| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Student Growth Measures | Target / Ideal (7-6) | Approaching (5-4) | Developing (3-2) | Entry (1) | ||||
2 | |||||||||
3 | Comprehension and Application of the Elements and Principles of Design. | Students at this level demonstrate a sophisticated and intuitive command of visual design. Their work consistently reflects a deep understanding of compositional balance, spatial relationships, and the purposeful use of the elements and principles of design. These students exhibit strong aesthetic judgment and make intentional, innovative choices that enhance clarity, mood, and impact. Often enrolled in both traditional Studio Art and Digital Media Art and Design, they bridge disciplines fluidly and contribute to the visual culture of the classroom. They seek learning beyond the curriculum through independent research, external coursework, or immersion in contemporary design trends and artist practices. Many serve as leaders within the AP program, modeling advanced visual literacy and mentoring peers. Students at this level often earn a top AP score of 5, reflecting both their technical fluency and conceptual sophistication. As emerging design thinkers, they help elevate class discourse and set a high bar for excellence in the program. | Students at this level demonstrate a solid working knowledge of the elements and principles of design and can apply them with growing consistency and intention. Their compositions often show thoughtful structure, emerging balance, and an awareness of aesthetic impact, though some areas may remain underdeveloped or overly reliant on familiar strategies. These students respond well to instruction and can articulate design choices when prompted, but they may still rely on feedback to strengthen compositional decisions. While not yet fully confident in experimenting with complex visual arrangements, they show a clear interest in improving their design fluency. Many have enrolled in advanced courses like AP or Digital Media, and while they may not yet be design leaders, they contribute meaningfully to critique and peer conversations. Students at this level may be on track to earn an AP score of 3 or 4, showing strong growth and the potential to reach a higher level with continued practice and risk-taking. | Students at this level show a basic understanding of the elements and principles of design but often apply them inconsistently or without clear intent. Their compositions may feel unbalanced, crowded, or lacking in visual hierarchy, and aesthetic decisions tend to be safe, formulaic, or underdeveloped. These students frequently require direct guidance to recognize compositional issues and to revise their work. They may struggle to explain the reasoning behind their design choices or to make connections between formal elements and overall meaning. While they are beginning to grasp fundamental design concepts, their application remains surface-level. Students at this level are typically still developing visual confidence and have not yet committed to advanced coursework. However, with encouragement and structured support, they may begin to build the habits and awareness necessary to move toward more intentional, compelling design work. | Students at this level are just beginning to engage with the elements and principles of design and often lack a foundational understanding of how these tools function within a composition. Their work may feel disorganized, accidental, or visually confusing, with limited attention to balance, contrast, emphasis, or spatial relationships. Design choices tend to be reactive rather than planned, and students may not yet have the vocabulary or awareness to evaluate or revise their compositions meaningfully. They may rely heavily on templates, tracing, or step-by-step instructions without demonstrating ownership of visual decisions. This level typically reflects early-stage learners or those who are disengaged from the design process. With sustained instruction, modeling, and encouragement, students at the entry level can begin to build the visual literacy and confidence needed for growth. | ||||
4 | |||||||||
5 | Personal Vision, Independence, Risk-Taking, Art Criticism, and Critical Thinking | These students actively seek out and embrace critique from both peers and instructors, using feedback not as validation but as fuel for deeper inquiry and refinement. Their work reflects a clear and evolving personal vision, marked by conceptual ambition, aesthetic confidence, and emotional resonance. They take bold, intentional risks with materials, processes, and ideas, often pushing beyond the expected boundaries of an assignment. Their choices are grounded in thoughtful research, self-reflection, and a strong understanding of artistic purpose. These students are not only proficient in a wide range of media, but also strategic in how they employ each one to serve their narrative or conceptual goals. In critiques, both written and verbal, they consistently contribute high-level insights, challenging their peers to think more deeply while articulating their own ideas with clarity and precision. Often earning a 5 on the AP exam or contributing significantly to the intellectual culture of the classroom, these students are seen as creative catalysts and respected thought leaders within the program. | These students show emerging confidence in their artistic voice and are beginning to assert a personal vision in their work. While not all pieces are fully resolved conceptually, there is a clear effort to make independent choices and take creative risks. Their engagement in critiques, both giving and receiving feedback, is sincere, and they are starting to integrate constructive criticism into their process. They demonstrate curiosity in exploring new materials and ideas, though experimentation may still feel tentative or inconsistent. These students are capable of producing work with conceptual depth and aesthetic strength but may need continued guidance to refine their intentions and maintain consistency. In group discussions, they contribute regularly and show growing skill in articulating their thoughts, often connecting their ideas to class themes or contemporary issues. Their work demonstrates solid critical thinking and a willingness to push themselves, even if the results vary. | These students show a foundational understanding of critical thinking and personal expression but often rely on prompts, trends, or