ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
1
https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/46
2
3
Verifier Leveling Rubric
4
CategoryL1L2L3L4L5
5
Long Term Network Alignment = Max(Time Commitment, Stake Exposure)0
6
Time CommitmentSubstantial, sustained contributions to Filecoin over 6 mos
(as a miner, developer, or active community organizer)		Substantial, sustained contributions to Filecoin over 1 year (as a miner, developer, or engaged community member)Substantial, sustained contributions to Filecoin over 2 years (as a miner, developer, or engaged community member)
Substantial, sustained contributions to Filecoin over 3 years (as a miner, developer, or engaged community member)
Substantial, sustained contributions to Filecoin over 4 years (as a miner, developer, or engaged community member)
.0// Just shy of 6 mos
7
Stake Exposure100k tokens at stake500k tokens at stake1MM tokens at stake5MM tokens at stake10MM tokens at stake.0
8
Industry Reputation = Max(In-protocol Reputation, In-protocol Security, Organization Reputation, Individual Reputation).2
9
In-protocol ReputationReputable leader in Filecoin Ecosystem for >6 mos yr (contributions to the Filecoin protocol and/or spec), actively supporting, and cultivating the success of other members in the Filecoin ecosystemReputable leader in Filecoin Ecosystem for 2 yr (contributions to the Filecoin protocol and/or spec), actively supporting, and cultivating the success of other members in the Filecoin ecosystemReputable leader in Filecoin Ecosystem for 3 yr (contributions to the Filecoin protocol and/or spec), actively supporting, and cultivating the success of other members in the Filecoin ecosystemReputable leader in Filecoin Ecosystem for 4 yr (contributions to the Filecoin protocol and/or spec), actively supporting, and cultivating the success of other members in the Filecoin ecosystemReputable leader in Filecoin Ecosystem for 4+ yr (contributions to the Filecoin protocol and/or spec), actively supporting, and cultivating the success of other members in the Filecoin ecosystem.0// Just shy of 6 mos
10
In-protocol securityContributions in identifying, responsibly disclosing, and fixing multiple low security vulnerabilities in protocols or services in the Filecoin communitySustained contributions identifying, responsibly disclosing, and fixing multiple medium protocol or service vulnerabilities, in the Filecoin communitySustained contributions identifying, responsibly disclosing, and fixing high/critical protocol or service vulnerabilities, in the Filecoin communitySustained contributions identifying, responsibly disclosing, and fixing multiple high/critical protocol or service vulnerabilities, in the Filecoin communityL4 Requirements.0
11
Organization ReputationCommunity MembersReputable entities in Filecoin-adjacent communities with substantially adopted services / products (e.g. Supranational, Pinata, Infura)Major organizations in Web3 (e.g. Polychain, Consensys)Major organizations in Web2 and Web3 (e.g. Ethereum Foundation, Vimeo)Household names / Publicly traded Institutions (e.g. Andreseen Horowitz, Netflix).1
12
Individual ReputationHas access to 2+ social media accounts which individually have audiences > 500 where they will post publicly about their status as a notary if approvedHas access to 2+ social media accounts which individually have audiences > 1000 where they will post publicly about their status as a notary if approvedHas access to 2+ social media accounts which individually have audiences > 10000 where they will post publicly about their status as a notary if approved--2
// Based on LinkedIn, if two or more of your officers post a message announcing your selection as a Notary (meeting the specified criteria) you'd meet this requirement!
13
Diversity and Decentralization = .3*Use Case Diversity + .7*Geographic Distribution.5
14
Geographic DistributionHighly represented geography (>=4 existing or >=30% global DataCap has been allocated to the Region)Highly represented geography (3 existing or 20-30% global DataCap has been allocated to the Region)Somewhat represented geography (2 existing OR 10-20% global DataCap has been allocated to the Region)Under-represented geography (1 existing Notary OR <10% global DataCap has been allocated to the Region))Unrepresented geography.5
15
Use Case DiversityHighly represented use case (4 or more existing)Highly represented geography (3 existing)Somewhat represented usecase (2 existing)Under-represented usecase (1 existing) Unrepresented usecase.5
16
.
17
Allocation Ranking.2
18
L1=Eligible up to 10TBL2=Eligible up to 100TBL3=Eligible up to 1PBL4=Eligible up to 10PBL5=Eligible up to 50PB.
19
Weighted Notary Leveling (see cell).2
20
Weighted Notary LevelingFloor(.3*Long term network alignment + .4* Industry Reputation + .3*Diversity and Decentralization)Floor(.3*Long term network alignment + .4* Industry Reputation + .3*Diversity and Decentralization)Floor(.3*Long term network alignment + .4* Industry Reputation + .3*Diversity and Decentralization)Floor(.3*Long term network alignment + .4* Industry Reputation + .3*Diversity and Decentralization)Floor(.3*Long term network alignment + .4* Industry Reputation + .3*Diversity and Decentralization).2
21
Concreteness of Allocation Plan =FLOOR(0.333*Allocation Strategy+0.333*Client Due Diligence+0.333*Bookkeeping Plan)3
22
Allocation StrategyMinimal specificity in allocation strategy but demonstrates how allocation will reflect the Principles.-Moderate specificity in allocation strategy in alignment with the Principles.-Detailed plan, including tooling, to successfully allocate DataCap in a way that reflects the goals and values of the Principles..3// In a subsequent application specificity on the actual rubric you will / did use would bump this up!
23
Client Due DiligenceMinimal due diligence protecting against abuse and vetting clients.-Base due diligence protecting against abuse and vetting clients.-Robust due diligence for protecting against abuse and vetting clients..5
24
Bookkeeping PlanMinimal bookkeeping plan to document DataCap allocation decision and ready to provide justification when challenged or dispute.Base bookkeeping plan to document DataCap allocation decision and ready to provide justification when challenged or dispute.Detailed bookkeeping plan, with tooling, to document DataCap allocation decision and ready to provide justification when challenged or dispute.Detailed bookkeeping plan, with tooling and defined audit processes, to document DataCap allocation decision and ready to provide justification when challenged or dispute.L4 Requirements.3
// Scored assuming you'll use the same framework as the Filecoin Foundation!
25
Track Record.1
26
Past AllocationNo previous track record. Successful allocation <100TB of DataCap with no consistent pattern of impropriety*. Justifications and audit trail can be produced when challenged.
Successful allocation of 100TB of DataCap with no consistent pattern of impropriety*. Convincing justifications and audit trail can be produced when challenged.
Successful allocation of 1PB of DataCap with no consistent pattern of impropriety*. Convincing justifications and audit trail can be produced when challenged.
Successful allocation of 10PB of DataCap with no consistent pattern of impropriety*. Convincing justifications and audit trail can be produced when challenged.
.1
27
Scale of Allocation3
28
Volume of DataVolume of DataCap Requested = <10TBVolume of DataCap Requested = 10-100TBVolume of DataCap Requested = 100TB- 1PBVolume of DataCap Requested = 1-10PBVolume of DataCap Requested = 10PB+.3
29
.
30
Final Allocation Amount =MIN(ROUND(0.5*Track Record + 0.3*Weighted Notary Leveling + 0.2*Concretness of Allocation Plan), Scale of Allocation)
.2
31
Unrounded Score (for tiebreaking only)
1.7
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100