| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | I, JONATHAN V. ALFARO, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period JANUARY to JUNE 2022. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | JONATHAN V. ALFARO | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Secretary to the Sanggunian | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Name & Signature of Department Head | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Date: ______________________________ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Approved by: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | MARIANO S. ESCALADA, JR. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Municipal Vice-Mayor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 5 - Outstanding 4 - Very Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 1 - Poor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | MFO/PAP | Success Idicators (Targets + Measures) | Alloted Budget | Division/ Individuals Accountable | Targets & Accomplishments | Rating | Remarks | |||||||||||||||||||
22 | E | E | T | E1 | E2 | T3 | A4 | |||||||||||||||||||
23 | Target | Accomp | Target | Accomp | Target | Accomp | ||||||||||||||||||||
24 | CORE FUNCTIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | Legislative Services | 4.00 | round off | |||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | POLICY FORMULATION SYSTEM | 4.05 | standard | |||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 1. Formulation of Ordinances | 3.80 | quality | timeliness | ||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 1.a. Referral of Proposed Policy/ Draft Ordinance | 100% of proposals under the Legislative Agenda were referred to the appropriate committee for policy research, study, and review. | Presiding Officer | 17 | 18 | 100% of the Proposed Policy under the LA were referred to the appropriate committee for research, study and review. | 106% of the Proposed Policy under the LA were referred to the appropriate committee for research, study and review. | 100% of the Proposed Policy under the LA were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | 106% of the Proposed Policy under the LA were referred to the appropriate committee within a week | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | 106% | 1st month of sem- 5 2nd month of sem-4 3rd month or more- 1 | reminder: ang counting diri na activity is tong sa LA lang; target is 16 as to LA | ||||||||||
29 | Urgent or necessary Proposals were referred to the appropriate committee for policy research, study, and review. | - | 22 | Proposals for Policy support were referred to the appropriate committee for research, study and review. | Proposals for Policy support were referred to the appropriate committee for research, study and review. | urgent or necessary Proposals were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | urgent or necessary Proposals were referred to the appropriate committee within the week | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | referred | 5 | - | reminder: ang counting diri na activity is tong sa tanan na dili included sa LA ; no target | |||||||||||
30 | 1.b. Conduct of Committee Meetings and Hearings (Policy research, study, and review) | 100% of referred proposals/Drafts were conducted a research, study, and review thru Committee meetings or hearings within 30 days upon referral. | SB Committees | 40 | 26 | 100% of the referred proposals/ Drafts under the LA were subject of Committee Meetings and/or hearings for research, study and review. | 65% of the referred proposals/ Drafts under the LA were subject of Committee Meetings and/or hearings for research, study and review. | 100% of the referred measures under the LA were acted upon by the committee within 30 days. | 65% of the referred measures under the LA were acted upon by the committee within 30 days. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 65% | reminder: ang counting diri na activity is tong sa tanan napolicies na narefer regardless if na include or wala sa LA; target is the total referral regardless if na include or wal sa LA | |||||||||||
32 | 1.c. Preparation of Committee Reports (Policy Reccomendation) | 100% of draft or proposals were recommended by the committee for enactment thru a Committee Report, signed and submitted for adoption. | SB Committees | 40 | 26 | 100% Drafts/ Proposals under the LA were recommended by the Committee for enactment thru a committee Report noting its findings and observation duly signed and submitted for adoption | 65% Drafts/ Proposals under the LA were recommended by the Committee for enactment thru a committee Report noting its findings and observation duly signed and submitted for adoption | 100% of the Committee Reports were prepared and submitted within a month after the committee process process. | 65% of the Committee Reports were prepared and submitted within a month after the committee process process. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 65% | target is number of referrals na recommend/or na consider for / during the CH/CM (pa submit report of conducted hearings and meetings) | |||||||||||
