given in P&B52, contra their statement… but the closest might indeed be A
1020000
comments_F: F1-F3. Steady-state. ; F1/F2/F3.1: 775/1064/2614; F1/F2/F3.2: 263/2378/3099; min.f0: 132; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 92; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: No pitch variation (either monotonous or falling). Synthesized on terminal analog serial synthesizer. Steady-state, male talker characteristics. F1-F3+ constant (for a and i) upper formants (f4=F10). 500 ms duration.; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 12; snr: 56; differ.in:
775106426323785005005005000.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:20;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:colorful bear;size.in:15.8823801742686;dist.from.child.in:30;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
individual data was sucks converted to percentage of baseline; they do an ANOVA including both vowel change in the absence of pitch variation and its control and pitch change in the absence of vowel variation and its control. So pooled SD is calculated in the R script from the information available.
no
12
Kuhl1982
Kuhl, P.K., & Miller, J.D. (1982). Discrimination of auditory target dimensions in the presence or absence of variation in a second dimension by infants. Perception & Psychophysics 31(3), 279-292.
Kuhl & Miller (1982)yesSho Tsujionly
with_variation
11behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control8878.478.40.15-0.08NANANA2.88NANANANANA77772.152.15NANANANANANA04.3criterionnativea-i_A-i_
their vowel doesn't correspond to any of the formants given in P&B52, contra their statement… but the closest might indeed be A
1020000
comments_F: F1-F3. Steady-state. ; F1/F2/F3.1: 775/1064/2614; F1/F2/F3.2: 263/2378/3099; min.f0: 132; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 92; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the familiarization stimuli varied in pitch. Synthesized on terminal analog serial synthesizer. Steady-state, male talker characteristics. F1-F3+ constant (for a and i) upper formants (f4=F10). 500 ms duration.; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 12; snr: 56; differ.in:
775106426323785005005005000.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:20;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:colorful bear;size.in:15.8823801742686;dist.from.child.in:30;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
individual data was sucks converted to percentage of baseline; they do an ANOVA for one part, and t-tests for the other. So ES for the first cond (without pitch variation) based on F of Anova where also a cond with only pitch var was in, and ES for the second cond (with pitch variation) is based on t-test for only that condition.
no
13
Jusczyk1987
Jusczyk, P. W., & Derrah, C. (1987). Representation of Speech Sounds by Young Infants. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 648-654.
Jusczyk & Derrah (1987)yesAlex Cristiaonlybu_group12behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control161660.260.25.78-12.03NA10.7412.08NANANANANANA44.144.118.62518.625NANANANANANA22.7225186.25
fussiness, sleeping, eq err, criterion [note: counting here half of the kids excluded for the control group]
native
[bi, bo, ber, ba] to [bi, bo, ber, ba, bu, bu, bu, bu] (randomized)
[bi, bo, b@r, bA] to [bi, bo, b@r, bA, bu, bu, bu, bu] (randomized)
not_looked_up
0NANANANANANA
comments_F: allowed to vary over time; here taking values for the 'stable' portion, at 180 ms; F1/F2/F3.1: well-described in paper (table 1 on p. 650), but not writing the F's for the 'first stimulus set' here because there's a lot of variability; F1/F2/F3.2: 317/966/2240; min.f0: 125; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 100; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: falling; other: synthetic modeled on male talker, 300 ms, f0 begins 121 rises to 125 at 50 ms and falls linearly to 100 hz at offset; ISI 750 ms; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 750; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 57; snr: 15; differ.in:
NANA317966300300300300NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:25;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
sucks per minute;noting here the 2 minute results, but 4 minute results also reported
no
14
Jusczyk1987
Jusczyk, P. W., & Derrah, C. (1987). Representation of Speech Sounds by Young Infants. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 648-654.
Jusczyk & Derrah (1987)yesAlex Cristiaonlydu_group13behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control161660.260.210.55-12.03NA11.6812.08NANANANANANA44.144.118.62518.625NANANANANANA22.7225186.25
fussiness, sleeping, eq err, criterion [note: counting here half of the kids excluded for the control group]
native
[bi, bo, ber, ba] to [bi, bo, ber, ba, du, du, du, du] (randomized)
[bi, bo, b@r, bA] to [bi, bo, b@r, bA, bu, bu, bu, bu] (randomized)
not_looked_up
0NANANANANANA
comments_F: allowed to vary over time; here taking values for the 'stable' portion, at 180 ms; F1/F2/F3.1: well-described in paper (table 1 on p. 650), but not writing the F's for the 'first stimulus set' here because there's a lot of variability; F1/F2/F3.2: 317/1100/2240; min.f0: 125; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 100; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: falling; other: synthetic modeled on male talker, 300 ms, f0 begins 121 rises to 125 at 50 ms and falls linearly to 100 hz at offset; ISI 750 ms; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 750; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 57; snr: 15; differ.in:
NANA3171100300300300300NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:25;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
sucks per minute;noting here the 2 minute results, but 4 minute results also reported
no
15
Miller1979
Miller, J. L., & Eimas, P. D. (1979). Organization in infant speech perception. Canadian journal of psychology, 33(4), 353-367.
Miller & Eimas (1979)yesAlex Cristiaexp1NA14behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control123690906.10NANANA1.676NANANANANA606019.519.5NANANANANANA36.661.56
fussiness, sleeping, criterion, eq error, exp error (note: counting here the excluded kids for all of the control groups -- there were 3)
native
[ba-da]-[bae-dae]_
[ba-da]-[b{-d{]_
Aenglish. the authors say nothing but /a/ everywhere, and based on the Fs I guess that it is indeed a: male voice F1 770 (so ok for both) but F2 1220 -- too forward for A, so it could fit a
1000010
comments_F: formants varied somewhat over vowel, here noting the 'steady state'; notice that order was counterbalanced, so I'm noting both vowels in the second stim column; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: a 771/1233/2520, ae 771/1796/2780; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: synthetic, 300 ms; ISI 700 ms; background level of noise 63 dB, stimuli at 75 db; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 700; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 63; snr: 12; differ.in:
77112337711796300300300300NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:20;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:colorful bear;size.in:15.8823801742686;dist.from.child.in:30;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
sucks per minute;noting here the 2 minute results minus the mean for 2 mins before shift, although other results also reported this is the only one for which stats were reported; IMPORTANT t estimated from approx p - see notes txt file
no
16
Cowan1982
Cowan, N., Suomi, K. & Morse, P. A. (1982). Echoic storage in infant perception. Child Development, 53(4), 984-990.
Cowan, Suomi, & Morse (1982)yesAlex Cristiaexp2NA15behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control1818606014.42-2.64NANANA3.08NANANANANA7714.514.5NANANANANANANANA
fussiness, sleeping
native
[a-a] to [a-ε] OR [ε-ε] to [ε-a] versus control: [a-a] to [ε-a] OR [ε-ε] to [a-ε]
[a-a] to [a-E] OR [E-E] to [E-a] versus control: [a-a] to [E-a] OR [E-E] to [a-E]
rather /a/ F1 750 F2 1150
0NANANANANANA
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: a 750/1150/2400 E 245/2250/3000; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: 200; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 40; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: falling; other: Notice that they presented pairs of vowels; synthetic, 50 ms long, 0ms within pair, 900ms between pair, amplitude ramped 10ms onset and offset, f0 fell linearly from 200 to 40 hz across 50 ms; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 900; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 45; snr: 22; differ.in:
7501150NANA50505050NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
sucks per 30s;not coding ES because too different from others - REVISIT.
no
17
Cowan1982
Cowan, N., Suomi, K. & Morse, P. A. (1982). Echoic storage in infant perception. Child Development, 53(4), 984-990.
Cowan, Suomi, & Morse (1982)yesAlex Cristiaexp3NA16behaviorhabituationHAS
sucking_time
betweenEnglishtypical
experimental
control10106060NA-2.64NANANA2.27NANANANANA775.3333333355.333333335NANANANANANANANA
fussiness, sleeping
native
[a-a] to [a-ε] OR [ε-ε] to [ε-a] versus control: [a-a] to [ε-a] OR [ε-ε] to [a-ε]
[a-a] to [a-E] OR [E-E] to [E-a] versus control: [a-a] to [E-a] OR [E-E] to [a-E]
rather /a/ F1 750 F2 1150
0NANANANANANA
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: a 750/1150/2400 E 245/2250/3000; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: 200; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 40; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: falling; other: Notice that they presented pairs of vowels; synthetic, 50 ms long, 250ms within pair, 900ms between pair, amplitude ramped 10ms onset and offset, f0 fell linearly from 200 to 40 hz across 50 ms; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 700; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: 45; snr: 22; differ.in: diphthonguization
7501150NANA50505050NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:NA;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
sucks per 30s;not coding ES because too different from others - REVISIT.
no
18
Mugitani2009
Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Fais, L., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental psychology, 45(1), 236-247.
Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Dietrich, Werker, & Amano (2009)
yesAlex Cristiaexp1NA17
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA8NA541.14NANANA2.113.8183766182.2627417NANANANANANA25.42NA2NANANANANANANA11
fussiness, criterion
nonnativeta:ku-takuta:ku-taku
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: several tokens recorded, 5 were selected and then manipulated to create a long (200 ms) and short (100 ms) vowel duration; the duration of the whole words was not reported; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the originals were spoken in English, then the vowel lengthened/reduced to the desired length; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in: diphthonguization
NANANANANANA200100NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:27;dist.from.child.in:46;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:9;CF.max.hab:27;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 of each kind;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.75; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
19
Mugitani2009
Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Fais, L., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental psychology, 45(1), 236-247.
Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Dietrich, Werker, & Amano (2009)
yesAlex Cristiaexp1NA18
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA8NA541.14NANANA3.541.7536248172.517300141NANANANANANA25.42NA2NANANANANANANA11
fussiness, criterion
nonnativetaku-ta:kutaku-ta:ku
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: several tokens recorded, 5 were selected and then manipulated to create a long (200 ms) and short (100 ms) vowel duration; the duration of the whole words was not reported; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the originals were spoken in English, then the vowel lengthened/reduced to the desired length; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in: diphthonguization
NANANANANANA100200NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:27;dist.from.child.in:46;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:9;CF.max.hab:27;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 of each kind;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.875; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
20
Mugitani2009
Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Fais, L., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental psychology, 45(1), 236-247.
Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Dietrich, Werker, & Amano (2009)
yesAlex Cristiaexp2NA19
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA8NA547.56NANANA3.592.7718585822.347594514NA3.597NANANANA26.42NA3.5NANANANANANANA0.53
fussiness, criterion
nativeta:ku-takuta:ku-taku
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: several tokens recorded, 5 were selected and then manipulated to create a long (200 ms) and short (100 ms) vowel duration; the duration of the whole words was not reported; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the originals were spoken in English, then the vowel lengthened/reduced to the desired length; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in: diphthonguization
NANANANANANA200100NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:27;dist.from.child.in:46;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:9;CF.max.hab:27;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 of each kind;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.75; partial.eta.squared: 0.291; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
21
Mugitani2009
Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Fais, L., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental psychology, 45(1), 236-247.
Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Dietrich, Werker, & Amano (2009)
yesAlex Cristiaexp2NA20
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA8NA547.56NANANA-1.22.4324473272.064751801NA1.204NANANANA26.42NA3.5NANANANANANANA0.53
fussiness, criterion
nativetaku-ta:kutaku-ta:ku
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: several tokens recorded, 5 were selected and then manipulated to create a long (200 ms) and short (100 ms) vowel duration; the duration of the whole words was not reported; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the originals were spoken in English, then the vowel lengthened/reduced to the desired length; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in: diphthonguization
NANANANANANA100200NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:27;dist.from.child.in:46;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:9;CF.max.hab:27;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 of each kind;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.5; partial.eta.squared: 0.044; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
22
Mugitani2009
Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Fais, L., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental psychology, 45(1), 236-247.
Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Dietrich, Werker, & Amano (2009)
yesAlex Cristiaexp3NA21
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA12NA550.56NANANA2.273.6373066963.083050437NA6.081NANANANA27.42NA11.5NANANANANANANA47.5
fussiness, criterion
nativeta:ku-takuta:ku-taku
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: several tokens recorded, 5 were selected and then manipulated to create a long (200 ms) and short (100 ms) vowel duration; the duration of the whole words was not reported; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the originals were spoken in Japanese, then the vowel lengthened/reduced to the desired length; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in: diphthonguization
NANANANANANA200100NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:27;dist.from.child.in:46;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:9;CF.max.hab:27;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 of each kind;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.916666666666667; partial.eta.squared: 0.213; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
23
Mugitani2009
Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Fais, L., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental psychology, 45(1), 236-247.
Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Dietrich, Werker, & Amano (2009)
yesAlex Cristiaexp3NA22
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA12NA550.56NANANA-0.123.6373066965.022947342NA0.17NANANANA27.42NA11.5NANANANANANANA47.5
fussiness, criterion
nativetaku-ta:kutaku-ta:ku
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: several tokens recorded, 5 were selected and then manipulated to create a long (200 ms) and short (100 ms) vowel duration; the duration of the whole words was not reported; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the originals were spoken in Japanese, then the vowel lengthened/reduced to the desired length; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in: diphthonguization
NANANANANANA100200NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:27;dist.from.child.in:46;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:9;CF.max.hab:27;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.416666666666667; partial.eta.squared: 0.001; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
24
Mugitani2009
Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Fais, L., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental psychology, 45(1), 236-247.
Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Dietrich, Werker, & Amano (2009)
yesAlex Cristiaexp4NA23
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA8NA301.78NANANA2.681.810193364.723473298NANANANANANA35.42NA4.5NANANANANANANA2.52
fussiness, criterion
nativeta:ku-takuta:ku-taku
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: several tokens recorded, 5 were selected and then manipulated to create a long (200 ms) and short (100 ms) vowel duration; the duration of the whole words was not reported; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the originals were spoken in Japanese, then the vowel lengthened/reduced to the desired length; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
NANANANANANA100200NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:27;dist.from.child.in:46;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:9;CF.max.hab:27;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.5; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
25
Mugitani2009
Mugitani, R., Pons, F., Fais, L., Dietrich, C., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2009). Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants. Developmental psychology, 45(1), 236-247.
Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Dietrich, Werker, & Amano (2009)
yesAlex Cristiaexp4NA24
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA8NA301.78NANANA22.2344574292.630437226NANANANANANA35.42NA4.5NANANANANANANA2.52
fussiness, criterion
nativetaku-ta:kutaku-ta:ku
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: several tokens recorded, 5 were selected and then manipulated to create a long (200 ms) and short (100 ms) vowel duration; the duration of the whole words was not reported; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: the originals were spoken in Japanese, then the vowel lengthened/reduced to the desired length; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
NANANANANANA100200NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:27;dist.from.child.in:46;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:9;CF.max.hab:27;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.75; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
26
Phan2008
Phan, J., & Houston, D. M. (2008). Infant Dialect Discrimination. Research on spoken language processing Progress Report No. 29.
Phan & Houston (2008)noAlex Cristiaexp1NA25
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA20NA205.6392NANANA0.921.382.182.19NANANANANA52.9308NANANANANANANANANANANANAaccented
pain-pa:n[southern]_
pain-pa:n[southern]_
not_looked_up
1020000
comments_F: F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; first dur is pa:n[southern]; second dur is pain ; F1/F2/F3.1: pa:n[southern] 989-921/1707-1752; F1/F2/F3.2: pain 719-607/1617-2069; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: single talker produced words in both dialects; F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
98917077191617689698.5364342.5NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.285714285714286;max.trial.duration:20000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:checkerboard;size.in:55;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:14;CF.testDetails:10 "same" which contained repetitions of the habituation token mixed in with another token of the same type; and 4 oddballs/switch trials which contained the habituation token interspersed with a token of the untrained type; the first 2 trials were always 1 same 1 oddball with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
27
Phan2008
Phan, J., & Houston, D. M. (2008). Infant Dialect Discrimination. Research on spoken language processing Progress Report No. 29.
