ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAF
1
measured or estimated inputs
2
adjustment for internal validity
3
adjustment for standardised comparisons and use in the GiveWell model
4
adjustments for external validity
5
6
vs G1vs no netsVs G1vs no nets
7
Questions for G2 effectivenessTanzaniaBeninAverageTanzaniaBeninAverage
8
TZ,0.8@70BJ,0.8@70TZ,0.8@70BJ,0.8@70What is the assumed Interceptor G1 effect at 70% use rates?0.800.800.80
9
V54W54V44W44Year 1What was the effect for cohort children in the trials?0.4600.4610.4610.3620.3550.359
10
V53W53V43W431. What was the effect for typical children in the trials?0.4960.4920.4940.3910.3810.386
11
V33W33V23W232. What would have been this effect if clusters were "pure"?0.3810.4160.3980.3000.3220.311
12
U33U33U23U233. What would have been this effect at 70% use rates?0.4080.4670.4370.3260.3740.350
13
S33S33S23S234. What would have been this effect at use rates in program contexts? (60%)0.4660.5220.4940.3850.4320.409
14
15
TZ,yr2,0.84@70BJ,yr2,0.84@70TZ,yr2,0.84@70BJ,yr2,0.84@70What is the assumed Interceptor G1 effect at 70% use rates?0.8400.8400.840
16
U54V54U44V44Year 2What was the effect for cohort children in the trials?0.6110.5710.5910.5080.4680.488
17
U53V53U43V431. What was the effect for typical children in the trials?0.6640.6160.6400.5570.5110.534
18
U33V33U23V232. What would have been this effect if clusters were "pure"?0.5270.5150.5210.4420.4270.434
19
U33U33U23U233. What would have been this effect at 70% use rates?0.5270.5390.5330.4420.4520.447
20
Q33Q33Q23Q234. What would have been this effect at use rates in program contexts? (50%)0.6360.6460.6410.5610.5700.566
21
22
TZ,yr3,0.895@70
BJ,yr3,0.895@70
TZ,yr3,0.895@70
BJ,yr3,0.895@70What is the assumed Interceptor G1 effect at 70% use rates?0.8950.8950.895
23
T54V54T44V44Year 3What was the effect for cohort children in the trials?0.7510.8010.7760.6690.7030.686
24
T53V53T43V431. What was the effect for typical children in the trials?0.8200.8290.8240.7370.7330.735
25
T33V33T23V232. What would have been this effect if clusters were "pure"?0.6480.7540.7010.5820.6660.624
26
U33U33U23U233. What would have been this effect at 70% use rates?0.6260.7690.6970.5580.6850.621
27
P33P33P23P234. What would have been this effect at use rates in program contexts? (45%)0.7420.8450.7940.6890.7850.737
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100