34 | 1.d. Preparation of Committee Version of the Draft Ordinance or Proposal | 100% of the recommended draft or proposed policy under the LA were prepared in a committee version draft, signed and submitted for deliberation. | SB Committees | 40 | 26 | 100% of the reccomended proposals were prepared a committee version draft incorporating all of its amendments discussed and approved by the committee, duly signed and submitted for deliberation | 65% of the reccomended proposals were prepared a committee version draft incorporating all of its amendments discussed and approved by the committee, duly signed and submitted for deliberation | 100% of the reccomended proposals were prepared a committee version draft were submitted for deliberation within a week | 65% of the reccomended proposals were prepared a committee version draft were submitted for deliberation within a week | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 65% | target is number of reports adopted | |||||||||||
36 | 2. Formulation of Resolutions | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | 2.a. Referral of matters needing legislative action or authorization | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action or authorization were referred to the appropriate committee for study, scrutiny and review. | Presiding Officer | 50 | 48 | 100% and above of the matters needing legislative action were referred to the appropriate committee for study, scrutiny and review. | 96% of the matters needing legislative action were referred to the appropriate committee for study, scrutiny and review. | 100% of the matters needing legis action were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | 96% of the matters needing legis action were referred to the appropriate committee within a week | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | 96% | ||||||||||||
38 | urgent matters needing legislative action or authorization were accomodated and acted upon immediately. | SB | - | 38 | Urgent matters needing legislative action were accomodated and acted upon immediately | Urgent matters needing legislative action were accomodated and acted upon immediately | Urgent matters needing legislative action were accomodated and acted upon immediately | Urgent matters needing legislative action were accomodated and acted upon immediately | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | immediate accomodation/ action | 5 | immediate action | 5 | ||||||||||
39 | 2.b. Conduct of Committee Meetings and Hearings | 100% and above of referred matters were subject of the Committee Meetings and Hearings within 30 days upon referral | SB Committees | 50 | 54 | 100% of the referred matters were subject of Committee Meetings and/or hearings for study, scrutiny and review. | 140% of the referred matters were subject of Committee Meetings and/or hearings for study, scrutiny and review. | 100% of the referred matters were acted upon by the committee within 30 days | 140%of the referred matters were acted upon by the committee within 30 days | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4.00 | 108% | target is number of referred matters | |||||||||||
40 | 2.c. Preparation of Committee Reports | 100% and above of reviewed/studied matters were prepared a report by the committee noting its finding and observations and recommendation, signed and submitted for adoption. | 50 | 54 | 100% and above of the reviewed, studied or scrutinized matters were reccomended for adoption thru a committee report. | 140% of the reviewed, studied or scrutinized matters were reccomended for adoption thru a committee report. | 100% and above of the committee reports were prepared and submitted a report within a month | 140% of the committee reports were prepared and submitted a report within a month | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4.00 | 108% | target is number of recommended during he CH/CM (pa submit report of conducted hearings and meetings) | ||||||||||||
41 | 2.d. Preparation of Draft Resolution | 100% and above of the recommended and adopted matters were prepared a draft resolution by the committee, signed and submitted for deliberation | 50 | 54 | 100% and above of the matters reccomended for deliberation were prepared a draf for deliberation | 140% of the matters reccomended for deliberation were prepared a draf for deliberation | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | 108% | target is number of adopted reports | ||||||||||||
42 | Policy Approval System | 3.88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 1. Enactment of Ordinances | 3.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | 1.a. Conduct of Public Hearing | 60% of finalized committee version draft were subjected to a Public hearing in consultation of sectors thay may be affected by the implementation of the ordinance, prior its enacment. | SB Committee/ SB Members | 8 | 0 | 100% regulatory policies were conducted a consultation among affected sectors thru a public hearing. | 0% regulatory policies were conducted a consultation among affected sectors thru a public hearing. | 100% of the public hearing were conducted prior enactment of the policy . | 0% of the public hearing were conducted prior enactment of the policy . | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 67% | target is number of enacted/reported policies needing PH | |||||||||||
45 | 1.b. Committee Reporting | 100% of committeed reports for draft/proposals were reported out and duly adopted. | SB Commitees | 26 | 26 | 100% of the submitted committee reports were reported out and duly adopted with complete documentation (endorsement, minutes, notice/invitation, attendance sheet) | 65% of the submitted committee reports were reported out and duly adopted with complete documentation (endorsement, minutes, notice/invitation, attendance sheet) | - | - | 5 | 3 | - | 4.00 | 100% | target is number of reccomended policies during the CH/CM (pa submit report of conducted hearings and meetings) | |||||||||||