external direction to generate ideas. While they occasionally demonstrate independent thinking or risk-taking, it tends to be cautious or short-lived. Their work may show glimpses of unique voice or conceptual ambition, but execution often lacks follow-through or clarity. During critiques, they participate but may offer surface-level observations or struggle to connect feedback to larger artistic or conceptual goals. They tend to stay within familiar materials and techniques and may be hesitant to push boundaries or revise work deeply. Growth is evident, particularly when provided with targeted feedback, but their development still leans heavily on structure and support rather than self-driven exploration. | These students are in the early stages of developing a personal voice and often rely heavily on direct instruction or imitation. Their work tends to be literal, safe, or purely decorative, with limited exploration of deeper meaning, concept, or individual style. Risk-taking is minimal or absent, and revisions are rare unless explicitly directed. They may struggle to reflect on their own work or provide constructive feedback to peers. During critiques, participation is limited and often lacks engagement or insight. While effort may be present, creative decision-making is generally passive rather than intentional, and critical thinking skills are still emerging. | ||||
6 | |||||||||
7 | Use of the Visual Journal for Idea Development, Self Reflection, and Research | These students treat the visual journal as an essential and ongoing part of their artistic process. Their journals are rich with layered research, original sketches, written reflection, conceptual development, and personal inquiry. They do not rely solely on class assignments to build content—instead, they independently explore themes, media, and ideas with a high degree of discipline and authenticity. Visual journals at this level reflect a deep investment in both process and personal growth, often functioning as incubators for advanced portfolio work. Pages are thoughtfully composed, both visually and intellectually, with evidence of revision, synthesis of influences, and curiosity-driven research. These students model reflective practice and demonstrate how the journal can serve as a powerful tool for long-term creative development. | These students engage regularly with their visual journals and demonstrate a growing understanding of how the journal can support their creative development. Their entries often include sketches, notes, research, and reflective writing, though the level of depth and consistency may vary. While many pages show thoughtful planning and personal connection, others may feel more assignment-driven or underdeveloped. These students respond well to prompts and structure but may need encouragement to explore beyond them. Their journals show evidence of emerging voice and a willingness to reflect on feedback, revise ideas, and experiment with materials. With continued guidance, students at this level are on the verge of using their journals as more independent and integral parts of their artistic practice. | These students use their visual journals inconsistently and often rely heavily on teacher direction to complete entries. Pages may contain basic sketches, lists, or copied references but lack depth, originality, or personal connection. Journals tend to serve more as a compliance tool than a meaningful space for exploration. Reflection is often surface-level or missing, and idea development is limited or rushed. Research may be present but is typically shallow or incomplete, showing limited understanding of the purpose behind the task. Students at this level are still building the habits and mindset required to use the journal as a place for risk-taking, growth, and authentic self-inquiry. | These students rarely engage with the visual journal and typically only complete pages when explicitly required. Entries are minimal, often rushed, and lack thoughtful content or creative intent. There is little to no evidence of idea development, personal reflection, or meaningful research. The journal is not yet viewed as a valuable tool for artistic growth, and students at this level may struggle to understand its purpose. Their journals often remain disconnected from the rest of their creative process. | ||||
8 | |||||||||
9 | Portfolio Development, Written Evidence, and Presentation | These students produce refined, high-caliber portfolios that meet or exceed the expectations of the AP Art and Design rubric, often earning scores of 5. Their work demonstrates advanced technical skill, innovative thinking, and a sustained investigation of meaningful personal ideas. The portfolio reflects intentional sequencing and thoughtful selection, presenting a cohesive visual and conceptual arc. Written evidence—including artist statements and written responses required by the AP portfolio—is clear, well-organized, and insightful, offering a deep understanding of the student's process, materials, and conceptual development. Artwork is professionally documented with consistent lighting, accurate color balance, appropriate contrast, and sharp focus, allowing the strength of the work to be communicated effectively. These students exhibit a high level of independence, professionalism, and creative clarity, and their portfolios are competitive for scholarship consideration and admission into top university art programs. | These students are steadily developing strong portfolios that demonstrate both technical growth and emerging conceptual thinking. Their work shows a growing awareness of composition, material control, and personal voice, though cohesion across pieces may still be inconsistent. Artist statements and reflective writing convey effort and intention, with some clarity around process and meaning, though language may be vague or underdeveloped. Students at this level are learning to make curatorial decisions about which works to include and how to present them effectively. While professional documentation may be inconsistent in terms of lighting, focus, or editing, there is clear effort to represent the work accurately. These students are on the path toward building competitive portfolios and are beginning to understand how presentation, written context, and artistic choices affect how their work is received. With continued support and revision, they are well-positioned to reach advanced levels of portfolio development. | These