A | B | C | D | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Competitive or Comparitive | |||
2 | This comparative analysis template has been created by Hack for LA so that we can publish a comprehensive list of all LA Neighborhood Council website features (across the system). This list of features will then be used in a open community survey that will help determine how the community prioritizes those features and if they wish features that are not currently represented. To learn more about our project, please read our project overview | |||
3 | ||||
4 | Instructions: | |||
5 | 1. Reach out to opencommunitysurvey@hackforla.org if you are from a NC and would like to help us with the analysis by doing the comparision on your NC. | |||
6 | 2. Find your NC on the NC Website Competitive/Comparative Analysis sheet | |||
7 | 3. Add any details about the Criteria into the cell under the Organization and color the boxes for each feature you have that matches the citeria on the left | |||
8 | 4. If there is a feature that is not in the Comparison Criteria on Column A, please add it to the bottom | |||
9 | 5. Color the cells under the organization to make it easy to process the overview at a glance | |||
10 | ||||
11 | Tips for people doing more than just one comparision: | |||
12 | As you find each organization you will find new Comparison Criteria, and it might make sense to revisit the prior NC websites that you identified to see if you missed any of the Criteria. | |||
13 | ||||
14 | Purpose: | |||
15 | To make sure we are learning from the community work of others in order to build on each others shoulders creating the change we want to see in the world. | |||
16 | ||||
17 | Mindset: | |||
18 | All the NCs have a vested interest is reducing repetitive work and serving their constituents as effectively as possible. | |||
19 | ||||
20 | Living Document: | |||
21 | This document will evolve as people use it and provide feedback. If you have questions or other contributions, please add them on the Suggestions Tab. | |||
22 | ||||
23 | ||||
24 | ||||
25 | For https://github.com/hackforla/open-community-survey/issues/35, Sonu states the following field are priorities for data visualization: | |||
26 | 33 | Ethics expiration date | ||
27 | 34 | Funding expiration date | ||
28 | 35 | Code of conduct expiration date | ||
29 | Submit Agenda items | |||
30 | Candidates | |||
31 | Neighborhood purpose grant | |||
32 | How to request funding for neighborhood purpose grant | |||
33 | ||||
34 | ||||
35 | ||||
36 | ||||
37 | ||||
38 | ||||
39 | ||||
40 | ||||
41 | ||||
42 | ||||
43 | ||||
44 | ||||
45 | ||||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | ||||
49 | ||||
50 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
53 | ||||
54 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | ||||
58 | ||||
59 | ||||
60 | ||||
61 | ||||
62 | ||||
63 | ||||
64 | ||||
65 | ||||
66 | ||||
67 | ||||
68 | ||||
69 | ||||
70 | ||||
71 | ||||
72 | ||||
73 | ||||
74 | ||||
75 | ||||
76 | ||||
77 | ||||
78 | ||||
79 | ||||
80 | ||||
81 | ||||
82 | ||||
83 | ||||
84 | ||||
85 | ||||
86 | ||||
87 | ||||
88 | ||||
89 | ||||
90 | ||||
91 | ||||
92 | ||||
93 | ||||
94 | ||||
95 | ||||
96 | ||||
97 | ||||
98 | ||||
99 | ||||
100 |