Lenses: all Canon SLR and Rangefinder Lenses

	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q
1	Table of all Canon SLR and Rangefinder Lenses ever											Find this table in the downloads section at ChristianSchnalzger.de, © 2025
2	EF and EF-S Lenses		1987-2o18			Scroll down for FD, FL, R and M39/LTM rangefinder series, and links to other manufacturers. This table does not contain evil lenses (EF-M, EOS-R).
3	Pull above 'FX' tab down for long entry; use right scrollbar	Measured	Full Frame Coverage?	L	IS	USM	Specialty Lens	Weight (g)	Focus	MF?	Close-up (cm)	Filter	Dia x Length (mm)	Introduced	MSRP	Notes and Geekery

4	Additional information to above columns (numbers: see footnotes at the end of this EF table):		1)	2)	└ IS generation; EVs of shutter speed gain promised over 1/shutter rule			└ white: specified weight; grey: measured weight without caps, tripod collar, etc; a (2) indicates two samples measured with identical result		3)					└ original recommended retail price in USD or Yen (note that Canon has been increasing them massively over the lifetime of many lenses! If possible, this list aims to compile the initial MSRPs)	see footnotes 4-9 for all information pertaining to more than one lens
5	click here for patents that Canon has been depriving us of - or see my separate table in the downloads section at ChristianSchnalzger.de
6
7	EF 8-15 mm f/4 L Fisheye USM		Y				Fisheye (circular to diagonal zoom)	543	USM	Y	16	rear	79 x 83	2010	1249	First fisheye zoom (the Nikon only came in 2o17), going from circular to diagonal on FF
8	EF-S 1o-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM	1o-21	N					383	USM	Y		77	84 x 90	2004	799
9	EF-S 1o-18 mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM	1o-17/4.6-5.7	N					240	USM	N		67	75 x 72	2014	299	covers full frame 14-18mm
10	EF 11-24 mm f/4 L USM	11-23/4.1 T4.3-4.6	Y					1166	USM	Y	28	rear	108 x 243	2015	2999
11	EF 14 mm f/2.8 L II USM	T3.3	Y				Cine version available, see right	643	USM	Y	20	rear	80 x 94	2007	2199	aka CN-E 14 mm T3.1 FP X and L F
12	EF 14 mm f/2.8 L USM		Y					538	USM	?	25	rear	77 x 89	1991	2199	same layout as FD version, but optical performance suggests new design: quite a bit less bad, although heavy CA. also, now 6 instead of 5 aperture petals
13	Cine CN-E 14-35mm T1.7 L S / SP		N				Cine Lens (APS only)	3400	manual	Y	60	114	? x 241	2023	21999
14	Cine CN-E 14.5-6o mm T2.6 L S		N				Cine Lens (APS only)	4500	manual	Y	70				42750
15	EF 15 mm f/2.8 Fisheye	15.3/2.8	Y				Fisheye (diagonal)	319	AF	Y	20	rear	73 x 62	1987	699	equisolid ● not the same as the FD: EF is a simpler 8/7 design with 5 petals; FD was 1o/9 with 6 petals and inbuilt filters
16	Cine Servo 15-12o mm T2.95-3.95		(Y)				Cine Lens	3400	manual	Y	85	114	295 x 167	2022	31000	inbuilt 1.5x extender for up to 18o mm; FF coverage if and only if extender is engaged ● T2.95 only at 15-9o mm
17	EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM	16-82	N					571	USM	Y		72	82 x 88	2009	799
18	Cine CN-E 15.5-47 mm T2.8 L S		N				Cine Lens (APS only)	2200	manual	Y	50
19
20	EF 16-35 mm f/2.8 L III USM	16.48-34/2.9 T3.1-3.2	Y					789	USM	Y	28	82	89 x 128	2016	2199	cine mod with manual aperture available: newsshooter.com/2017/11/16/technical-farm-cine-modded-canon-lenses/
21	EF 16-35 mm f/2.8 L II USM	17-34/2.9 T3.3-3.4	Y					643	USM	Y	28	82	89 x 112	2007	1599
22	EF 16-35 mm f/2.8 L USM	16.48-34/2.9 T3.5	Y					600	USM	Y	28	77	84 x 103	2001	1499	IMHO the worst lens Canon ever made (and I have used the 1oo-2oo/5.6 which is normally given this title!)
