one-l guide to identifying judicial corruption
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
Still loading...
ABCDEFGHIJKL
1
HistoryPayments1/8/08 HearingDebtor Exams3/4/09 Contempt HrngUSDC9th Circuit Pt IUS Supreme Court
2
3
SBX2-11 is illegal under Constitutions' ex post facto laws.

Auto disqual b/c County a ptyJudgment void b/c Yaffe did not have jurisdiction over FineCommissioner not legally authorized to conduct examYaffe should have recused self b/c he was criticized for receiving the paymentsDenial of writing materials (pencil/paper), on Yaffe's order. (Caused delay of petition filing by 16 days)Improper handling of first petition? Improper co-ordination with USDC?Overcoming initial review hurdle, Petition set for conference on Sept 29
4
Payments illegal at time made, SBX2-11 doesn't change thatYaffe didn't disclose pymts to parties or on Form 700 Statement of Economic InterestsJudgment void b/c hearing not noticed to FineExam never legally convenedRefusal to acknowledge = auto disqual. Yaffe disqual as of 4/7/08Denial of law library access, on Yaffe's orderDenial of law library accessState Bar waives right to respond
5
Pass "GO", continue to next columnSturgeon decision proved that pymts were illegalJudgment void b/c hearing not attended by FineYaffe mishandled motions at 3/20/08 hearingContempt charge cannot lie for filing pleading criticizing a judgeAbsence of law libraryAbsence of law library
6
Fine's case re budget caused judges pay to be frozenSBX2-11 doesn't remove appearance of biasJudgment void b/c Yaffe sat as judge & witnessPass "GO", continue to next columnNo jury trialPrevented from pauper statusPrevented from pauper status
7
Developer's atty's sworn testimony conflicts with facts in underlying Marina Strand casePass "GO", continue to next columnLack of Notice of EvidenceHearing not reasonably expeditiousFilings struck for lack of signature even though Woehrle knew Fine couldn't signPass "GO", continue to next column
8
LA County stopped losing lawsuits when judges decided; incarceration rates have doubled since pymts beganDeveloper has substantilal motive to control outcome, broke law by contributing to Supervisors' campaignsWrit of Execution and Subpoena void because order voidFilings struck after Fine filed Auth Sigs (not in PACER)
9
The CA Supreme Court did not properly order Fine to "inactive" statusLA County and Del Rey Shores were co-applicants for an EIR in underlyng Marina Strand case.Motion for Relief filed on basis of excusable neglect, not atty fault as stated in judgmentWoehrle didn't follow 28 USC 2243, in several instances
10
Yaffe/Mitchell in same dept.OSC impermissably vagueImproper prosecutorsPetition becomes unopposed
11
Fine's distinguished careerFine denied right to honest servicesRosen testimony based on hearsayFine denied press interviews by Yaffe
12
Award of atty fees under ccp 473b was precluded under the Public Resources Code3/4/09 judgment does not conform to Transcript or Minute Order as to specific counts upon which Fine was found guiltyWoehrle should have been recused because she fundraises w/LASC judges, works with former LASC judges, and former colleague became LASC judge
13
Official "Free Richard Fine" website:
http://sites.google.com/site/freerichardfine/Home
Pass "GO", continue to next columnNo hearing prior to 4/15/08 order issuanceWoehrle/Walter ignored Caperton
14
"Right Trumps Might" blog:
http://righttrumpsmight.blogspot.com
4/15/08 Order also voidWoehrle/Walter clearly didn't even read all pleadings
15
3/4/09 order improperly datedWoehrle/Walter refuse to pierce any insufficient pleading and insure justice is accomplished
16
Yaffe forced to find Fine "not guilty" of 14 of 16 charges of contemptJudges Pregerson & Wu properly recused themselves
17
SBX2-11's immunity does not justify Yaffe's actsProblems w/misdated 3/4/09 order brought to Woehrle's attention post-denial by court clerk
18
Judgment contained charges and findings not in OSCWoehrle/Walter should have been recused b/c they can be sued for malpractice
19
Evidence in record doesn't support findings & conclusionsHorrible jail conditions (staph infection, swelling & pain, 24-hour lights, cold, no outdoor time)
20
This is post-Sturgeon, Yaffe now knows pymts were illegalPass "GO", continue to next column
21
4/1/08 order not in evidence
22
Judge Fischer properly recused self
23
Pass "GO", continue to next column
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Loading...
 
 
 
Idiot's Guide