CCCEP
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
Source
2
444
papers are claimed by the CCCEP final report to the ESRC
http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk/projects?ref=ES/G021694/1
3
4
36or8.2%
of these papers were published in or before 2008. The CCCEP project started in October 2008.
5
4or0.9%
of these papers do not have a publication date.
6
151or 34.0%
of these papers specify the date of submission to the journal in which it was published.
7
41or27.2%
of known submission dates were in or before 2008. The project started in October 2008.
8
64or14.4%
of the papers appear to have been completed before the project start.
9
10
331or74.5%
of the claimed papers are accessible to a UK academic with standard internet privileges.
11
185or55.9%
of the accessible papers state their funding source in the acknowledgements.
12
51or27.6%
of the papers that state their funding, state funding by CCCEP.
13
134or72.4%
of the papers that state their funding, state funding by other funding sources.
14
15
287or64.6%
of the claimed papers relate to the themes of the CCCEP.
16
157or35.4%
of the claimed papers do not relate to the themes of the CCCEP.
17
40or9.0%
of the claimed papers are on the science of climate change. Science-for-policy is a theme of the CCCEP, but these papers look like science-for-science.
18
9or2.0%
of the claimed papers are about insurance. Munich Re was a major co-funder of the CCCEP.
19
20
325or 73.2%
papers have author whose affiliations are known.
21
156or48.0%
of these papers had at least one LSE co-author.
22
132or40.6%
of these papers had at least one ULeeds co-author.
23
285or87.7%
of these papers had at least one co-author from either LSE or U Leeds.
24
3or0.9%
of these papers had a co-author from both LSE and U Leeds. None of the three Cs in CCCEP stands for collaboration.
25
40or12.3%
of these papers had a co-author affiliated with neither LSE nor U Leeds.
26
1or0.3%
of these papers had no known connection to either LSE of U Leeds.
27
39or12.0%
of these papers had a co-author who later moved to, or had earlier left either LSE of U Leeds.
28
29
318or 71.6%
of the claimed papers have known funding and affiliation.
30
20or 6.3%
of these papers neither claim CCCEP funding nor claim LSE or U Leeds affiliation.
31
32
318or 71.6%
of the claimed papers have known funding, affiliation and theme.
33
7or 2.2%
of these papers are unrelated to CCCEP research, do not claim CCCEP funding, and were written by people not at LSE or U Leeds. These papers are marked in yellow.
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
summaryold
dataoldgrant
summarynew
datanewgrant
funding
people