Phan & Houston (2008)noAlex Cristiaexp1NA26
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA20NA341.0082NANANA-0.051.752.3-0.08NANANANANA46.8468NANANANANANANANANANANANAaccented
pain-pa:n[southern]_
paIn-pa:n[southern]_
not_looked_up
1020000
comments_F: F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: pa:n[southern] 989-921/1707-1752; F1/F2/F3.2: pain 719-607/1617-2069; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: single talker produced words in both dialects; F's not reported, but the change in F2 within each vowel was: F2 movement was (410+494)/2 for the northern midland pain, and (45+45)/2 for the southern pa:n; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
98917077191617689698.5364342.5NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.285714285714286;max.trial.duration:20000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:checkerboard;size.in:55;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:14;CF.testDetails:10 "same" which contained repetitions of the habituation token mixed in with another token of the same type; and 4 oddballs/switch trials which contained the habituation token interspersed with a token of the untrained type; the first 2 trials were always 1 same 1 oddball with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
28
Phan2008
Phan, J., & Houston, D. M. (2008). Infant Dialect Discrimination. Research on spoken language processing Progress Report No. 29.
Phan & Houston (2008)noAlex Cristiaexp2NA27
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA30NA541.476NANANA0.281.692.980.55NANANANANA71.1828NANANANANANANANANANANANAaccented
pain-pa:n[southern]_
paIn-pa:n[southern]_
not_looked_up
1020000
comments_F: F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: pa:n[southern] 989-921/1707-1752; F1/F2/F3.2: pain 719-607/1617-2069; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: single talker produced words in both dialects; F's not reported, but the change in F2 within each vowel was: F2 movement was (410+494)/2 for the northern midland pain, and (45+45)/2 for the southern pa:n; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
98917077191617689698.5364342.5NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.285714285714286;max.trial.duration:20000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:checkerboard;size.in:55;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:14;CF.testDetails:10 "same" which contained repetitions of the habituation token mixed in with another token of the same type; and 4 oddballs/switch trials which contained the habituation token interspersed with a token of the untrained type; the first 2 trials were always 1 same 1 oddball with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
29
Phan2008
Phan, J., & Houston, D. M. (2008). Infant Dialect Discrimination. Research on spoken language processing Progress Report No. 29.
Phan & Houston (2008)noAlex Cristiaexp2NA28
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA30NA729.1674NANANA0.411.691.871.07NANANANANA59.9274NANANANANANANANANANANANAaccented
pain-pa:n[southern]_
paIn-pa:n[southern]_
not_looked_up
1020000
comments_F: F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: pa:n[southern] 989-921/1707-1752; F1/F2/F3.2: pain 719-607/1617-2069; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: single talker produced words in both dialects; F's not reported, but the change in F2 within each vowel was: F2 movement was (410+494)/2 for the northern midland pain, and (45+45)/2 for the southern pa:n; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
98917077191617689698.5364342.5NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.285714285714286;max.trial.duration:20000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:checkerboard;size.in:55;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:14;CF.testDetails:10 "same" which contained repetitions of the habituation token mixed in with another token of the same type; and 4 oddballs/switch trials which contained the habituation token interspersed with a token of the untrained type; the first 2 trials were always 1 same 1 oddball with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
30
Phan2008
Phan, J., & Houston, D. M. (2008). Infant Dialect Discrimination. Research on spoken language processing Progress Report No. 29.
Phan & Houston (2008)noAlex Cristiaexp2NA29
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA30NA912.2958NANANA0.842.213.821.48NANANANANA61.1442NANANANANANANANANANANANAaccented
pain-pa:n[southern]_
paIn-pa:n[southern]_
not_looked_up
1020000
comments_F: F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: pa:n[southern] 989-921/1707-1752; F1/F2/F3.2: pain 719-607/1617-2069; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: single talker produced words in both dialects; F's not reported, but the change in F2 within each vowel was: F2 movement was (410+494)/2 for the northern midland pain, and (45+45)/2 for the southern pa:n; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
98917077191617689698.5364342.5NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.285714285714286;max.trial.duration:20000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:checkerboard;size.in:55;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:14;CF.testDetails:10 "same" which contained repetitions of the habituation token mixed in with another token of the same type; and 4 oddballs/switch trials which contained the habituation token interspersed with a token of the untrained type; the first 2 trials were always 1 same 1 oddball with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
31
Phan2008
Phan, J., & Houston, D. M. (2008). Infant Dialect Discrimination. Research on spoken language processing Progress Report No. 29.
Phan & Houston (2008)noAlex Cristiaexp3NA30
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA30NA334.62NANANA0.432.323.390.95NANANANANA55.9728NANANANANANANANANANANANAaccented
pa:n[southern]-pa:n_
pa:n[southern]-pa:n_
pine (Southern) vs. pawn
1000000
comments_F: F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; first dur is pa:n[southern] second is pa:n; F1/F2/F3.1: pa:n[southern] 989-921/1707-1752; F1/F2/F3.2: pa:n 966-921/1438-1461; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: single talker produced words in both dialects; F's not reported, but the change in F2 within each vowel was: F2 movement was (410+494)/2 for the northern midland pain, and (45+45)/2 for the southern pa:n; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
98917079661438689784364356NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.285714285714286;max.trial.duration:20000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:checkerboard;size.in:55;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:14;CF.testDetails:10 "same" which contained repetitions of the habituation token mixed in with another token of the same type; and 4 oddballs/switch trials which contained the habituation token interspersed with a token of the untrained type; the first 2 trials were always 1 same 1 oddball with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
32
Phan2008
Phan, J., & Houston, D. M. (2008). Infant Dialect Discrimination. Research on spoken language processing Progress Report No. 29.
Phan & Houston (2008)noAlex Cristiaexp3NA31
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA12NA345.267NANANA-0.52.181.99-0.89NANANANANA43.8048NANANANANANANANANANANANAnativepain-pa:n_paIn-pa:n_
pine (Northern) vs. pawn
1020000
comments_F: F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: pain 719-607/1617-2069; F1/F2/F3.2: pa:n 966-921/1438-1461; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: single talker produced words in both dialects; F's not reported, but the change in F2 within each vowel was: F2 movement was (410+494)/2 for the northern midland pain, and (45+45)/2 for the southern pa:n; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
71916179661438689698.5342.5356NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.285714285714286;max.trial.duration:20000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:checkerboard;size.in:55;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:14;CF.testDetails:10 "same" which contained repetitions of the habituation token mixed in with another token of the same type; and 4 oddballs/switch trials which contained the habituation token interspersed with a token of the untrained type; the first 2 trials were always 1 same 1 oddball with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
33
Phan2008
Phan, J., & Houston, D. M. (2008). Infant Dialect Discrimination. Research on spoken language processing Progress Report No. 29.
