Labor's Effect on Land Function

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N
1		Value	type	Definition				FOR MODELING PURPOSES
2	M_b	1	Land-specific	Best case scenario for positive change in land, caused by labor				Assuming there is a best-case productive capacity that is set through policy, could we take a fraction of this difference to represent M_b and M_w. In other words, M_b could represent one quarter of the distance between current productive capacity and maximum productive capacity. This accomplishes the same exponential decay that Joseph's model also uses.
3	M_w	2	Land-specific	Worst case scenario for negative change in land, caused by labor
4	beta	1	Land-specific	Marginal effect of labor on land
5	C_f	1	Firm-specific	Competency of firm
6
7		Single plot of land, varying firm competency						Single plot of land, varying labor amount
8		Start Productive Capacity	C_f	L	Δproductive capacity	New Productive Capacity		Start Productive Capacity	C_f	L	Δproductive capacity	New Productive Capacity
9		10	-1	1	-0.9242343145	9.075765685		10	0.5	0	0	10
10		10	-0.8	1	-0.7598979245	9.240102075		10	0.5	1	0.2449186624	10.24491866
11		10	-0.6	1	-0.5826252249	9.417374775		10	0.5	2	0.4621171573	10.46211716
12		10	-0.4	1	-0.3947506404	9.60524936		10	0.5	3	0.6351489524	10.63514895
13		10	-0.2	1	-0.1993359892	9.800664011		10	0.5	4	0.761594156	10.76159416
14		10	0	1	0	10		10	0.5	5	0.84828364	10.84828364
15		10	0.2	1	0.09966799462	10.09966799		10	0.5	6	0.9051482536	10.90514825
16		10	0.4	1	0.1973753202	10.19737532		10	0.5	7	0.9413755385	10.94137554
17		10	0.6	1	0.2913126125	10.29131261		10	0.5	8	0.9640275801	10.96402758
18		10	0.8	1	0.3799489623	10.37994896		10	0.5	9	0.9780261147	10.97802611
19		10	1	1	0.4621171573	10.46211716		10	0.5	10	0.9866142982	10.9866143
20
21			Example of proposed M_b						Example of proposed M_w
22	Optimal Productive Capacity	t	Current Productive Capacity	C_f	L	Δproductive capacity	% of best case		t	Current Productive Capacity	C_f	L	Δproductive capacity	% of worst case
23	20	0	10	1	5	2.47	0.00%		0	10	-1	5	-2.47	0.00%
24	Base year	1	12.47	1	5	1.86	24.67%		1	7.53	-1	5	-1.86	-24.67%
25	10	2	14.32	1	5	1.40	43.25%		2	5.68	-1	5	-1.40	-43.25%
26	Worst Productive Capacity	3	15.72	1	5	1.05	57.25%		3	4.28	-1	5	-1.05	-57.25%
27	0	4	16.78	1	5	0.79	67.79%		4	3.22	-1	5	-0.79	-67.79%
28		5	17.57	1	5	0.60	75.74%		5	2.43	-1	5	-0.60	-75.74%
29		6	18.17	1	5	0.45	81.72%		6	1.83	-1	5	-0.45	-81.72%
30		7	18.62	1	5	0.34	86.23%		7	1.38	-1	5	-0.34	-86.23%
31		8	18.96	1	5	0.26	89.63%		8	1.04	-1	5	-0.26	-89.63%
32
33		C_f -> net competency
34		m_w -> negative
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100