46 | 1.c. Floor Deliberation | 100% of committees' recommended draft/proposal were deliberated in the second reading | SB Members | 26 | 26 | 100% of the recommended policies were deliberated on the floor for the second reading | 65% of the recommended policies were deliberated on the floor for the second reading | - | - | 5 | 3 | - | 4.00 | 100% | target is number of CR adopted | |||||||||||
47 | 1.d. Enactment | 100% of deliberated draft ordinances were enacted in the Third reading | 26 | 26 | 100% of the approved draft in the second reading were duly enacted in the third and final reading | 65% of the approved draft in the second reading were duly enacted in the third and final reading | - | - | 5 | 3 | - | 4.00 | 100% | target is number of 2nd reading | ||||||||||||
48 | 1. Adoption of Resolutions | 4.50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | 1.a. Committee Reporting | 100% and above of committeed reports for matters needing legislative action were reported out and duly adopted. | SB Commitees | 54 | 54 | 100% and above of the submitted committee reports were reported out and adopted with complete documentation (endorsement, minutes, notice/invitation, attendance sheet) | 146% of the submitted committee reports were reported out and adopted with complete documentation (endorsement, minutes, notice/invitation, attendance sheet) | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | 100% | same targeting applies | |||||||||||
50 | 1.b. Floor Deliberation | 100% and above of Committees' recommended matter were deliberated in the second reading | SB Members | 86 | 108 | 100% and above of the recommended matters were deliberated on the floor for the second reading | 126% of the recommended matters were deliberated on the floor for the second reading | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | 126% | ||||||||||||
51 | 1.c. Adoption | 100% and above of the deliberated Resolutions were passed | 86 | 155 | 100% and above deliberated matters in second reading were adopted | 180% deliberated matters in second reading were adopted | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | 180% | |||||||||||||
52 | Advocacy | 2.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | 1. Promotion | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | 1.a. Promotion | 25% of the approved policies conducted IECs/information drive. | Sangguniang Bayan | 19 | 0 | 25% of the approved Policies have conducted IECs for public information | 0% of the approved Policies have conducted IECs for public information | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 25% | tax code | ||||||||||||||
55 | 2. Post Approval Actvities | 4.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | 2. a. attestation | 100% and above of enacted policies an adopted Resolutions were signed and attested. | Vice-Mayor and Secretary to the Sanggunian | 169 | 181 | 100% above of the enacted policies and adopted resolutions were duly attested. | 107% of the enacted policies and adopted resolutions were duly attested. | 100% and above of the approved ordinances and rsolutions were attested within a week after its enactment | 107% of the approved ordinances and resolutions were attested within a week after its enactment | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | 107% | number of adopted/enacted reso or ord | |||||||||||
57 | 2.b. Sealing | 100% of approved policies sealed. | 169 | 176 | 100% of the approved policies and resolutions were properly sealed | 104% of the approved policies and resolutions were properly sealed | 100% and above of the approved ordinances and resolutions sealed after approval of the LCE | 104% of the approved ordinances and resolutions sealed after approval of the LCE | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | 104% | number of adopted/enacted reso or ord | ||||||||||||
58 | 2.c. posting/ publication | 100% of approved policies posted. | Secretary to the Sanggunian | 25 | 20 | 100% of the approved ordinances were posted in conspicuos places in the municipality with proper notice and/or published in a news paper with proper documents and a copy of the published issue. | 80% of the approved ordinances were posted in conspicuos places in the municipality with proper notice and/or published in a news paper with proper documents and a copy of the published issue. | 100% of the approved ordinances were posted/ published within 30 days after approval of the LCE | 80% of the approved ordinances were posted/ published within 30 days after approval of the LCE | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | 80% | number of enacted Ords | |||||||||||
59 | 2.d. Submission for SP Review | 100% of approved policies were submitted for review of higher authority in compliance to the provision of R.A. 71.60. | 25 | 20 | 100% of the approved ordinances were transmitted for review of SP within 3 days after approval of the LCE | 80% of the approved ordinances were transmitted for review of SP within 3 days after approval of the LCE | 4 | - | 4 | 4.00 | 80% | number of enacted Ords | ||||||||||||||
60 | 2.e. Dissemination | 100% of approved policies transmitted and disseminated. | 176 | 176 | 100% of the approved ordinances and resolutions transmitted to concern offices, agencies and individuals for information and/or approriate action within 30 days after approval | 100% of the approved ordinances and resolutions transmitted to concern offices, agencies and individuals for information and/or approriate action within 30 days after approval | 5 | - | 5 | 5.00 | 100% | number of adopted/enacted reso or ord | ||||||||||||||