Phan & Houston (2008)noAlex Cristiaexp3NA32
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA20NA330.057NANANA-0.062.83.41-0.15NANANANANA60.2316NANANANANANANANANANANANAnativepʌn-pa:n_pVn-pa:n_AEnglish1100000
comments_F: F's to the right are averages over 2 tokens and represent values at one third and two thirds of the vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: pa:n 966-921/1438-1461; F1/F2/F3.2: p[inverted v]n 1011-989/1685-1797; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: single talker produced words in both dialects; F's not reported, but the change in F2 within each vowel was: F2 movement was (410+494)/2 for the northern midland pain, and (45+45)/2 for the southern pa:n; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
966143810111685689661356223NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.285714285714286;max.trial.duration:20000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:checkerboard;size.in:55;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:3;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:14;CF.testDetails:10 "same" which contained repetitions of the habituation token mixed in with another token of the same type; and 4 oddballs/switch trials which contained the habituation token interspersed with a token of the untrained type; the first 2 trials were always 1 same 1 oddball with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
34
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp1NA33
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA15NA131NANANA0.8582.7713.0311.056NANANA0.4136643196NA27.378NA4.5NANANANANANANA40
fussiness, exp err
native
mana-ma:na
mana-ma:na
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 215.046; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: there were 18 tokens of ma:na, which were then artificially shortened to make the mana tokens by removing on average 106 ms of vowel; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel; pitch averages across the averages given for both syll; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1103.954; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
NANANANA343.006449.086133.12239.2NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.296
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
35
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp1NA34
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA17NA131NANANA-0.3463.1023.380.53NANANA0.6575968788NA27.378NA4.5NANANANANANANA40
fussiness, exp err
native
ma:na-mana
ma:na-mana
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 215.046; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: there were 18 tokens of ma:na, which were then artificially shortened to make the mana tokens by removing on average 106 ms of vowel; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel; pitch averages across the averages given for both syll; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1103.954; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
NANANANA449.086343.006239.2133.12NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.107
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
36
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp2NA35
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA17NA309NANANA2.1973.0024.2471.857NANANA0.127906149NA30.42NA5NANANANANANANA30
fussiness, exp err
native
mana-ma:na
mana-ma:na
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 215.046; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: there were 18 tokens of ma:na, which were then artificially shortened to make the mana tokens by removing on average 106 ms of vowel; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel; pitch averages across the averages given for both syll; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1103.954; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
NANANANA343.006449.086133.12239.2NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.598
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
37
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp2NA36
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA16NA309NANANA1.7492.993.0191.794NANANA0.1571412338NA30.42NA5NANANANANANANA30
fussiness, exp err
native
ma:na-mana
ma:na-mana
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 215.046; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: there were 18 tokens of ma:na, which were then artificially shortened to make the mana tokens by removing on average 106 ms of vowel; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel; pitch averages across the averages given for both syll; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1103.954; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
NANANANA449.086343.006239.2133.12NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.583
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
38
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp3NA37
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA17NA244NANANA0.2343.5882.7960.454NANANA0.8057339447NA30.42NA0.5NANANANANANANA30
fussiness, exp err
native
mana-ma:na
mana-ma:na
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 215.046; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: there were 18 tokens of ma:na, which were then artificially shortened to make the mana tokens by removing on average 106 ms of vowel; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel; pitch averages across the averages given for both syll; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1103.954; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
NANANANA343.006449.086133.12239.2NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.07
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
39
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp3NA38
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA16NA244NANANA0.7731.8732.9411.03NANANA0.2854914849NA30.42NA0.5NANANANANANANA30
fussiness, exp err
native
ma:na-mana
ma:na-mana
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 215.046; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: there were 18 tokens of ma:na, which were then artificially shortened to make the mana tokens by removing on average 106 ms of vowel; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel; pitch averages across the averages given for both syll; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1103.954; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
NANANANA449.086343.006239.2133.12NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.314
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
40
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp4NA39
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA17NA246NANANA0.8012.1722.3690.864NANANA-0.4133801523NA30.42NA7NANANANANANANA4.50
fussiness, exp err
native
mana-ma:na
mana-ma:na
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 222.93175; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: there were the same 18 tokens of ma:na plus 20 new mana tokens; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel and pitch averages across the values given for each syllable; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1124.524; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
NANANANA301.866449.086133.7239.2NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.353
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
41
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp4NA40
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA16NA246NANANA0.7071.73682.7611.091NANANA0.4095841911NA30.42NA7NANANANANANANA4.50
fussiness, exp err
native
ma:na-mana
ma:na-mana
not_looked_up
0000001
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 222.93175; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: there were the same 18 tokens of ma:na plus 20 new mana tokens; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel and pitch averages across the values given for each syllable; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1124.524; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
NANANANA449.086301.866239.2133.7NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.307
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
42
Sato2010
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental psychology, 46(1), 106-119.
Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka (2010)yesAlex Cristiaexp5NA41
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoJapanesetypicalNANA24NA140NANANA0.9592.972.5742.255NANANA0.7262613131NA27.378NA11NANANANANANANA9.50
fussiness, exp err
nativemana-mina_mana-mina_
not_looked_up
1020000
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 277.7315; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: bell; other: an additional 10 mina tokens were recorded and judging from the averages it looks like mana was also re-recorded; NOTICE that duration is for the 'ma' syllable, not just the vowel and pitch is averaged across the values given for each syllable; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural_processed; ISI: 1195.3035; SOA: 1500; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 60; differ.in:
63112672972320310.213299.18117.783108.83NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:35;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:15000;nb.tokens.trial:10;visual.stim:red & black checkerboard;size.in:19;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:4;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:29;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:1 same 1 oddball, with order counterbalanced across kids;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: 0.346
no
;CI of the difference reported; all same stats provided for pre vs posttest
no
43
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp1NA42
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoSpanishtypicalNANA12NA124NANANA1.652.251666052.25166605NANANANA0.61NA31NA5NANANANANANANA3.51
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebel-bilbel-bil
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 652/2423/3167; F1/F2/F3.2: 365/2615/3199; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
652242336526150.850.86NANA0.28666666670.1666666667manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
44
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp1NA43
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoCatalantypicalNANA12NA120NANANA2.31.7666918242.182384018NANANANA0.303NA34NA2.5NANANANANANANA1.51
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebel-bilbel-bil
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 652/2423/3167; F1/F2/F3.2: 367/2645/3206; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
652242336726450.850.86NANA0.050.14manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
45
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp1NA44
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoSpanishtypicalNANA12NA124NANANA-0.42.0091789372.286307066NANANANA0.622NA31NA5NANANANANANANA3.51
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebil-belbil-bel
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 367/2645/3206; F1/F2/F3.2: 652/2423/3167; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
367264565224230.860.85NANA0.16666666670.2866666667manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
46
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp1NA45
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoCatalantypicalNANA12NA120NANANA-0.031.8706148722.043819953NANANANA0.521NA34NA2.5NANANANANANANA1.51
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebil-belbil-bel
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 367/2645/3206; F1/F2/F3.2: 652/2423/3167; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
367264565224230.860.85NANA0.140.05manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
47
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp2NA46
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoSpanishtypicalNANA12NA185NANANA0.911.5242047111.835973856NANANANA0.543NA36NA4NANANANANANANA2.50.5
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebel-bilbel-bil
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 652/2423/3167; F1/F2/F3.2: 367/2645/3206; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
652242336726450.850.86NANA0.28666666670.1666666667manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
48
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp2NA47
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoCatalantypicalNANA12NA182NANANA1.541.7666918242.459512147NANANANA0.707NA33NA2.5NANANANANANANA20.5
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebel-bilbel-bil
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 652/2423/3167; F1/F2/F3.2: 367/2645/3206; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
652242336726450.850.86NANA0.050.14manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
49
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp2NA48
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoSpanishtypicalNANA12NA185NANANA0.21.4202816621.766691824NANANANA0.29NA36NA4NANANANANANANA2.50.5
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebil-belbil-bel
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 367/2645/3206; F1/F2/F3.2: 652/2423/3167; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
367264565224230.860.85NANA0.16666666670.2866666667manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
50
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp2NA49
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoCatalantypicalNANA12NA182NANANA0.382.3555890982.009178937NANANANA0.654NA33NA2.5NANANANANANANA20.5
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebil-belbil-bel
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 367/2645/3206; F1/F2/F3.2: 652/2423/3167; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
367264565224230.860.85NANA0.140.05manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
51
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp3NA50
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoSpanishtypicalNANA12NA354NANANA0.542.3555890982.3902301140.62NANANA0.16NA38NA2.5NANANANANANANA20.5
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebel-bilbel-bil
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 652/2423/3167; F1/F2/F3.2: 367/2645/3206; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
652242336726450.850.86NANA0.28666666670.1666666667manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.583333333333333; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
52
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp3NA51
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoSpanishtypicalNANA12NA354NANANA4.441.1777945492.251666055.97NANANA0.3NA38NA2.5NANANANANANANA20.5
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebil-belbil-bel
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 367/2645/3206; F1/F2/F3.2: 652/2423/3167; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
367264565224230.860.85NANA0.050.14manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 1; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
53
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp3NA52
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoCatalantypicalNANA12NA356NANANA2.941.9052558882.701999262.63NANANA-0.267NA28NA2.5NANANANANANANA1.51
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebel-bilbel-bil
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 652/2423/3167; F1/F2/F3.2: 367/2645/3206; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
652242336726450.850.86NANA0.16666666670.2866666667manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.666666666666667; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
54
Pons2012
Pons, F., Albareda-Castellot, B., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2012). The Interplay Between Input and Initial Biases: Asymmetries in Vowel Perception During the First Year of Life. Child Development 83(3), 965-976.
Pons, Albareda-Castellot, & Sebastian-Galles (2012)
yesSho Tsujiexp3NA53
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoCatalantypicalNANA12NA356NANANA0.312.5980762112.5980762110.35NANANA0.338NA28NA2.5NANANANANANANA1.51
crying, fussiness, exp error, eq error,criterion
nativebil-belbil-bel
not_looked_up
0010000
comments_F: average (of 10 hab & test stimuli); range available; F1/F2/F3.1: 367/2645/3206; F1/F2/F3.2: 652/2423/3167; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 263; max.f0: NA; range.f0: 190.5; pitch.contour: NA; other: 10 tokens per vowel; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1000; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
367264565224230.860.85NANA0.140.05manuscript0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:40;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:14000;nb.tokens.trial:5;visual.stim:static bw checkerboard;size.in:18.4390889145858;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:longest;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:24;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:2;CF.testDetails:2, same-switch, counterbalances;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.333333333333333; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
yes
; the stimuli differed in frequency for spanish and catalan learning infants: I more frequent for c, e for spanish
no
55
Polka 1994
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 20(2), 421-435.