23	EF 16-35 mm f/4 L IS USM	T4.5-4.6	Y					617	USM	Y	28	77	83 x 113	2014	1199
24	TS-E 17 mm f/4 L		Y				Tilt/Shift	820	manual	Y	28	none	89 x 107	2009	2149	All TS lenses are manual focus only, but still only set their aperture through the camera; there is no aperture dial
25	EF 17-4o mm f/4 L USM	17.49-39/4.1 T4.5	Y					474	USM	Y	28	77	84 x 97	2003	799	Similarly bad reputation than the 16-35/2.8 Mk I
26	EF 17-35 mm f/2.8 L USM	18-34/2.9 T3	Y					534	USM	Y	42	77	84 x 96	1996
27	Cine Servo CN7x17 17-12o mm T2.95 Servo		N				Cine Lens (APS-H only)	2900	manual	Y	85	114	172 x 263	2022	23850	T2.95 only at 17-91 mm
28	EF-S 17-85 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM	18-82/4.1-5.8	N					469	USM	Y		67	79 x 92	2004	599
29	EF-S 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS USM	18-52/2.9	N					652	USM	Y		77	84 x 111	2006	1149
30	EF-S 18-2oo mm f/3.5-5.6 IS	19-193/3.6-5.9	N					596	AF	Y		72	79 x 102	2008	699
31	EF-S 18-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS	19-131/3.6-5.9	N					452	AF	Y		67	75 x 101	2009	499
32	EF-S 18-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM		N					515	USM	Y		67	77 x 96	2016	599
33	EF-S 18-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM		N					464	STM	N		67	77 x 96	2012	549
34	Cine Compact Servo CN-E 18-8o mm T4.4L IS KAS S		N				Cine Lens (APS only)	1200	manual	Y	50	77	182 x 93	2022	4600
35	EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6		N					190	AF	Y		58	69 x 80	2003	199
36	EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 USM		N						AF	Y		58	69 x 80	2003
37	EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 II		N					182	AF	Y		58	69 x 80	2005	199
38	EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 II USM		N						AF	Y		58	69 x 80	2005
39	EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 III		N						AF	Y
40	EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS		N					200	AF	Y		58	69 x 70	2007	199
41	EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II		N					198	AF	Y		58	69 x 70	2011	249
42	EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM		N					205	STM	N		58	69 x 75	2013	249
43	EF-S 18-55 mm f/4-5.6 STM		N					213	STM	N		58	67 x 62	2017
44	EF-S 18-55 mm f/4-5.6 IS STM		N					213	STM	N		58	67 x 62	2017	249
45
46	Cine Sumire CN-E 2o mm T1.5 FP X and L F		Y				Cine Lens (FF)	1100	manual	Y	30	114	118 x 1o2	2019	7410	full frame EF or PL mount cine lens ● this is the only cine prime NOT to be derived from an existing EF photo lens ● very similiar rendition to the Sigma Art 2o T1.5, but the Sigma shows less field curvature and therefore more separation in the edges
47	EF 2o mm f/2.8 USM	T3.2	Y					394	USM	Y	25	72	78 x 71	1992	539
48	Cine CN-E 2o-5o mm T2.4		Y				Cine Lens (FF)	3300	manual	Y	60	114	? x 241	2022	21999	full frame EF or PL mount cine lens (in fact, it's just the above 14-35/1.7 with an extender screwed into the back!)
