CAMA_LiteratureSearch
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAE
1
This spreadsheet is a suggestion for keeping track of a literature search for a meta-analysis. Please use in conjuction with the instructions on sites.google.com/site/inphondb/home/create-your-own-cama
2
(1) Document search term, database, number of hits/number of items scanned, and search date in light blue row below
3
(2) List below all studies that you identified as relevant. Add studies as you find them. Using a unique identification number will facilitate double-checking for PRISMA flowchart, etc. Using a full bibliographical reference and/or DOI allows you to remember which specific study you considered. Notice that at the end you also have bibliographical information decomposed to facilitate e.g. sorting to find duplicates. The specific column names we propose follow the pubmed .csv output format, plus year of publication extracted with a formula. Please note that the papers mentioned here are given for illustration and do not reflect a real search (i.e., these authors were not contacted)
4
(3) Document where you found a particular study (database seach, prior knowledge, in the reference section of relevant articles, or by consulting an expert - notice that the first source is reported separately in PRISMA flowcharts, and all the other are typically collapsed together)
5
(4) Document whether you were able to access the abstract (during the screening phase) and the full-text a particular study (during the eligibility stage), and if not, what the current status is. Update this information in case it changes (e.g., you were able to access it or you got a negative reply/no reply over a long period of time)
6
(5) Document whether or not (and if not, why) you include a particular study in your final sample.
7
{infant word segmentation}; scholar.google.com; first 1000 hits scanned; November 27, 2012
8
NOTE: CONTAINS FORMULA
NOTE: CONTAINS FORMULA
NOTE: CONTAINS FORMULA
NOTE: CONTAINS FORMULA
9
UniqueID
Bibliographical_referenceSource
Abstract_retrieved
Screening_decision
Fulltext_retrieved
Notes_fulltext_retrieved_status
Eligibility_decision
Notes_eligibility_decision
Quantitative_MA_Decision
Notes_quantitative_MA_DecisionTitleURLDescriptionDetailsShortDetailsResourceTypeIdentifiersDbEntrezUIDPropertiesYearPubmedLink
10
1000Finn AS, Hudson Kam CL.Why segmentation matters: Experience-driven segmentation errors impair morpheme" learning."J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Sep;41(5):1560-9. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000114. Epub 2015 Mar 2.database_searchyesincludeyesincludeinclude
Why segmentation matters: Experience-driven segmentation errors impair morpheme" learning."
/pubmed/25730305
Finn AS, Hudson Kam CL.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Sep;41(5):1560-9. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000114. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015
PubMedcitation
PMID:25730305 | PMCID:PMC4558406
pubmed25730305
create date:2015/03/03 | first author:Finn AS
2015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25730305
11
1001Wright BA, Baese-Berk MM, Marrone N, Bradlow AR.Enhancing speech learning by combining task practice with periods of stimulus exposure without practice.J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Aug;138(2):928. doi: 10.1121/1.4927411.database_searchyesincludeyesoff-topic
Looked at non-speech sound discrimination
Enhancing speech learning by combining task practice with periods of stimulus exposure without practice.
/pubmed/26328708
Wright BA, Baese-Berk MM, Marrone N, Bradlow AR.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Aug;138(2):928. doi: 10.1121/1.4927411.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015
PubMedcitation
PMID:26328708 | PMCID:PMC4545053
pubmed26328708
create date:2015/09/04 | first author:Wright BA
2015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328708
12
1002Gabay Y, Dick FK, Zevin JD, Holt LL.Incidental auditory category learning.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1124-38. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000073. Epub 2015 May 25.database_searchyesincludenoauthor contacted, but no reply
Incidental auditory category learning.
/pubmed/26010588
Gabay Y, Dick FK, Zevin JD, Holt LL.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1124-38. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000073. Epub 2015 May 25.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015
PubMedcitation
PMID:26010588 | PMCID:PMC4516559
pubmed26010588
create date:2015/05/27 | first author:Gabay Y
2015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26010588
13
1003Guo LY, McGregor KK, Spencer LJ.Are Young Children With Cochlear Implants Sensitive to the Statistics of Words in the Ambient Spoken Language?J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):987-1000. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0135.Referencesyesincludeyesincludeinclude
Are Young Children With Cochlear Implants Sensitive to the Statistics of Words in the Ambient Spoken Language?
/pubmed/25677929
Guo LY, McGregor KK, Spencer LJ.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):987-1000. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0135.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015
PubMedcitation
PMID:25677929 | PMCID:PMC4490103
pubmed25677929
create date:2015/02/14 | first author:Guo LY
2015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25677929
14
1004Bao S.Perceptual learning in the developing auditory cortex.Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Mar;41(5):718-24. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12826.Expertyesincludeyeinclude
missing_key_information
means reported but no SD, author has not replied to emails
Perceptual learning in the developing auditory cortex.
/pubmed/25728188
Bao S.
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Mar;41(5):718-24. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12826.
Eur J Neurosci. 2015
PubMedcitation
PMID:25728188 | PMCID:PMC4349211
pubmed25728188
create date:2015/03/03 | first author:Bao S
2015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25728188
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Relevant_studies_search
Experts_contacted
Authors_contacted
Notes_inclusion