paid-ed
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
$
%
123
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST
1
support? Y, to at least some version of a policy
2
reduce appearance of openness to abuse
3
Franko2ndy
4
Robert McClenony
5
Bilbobagy
6
DamSomy
7
SlimVirginyP is too weak
8
Coretheapple yAll props too weak: doesn't address AfC abuse, 'whip cracking' on talk pages. want 'bright line' = policy.
9
Ubikwity
10
Jytdogy
11
AGKyneeded to be effective a top 10 site; big change.
12
Mark Millerywants bright line; to suppress all self-promo
13
Gaijin42ystart by requiring COI disclosure
14
Charmlety
15
IRWolfie-y
16
17
being paid is bad; can't be NPOV
18
Docy
19
Bushrangery
20
GiantSnowmany
21
JWNynatural extension of COI
22
Smokefooty
23
AlanScottWalkery
24
MastCelly
25
MiniapolisyP2 is better
26
Jinkinsony
27
EllenCTy
28
Ceddersyparticularly problematic, compared to other pov sources (in extent, persistence, scale)
29
30
demotivates people; money skews the edit war balance
31
ThemFrom Spaceythis keeps me from editing more
32
regentsparky
33
Elveyysite faces decline otherwise
34
Teadrinkeryhave reduced own work because this is frustrating
35
Figureofnineydoesn't under stand the vehement opposition. isn't it basically already in policy? thinks P is too easy, sanctions bad editing
36
Smm201`0ygetting this wrong could be hard to reverse
37
38
39
other
40
BeyondMyKenyput the onus on them, not us
41
Niteshift36y
42
Alex Bakharevymaybe bright line; definitely transparency and 0RR
43
DavidHobbyystep in right direction
44
Abecedarey
45
Kaldariy
46
LibStaryconsiders SPIs to generally be paid advocates
47
Siawasey
48
Thomas.Wyconsiders promo editors to be paid advocates
49
Iryna Harpyyif fixed to allow experts
50
Ssilversytalk-page only
51
Robofishy
52
Chetvornoymany people have COI-free expertise. like me.
53
Benboy00y
54
Gobonoboy
55
FurrySingsy
56
Pocketthisybut hard to enforce. + reinforce anyone can edit as a result.
57
Tikukoystronger y if the good channels for processing requsts were beefed up.
58
Anu Rajy
59
Retartisty
60
Carptrashy
61
Hobity
62
Gandydancery
63
Neljack ycodifies industry standards
64
NaBUru38 y
65
Herostratusybrink
66
Doc Jamesy
67
Waggersy
68
asnacy
69
shabidooystrong oppose to P - slippery slope
70
StormRidery
71
Robert EA Harveyy
72
JJLy
73
MONGOya policy will help in egregious situations; don't need to share real life identity to implement
74
Jusdafaxy
75
John Nagleythinking of puffery and corp positive spin
76
CUSH-P is too weak
77
78
79
Support only for the PEPP version (v1 or v2)
80
Smallbonesy
81
Tryptofish -P (not v2)
82
Thibbs-
83
Frmorrisony
84
DavidEppsteiny-
85
Jeremy112233y
86
Piotrusy-allow submission for review; ideal: AfC or flagged-revs equivalent.
87
FeralOinky-per CarolMoore: caveats
88
89
other
90
smokeyjoey-need sticks, not just the carrots of how to do things well. delete articles created. require min, not max, disclosure.
91
jehochmanyP, v2
92
astynaxyP2
93
esoxidy-NPEd
94
Lukesurly
95
seraphimbladeymay decide talk-page only
96
Anne Delongythough may be unenforceable, still useful.
97
98
99
100
Not as written, indicates some change could change position
Loading...
Main menu