Polka & Werker (1994) yesSho Tsujiexp2NA54
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA12NA135.68NANANANANANANANANANANANA34.42NA8.333333333NANANANANANANANANA
observer agreement, criterion, fussiness, eq error
nativedit-dat_dit-dAt_
no info given, they say "American /a/" so I'm guessing they actually mean A
1020000
comments_F: rangeover 6 tokens, for F2 only; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: NA; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 69; differ.in:
34323237561309NANANANA0.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:black-white static checkerboard;size.in:13;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:last.hab&change;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4: two switch, two same in that order;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
graph with means for CHT + VH part CF.recovery, but no error bars
no
56
Polka 1994
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 20(2), 421-435.
Polka & Werker (1994) yesSho Tsujiexp2NA55
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA12NA135.68NANANANANANANANANANANANA34.42NA8.333333333NANANANANANANANANA
observer agreement, criterion, fussiness, eq error
nonnativedut-dyt_du:t-dy:t_German1200000
comments_F: rangeover 6 tokens, for F2 only; F1/F2/F3.1: F2 742-1170; F1/F2/F3.2: F2 1658-1739; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: NA; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 69; differ.in:
NA956NA1698.5NANA187.7187.7NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:black-white static checkerboard;size.in:13;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:last.hab&change;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4: two switch, two same in that order;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
graph with means for CHT + VH part CF.recovery, but no error bars
no
57
Polka 1994
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 20(2), 421-435.
Polka & Werker (1994) yesSho Tsujiexp2NA56
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA12NA135.68NANANANANANANANANANANA34.42NA8.333333333NANANANANANANANANA
observer agreement, criterion, fussiness, eq error
nonnativedʊt-dʏt_dUt-dYt_German1200000
comments_F: rangeover 6 tokens, for F2 only; F1/F2/F3.1: F2 1099-1353; F1/F2/F3.2: F2 1566-1658; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: NA; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 69; differ.in:
NA1226NA1612NANA90.7590.75NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:black-white static checkerboard;size.in:13;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:last.hab&change;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4: two switch, two same in that order;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
graph with means for CHT + VH part CF.recovery, but no error bars
no
58
Polka 1994
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 20(2), 421-435.
Polka & Werker (1994) yesSho Tsujiexp2NA57
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA12NA198.52NANANANANANANANANANANANA53.84NA3.666666667NANANANANANANANANA
observer agreement, criterion, fussiness, eq error
nativedit-dat_dit-dAt_
no info given, they say "American /a/" so I'm guessing they actually mean A
1020000
comments_F: rangeover 6 tokens, for F2 only; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: NA; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 69; differ.in:
34323237561309NANANANA0.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:black-white static checkerboard;size.in:13;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:last.hab&change;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4: two switch, two same in that order;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
graph with means for CHT + VH part CF.recovery, but no error bars
no
59
Polka 1994
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 20(2), 421-435.
Polka & Werker (1994) yesSho Tsujiexp2NA58
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA12NA198.52NANANANANANANANANANANANA53.84NA3.666666667NANANANANANANANANA
observer agreement, criterion, fussiness, eq error
nonnativedut-dyt_du:t-dy:t_German1200000
comments_F: rangeover 6 tokens, for F2 only; F1/F2/F3.1: F2 742-1170; F1/F2/F3.2: F2 1658-1739; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: NA; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 69; differ.in:
NA956NA1698.5NANA187.7187.7NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:black-white static checkerboard;size.in:13;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:last.hab&change;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4: two switch, two same in that order;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
graph with means for CHT + VH part CF.recovery, but no error bars
no
60
Polka 1994
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 20(2), 421-435.
Polka & Werker (1994) yesSho Tsujiexp2NA59
eye-tracking
habituationCF
looking_time
within_twoEnglishtypicalNANA12NA198.52NANANANANANANANANANANANA53.84NA3.666666667NANANANANANANANANA
observer agreement, criterion, fussiness, eq error
nonnativedʊt-dʏt_dUt-dYt_German1200000
comments_F: rangeover 6 tokens, for F2 only; F1/F2/F3.1: F2 1099-1353; F1/F2/F3.2: F2 1566-1658; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: NA; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 69; differ.in:
NA1226NA1612NANA90.7590.75NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:50;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:NA;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:black-white static checkerboard;size.in:13;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:first;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:last.hab&change;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4: two switch, two same in that order;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
graph with means for CHT + VH part CF.recovery, but no error bars
no
61
Figueras2010
Figueras Montiu, M., & Bosch Galceran, L. (2010). Capacidades de discriminación fonética de un contraste vocálico nativo en el prematuro. Psicothema 22(4), 669-676. Retrieved from http://www.unioviedo.es/reunido/index.php/PST/article/view/8935
Figueras Montiu & Bosch Galceran (2010)
NAAlex Cristiaexp1NA60
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
premature
NANA14NA134NANANA-0.356.786.17NANANANANANA49NANANANANANANANANANANANAnativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = o, second u (averaging over fam and test tokens); dur: o 856 u 916.67; o 843.17 u 873.67; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; ACOUSTIC ANALYSES FROM SEB-GAL & BOSCH 2009; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.571428571428571; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
CORRECTED age;also report means, SD and t between first and last familiarization trial
no
62
Figueras2010
Figueras Montiu, M., & Bosch Galceran, L. (2010). Capacidades de discriminación fonética de un contraste vocálico nativo en el prematuro. Psicothema 22(4), 669-676. Retrieved from http://www.unioviedo.es/reunido/index.php/PST/article/view/8935
Figueras Montiu & Bosch Galceran (2010)
NAAlex Cristiaexp1NA61
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
typicalNANA14NA140NANANA3.56.445.69NANANANANANA31NANANANANANANANANANANANAnativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; ACOUSTIC ANALYSES FROM SEB-GAL & BOSCH 2009; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.928571428571429; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
;also report means, SD and t between first and last familiarization trial
no
63
Figueras2010
Figueras Montiu, M., & Bosch Galceran, L. (2010). Capacidades de discriminación fonética de un contraste vocálico nativo en el prematuro. Psicothema 22(4), 669-676. Retrieved from http://www.unioviedo.es/reunido/index.php/PST/article/view/8935
Figueras Montiu & Bosch Galceran (2010)
NAAlex Cristiaexp2NA62
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
premature
NANA14NA253NANANA3.2287.3348.87NANANANANANA81NANANANANANANANANANANANAnativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; ACOUSTIC ANALYSES FROM SEB-GAL & BOSCH 2009; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.642857142857143; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
CORRECTED age;also report means, SD and t between first and last familiarization trial
no
64
Figueras2010
Figueras Montiu, M., & Bosch Galceran, L. (2010). Capacidades de discriminación fonética de un contraste vocálico nativo en el prematuro. Psicothema 22(4), 669-676. Retrieved from http://www.unioviedo.es/reunido/index.php/PST/article/view/8935
Figueras Montiu & Bosch Galceran (2010)
NAAlex Cristiaexp2NA63
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
typicalNANA14NA264NANANA4.8284.3665.219NANANANANANA45NANANANANANANANANANANANAnativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; ACOUSTIC ANALYSES FROM SEB-GAL & BOSCH 2009; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.857142857142857; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
;also report means, SD and t between first and last familiarization trial
no
65
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp1a
monolingual_4m
64
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
typicalNANA12NA142NANANA3.216.905109226.30466494NA15.285NANANANA22NA2NANANANANANANA1.750
fussiness, parental
nativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
66
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp1a
monolingual_8m
65
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
typicalNANA12NA268NANANA5.3914.2723919926.027536814.523NANANANANA41NA2NANANANANANANA1.750
fussiness, parental
nativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
67
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp1abilingual_4m66
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA141.17NANANA2.755459.57081435.311622477NANANANANANA17NA2NANANANANANANA1.750
fussiness, parental
nativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
68
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp1abilingual_8m67
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA261NANANA-0.9346.1661008753.718135734NANANANANANA12.92NA2NANANANANANANA1.750
fussiness, parental
nativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
69
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp1b
bilingual_12m
68
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA379.59NANANA3.346.5817930695.7735026923.107NANANANANA23NA8NANANANANANANA50
fussiness, parental
nativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: o 549/1211, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: o 526/1131 u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
537.511713701022849.585896.635278.21173.915NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
author_provided
no
70
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp2a
bilingual_8m_2speakers
69
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA243.36NANANA0.885.4386.785NANANANANANANANA3NANANANANANANA20
fussiness, parental
nativedodi-dudi_dodi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; dur: o 894 u 884; dur test o 903 u 901; F1/F2/F3.1: o 498/1108, u 341/953; F1/F2/F3.2: o 495/1071 u 351/918; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 2 different female talkers; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
