Evaluation Sheet for LGUs

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G
1	Performance Evaluation Sheet for LGUs
2	Performance Evaluation Sheet for LGUs
3
4	Name of LGU:				Major Areas of Evaluation
5					Governance and Planning		30%
6					Financial Management and Innovation		30%
7					Implementation and Impact		25%
8					Knowledge Management and Learning		15%
9					TOTAL		100%
10
11	CRITERIA				Minimum Points	Maximum Points	Actual Points
12	I. Governance and Planning (Weight: 30%)
13	I.1	Strategic Planning and Integration (10%):				10
14		I. 1.1	Existence and quality of Local Climate Change Action Plan (LCCAP) and Local DRRM Plan (LDRRMP) – must be officially adopted, regularly updated, and demonstrate integration of BCBGE principles (resilience, green economy, equity)		0-1	3
15		I. 1.2	Integration of DRRM/CCA and BCBGE strategies into CLUP and AIP		0-1	2
16		I. 1.3	Alignment with national frameworks (RA 10121, RA 9729, NCCAP, Sendai, Paris Agreement)		0-1	3
17		I. 1.4	Innovativeness in planning (e.g., GIS, science-based risk assessments, climate projections, BCBGE ecosystem-based approaches)		0-1	2
18	I.2	Institutional Capacity (8%):				8
19		I. 2.1	Organizational structure of LDRRMO and related offices		0	1
20		I. 2.2	Number and competency of staff (trained, certified, technically skilled; with documented participation in DRRM/CCA/BCBGE-related capacity building)		0	1
21		I. 2.3	Availability of equipment, facilities, and systems (early warning, communication, rescue, GIS, green tech applications)		0-1	3
22		I. 2.4	Access to budget allocations for climate/disaster/BCBGE programs		0-1	3
23	I.3	Multi-stakeholder Engagement (6%):				6
24		I. 3.1	Formal mechanisms (e.g., Local DRRM Council, multi-stakeholder CCA & BCBGE committees)		0	1
25		I. 3.2	Frequency and quality of consultations with CSOs, academe, private sector, communities		0	1
26		I. 3.3	Evidence of co-created projects/partnerships on DRRM, CCA, and green economy initiatives		0-1	2
27		I. 3.4	Inclusiveness (representation of women, youth, IPs, vulnerable groups in DRRM/CCA/BCBGE planning)		0-1	2
28	I.4	Transparency and Accountability (6%):				6
29		I. 4.1	Accessibility of LCCAP, DRRM/BCBGE plans, and budgets (publicly available, online/offices)		0-1	2
30		I. 4.2	Public disclosure of expenditures (bulletin boards, websites, consultations) – must show no outstanding unliquidated cash advances/disallowances as eligibility baseline		0-1	2
31		I. 4.3	Compliance with FOI and government transparency requirements		0	1
32		I. 4.4	Citizen feedback mechanisms (hotlines, grievance systems, participatory monitoring)		0	1
33	II. Financial Management and Innovation (Weight: 30%)
34	II. 1	Fund Utilization Efficiency (10%):				10
35		II. 1.1	Timeliness and efficiency of LDRRMF/CCA fund utilization (70/30 allocation compliance, evidence of consistent 5% LDRRMF allocation as baseline)		0-1	3
36		II. 1.2	Ratio of funds allocated vs. actual utilization		0-1	2
37		II. 1.3	Outcomes and impact of funded projects (resilience, preparedness, BCBGE-aligned recovery)		0-1	2
38		II. 1.4	Proper liquidation and compliance with COA audit findings – must have no unliquidated cash advances/disallowances as baseline		0-1	3
39	II. 2	Access to External Financing (8%):				10
40		II. 2.1	Ability to secure climate/disaster/green economy financing beyond LGU funds		0-1	3
41		II. 2.2	Diversity of sources: GCF, Adaptation Fund, multilateral/bilateral, private/NGO		0-1	2
42		II. 2.3	Absorptive capacity: implementation of externally funded projects		0-1	3
43	II. 3	Innovative Financing Mechanisms (4%):				4