49	EF 2o-35 mm f/2.8 L	21-34	Y					549	AF	Y	50	72	89 x 79	1989	1199	not the same as the FD: f/2.8 instead of f/3.5
50	EF 2o-35 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM	T4.1-5.1	Y					331, 333	USM	Y	34	77	84 x 69	1993	449
51
52	EF 22-55 mm f/4-5.6 USM		Y					175	USM	Y	35	58	66 x 59	1998		shortest EF zoom (by zoom factor) ● Great value for money: very cheap and very decent
53	EF 24 mm f/1.4 L II USM	25/1.45 T1.6	Y				Cine version available, see right	647	USM	Y	25	77	94 x 87	2008	1549	aka CN-E 24 mm T1.5 FP X and L F ● The Sigma Art Mk I is sharper
54	EF 24 mm f/1.4 L USM	25/1.45	Y					550	USM	?	25	77	84 x 77	1997	1349	whilst a functional copy of the lenses has demonstrated focus without being attached to a camera, I came across a "spares" listing on ebay detailling that neither AF nor MF worked, and Canon refused service due to discontinued spares!! the lack of MF might be due to a mechanical problem, i.e. not a USM problem, but beware! ● The Sigma Art Mk I is orders of magnitude sharper
55	EF 24 mm f/2.8	T3.4!	Y					270	AF	Y	25	58	67 x 48	1988	349	not the same as the FD: now 1o instead of 9 lenses
56	EF 24 mm f/2.8 IS USM	25/2.9 T2.9	Y					270	USM	Y	20	58	68 x 56	2012	599
57	EF-S 24 mm f/2.8 STM	25/2.9	N					125	STM	N	16	52	68 x 23	2014	149
58	TS-E 24 mm f/3.5 L II		Y				Tilt/Shift	786	manual	Y	21	82	89 x 107	2009	1899
59	TS-E 24 mm f/3.5 L		Y				Tilt/Shift	570	manual	Y	30	72	86 x 78	1991	1349
60	EF 24-1o5 mm f/4 L IS USM II	T4.3-4.6	Y					789	USM	Y	45	77	84 x 118	2016	1099
61	EF 24-1o5 mm f/4 L IS USM	25-1o3/4.1 T5.2!	Y					665	USM	Y	45	77	84 x 107	2005	999
62	EF 24-1o5 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM	T3.8-6.3	Y					523	STM	N	40	77	83 x 104	2014	599
63	EF 24-85 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM	25-82 T4.3-5.4!	Y					360	USM	Y	50	67	73 x 69	1996	399	f/3.5 only at 24-34 mm! f/4 by 35 mm, f/4.5 by 5o mm
64	EF 24-7o mm f/2.8 L II USM	25-68/2.91 T2.9-3.1	Y					805	USM	Y	38	82	89 x 113	2012	1899	cine mod with manual aperture available: newsshooter.com/2017/11/16/technical-farm-cine-modded-canon-lenses/
65	EF 24-7o mm f/2.8 L USM	25-68/2.9 T3.5!	Y					910	USM	Y	38	77	83 x 124	2002	2099
66	EF 24-7o mm f/4 L IS USM	T4-4.1	Y					600	USM	Y	20	77	83 x 93	2012	1499
67	Cine CN1ox25 25-25o mm T2.95-3.95 Servo		(Y)				Cine Lens	3060	manual	Y	120	114	282 x 187	2020	30999	inbuilt 1.5x extender for 37.5-375 mm; FF coverage if and only if extender is engaged ● T2.95 only at 25-187 mm, with extender T4.4 37.5-281 mm
68
69	EF 28 mm f/1.8 USM	T2.1	Y					310	USM	Y	25	58	74 x 56	1995	449	lens can manually focus without power, as confirmed by owner: dpreview.com/forums/thread/4547784#forum-post-64760189 ● perhaps the most characterful bokeh of any EF lens - love or hate it ● about as sharp as the Sigma pre-Art 28/1.8, and visibly behind any Sigma Art
70	EF 28 mm f/2.8 IS USM	29/2.9 T2.8!	Y					257	USM	Y	23	58	68 x 52	2012	549
71	EF 28 mm f/2.8		Y					185	AF	Y	30	52	67 x 43	1987	249	not the same as the FD: EF is a simpler 5/5 design; FD was 7/7!
72	EF 28-3oo mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM	T4.3-6.9!!!	Y					1700	USM	Y	70	77	92 x 184	2004	2499	167o g specified ● not very good throughout, and inferior to the 28-135 ● 28-39mm = f/3.5, 4o-59mm = f/4.o, 6o-69mm = f/4.5, 7o-1o9mm = f/5.o, 11o-3oomm = f/5.6
73	EF 28-2oo mm f/3.5-5.6 USM		Y					505	USM	Y	45	72	78 x 90	2000	799	whenever a USM and a non-USM version of a lens came out in the same year, they are optically identical ● very bad reviews, which are somewhat justified, but the 28-3oo L is not stellar, either
74	EF 28-2oo mm f/3.5-5.6		Y					495	AF	Y	45	72	78 x 90	2000		wide-angle horrible outside image centre; 35mm is already f/4. gets better around 135mm ● overall not much worse than the 28-3oo L, but disappointing reviews throughout. many find the Nikon 28-2oo G visibly superior ● very compact
75	EF 28-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM	29-131/3.6-5.8 T4.3-6.6!!!	Y					537	USM	Y	50	72	78 x 97	1998	499	ALL 28-… zooms measured start at 29 mm! ● strong CA ● "generally considered a mid-range performer, with a good value to performance ratio that makes it popular as either a starter lens or an upgrade from lower quality lenses" ● 28mm centre really great at f/8 and portrait focus distance, bokeh nice, but still massive CA. sharpness then decays with distance; almost irrelevant as a landscape lens, even if stopping further down. ● 35mm is significantly worse than 28mm; only f/3.5 at 35mm ● 135 mm acceptably sharp but hardly any micro detail; image edges nicer. bokeh still nice. close-ups irrelevant without any micro detail. ● compared to 24-1o5 4 I: same sharpness at wide angle, 28-135 lower sharpness at 1oomm
76	EF 28-1o5 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM II	29-1o1/3.6-4.7	Y					362	USM	Y	50	58	72 x 75	2000	539	optically virtually identical to the 28-135, actually slightly better at 1o5mm. None of them have a lot of micro detail ● already at 35mm, f/4 is the fastest you get!