61 | Technical Assistance | 4.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | Review of Barangay Legislations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | 1. Referral of Submitted Barangay Legislations | 100% and above of Barangay ordinances or resolution were referred to the committee for review. | SB Committees | 31 | 43 | 100% and above of the submitted Barangay Legislations were referred to appropriate committee | 139% the submitted Barangay Legislations were referred to appropriate committee | 100% Barangay Legislations were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | 139% Barangay Legislations were referred to the appropriate committee within a month upon receipt | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | 139% | target for second sem is 31 Supplemental Budgets | note: for 1st sem 2023- 31 Annual Budgets, 31 SK budget and 4 regulatory ordinances; for 2nd sem 31 supplementa budgets and 5 regulatory ordinances | ||||||||||
64 | 2. Review of Barangay ordinances/ resolutions | 100% and above of the referred Barangay ordinance or resolution were processed/reviewed by the committee. | 43 | 24 | 100% and above of the referred Barangay legislation were processed/ reviewed by the Committee thru a conduct of a Committee Meeting/ hearing | 56% of the referred Barangay legislation were processed/ reviewed by the Committee thru a conduct of a Committee Meeting/ hearing with 1-2 minor lapses | 100% and above of the referred barangay legislations were processed by the committee within 30 days after referral | 56% of the referred barangay legislations were processed by the committee within 30 days after referral | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 56% | target is number of referred barangay ords/reso | ||||||||||||
65 | 3. Reccomendation | 100% above of the processed/reviewed Barangay Ordinance or resolution were reported out by the committee. | 24 | 24 | 100% and above of reviewed Barangay Legislation were recommended by the committee thru a report with complete documentation and attachments (endorsement, minutes, notice/ invitation, attendance sheet) | 100% of reviewed Barangay Legislation were recommended by the committee thru a report with complete documentation and attachments (endorsement, minutes, notice/ invitation, attendance sheet) | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | 100% | target is number of reccomended barangay ords during the CH/CM (pa submit report of conducted hearings and meetings) | ||||||||||||
66 | 4. Adoption of the Review | 100% and above of the reccomended Barangay Ordinance or resolution were adopted by the Sanggunian . | 24 | 24 | 100% and above of reviewed Barangay Legislation were reported out and duly adopted by the Sanggunian | 100% of reviewed Barangay Legislation were reported out and duly adopted by the Sanggunian with 1 minor lapse | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | 100% | target is number of adopted reports | ||||||||||||
67 | Quasi-Judicial Services | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | Hearing of Administrative Complaints against elected barangay officials | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | 1. receiving of a verified complaint | 100% of the verified complaint were received in accordance to ordinance no. Ordinance No. 2006-016. | Committee of the Whole sitting as Quasi-judicial body | 0 | 0 | 100% of verified complaint were received in accordance to Ordinance No. 2005-016 | 100% of verified complaint were received in accordance to Ordinance No. 2005-016 | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | |||||||||||||||
70 | 2. Referral to and creation of the investigating committee | 100% of the verified complaint were properly refered and endorsed to the created investigation committee. | Committee of the Whole sitting as Quasi-judicial body | - | - | 100% of the verified complaint were properly referred and endorsed to the investigating committee | 100% of the verified complaint were properly referred and endorsed to the investigating committee | 100% of the verified compliant were refer within 7 days upon receipt of the Verified Complaint | 100% of the verified compliant were refer within 7 days upon receipt of the Verified Complaint | |||||||||||||||||
71 | 3. conduct of Administrative case hearings | 100% of the administrative case/s were conducted investigation process and hearings. | Committee of the Whole sitting as Quasi-judicial body | - | - | 100% of the referred verified complaint were conducted preliminaries and hearings upon determination of prima facie case | the referred verified complaint were conducted preliminaries and hearings upon determination of prima facie case | 100% of the conducted admin case hearings is in accordance to the reglamentary period set forth in ordinance No.2005-016 | 100%of the conducted admin case hearings is in accordance to the reglamentary period set forth in ordinance No.2005-016 | |||||||||||||||||
72 | 4. Decision Making / Resolution of the Case | 100% of the administrative cases were resolved or decided upon. | Committee of the Whole sitting as Quasi-judicial body | - | - | 100% of Admin cases were resolved or decided upon after thorough investigation | 100% of Admin cases were resolved or decided upon after thorough investigation | 100% of the Admin cases were decided or resolved with 90 days upon its filing | 100% of the Admin cases were decided or resolved with 90 days upon its filing | |||||||||||||||||