496.51089.5346935.5898.5892.5335.585181.4NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
NB!!!! AGE WAS NOT PROVIDED OTHER THAN '8MO';author provided SDs (except for E2a & 2b, where they are given in the article)
no
71
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp2b
bilingual_8m_1speaker
70
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA243.36NANANA1.1314.8654.257NANANANANANANANA3NANANANANANANA10
fussiness, parental
nativedo-du_do-du_
not_looked_up
1010000
comments_F: note, this was a subselection, and they are shown in a figure so we could eye-ball them (ST: not sure where the current values come from?); F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 1 talker; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
496.83333331095.611111344.3333333941.3888889NANANANANANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
NB!!!! AGE WAS NOT PROVIDED OTHER THAN '8MO';author provided SDs (except for E2a & 2b, where they are given in the article)
no
72
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp3
monolingual_4m
71
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
typicalNANA12NA121.68NANANA5.7536.2353829074.6649901754.03NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAnativededi-dudi_dedi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1210100
comments_F: e taken from bosch & seb-gal 03; averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: e 452/2729, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: e 443/2685, u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers for u, 5 different female talkers for e (this seems odd, perhaps there's an error and it wasn't the same stimuli as in bosh & seb-gal 2003?); voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
45227293701022NANANANANANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
NB!!!! AGE WAS NOT PROVIDED OTHER THAN '8MO';author provided SDs (except for E2a & 2b, where they are given in the article)
no
73
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp3
monolingual_8m
72
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
typicalNANA12NA243.36NANANA5.3135.704220666.0737248322.965NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAnativededi-dudi_dedi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1210100
comments_F: e taken from bosch & seb-gal 03; averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: e 452/2729, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: e 443/2685, u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers for u, 5 different female talkers for e (this seems odd, perhaps there's an error and it wasn't the same stimuli as in bosh & seb-gal 2003?); voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
45227293701022NANANANANANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
NB!!!! AGE WAS NOT PROVIDED OTHER THAN '8MO';author provided SDs (except for E2a & 2b, where they are given in the article)
no
74
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp3bilingual_4m73
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA121.68NANANA4.9325.1961524235.3809045092.768NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAnativededi-dudi_dedi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1210100
comments_F: e taken from bosch & seb-gal 03; averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: e 452/2729, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: e 443/2685, u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers for u, 5 different female talkers for e (this seems odd, perhaps there's an error and it wasn't the same stimuli as in bosh & seb-gal 2003?); voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
45227293701022NANANANANANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
NB!!!! AGE WAS NOT PROVIDED OTHER THAN '8MO';author provided SDs (except for E2a & 2b, where they are given in the article)
no
75
Sebastian2009
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental science, 12(6), 874–887.
Sebastián-Gallés & Bosch (2009)yesAlex Cristiaexp3bilingual_8m74
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA243.36NANANA4.123.8336057875.7735026923.568NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAnativededi-dudi_dedi-dudi_
not_looked_up
1210100
comments_F: e taken from bosch & seb-gal 03; averages over all tokens; first stim = fam, second stim = test; Formant frequency mean values in Hz of the first two formants were obtained from a 150–200 ms central section of the target vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: e 452/2729, u 377/995; F1/F2/F3.2: e 443/2685, u 363/1049; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 6 different female talkers for u, 5 different female talkers for e (this seems odd, perhaps there's an error and it wasn't the same stimuli as in bosh & seb-gal 2003?); voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
45227293701022NANANANANANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:12;visual.stim:simple, colorful animated images;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:2 same, 2 switch;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
NB!!!! AGE WAS NOT PROVIDED OTHER THAN '8MO';author provided SDs (except for E2a & 2b, where they are given in the article)
no
76
Bosch2003
Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2003). Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life. Language and Speech 46(2-3), 217-243.
Bosch & Sebastian-Galles (2003)yesSho Tsujiexp1NA75
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_twoCatalantypicalNANA12NA139NANANA2.7465.2295.4163.295NANANA0.855NA25NA3NANANANANANANA20
crying, fussiness, failure to reach familiarization criterion, parental interference
nativedεði -deði_dEDi -deDi_AEnglish1000010
comments_F: F1 & F2 taken from 150-200 ms central section of vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: 675/2524; F1/F2/F3.2: 442/2714; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: first syllable stressed. 18 tokens from 5 female talkers. ; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
67525244422714761.9792.8NANANANANA0
fam.length:120;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:image on screen;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4,same-switch-same-switch, order counterbalanced;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.833333333333333; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
77
Bosch2003
Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2003). Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life. Language and Speech 46(2-3), 217-243.
Bosch & Sebastian-Galles (2003)yesSho Tsujiexp1NA76
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_twoSpanishtypicalNANA12NA140NANANA3.0434.6796.3762.616NANANA0.776NA38NA3NANANANANANANA20
crying, fussiness, failure to reach familiarization criterion, parental interference
nonnativedεði -deði_dEDi -deDi_AEnglish1000010
comments_F: F1 & F2 taken from 150-200 ms central section of vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: 675/2525; F1/F2/F3.2: 442/2715; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: first syllable stressed. 18 tokens from 5 female talkers. ; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
67525254422715761.9792.8NANANANANA0
fam.length:120;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:image on screen;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4,same-switch-same-switch, order counterbalanced;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.833333333333333; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
78
Bosch2003
Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2003). Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life. Language and Speech 46(2-3), 217-243.
Bosch & Sebastian-Galles (2003)yesSho Tsujiexp1NA77
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA138NANANA4.1635.5185.1352.93NANANA0.575NA23NA2NANANANANANANA20
crying, fussiness, failure to reach familiarization criterion, parental interference
nativedεði -deði_dEDi -deDi_AEnglish1000010
comments_F: F1 & F2 taken from 150-200 ms central section of vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: 675/2526; F1/F2/F3.2: 442/2716; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: first syllable stressed. 18 tokens from 5 female talkers. ; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
67525264422716761.9792.8NANANANANA0
fam.length:120;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:image on screen;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4,same-switch-same-switch, order counterbalanced;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.75; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
79
Bosch2003
Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2003). Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life. Language and Speech 46(2-3), 217-243.
Bosch & Sebastian-Galles (2003)yesSho Tsujiexp2NA78
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_twoCatalantypicalNANA12NA249NANANA5.1266.5847.8612.571NANANA0.555NA27NA1NANANANANANANA1.3333333330
crying, fussiness, failure to reach familiarization criterion, parental interference, eq error
nativedεði -deði_dEDi -deDi_AEnglish1000010
comments_F: F1 & F2 taken from 150-200 ms central section of vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: 675/2524; F1/F2/F3.2: 442/2714; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: first syllable stressed. 18 tokens from 5 female talkers. ; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
67525244422714761.9792.8NANANANANA0
fam.length:120;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:image on screen;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4,same-switch-same-switch, order counterbalanced;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.916666666666667; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
80
Bosch2003
Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2003). Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life. Language and Speech 46(2-3), 217-243.
Bosch & Sebastian-Galles (2003)yesSho Tsujiexp2NA79
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_twoSpanishtypicalNANA12NA245NANANA-1.3887.0826.0571.02NANANA0.754NA27NA3NANANANANANANA1.3333333330
crying, fussiness, failure to reach familiarization criterion, parental interference, eq error
nonnativedεði -deði_dEDi -deDi_AEnglish1000010
comments_F: F1 & F2 taken from 150-200 ms central section of vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: 675/2525; F1/F2/F3.2: 442/2715; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: first syllable stressed. 18 tokens from 5 female talkers. ; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
67525254422715761.9792.8NANANANANA0
fam.length:120;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:image on screen;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4,same-switch-same-switch, order counterbalanced;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.333333333333333; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
81
Bosch2003
Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2003). Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life. Language and Speech 46(2-3), 217-243.
