| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 2025 - Recovery Voucher Grant Application Scorecard | Applicant: | Applicant's Name | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Reviewer: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Topics & Questions | Maximum Potential Points | Score | Rationale & Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Applicant Eligibility | Eligible | #N/A | Potential Points | Awarded Points | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 1 | Is applicant willing to fulfill the RV grant administrator role? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing. | Eligible/ Ineligible | Categories | # | % Total | Received | Lost | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | Applicant Eligibility | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Project Needs Statement | 20 | 40% | 0 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 2 | Is applicant a member of their HUD-recognized Continuum of Care (CoC)/local coalition (LC)? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing. | Eligible/ Ineligible | 2023 RV Admin Bonus | 2.5 | 5% | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Client Eligibility | 5 | 10% | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Budget & Estimated Clients | 10 | 20% | 0 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Contractual Responsibility | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 3 | Does the applicant have current direct experience delivering services to people experiencing homelessness? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing | Eligible/ Ineligible | Financial Mgt & Accountability | 5 | 10% | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
14 | PPP&D | 5 | 10% | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Racial Equity | 2.5 | 5% | 0 | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Total (minus bonus) | 50 | 100% | 0 | 47.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 4 | Does applicant have an active HMIS subscription? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing | Eligible/ Ineligible | |||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | General Application | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Eligibility Status | #N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 5 | Did the applicant attach proof from SAM.gov that they are not in a period of debarment, suspension or in ineligibility status? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing | Eligible/ Ineligible | Follow Up Needed (not incl. eligibility)? | #N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||
21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | Exception Request Form & Letter of Support Scorecard | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | Exception Approved? | #N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 6 | Is there a DHS recognized recovery residence within the agency’s service region? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing | Eligible/ Ineligible | Letter of Support | ||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | 1. Did the letter of support state the applicant is a member in good standing of their CoC/LC and meets/will meet by 10/27/23 the 6 eligibility requirements and is the letter signed by the LC/CoC lead agency director? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 6a | Number of recovery residences (RR) provided? Yes and 1+ RR or exception? = No Follow Up Required (NFUR); No = Follow Up Required (FUR) | NFUR/FUR | |||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | 7 | Is the applicant in good standing with DEHCR? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing | Eligible/ Ineligible | |||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing | Exception Request Form Questions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | 1-4.) Did applicant say "yes" to all questions? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible, stop reviewing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | 8 | Is the applicant a recovery residence or have a recovery residence within its organization? No = Eligible; Yes = Go to next question | Eligible/ Ineligible/ FUR | 5.) Did applicant provide strong rationale for why their organization should be given an exception? Yes = Eligible; No = FUR (decision to be taken after review of all applications) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | 8a | Did the applicant submit an Exception Request Form and letter of support with their application? No = Ineligible, stop reviewing Yes = Review exception materials to determine final eligibility (use side scorecard) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | 6.) Did the applicant provide a reasonable explanation of how they will avoid preferential treatment towards their owned/affiliated recovery residences and will partner with other recovery residences in their service area (if applicable)? Yes = Eligible; No = Applicant is ineligible, stop reviewing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46 | Project Needs Statement | 20 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | 9 | Assess the applicant's process for identifying potential clients (individuals and families) and leveraging referral sources. Applicant has: Specific plans = 3; General plans = 2; Minimal plans = 1; No plans = 0 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | 7.) Did the applicant attach a copy form/s they will use to document HUD category 1, 2, 3, and 4 homelessness if awarded? Yes = Eligible; No = Ineligible | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | 10 | The applicant's RV client prioritization plan is: Specific or applicant states a plan is not required with strong rationale = 1; General = 0; No plan described = (-1) | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | 11 | What is the applicant's experience conducting inspections? Strong = 2; Moderate = 1; Minimal = 0 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | 12 | Is the applicant able to travel to conduct regular inspections? Yes = 3; No = 0 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | 13 | Assess the applicant's proposed process for placing clients in recovery residences, including how spots/available beds will be identified and what type of communication will be had with recovery residences after the client is placed. Applicant's proposed plan is: Specific = 4; General = 3; Minimal = 1 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | 14 | What is the applicant's experience administering RV and/ or rental assistance programs? Strong = 2; Moderate = 1; Minimal = 0 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | 15 | Does the applicant have a plan for what type of case management support they will provide to clients throughout the client's time in the program? Yes, specific plans = 2; General plans = 1; Minimal or no plans = 0 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | 16 | 2024 RV Admin Bonus | 2.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | Was the applicant an RV grantee during 2024, and did they serve 3 or more clients in the RV program as of September 1, 2024? Clients can be currently enrolled or exited. Yes = 2.5; No = 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | 17 | What type of capacity for the RV administrator role (including serving clients referred by other organizations, and increasing overall awareness of the RV program) did the applicant describe? Strong = 3; Moderate = 2; Minimal =1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | Client Eligibility | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | 18 | Assess the applicant's process for assessing and documenting client eligibility (OUD and Homelessness). Applicant has: Specific plans = 5; General plans = 3; Minimal plans = 1; No plans = (-1) | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | Budget & Estimated Clients Served | 10 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | 19 | Applicant provided an estimated number of clients that could be served; Yes (provided numbers for both individuals and families) = 2; Yes (provided number for only 1 type client) = 1; No = (-1) | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | 20 | Budget request chart is filled out: Yes = 2; Partially = 1; No = (-1) | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | 21 | The applicant provided rationale for the amount requested in grant funds that was: | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | Specific = 4; General = 3; Minimal = 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | 22 | Is the applicant's policy not longer than 2-years or December 31, 2025 whichever comes first? Yes = 2; No = 0 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||