44		II. 3.1	Presence of local financing innovations (e.g., resilience bonds, revolving funds, green taxes, PPPs)		0-1	2
45		II. 3.2	Replicability and scalability of these mechanisms		0-1	2
46	II. 4	Financial Sustainability (8%):				8
47		II. 4.1	Presence of medium- to long-term financial strategies for DRRM/CCA/BCBGE		0-1	3
48		II. 4.2	Diversification of funding sources (local revenues, external grants, PPPs, green finance)		0-1	3
49		II. 4.3	Institutionalization of financing streams (e.g., revolving funds, trust funds, climate/disaster insurance)		0-1	2
50		II. 4.4	Evidence of continuity beyond project life spans		0-1	2
51	III. Implementation and Impact (Weight: 25%)
52	III. 1	Project Implementation (8%):				8
53		III. 1.1	Quality of design and execution of DRRM/CCA/BCBGE projects		0-1	2
54		III. 1.2	Timeliness of implementation (delivered within planned period)		0-1	3
55		III. 1.3	Tangible results and community benefits (preparedness, reduced risks, green jobs, inclusive growth)		0-1	3
56	III. 2	Vulnerability Reduction (7%)				7
57		III. 2.1	Reduction in casualties, damages, and losses from disasters		0-1	3
58		III. 2.2	Improved early warning systems (coverage, accuracy, response time)		0-1	2
59		III. 2.3	Strengthened protective infrastructure and community preparedness (nature-based + engineered solutions)		0-1	2
60	III. 3	Adaptive Capacity Enhancement (5%):				5
61		III. 3.1	Adoption of climate-resilient livelihoods (e.g., climate-smart agri, resilient fisheries, green enterprises)		0-1	2
62		III. 3.2	Ecosystem-based adaptation (mangroves, watershed protection, reforestation)		0	1
63		III. 3.3	Community training/institutional strengthening for adaptive decision-making		0	1
64		III. 3.4	Sustainability of adaptive practices (continuing beyond project cycle, embedded in local systems)		0	1
65	III. 4	Innovation in Action (5%):				5
66		III. 4.1	Use of new technologies/approaches in DRRM/CCA/BCBGE		0-1	2
67		III. 4.2	Relevance to local context and challenges		0-1	2
68		III. 4.3	Potential for scaling or replication in other LGUs/communities		0	1
69	IV. Knowledge Management and Learning (Weight: 15%)
70	IV. 1	Documentation and Reporting (5%):				5
71		IV. 1.1	Completeness and quality of project documentation (reports, case studies, photos/videos, success stories)		0-1	2
72		IV. 1.2	Clarity in reporting lessons learned and best practices		0-1	2
73		IV. 1.3	Dissemination to stakeholders (internal and external) – includes timely and accurate data/report submission to national agencies (eligibility baseline)		0	1
74	IV. 2	Learning and Adaptation (5%)				5
75		IV. 2.1	Presence of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems		0	1
76		IV. 2.2	Regular review of project outcomes and performance		0-1	2
77		IV. 2.3	Evidence of strategies/policies adjusted based on lessons learned		0	1
78		IV. 2.4	Training/learning programs for LGU staff and stakeholders		0	1
79	IV. 3	Knowledge Sharing (5%):				5
80		IV. 3.1	Participation in national platforms (e.g., LCCAP confs, DRRM/BCBGE summits)		0-1	2
81		IV. 3.2	Engagement in international platforms (e.g., UNDRR, ASEAN, GCF knowledge hubs)		0-1	2
82		IV. 3.4	Contribution to knowledge exchange (presentations, publications, hosting peer-learning events)		0	1
83
84				SUMMARY COMPUTATIONS
85				Particulars	Percentage Points
86				Governance and Planning	0
87				Financial Management and Innovation	0
88				Implementation and Impact	0
89				Knowledge Management and Learning	0
90				TOTAL PERCENTAGE POINTS	0
91
92
93				_________________________________
94				(Name of Evaluator, Signature and Date)
95
96
97
98
99
100