77	EF 28-1o5 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM	29-1o2/3.5-4.7 T4.1-5.2	Y					375	USM	Y	50	58	72 x 75	1992	570	not very good throughout
78	EF 28-1o5 mm f/4-5.6 USM		Y					210	USM	Y	48	58	67 x 68	2002
79	EF 28-1o5 mm f/4-5.6	29-1o2/4-5.9	Y					210	AF	Y	48	58	67 x 68	2002
80	EF 28-9o mm f/4-5.6 USM II	29-87/3.8-5.9	Y					190	USM	Y	38	58	67 x 71	2002
81	EF 28-9o mm f/4-5.6 USM		Y					190	USM	Y	38	58	67 x 71	2000		reviewer: "Image quality suffers particularly between 28–35mm and 80–90mm, and there is heavy vignetting when used wide open" in other words, what's left would be better covered by a 5o/1.8 prime! ● AF performance significantly better than optical performance…
82	EF 28-9o mm f/4-5.6 III		Y					190	AF	Y	38	58	67 x 71	2004
83	EF 28-9o mm f/4-5.6 II		Y					180	AF	Y	38	58	67 x 71	2003
84	EF 28-9o mm f/4-5.6		Y					180	AF	Y	38	58	67 x 71	2000
85	EF 28-8o mm f/2.8-4 L USM		Y					945	USM	N	50	72	84 x 120	1988		f/3.2 by 35 mm, f/3.5 by 4o mm, f/4 by 6o mm
86	EF 28-8o mm f/3.5-5.6 USM V		Y					200	USM	Y	38	58	66 x 71	1999		II through V versions have plastic lens mounts ● only the original USM version supports full-time manual focusing; USM versions II through V do not.
87	EF 28-8o mm f/3.5-5.6 USM IV		Y					200	USM	Y	38	58	66 x 71	1996
88	EF 28-8o mm f/3.5-5.6 USM III		Y					205	USM	Y	38	58	65 x 64	1995
89	EF 28-8o mm f/3.5-5.6 USM II	29-77/3.46-5.88	Y					200	USM	Y	38	58	64 x 69	1993
90	EF 28-8o mm f/3.5-5.6 USM		Y					321	USM	Y	50	58	72 x 78	1991	450	only this USM version supports full-time manual focusing; the following versions II through V do not
91	EF 28-8o mm f/3.5-5.6 II	29-77/3.46-5.88	Y					200	AF	Y	38	58	66 x 71	1999
92	EF 28-8o mm f/3.5-5.6 I		Y					200	AF	Y	38	58	66 x 71	1996
93	EF 28-7o mm f/2.8 L USM	T3.3-3.4	Y					862	USM	Y	50	77	84 x 118	1993	1299
94	EF 28-7o mm f/3.5-4.5 II		Y					285	AF	Y	39	52	70 x 77	1988
95	EF 28-7o mm f/3.5-4.5		Y					300	AF	Y	39	52	70 x 75	1987	357
96	Cine CN-E 3o-3oo mm T2.95–3.7 L S		N				Cine Lens (APS only)	5800	manual	Y	150				44650
97	Cine CN-E 3o-1o5 mm T2.8 L S		N				Cine Lens (APS only)	2200	manual	Y	60				9999
98	Cine CN-E 31.5-95mm T1.7 L S / SP		N				Cine Lens (APS only)	3500	manual	Y	100	114	? x 246	2023	22000
99
100	EF 35 mm f/1.4 L II USM	T1.7	Y				Cine version available, see right	760	USM	Y	28	72	80 x 106	2015	1799	aka CN-E 35 mm T1.5 FP X and L F ● on par with the Sigma Art Mk I