Presentation evaluation criteria

	A	B	C	D
1	Criteria	3 points	2 points	1 point

2	Presentation	- Slides are visually engaging and effectively support the presentation without excessive text. - Presentation is between 30-40 minutes	- Some of slides may contain too much text or lack of visual appeal - Occationally talks about things not on the slides - Presentation less than 30 mintues	- The slides are visually unappealing or cluttered with excessive text - Talks more about things not on the slides (slides do not support the presentation)
3	Mastery of content	- Well structured around clear main ideas and scientific contribution - Flow is logical and easy to follow - Expresses ideas using their own words, without reading from the slides	- Main ideas not clearly conveyed - Goes into details about methods and technical descriptions - Flow is somewhat disrupted - Sometimes reading from the slides	- Reading heavily from the slides - Unclear main ideas - Disjointed flow
4	Engagement and Discussion	- Raises 2+ thoughtful questions - Supports the discussion with relevant content from the article - Steers discussion back on the content of the paper if necessary	- Raises some question but lacks depth or relevance - Answers question based on subjective experience - Discussion drifts heavily away from the article	- Does not raise meaningful questions - Does not support the discussion with substantial content - Struggles answering questions
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100