Example lit rev notes space.xlsx

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N
1	Author	Year	Title	Journal	Topic/theme	Theory	Method	Sampling	Source of data	Contribution	Key concept(s)	context	limitations/future directions	Notes

2	Cheetham et al	2018	A Kaleidoscopic View of the Territorialised Consumption of Place	Marketing Theories	place is relationally constructed through territorialising consumption practices which produce multifarious versions of place	exposition of territorology	empirical research/fieldwork/multi-sensory ethnography		documentary fils/ photoagraphy and walking intervies	integrate spatial, temporal and affective dimenssion of micro-practices of consumption territories/ affective dimension in formation and disolution of terirritories (i.e. sensual imaginations and bodily experiences)	Place as a discrete object and place as soial relations and material dimensions	urban gren spaces	focus on individual experence
3	Spicer	2006	Beyond the Convergence–Divergence Debate:The Role of Spatial Scales in Transforming Organizational Logi	organisation studies	organisational logics (as organisational globalisation) are transformed as they move across space and are embedded in a range of spatial scales (global, regional, national and local scales)		theoretical			integrate the concept of scales in the studies of transformation of organisational logics	spatial scales are multiple spatial levels produced through capital accumulation, regulation and articulation of discourse/ types of rescaling in organisations (i.e. external, internal, hybrid, shared)
4	Dale	2005	Building a Social Materiality: Spatial and Embodied Politics in Organizational Contro	Organization	explore how materiality explains changing modes of control in organizational life	social theory ( material culture, Lefebvre’s work on the ‘social production of space’, and sociological and phenomenological approaches to embodiment)	conceptual			reconceptualization of social materiality whereby social processes and structures and material processes and structures are seen as mutually enacting	organizational control and materiality are linked through spatial politics/ relation material-social world is dynamic (riparian metaphor)
5	Beyes & Michel	2011	The production of educational space: Heterotopia and the business university	Management Learning	critical management education, how institutions of management education can enact ‘other spaces’?	Foucault - heterotopic space; Lefebvre - spatial space	Experiment teaching project - assembling a future city	freshmen at a mid-sized university		This paper illustrates and discusses how practices of management education can engage with the contradictions and tensions of spatial production and how they can become part of imaginative geographies that enable heterotopic spaces in business schools	Spatial interventions facilitate critically affirmative engagement with the business school by offering an imaginative approach to management education	a mid-sized business university
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101