EU Land Rights Log-frame.xls

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
1			EU Land Rights Logframe updated Version
2		Result Chain	Indicators	Baseline	Current value	What is the target value?	Source and mean of verification	Assumption

3	Overall Objective: Impact	People-centred land governance policies contribute to poverty reduction for landless and poor communities in the North, South and North East of Thailand and the attainment of SDGs 1, 2, 5 and 10.	1) Extent to which laws and policies which increase landless and poor communities access to natural resources and improve land rights are adopted and implemented by the government (in line with SDG 1 and 2 and Target 4 of SDG 10)	The community deed, land bank laws have been drafted, but have not progressed in the legislature	National Land Policy Committee Act 2019 was Enacted in 2019 which the Community Land Title Deed need to pushing within this laws throug raise the way on land management The movement of P-Move resulted in the appointment the committee under National Land Policy Committee Land Bank Laws was adjusted and propose the draft laws on Land Administration Institute and Allocation Land Tenure Equally which this laws in the process of public hearing and sub-comittee agreed to propose it to National Land Policy Committee	Community Land Title Deed and Land Bank laws are enacted within 3 years beyond the life of the action	∙ Meeting minutes and official documents related Land bank Laws or Policy ∙ Meeting minutes and official documents related to the progress of Land Bank policies ∙ Draft Laws on Land Bank ∙ Mid term evaluation review ∙ Final evaluation report
4				Justice Fund has been enacted	P-Move propose the proposal to revise and amend the laws on Justice Fund after it already enacted 5 years to the Justice Fund Committee which the committee accecpted to cosidere the proposal of P-Move		P-Move's proposal to revises and amend Justice Fund Laws Meeting minutes related to the proposal to revise and amend Justice Fund Laws Quaterly and annual reports
5				No law to protect the cultural rights of all 56 ethnic minorities in Thailand	∙Bill on Protecting and Promoting Ethnic Livelihood by SAC was drafted and processing to public hearing from stakeholders ∙Bill on Protecting Rights and Promoting Livelihood of Ethnic group and Indigenous People was dfafted by CSOs and initiator for pushing this law were set up		∙Draft law on Protecting and Promoting Ethnic Livelihood by SAC ∙Draft law on Protecting Rights and Promoting Livelihood of Ethnic group and Indigenous People by CSOs ∙Letter on appointment sub-committee to draft law on Protecting and Promoting Ethnic Livelihood ∙Relavant documents and evidence
6					P-Move is pushing Government to appoint sub-committee reviewing the laws that affected the livelihood of the prople including Community Forest Act, National Park Act, Wild Animal Reservation and Protection Act, and repealing of the cabinet resolution dated 26th November 2018 on the target area and the framework for solving the housing and farming area in the forest (of all kinds)		∙Reports related to the movement to push the review on laws ∙Meeting minutes ∙Official documents ∙Reports
7			2 ) Increase in land ownership and access to natural resources of target communities in line with Target 3 of SDG 1		Collect the data and evidence in line with indicator namely successful in solvong proble in community level and policy level	At least 30% increase in land ownership and access to natural resources of communities once land laws are enacted.	∙Relevant documents and evidence to point out target communities have increased secure rights in land and natural resources ∙Baselins study report ∙Internal Midtern Review Report ∙Final Evaluation Report
8			3) More secure livelihoods and increased incomes for landless and poor communities (in line with Target 7 of SDG 2)		COVID-19 pandemic has affected to incomes of community	10% increase in incomes of target communities following increased land ownership and access to natural resources.