Bosch & Sebastian-Galles (2003)yesSho Tsujiexp2NA80
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA243NANANA-0.015.4495.927NANANANA0.514NA32NA2NANANANANANANA1.3333333330
crying, fussiness, failure to reach familiarization criterion, parental interference, eq error
nativedεði -deði_dEDi -deDi_AEnglish1000010
comments_F: F1 & F2 taken from 150-200 ms central section of vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: 675/2526; F1/F2/F3.2: 442/2716; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: first syllable stressed. 18 tokens from 5 female talkers. ; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
67525264422716761.9792.8NANANANANA0
fam.length:120;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:image on screen;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4,same-switch-same-switch, order counterbalanced;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.5; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
82
Bosch2003
Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2003). Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life. Language and Speech 46(2-3), 217-243.
Bosch & Sebastian-Galles (2003)yesSho Tsujiexp3NA81
eye-tracking
familiarization
HPP
looking_time
within_two
Catalan, Spanish
bilingualNANA12NA371NANANA4.7236.0425.0973.116NANANA0.567NA71NA3NANANANANANANA20fussinessnativedεði -deði_dEDi -deDi_AEnglish1000010
comments_F: F1 & F2 taken from 150-200 ms central section of vowel; F1/F2/F3.1: 675/2526; F1/F2/F3.2: 442/2716; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: first syllable stressed. 18 tokens from 5 female talkers. ; voice: female; IDS: yes; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 65; differ.in:
67525264422716761.9792.8NANANANANA0
fam.length:120;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:25000;nb.tokens.trial:6;visual.stim:image on screen;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:29.5;side.degrees:35;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:same-switch;CF.ntest:4;CF.testDetails:4,same-switch-same-switch, order counterbalanced;CHT.responsetimeout:NA;CHT.criterion:NA;CHT.criterionByChance:NA;CHT.maximum.trials:NA;CHT.Max.nb.visits:NA;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.833333333333333; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
83
Tsao2004
Tsao, F.-M., Liu, H.-M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 75(4), 1067–1084. Retrieved from http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16017499
Tsao Liu, & Kuhl (2004)yesAlex CristiaonlyNA82behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneEnglishtypicalNANA28NA180.0864NA73.6150NA10.98NANANANANANANA18.252NA6NANANANANANANA06criterionnonnativeu-yu:-y:
not_looked_up
0200000
comments_F: single tokens, synthesized; probably more info in Kuhl et al. 1992; F1/F2/F3.1: 289/630; F1/F2/F3.2: 255/1947; min.f0: 120; average.f0: 120; max.f0: 120; range.f0: 0; pitch.contour: flat; other: pitch etc. found in Cardillo 2009; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 1729; SOA: 2000; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 68; differ.in:
2896302551947271271271271NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:5000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:human.distraction;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:5000;CHT.criterion:3 consecutive;CHT.criterionByChance:0.125;CHT.maximum.trials:30;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
;range also given
no
84
Cardillo2010
Cardillo, G.C. (2010). Predicting the predictors: Individual differences in longitudinal relationships between infant phonetic perception, toddler vocabulary, and preschooler language and phonological awareness. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.
Cardillo (2010)noAlex Cristiaonly
6mo_measure
83behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneEnglishtypicalNANA28NA212.6358NA77.1250NA8.81NANANANANANANA12.168NA0NANANAd-prime1.520.57NA00criterionnonnativeu-yu:-y:
not_looked_up
0200000
comments_F: single tokens, synthesized; probably more info in Kuhl et al. 1992; F1/F2/F3.1: 289/630; F1/F2/F3.2: 255/1947; min.f0: 120; average.f0: 120; max.f0: 120; range.f0: 0; pitch.contour: flat; other: NA; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 1729; SOA: 2000; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 68; differ.in:
2896302551947271271271271NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:5000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:human.distraction;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:5000;CHT.criterion:3 consecutive;CHT.criterionByChance:0.125;CHT.maximum.trials:30;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
PC IS PCMAX: the percentage of infant’s correct responses will be expressed as adjusted maximum percent correct (PCmax). PCmax is preferred rather than raw percent correct because the latter measure can be confounded by response bias. PCmax is defined as
yes
85
Cardillo2010
Cardillo, G.C. (2010). Predicting the predictors: Individual differences in longitudinal relationships between infant phonetic perception, toddler vocabulary, and preschooler language and phonological awareness. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.
Cardillo (2010)noAlex Cristiaonly
11mo_measure
83behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneEnglishtypicalNANA27NA323.6688NA82.3450NA9.35NANANANANANANANANA0NANANAd-prime1.960.7NA00criterionnonnativeu-yu:-y:
not_looked_up
0200000
comments_F: single tokens, synthesized; probably more info in Kuhl et al. 1992; F1/F2/F3.1: 289/630; F1/F2/F3.2: 255/1947; min.f0: 120; average.f0: 120; max.f0: 120; range.f0: 0; pitch.contour: flat; other: NA; voice: NA; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 1729; SOA: 2000; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 68; differ.in:
2896302551947271271271271NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:5000;nb.tokens.trial:1;visual.stim:human.distraction;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:5000;CHT.criterion:3 consecutive;CHT.criterionByChance:0.125;CHT.maximum.trials:30;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
PC IS PCMAX: the percentage of infant’s correct responses will be expressed as adjusted maximum percent correct (PCmax). PCmax is preferred rather than raw percent correct because the latter measure can be confounded by response bias. PCmax is defined as
yes
86
Marean1992
Marean, G., Werner, L., & Kuhl, P. (1992). Vowel categorization by very young infants. Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 396-405.
Marean, Werner, & Kuhl (1992)yesAlex Cristiaonly2mo84behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneEnglishtypicalNANA10NA60.84NA8050NA41.42583735NANANANANANANANANA11NANANANANANANA45
criterion, fussiness, hearing
nativea-iA-i
not_looked_up
0020000
comments_F: [copied from Kuhl 1979] F1-F3. Steady-state.; F1/F2/F3.1: 775/1064/2614; F1/F2/F3.2: 263/2378/3099; min.f0: 132; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 92; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: With pitch variation ( monotonous and falling mixed both pre and post). Synthesized on terminal analog serial synthesizer. Steady-state, male talker characteristics. F1-F3+ constant (for a and i) upper formants (f4=F10). 500 ms duration.; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 200; SOA: 0; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
775106426323785005005005000.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:7000;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:human.distraction;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:7000;CHT.criterion:9 out of 10;CHT.criterionByChance:0.03125;CHT.maximum.trials:40;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
trials to criterion from the conditioning phase, not the shaping phase; trials to criterion from the categorization phase also reported; d' is shown in graphs but calculated for the group, not individually; percent correct is for the first occurrence in t
no
87
Marean1992
Marean, G., Werner, L., & Kuhl, P. (1992). Vowel categorization by very young infants. Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 396-405.
Marean, Werner, & Kuhl (1992)yesAlex Cristiaonly3mo85behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneEnglishtypicalNANA10NA91.26NA9050NA31.6227766NANANANANANANANANA14NANANANANANANA21
criterion, fussiness, hearing
nativea-iA-i
not_looked_up
0020000
comments_F: [copied from Kuhl 1979] F1-F3. Steady-state.; F1/F2/F3.1: 775/1064/2614; F1/F2/F3.2: 263/2378/3099; min.f0: 132; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 92; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: With pitch variation ( monotonous and falling mixed both pre and post). Synthesized on terminal analog serial synthesizer. Steady-state, male talker characteristics. F1-F3+ constant (for a and i) upper formants (f4=F10). 500 ms duration.; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 200; SOA: 0; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
775106426323785005005005000.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:7000;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:human.distraction;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:7000;CHT.criterion:9 out of 10;CHT.criterionByChance:0.03125;CHT.maximum.trials:40;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
trials to criterion from the conditioning phase, not the shaping phase; trials to criterion from the categorization phase also reported; d' is shown in graphs but calculated for the group, not individually; percent correct is for the first occurrence in t
no
88
Marean1992
Marean, G., Werner, L., & Kuhl, P. (1992). Vowel categorization by very young infants. Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 396-405.
