AB
1
Notes on how to engage with our cost-effectiveness analysis
2
3
4
5
This workbook contains our cost-effectiveness analyses.

Individual staff estimates for a few parameters are included in the "User inputs" and "Moral weights" tabs. If you'd like to see how our results would change based on different inputs for these parameters, you can enter your own values in the "Anyone" columns in these two sheets, then select "Anyone" from the dropdown menus in the "Results" tab. You can also select an individual staff member's name from the dropdown menu to see how the results would change if we used their values. To see the results for programs in specific countries, select a country from the dropdown menus in the "Results" tab.

Expanding the formula bar at the top of the page (by clicking and dragging the bottom boundary) may make it easier to read the contents of explanatory cells.
6
7
8
9
Notes on text color coding
10
Blue text: direct input
11
Green text: pulling from another cell in this workbook
12
Black text: calculation
13
14
Index
15
List of funding gapsEstimates of the size and cost-effectiveness of top charities' current funding gaps
16
Moral weights and discount rate
Allows staff members or anyone else to supply discount rates and numbers used to trade off different good outcomes
17
ResultsShows cost-effectiveness estimates for each top charity
18
AMF
Cost-effectiveness analysis for long-lasting insecticide-treated net distributions by the Against Malaria Foundation.
19
GiveDirectlyCost-effectiveness analysis for uncondtional cash transfers by GiveDirectly.
20
Deworm the WorldCost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by Deworm the World
21
END FundCost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by The END Fund
22
SCI FoundationCost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by SCI Foundation
23
SightsaversCost-effectiveness analysis for deworming by Sightsavers
24
Malaria ConsortiumCost-effectiveness analysis for seasonal malaria chemoprevention by Malaria Consortium
25
VASCost-effectiveness analysis for vitamin A supplementation by Helen Keller International
26
Counterfactual non-philanthropicUsed in the leverage and funging adjustment to our cost-effectiveness analyses
27
Inclusion/ExclusionUsed in the adjustment for excluded effects of our cost-effectivenes analyses
28
RFMF_AMFRoom for more funding projections for the Against Malaria Foundation
29
RFMF_GDRoom for more funding projections for GiveDirectly
30
RFMF_DtWRoom for more funding projections for Deworm the World
31
RFMF_ENDRoom for more funding projections for The END Fund
32
RFMF_SCIRoom for more funding projections for SCI Foundation
33
RFMF_SightsaversRoom for more funding projections for Sightsavers
34
RFMF_MCRoom for more funding projections for Malaria Consortium
35
RFMF_HKIRoom for more funding projections for Helen Keller International
36
Helper sheetUsed to simplify formulas on the "Results" sheet
37
38
Helpful GiveWell references
39
Guide to GiveWell cost-effectiveness analyses
40
Full reviews of our top charities
41
Past versions of our cost-effectiveness analyses
42
Discussion of cost-effectiveness as a criterion
43
Blog posts discussing cost-effectiveness