73 | Administrative Services | 3.90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | SB Secretariat | 4.42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | 1. Documentation, | 4.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | 1.a. Recording | 100% of legislative proceedings were recorded | MISPerlas | 48 | 24 | 100% and above of legislative activity were properly/ accurately recorded, in an audio and/ or written/ stenographic notes | 100% and above of legislative activity were properly/ accurately recorded, in an audio and/ or written/ stenographic notes | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | |||||||||||||
77 | 1.b. Documentation | 100% of legislative proceedings were documented | TCCercado | 48 | 24 | 100% of legislative proceedings were documented as to attestation of Attendance, minutes and journals | 100% of legislative proceedings were documented as to attestation of Attendance, minutes and journals | - | - | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | |||||||||||||
78 | 1.c. transcription | 100% of recorded legislative proceedings were transcripted into a journal of proceedings | TCCercado | 48 | 22 | 100% of recorded legislative proceedings were transcripted into a journal | 92% of recorded legislative proceedings were accurately transcripted into a journal | 100% of the journal of proceeding were submitted every week or the succeding session | 92% of the journal of proceeding were submitted every week or the succeding session | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | |||||||||||||
79 | 1.d. minutes | 100% of recorded legislative proceedings/transcripted journal of proceedings were summarized into minutes and submitted for adoption in the succeeding session | MISPerlas | 48 | 22 | 100% of the recorded legislative proceedings were summarized into a minutes | 92% of the recorded legislative proceedings were summarized into a minutes | 100% of the minutes of proceedings were submitted every week or the succeding session | 92% of the minutes of proceedings were submitted every week or the succeding session for adoption | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | |||||||||||||
80 | 1.e. finalization encoding and printing of Enacted Ordinances and Adopted Resolutions | 100% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed | JVAlfaro EJPLBrigole | 144 | 181 | 100% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed with acuracy | 126% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed with acuracy | 100% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed within the week | 126% and above of enacted ordinances and adopted resolutions were finalized, encoded, and printed within the week | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | |||||||||||||
81 | 2. Database Management System | 4.83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | 2.a. Data entry and generation of documents from LMIS/LTS | 100% of legislative data were properly entried to/generated from LMIS/LTS. | referrals, agenda | GOGNayre | 500 | 501 | 100% of identified data were properly entried to and/or generated from the LMIS/LTS | 100% of identified data were properly entried to and/or generated from the LMIS/LTS | - | - | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||||||
83 | 2.b. e-session management | 100% of session's agenda were properly uploaded one day before the scheduled session. | uploading of agenda and its attachments | JPFuerte | 24 | 24 | 100% of agenda and its pertinent documents were properly uploaded for the e-session | 100% of agenda and its pertinent documents were properly uploaded for the e-session | 100% of agenda uploaded one day before the scheduled session | 100% of agenda uploaded one day before the scheduled session | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4.33 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||||||
84 | 2.c. scanning and labeling of session's agenda and pertinent documents | 100% of agenda and its pertinent documents were properly and accurately scanned and labelled for the particular session. | JPFuerte | 500 | 501 | 100%and above of session's agenda and pertinent attachments were properly scanned and labeled | 100%and above of session's agenda and pertinent attachments were properly scanned and labeled | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | ||||||||||||||
85 | 2.d. Reports and other Compliances | 100% of reports and other compliances prepared and submitted | EJPLBrigole | 6 | 8 | 100% of reports and other compliances accurately prepared and submitted | 133% of reports and other compliances accurately prepared and submitted | 100% of repordt and compliances were submitted on time | 133% of repordt and compliances were submitted on time | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | |||||||||||||
86 | 3. Records and Archives | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | 3.a. Manual Tracking System | 100% of matters needing legislative action were accurately recorded in the manual tracking form | Reso and Ord | EJPL-Brigole EMTanggan | 500 | 501 | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action accurately recorded in the manual tracking form | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action accurately recorded in the manual tracking form with 1 minor lapse | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action accurately recorded in the manual tracking form every week | 100% and above of matters needing legislative action accurately recorded in the manual tracking form every 2 weeks | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
88 | 3.b. filing | 100% of legislative (session) documents were filed properly | CR, Reso, Ord, Minutes, Journal, Agenda, | EJPL-Brigole EMTanggan | 500 | 501 | 100% and above of session documents properly filed | 100%% and above of session documents properly filed | - | - | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