9	Specific Objective (s): Outcome(s)	Effective participation of CSOs and land rights networks in framing public policies on land and natural resource management leads to better ownership and control over land and natural resources for landless/land-poor communities.	1) Extent to which draft legislation protecting land rights, in line with SDG 1 and 2, as well as accepted and enacted by government.	1.1) No law to protect the cultural rights of all 56 ethnic minorities in Thailand	∙Bill on Protecting and Promoting Ethnic Livelihood by SAC was drafted and processing to public hearing from stakeholders ∙Bill on Protecting Rights and Promoting Livelihood of Ethnic group and Indigenous People was dfafted by CSOs and initiator for pushing this law were set up	1.1) Bill on protecting the special cultural zones for ethnic minority groups is developed and proposed to the government	∙Draft law on Protecting and Promoting Ethnic Livelihood by SAC ∙Draft law on Protecting Rights and Promoting Livelihood of Ethnic group and Indigenous People by CSOs ∙Letter on appointment sub-committee to draft law on Protecting and Promoting Ethnic Livelihood ∙Relavant documents and evidence ∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project	Stable political and security situation in target areas, especially around time of general election Rights to organize and assemble are not restricted
10				1.2) Justice Fund has been enacted	1.2.1) P-Move propose the proposal to revise and amend the laws on Justice Fund after it already enacted 5 years to the Justice Fund Committee which the committee accecpted to cosidere the proposal of P-Move 1.2.2) P-Move is pushing Government to appoint sub-committee reviewing the laws that affected the livelihood of the prople including Community Forest Act, National Park Act, Wild Animal Reservation and Protection Act, and repealing of the cabinet resolution dated 26th November 2018 on the target area and the framework for solving the housing and farming area in the forest (of all kinds)	1.2) Amendment of laws affecting communities management of land and natural resource (Wildlife Preservation and Protection Act and National Park Act) is tabled by government	∙Reports related to the movement to push the review on laws ∙Meeting minutes ∙Official documents ∙Reports
11				1.3) The community deed, land bank laws have been drafted, but have not progressed in the legislature	1.3.1) National Land Policy Committee Act 2019 was Enacted in 2019 which the Community Land Title Deed need to pushing within this laws throug raise the way on land management The movement of P-Move resulted in the appointment the committee under National Land Policy Committee 1.3.2) Land Bank Laws was adjusted and propose the draft laws on Land Administration Institute and Allocation Land Tenure Equally which this laws in the process of public hearing and sub-comittee agreed to propose it to National Land Policy Committee	1.3) 1.3) Adoption of laws on CLDT and Land bank discussed at least once by government	∙ Meeting minutes and official documents related Land bank Laws or Policy ∙ Meeting minutes and official documents related to the progress of Land Bank policies ∙ Draft Laws on Land Bank ∙ Mid term evaluation review ∙ Final evaluation report
12			2) Number of community and civil society representatives serving as members of government committees to solve land and resource problems.	2) 54.2% of community and civil society representatives serving as members of government committees to solve land and resource problems	2) 100% of community and civil society representatives serving as members of government committees to solve land and resource problems	2) At least one civil society participant appointed to the governmental committee (s) on land rights issues	∙Govermental documents in appointing 11 sub-committees to solve problems of P-Move ∙Meeting minutes ∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project	Local and provincial government open to dialogue with civil society over land rights issues
13			3) 3) Number of successful resolutions of disputes over access to land or natural resources	3) Need to verified in baseline study report	3) need to be updated the documents and evidence to point out mechanism to solve the problem	3) At least 50% of target communities can access justice mechanisms such as government provincial committee to resolve land and natural resource disputes	∙Records on role of Provicial Committee to solve the problems ∙MOU to sovle the problem in Provicial, Ministry and national levels ∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project	Local vested interests do not intimidate communities and prevent actions over land issues
14	Outputs
