Copy of Capstone Poster Rubric
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRS
1
STEM PresentationsJune 3, 2019
2
Student Name:
3
Evalutator Name:
4
5
Comments
6
Knowledge of ProjectIt is not clear if the presenter fully grasped the project . The poster lacked coherence and only communicated a vague understanding.The poster demonstrated a pretty good knowledge of the project. The description was difficult to follow at times, but it did communicate the main ideas.The poster gave a clear introduction to the project. The audience for the most part understood the topic of the posterIt is evident that the presenter had complete understanding of the project. The descriptions were clear and thorough.
7
8
Innovative thoughtThe presenter did not think creatively about anything that they didThere is some evidence that the presenter was thinking creatively about their projectCreative thought was evident throughout the projectThe project ventured into unexplored territory and resulted in a discovery
9
10
OrganizationClutter, no definitive sections. Not all sections present.Hard to follow, requires assistance. Missing parts. Obvious refinement required.All present, but unclear. Must reread for clarityDefined sections and clear headings. Flows nicely to assist the reader without help.
11
12
Creativity of PosterBland, no variability. No use of color or diagrams. Interest, motivation effort and time clearly absent.Very little use of color or pictures but enough to engage and hold attention.Some use of color and diagrams. Will engage but not stimulate.Interesting, engaging, visually stimulating. Interest, motivation effort and time obviously present.
13
14
Response to QuestionsAnswers were halting or inadequateThe presenter could provide meaningful answers, but could not thoroughly explain the topic or presentation materials.The presenter was able to answer question directly related to their presentation, for example, clarifying or explaining their posters when asked.Ability to answer questions demonstrated in depth knowledge of the topic in excess of that contained in the poster.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...