89 | 3.c. archiving | 100% of legislative documents were properly kept and maintained | Reso, Ord., CRs, Agenda, | EJPL-Brigole EMTanggan MISPerlas | 500 | 501 | 100% and above of legislative documents properly kept and maintained | 100% and above of legislative documents properly kept and maintained | - | - | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | |||||||||||||
90 | 3.d. logbooking | 100% of legislative documents were logged for proper number series and tracking | CR, Referral, Resolution, Transmittals | EJPL-Brigole EMTanggan | 500 | 501 | 100% and above of legislative were logged for proper series and tracking | 100% and above of legislative were logged for proper series and tracking | - | - | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
91 | 4. Other Administrative Support | 4.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | 4.a. receiving | 100% of matters needing legislative action were properly received; attachments and references were checked and scrutinized with respect to the request presented . | GOGNayre | 322 | 468 | 100% of matters were properly received; attachments and references were checked and scrutinized | 145% of matters were properly received; attachments and references were checked and scrutinized | 100% of matters received within 1-5 minutes | 145% of matters received within 2 minutes | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | ||||||||||||
93 | 4.b. Outgoing and logbooking | 100% of sb documents were properly logged and released or transmitted to identified concern office or individual. | GOGNayre | 376 | 361 | 100% of sb documents were released or transmitted properly with receipt to identified concern office or individual | 96% of sb documents were released or transmitted properly with receipt to identified concern office or individual | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | ||||||||||||||
94 | 4.c. sealing | 100% of legislative documents and issuances were properly sealed. | reso, ord, certificates, others | GOGNayre | 36 | 169 | 100% of legislative documents and issuances were properly sealed | 469% of legislative documents and issuances were properly sealed | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||||||||
95 | 4.d. posting | 100% of notice of posting for approved ordinances were posted in conspicuous/designated places. | posting of copies of ords in places | JPFuerte | 120 | 100 | 100% of notice of posting for approved ordinances were posted in conspicuous/ designated places | 83% of notice of posting for approved ordinances were posted in conspicuous/ designated places | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||||||||
96 | 4.e. Preparation, encoding and printing | 100% of transmittals, endorsements, notices and communications were prepared, encoded and printed accurately. | notice of posting, transmittals, communications, endorsements | GOGNayre | 376 | 361 | 100% of transmittals, endorsements, notices and communi-cations were prepared encoded and printed accurately | 96% of transmittals, endorsements, notices and communi-cations were prepared encoded and printed accurately | 2 | 2 | - | 2.00 | tasked was performed by a CEW | |||||||||||||
97 | 4.f. planning and preparation | 100% of admistrative and financial documents were accurately planned, reports were properly prepared. | spms, arta, compliances/ ppmp, designs, budget proposals, PRs | JPG-Casiple | 30 | 85 | 100% of administrative and financial documents were were accurately planned and prepared | 283% of administrative and financial documents were were accurately planned and prepared | 5 | 4 | - | 4.50 | ||||||||||||||
98 | 5. Messengerial and utility services | 3.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | 5.a. maintenance of SB Offices and premises | SB Office and premises were maintained daily. | JTMaluya | - | - | maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of SB Offices and Premises | maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of SB Offices and Premises with 2-3 minor lapses | offices and surroundings maintained thrice daily | offices and surroundings maintained once a day | - | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | |||||||||||||
100 | 5.b. waste segregation and disposal | SB waste were properly segregated and disposed daily. | JTMaluya | - | - | office wastes segregated daily | office wastes segregated twice a week | - | - | 3 | 3.00 | |||||||||||||||
101 | 5.c. reservation and scheduling | 100% of usage of SB facilities are well reserved and prepared scheduled use | MISPerlas | 30 | 73 | 100% of activities were scheduled and reserved appropriately, equipments are well provided and monitored during the usage | 193% of activities were scheduled and reserved appropriately, equipments are well provided and monitored during the usage | 5 | 5 | - | 5.00 | |||||||||||||||
102 | 5.d. maintenance and equipment | SB equipments were properly kept and maintained | JPFuerte | - | - | maintain the operation of SB electronic equipments and appliances | maintain the operation of SB electronic equipments and appliances | 4 | 4.00 | task was performed by a CEW | ||||||||||||||||
103 | 5.e. delivery of SB Documents | 100% of SB Documents were delivered to concern offices or individuals with receipt. | JPFuerte | 376 | 361 | 100% of SB Documents were delivered to concern offices with receipt | 96% of SB Documents were delivered to concern offices with receipt | - | - | 4 | 4 | - | 4.00 | task was performed by a CEW | ||||||||||||