students are beginning to assemble a portfolio but may lack consistency in both technical execution and conceptual depth. Their work often feels assignment-driven or disconnected, with limited evidence of a unifying vision or sustained exploration. Artist statements or written reflections tend to be brief, vague, or overly descriptive, showing minimal insight into process or meaning. Presentation choices may feel rushed or unintentional, and documentation of the work—such as photographs—often suffers from poor lighting, blurry focus, or uneven editing. Students at this level are still learning the importance of thoughtful curation, self-reflection, and professionalism in how their work is shared. With focused guidance and revision, they have the potential to build stronger bodies of work that reflect more personal engagement and intentional development. | These students have not yet begun to develop a cohesive portfolio and show limited understanding of how to present their work effectively. Artworks are often incomplete, inconsistently executed, or missing altogether, making it difficult to evaluate growth or intention. Written reflections are minimal or absent, with little to no attempt to articulate process, purpose, or personal meaning. There is little awareness of presentation standards, and documentation of work—if attempted—is typically unedited, poorly lit, and not representative of the original pieces. Students at this level are still learning foundational skills in both artmaking and reflective practice, and require significant structure, support, and encouragement to begin engaging in the portfolio development process. | ||||
10 | |||||||||
11 | Craftsmanship and Visual Perception | These students demonstrate exceptional command of their chosen materials, using them with intention, fluency, and precision. Their work reflects a deep understanding of form, proportion, and spatial relationships—whether working from direct observation, photographic reference, or imagination. Marks are purposeful, surfaces are refined, and details are rendered with clarity and subtlety. These students exhibit a sensitivity to light, texture, and nuance that elevates their work beyond replication into expressive interpretation. Technical decisions are consistently aligned with conceptual goals, showing a mature relationship between media and meaning. Their craftsmanship is not only meticulous but responsive—adjusted in real time to serve the evolving needs of the artwork. Work at this level often contributes to top scores (5) on the AP rubric, as it reflects sustained inquiry, control, and evidence of risk-taking within highly developed technical execution. | These students show growing control over a range of materials and processes, with developing sensitivity to proportion, detail, and spatial relationships. Their work reflects a clear effort to observe and translate visual information accurately, though execution may still be inconsistent. Some pieces display strong craftsmanship and intentional mark-making, while others may appear rushed, unresolved, or overly reliant on reference without interpretation. These students are beginning to connect technique to meaning, but may not yet consistently align material choices with conceptual goals. While their visual perception is improving, they are still learning how to fully observe, simplify, or amplify visual information to support their artistic intentions. With continued practice and reflection, they are well-positioned to reach the highest level of technical and perceptual performance. | These students demonstrate emerging technical skills but often struggle with control, consistency, or intentionality in their use of materials. Their work may show basic understanding of proportion, form, or spatial relationships, but execution is frequently uneven or overly dependent on copying references without critical observation. Marks and surfaces may appear uncertain, rushed, or unrefined, and students at this level often have difficulty translating what they see into effective visual choices. There may be moments of growth or isolated success, but the work lacks the sustained attention to detail and media responsiveness needed for fully resolved pieces. These students are beginning to recognize the value of craftsmanship and observation but require ongoing support and guidance to refine their techniques and deepen their perceptual awareness. | These students are just beginning to engage with materials and develop observational skills. Their work may appear hesitant, underdeveloped, or disconnected from the visual references they are using. There is limited evidence of planning or precision, and basic concepts such as proportion, value, and spatial relationships are often misunderstood or overlooked. Craftsmanship is minimal or inconsistent, and students may show little awareness of how media choices affect the outcome of their work. At this stage, they are learning foundational techniques and beginning to explore how to truly “see” like an artist. They require significant guidance to build confidence, develop control, and begin making more intentional visual decisions. | ||||
12 | |||||||||
13 | |||||||||
14 | |||||||||
15 | |||||||||
16 | |||||||||
17 | |||||||||
18 | |||||||||
19 | |||||||||
20 | |||||||||
21 | |||||||||
22 | |||||||||
23 | |||||||||
24 | |||||||||
25 | |||||||||
26 | |||||||||
27 | |||||||||
28 | |||||||||
29 | |||||||||
30 | |||||||||
31 | |||||||||
32 | |||||||||
33 | |||||||||
34 | |||||||||
35 | |||||||||
36 | |||||||||
37 | |||||||||
38 | |||||||||
39 | |||||||||
40 | |||||||||
41 | |||||||||
42 | |||||||||
43 | |||||||||
44 | |||||||||
45 | |||||||||
46 | |||||||||
47 | |||||||||
48 | |||||||||
49 | |||||||||
50 | |||||||||
51 | |||||||||
52 | |||||||||
53 | |||||||||
54 | |||||||||
55 | |||||||||
56 | |||||||||
57 | |||||||||
58 | |||||||||
59 | |||||||||
60 | |||||||||
61 | |||||||||
62 | |||||||||
63 | |||||||||
64 | |||||||||
65 | |||||||||
66 | |||||||||
67 | |||||||||
68 | |||||||||
69 | |||||||||
70 | |||||||||
71 | |||||||||
72 | |||||||||
73 | |||||||||
74 | |||||||||
75 | |||||||||
76 | |||||||||
77 | |||||||||
78 | |||||||||
79 | |||||||||
80 | |||||||||
81 | |||||||||
82 | |||||||||
83 | |||||||||
84 | |||||||||
85 | |||||||||
86 | |||||||||
87 | |||||||||
88 | |||||||||
89 | |||||||||
90 | |||||||||
91 | |||||||||
92 | |||||||||
93 | |||||||||
94 | |||||||||
95 | |||||||||
96 | |||||||||
97 | |||||||||
98 | |||||||||
99 | |||||||||
100 |