15	Output 1	Output 1: Civil Society Organisations and land rights networks engage effectively with land rights policy and governance Activities related to Op1. A.1.1 Project inception meetings with all stakeholders A.1.2. Project management workshop A.1.3. Team Capacity building A.1.4. Training for core groups A.1.5. Training for women leaders A.1.6. Provincial committees for action on land rights A.1.7. Regional meetings A.1.8. Inter-regional meetings	1.1) Number of land right activists trained who take active role in activities to uphold land rights in communities and at provincial level. Disaggregated by sex to indicate increased participation of women in particular	1.1) 148 of land right activists trained who take active role in activities to uphold land rights in communities and at provincial level which 87 were male and 61 were female	1) 429 activists trained with 189 women (42%) and 246 men (57%) 2) 126 women leaders trained	1) 120 activists trained of whom 40% women 2) 80 women leaders trained	∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project	Marginalised communities support community activists and the work of land rights networks and bring forward cases of land rights violations Communities and land rights networks support the nomination of women activists
16			1.2) Civil society recommendations and perspectives are proactively shared with government through regular participation in provincial committees.	1.2) 8% of Civil society recommendations and perspectives are proactively shared with government through regular participation in provincial committees	2018, 14 out of 16 (87.5%) 2019, 15 out of 16 (93.75%) 2020, 15 out of 16 (93.75%) Wait for evidence to be updated	16 provincial committees set up by end of Year 1 (2018) that meet at least twice a year with at least 1 government participant	∙Documents on appointment Provincial Committee ∙Meeting Minutes of Provicial Committee ∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project	Activists have time and commitment to attend provincial, regional and national meetings
17			1.3) Establishment of Policy advocacy plan (operational and budget allocation) is established by each provincial committee at the end of the first year of the Action	1.3) 12.5% Policy advocacy plan (operational and budget allocation) is established Need to be verified in baseline study	93.75% Established of Policy advocacy plan operational &budget allocation established in 15 provincial committee	16 provincial committees establish plans by end of Yr 1. At national level by end of project	∙Update via the Form number 3 to collect evidence
18			1.4) Regional and inter-regional land rights protection movement established with national coordination	1.4) 90% of regional and inter-regional land rights protection movement established with national coordination	1.4) 100% of regional and inter-regional land rights protection movement established with national coordination call P-move	1.4) Regional land rights committees and national level movement established by end of Yr 1 and share recommendations on land rights with national government stakeholders	∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project
19	Output 2	Output 2: Trained landless and land-poor communities viz. small scale farmers and fishers, highland ethnic minorities, sea gypsies and previously stateless people, secure land rights and become accountable custodians of their natural resources. Activities related to Op 2: 2.1. Meetings between core groups and administrators from local to provincial level resulting in MOU signed between communities and LAO for management of natural resources 2.2. Set up model community land management initiatives 2.3. Exposure visits to successful land management projects 2.4. Experience exchange seminars for stakeholders	2.1) Number of local authority organizations (LAOs) with MOU on participatory and natural resource management.	2.1) 11 of local authority organizations (LAOs) with MOU on participatory and natural resource management.	2.1) 40 MOU on participatory and natural resource management were sign Need to check MOUs	2.1) 100 MOU set up that demonstrate successful outcomes by the end of project	∙ Signed MOUs in Local and Policy levels in line with the Form number 4	LAO are willing to work collaboratively with local communities for joint natural resources projects Communities open to working with LAO and SAO
20	Output 2		2.2) Number of model land management projects that successfully demonstrate LAO/community collaboration.	2.2) 0 of model land management projects that successfully demonstrate LAO/community collaboration	2.2 80 % of model land management projects that successfully demonstrate LAO/community collaboration	2.2) 8 model projects receive support by government and demonstrate successful outcomes	∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project ∙Model Community Activity Report ∙Internal Midtern Review Report ∙Final Evaluation Report