Marean, Werner, & Kuhl (1992)yesAlex Cristiaonly
6mo_measure
86behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneEnglishtypicalNANA10NA182.52NA10050NA17.89265914NANANANANANANANANA18NANANANANANANA24
criterion, fussiness, hearing
nativea-iA-i
not_looked_up
0020000
comments_F: [copied from Kuhl 1979] F1-F3. Steady-state.; F1/F2/F3.1: 775/1064/2614; F1/F2/F3.2: 263/2378/3099; min.f0: 132; average.f0: NA; max.f0: 92; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: With pitch variation ( monotonous and falling mixed both pre and post). Synthesized on terminal analog serial synthesizer. Steady-state, male talker characteristics. F1-F3+ constant (for a and i) upper formants (f4=F10). 500 ms duration.; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: synthetic; ISI: 200; SOA: 0; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 70; differ.in:
775106426323785005005005000.059267595770.09346106843
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.5;max.trial.duration:7000;nb.tokens.trial:NA;visual.stim:human.distraction;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:7000;CHT.criterion:9 out of 10;CHT.criterionByChance:0.03125;CHT.maximum.trials:40;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
SD of PC is 0; but as such difficult to calculate valid ES. Therefore, mean of al CHT efect sizes chosen as SD
no
89
Nittrouer2001
Nittrouer, S. (2001). Challenging the notion of innate phonetic boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1598-1605.
Nittrouer (2001)yesAlex Cristiaonlyvowel87behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneEnglishtypicalNANA23NANANANANANANANANANANANANANA243.36NANANANANANANANANANANANAnative
sa-su or ʃa-ʃu
sA-su or SA-Su
AEnglish0220100
comments_F: NA; F1/F2/F3.1: NA; F1/F2/F3.2: NA; min.f0: NA; average.f0: NA; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: NA; voice: NA; IDS: NA; naturalness: natural; ISI: NA; SOA: 2000; ambient.noise: NA; snr: 68; differ.in:
7561309380992NANANANA0.059267595770.08650814733
R.Daland corpus, overall vowel counts
0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:6000;nb.tokens.trial:3;visual.stim:human.distraction;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:6000;CHT.criterion:8 out of 10;CHT.criterionByChance:0.03125;CHT.maximum.trials:15;CHT.Max.nb.visits:4;
proportion.infants.passed: 0.65; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
noNAno
90
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp1NA88behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA17NA107.26NA55.750NA8.7NANANANANANANA66.84NA17.25NANANAd-prime2.110059938NANA014.25
criterion, scheduling, eq error, exp error
nonnativedɒt-dʌtdAt-dVtAEnglish0010000
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 653/898/2482; F1/F2/F3.2: 672/1454/2425; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 120.5; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 4 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
6538986721454NANA171.25152NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:4;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no
;using change score/SD change score (Within-subject version of formula 1) for d
no
91
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp1NA89behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA17NA107.26NA63.450NA9.7NANANANANANANA66.84NA17.25NANANAd-prime2.352595563NANA014.25
criterion, scheduling, eq error, exp error
nonnativedʌt-dɒtdVt-dAtAEnglish0010000
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 672/1454/2425; F1/F2/F3.2: 653/898/2482; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 120.5; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 4 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
6721454653898NANA152171.25NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:4;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
92
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp1NA90behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA18NA143.18NA56.750NA12.2NANANANANANANA86.26NA17.25NANANAd-prime2.875567577NANA014.25
criterion, scheduling, eq error, exp error
nonnativedɒt-dʌtdAt-dVtAEnglish0010000
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 653/898/2482; F1/F2/F3.2: 672/1454/2425; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 120.5; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 4 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
6538986721454NANA171.25152NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:4;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
93
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp1NA91behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA18NA143.18NA65.150NA9.8NANANANANANANA86.26NA17.25NANANAd-prime2.309882152NANA014.25
criterion, scheduling, eq error, exp error
nonnativedʌt-dɒtdVt-dAtAEnglish0010000
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 672/1454/2425; F1/F2/F3.2: 653/898/2482; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 120.5; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 4 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
6721454653898NANA152171.25NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:4;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
94
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp2NA92behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA15NA103.76NA51.150NA11.8NANANANANANANA83.26NA7.5NANANAd-prime3.046746899NANA05.5
criterion, scheduling
nativedet-dɛtdet-dEtAEnglish0000010
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 355/1879/2576; F1/F2/F3.2: 412/1838/2550; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 115.666666666667; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 3 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
35518794121838NANA100.3333333107.6666667NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:3;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
95
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp2NA93behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA15NA103.76NA60.150NA8.6NANANANANANANA83.26NA7.5NANANAd-prime2.220510452NANA05.5
criterion, scheduling
nativedɛt-detdEt-detAEnglish0000010
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 412/1838/2550; F1/F2/F3.2: 355/1879/2576; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 115.666666666667; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 3 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
41218383551879NANA107.6666667100.3333333NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:3;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
96
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp2NA94behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA15NA166.6NA57.950NA7.8NANANANANANANA44.42NA7.5NANANAd-prime2.01395134NANA05.5
criterion, scheduling
nativedet-dɛtdet-dEtAEnglish0000010
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 355/1879/2576; F1/F2/F3.2: 412/1838/2550; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 115.666666666667; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 3 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
35518794121838NANA100.3333333107.6666667NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:3;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
97
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp2NA95behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA15NA166.6NA60.950NA12.1NANANANANANANA44.42NA7.5NANANAd-prime3.124206566NANA05.5
criterion, scheduling
nativedɛt-detdEt-detAEnglish0000010
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 412/1838/2550; F1/F2/F3.2: 355/1879/2576; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 115.666666666667; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 3 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
41218383551879NANA107.6666667100.3333333NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:3;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
98
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp3NA96behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA12NA97.26NA61.850NA9.8NANANANANANANA46.42NA5NANANAd-prime2.829016319NANA04
criterion, scheduling, eq error, exp error
nativedet-døtdet-d2t
Danish_2OR9?
0000100
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 355/1879/2576; F1/F2/F3.2: 412/1838/2550; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 120.333333333333; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 3 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
35518794121838NANA100.333333394NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:3;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
99
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp3NA97behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA12NA97.26NA54.450NA6.9NANANANANANANA46.42NA5NANANAd-prime1.991858429NANA04
criterion, scheduling, eq error, exp error
nativedøt-detd2t-det
Danish_2OR9?
0000100
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 349/1620/2284; F1/F2/F3.2: 412/1838/2550; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 120.333333333333; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 3 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
34916204121838NANA94100.3333333NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:3;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
100
Polka2011
Polka, Linda, & Bohn, O.-S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.
Polka & Bohn (2011)yesSho Tsujiexp3NA98behaviorconditioningCHT
pc_head_turns
within_oneDanishtypicalNANA12NA123.47NA55.850NA12.1NANANANANANANA108.68NA5NANANAd-prime3.492969129NANA04
criterion, scheduling, eq error, exp error
nativedet-døtdet-d2t
Danish_2OR9?
0000100
comments_F: mean (range, length, pitch also available); F1/F2/F3.1: 412/1838/2550; F1/F2/F3.2: 349/1620/2284; min.f0: NA; average.f0: 120.333333333333; max.f0: NA; range.f0: NA; pitch.contour: NA; other: 3 tokens per vowel; voice: male; IDS: no; naturalness: natural; ISI: 1500; SOA: NA; ambient.noise: NA; snr: NA; differ.in:
41218383491620NANA100.333333394NANANA0
fam.length:NA;habituation.criterion:NA;proportion.same.change:0.333333333333333;max.trial.duration:4800;nb.tokens.trial:3;visual.stim:NA;size.in:NA;dist.from.child.in:NA;side.degrees:NA;CF.longest.first:NA;CF.window.size:NA;CF.min.hab:NA;CF.max.hab:NA;CF.contrast:NA;CF.ntest:NA;CF.testDetails:NA;CHT.responsetimeout:4800;CHT.criterion:7 out of 8;CHT.criterionByChance:0.0625;CHT.maximum.trials:25;CHT.Max.nb.visits:2;
proportion.infants.passed: NA; partial.eta.squared: NA; d: NA
no;no
Loading...
 
 
 
Sheet1
Sheet2