21	Output 3	Ouput 3: Networks and multi-stakeholder partnerships on land rights for landless and land-poor communities build sustainable alliances for ongoing joint advocacy, research, and knowledge sharing 3.1. Participatory research and data base on land rights 3.2. Research on project related issues 3.3. Forums to present research findings 3.4. Online presence 3.5. Media visit 3.6. Training for community journalists 3.7. Production of materials for media work including	3.1) Number of and diversity of stakeholders and frequency of use of data base on land rights.	3.1) 0% of and diversity of stakeholders and frequency of use of data base on land rights	3.1) Government, NGOs, academic and community leaders made use of the database for their research and proposal	3.1) Data base used by government officials, CSO actors and community leaders	∙Database of researchs under the project	General public receptive to messages about land rights and natural resource management
22			3.2) Community understanding of and support for project work on rights issues.	3.2) 88.8% of community understanding of and support for project work on rights issues	3.2) 90% Community understanding of and support for project work on rights issues	3.2) 100% of target communities who demonstrate understanding of issues and support	∙Feedback from core groups ∙Participatory research findings	Media is prepared to disseminate information on land rights
23			3.3) Number of articles on land rights issues in media and improved quality of reporting on the issues, as a result of project activities	3.3) 0% of articles on land rights issues in media and improved quality of reporting on the issues, as a result of project activities	3.3) 43 of articles and news were reported on land rights issues, ethnic minority groups and events organized by the project	3.3) At least 15 high quality media pieces on land rights issues are published online and offline	3.3) Media articles etc. Media materials produced by project
24			3.4) 3.4) Number of community journalists continue to take part in public awareness raising following the project activities	3.4) 0% of community journalists continue to take part in public awareness raising following the project activities	3.3) 78 of community journalists continue to take part in public awareness raising by producing some clips voicing out their issues	3.4) 40 community journalists trained of whom at least 80% go on to make two or more presentations on land rights in relevant forums	3.4) Training records, articles produced by community journalists in line with the Form number 5 to collect evidence
25	Output 4	Op 4: CSOs and land rights networks jointly contribute to policy dialogue on land ownership for landless and land-poor communities, leading to increased community participation in and responsibility for land and natural resources management Activities related to Op.4: 4.1. Support research network to monitor land policies and laws 4.2. Public mobilization 4.3. Regional campaigns for introduction of people’s bills 4.4. Campaign and advocacy in support of ethnic minority rights 4.5. Policy dialogues	4.1) Political parties adopt movement proposals in their election platforms.		4.1) 4.1) 9 political parties namely Future Forward Party, Thai Liberty Party, Commoners' Party, Action Coalition for Thailand, Democrat Party, Prachachat Party, Commoner Party, the Green Party and the Pheu Thai Party, adopted movement proposals in their election platforms	4.1) At least 3 political parties put land rights issues in their election platforms	∙Political party manifestos ∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project	Government authorities allow networks and CSOs to interact with communities for campaigns to introduce people’s bills
26			4.2) Attendance, media coverage and positive response, to the public demonstration.		4.2) 3,000 Attendance, media coverage and positive response, to the public demonstration	4.2) At least 100 community members participating in the public demonstration and media coverage is visible and supportive	∙Media reports, network reports.
27			4.3) Number of signatories on petitions for people’s bills, which will be prepared to protect against discrimination and inequalities, in line with SDGs 1, 2, 5 and 10.		The activies have just been starting in July 2021	4.3) 10,000 signatories	∙Petitions ∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project
28			4.4) Numbers and diversity of those attending policy dialogues e.g. government officials, academics etc.		Need to update information and evidence 250 people attending policy dialogues and there are representative of government officials, academics joining 2018, 6 meetings/events 2019, 11 meetings/events 2020, 5 meetings/events Need to be updated	4.4) At least one representative from relevant government agencies joins each policy dialogue	∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project ∙Relavant document in line with the Form number 6 to collect evidence
29			4.5) Number of community leaders from landless and land-poor communities who are actively engaging in policy dialogue.		2018, 192 not disaggregate sex and background 2019, 237 (148 men and 89 women) 2020, 5 events	4.5) 30 community leaders (70% men and 30% women)	∙Quarterly report by partner organizations ∙Annual report of the project
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100