ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-
POLICY
2
3
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - POLICY
4
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
5
NOPARTLYYES
6
1. Issuance of Foundational Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
7
1.1 Has the organization issued policies articulating support to GAD mandates and establishing the essential elements of GAD Planning and Budgeting? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No policy/policies articulating support to GAD mandates and establishing essential elements of GAD planning and budgeting issuedPolicy/policies articulating support to GAD mandates and establishing
at least one (1) essential element of GAD planning and budgeting issued
Policy/policies articulating support to GAD mandates and establishing all four essential elements
of GAD planning and budgeting issued
0.83Enumerate the GAD related policies issued
(e.g., policy on setting up GFPS or GAD Office; collection and maintenance of sex-disaggregated database; conduct of organization-wide gender audit; capacity-building plan for GFPS and HR of organization).
8
Policy TitlePurpose/ Subject MatterDate Issued
9
10
11
12
13
1.2 Has the organization conducted a review of existing policies for consistency with emerging GAD issues? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No policy reviewedSome existing policies reviewed but no new policies re-issued and/ or revisedSome existing policies reviewed, revised and re-issued0Enumerate policies reviewed and/or re-issued/ revised for consistency with new GAD issuances (e.g. policy reconstituting the GAD Focal Point System based on MC 2011-01, etc.).
14
TitleTypePurpose/ Subject MatterDate Issued
15
16
17
18
1.3 Has the organization issued broad statements of intentions or aspirations reflecting its support for GAD- related activities? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No broad statement supporting GAD- related activities issued1-2 broad statements supporting GAD- related activities issued3 or more broad statements supporting GAD-related activities issued0.83Enumerate broad statements issued in support of GAD related activities/issues (e.g., memorandum for the organization to participate in Women’s Month activities, 18-day Campaign on VAW, etc).
19
TitleTypePurpose/ Subject MatterDate Issued
20
21
22
23
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 1 Policy)
1.66
24
25
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
26
NOPARTLYYES
27
2. Issuance of Policies to mainstream GAD in the Organization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
28
2.1 Has the organization issued policies reflecting its interest for gender mainstreaming? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No policy reflecting the organization’s interest for gender mainstreaming issued1-2 policies reflecting the organization’s interest for gender mainstreaming issued3 or more policies reflecting the organization’s interest for gender
mainstreaming issued
0List all policies issued by the organization related to gender mainstreaming (e.g. issuance of
DOH department order to integrate GAD in all programs):
29
TitleTypePurpose/ Subject MatterDate Issued
30
31
32
33
2.2 Has the organization issued policies addressing the gender needs of the clients (internal and external)? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No policy reflecting gender needs
of internal and/or external clients issued
1-2 policies reflecting gender needs of internal and/or external clients issued3 or more policies reflecting gender needs of internal and/ or external clients issued0Enumerate all policies issued addressing gender needs of internal and external clients of the organization (e.g. issuance of policy for the establishment of a child-minding center for use of employees and clients with small children)
34
TitleTypePurpose/ Subject MatterDate Issued
35
36
37
38
2.3 Has the organization used gender-fair language and images in its policy issuances? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)Gender-fair language and images not
yet used in policy issuances
Gender-fair language and images used in some policy issuancesGender-fair language and images used in all policy issuances0.83Attach sample policy of the organization directing the use of gender-fair language and polices as well as policies of the organization that used gender-fair language and images.
39
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 2 Policy)
0.83
40
41
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
42
NOPARTLYYES
43
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
44
3.1 Has the organization adopted a GAD Agenda/Strategic Framework? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No GAD Agenda/ Strategic Framework formulatedGAD Agenda/Strategic Framework formulated but not adopted by managementGAD Agenda/Strategic Framework formulated and adopted by management0Attach a copy of the GAD Agenda/ Strategic Framework of the organization (or GAD Code, if LGU)
45
3.2 Has the organization integrated GAD perspective in its organizational and/ or national/sectoral plan/s? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)GAD perspective not yet integrated in organizational and/ or national/ sectoral plan/sGAD perspective integrated in selected areas of the organizational and/ or national/sectoral plan/sGAD perspective integrated in all areas of the organizational and/or national/ sectoral plan/s0.83Enumerate the organizational and/or national/ sectoral plan/s in which GAD has been integrated (e.g. Philippine Development Plan, Annual Budget Call or Gender-Responsive LGU Plans such as Comprehensive Development Plan for LGU) Organizational Plans (e.g., Work Plan, Capacity Development Plan, Procurement Plan; Sectoral Plan i.e. Youth Plan, Disaster Plan, Disability Plan etc.)
46
TitleTypeDate Issued
47
48
49
50
51
52
3.3 Has the organization formulated organizational/national/ sectoral policies on GAD? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No organizational/ national/sectoral policies on GAD issued1-2 organizational/ national/ sectoral policies on GAD issued3 or more organizational/ national/sectoral policies on GAD issued0Provide complete title of sector specific GAD policies issued (e.g. Agency provision in the MCW i.e. CSC-Special Leave for Women, DFA- establishment of Gender Focal Point Officer in Philippine Embassies and Consulates, GAD Code, RH Code and NAP WPS) and attach copies if available.
53
TitleTypePurpose/ Subject MatterDate Issued
54
55
56
57
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 3 Policy)
0.83
58
59
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
60
NOPARTLYYES
61
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
62
4.1 Has the organization’s GAD policy/policies resulted in bridging gender gaps of its clients (internal and external)? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)No gender gaps addressed by GAD policy/policiesGender gaps of either internal and/or external clients are addressed by 1-2 GAD policiesGender gaps of either internal and/or external clients are addressed by 3 or more GAD policies0List down existing GAD policies of the organization and how it bridged gender gaps of its internal and/or external clients (e.g. lowering and responding to the cases Violence against Women
63
Title of GAD Policy IssuedIntended Client/ BeneficiariesGender Gaps Addressed
64
65
66
67
Attach a copy of the policy assessment or Gender Impact Assessment conducted by the organization, if applicable.
68
4.2 Has the organization used the results of gender analysis in the development and/or enhancement of policies? (possible scores are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)Results of gender analysis was not used in the development and/or enhancement of policiesResults of gender analysis used in the development and/or enhancement of 1-2 policiesResults of gender analysis used in the development and/or enhancement of 3 or more policies0Enumerate enhanced policies, guidelines and/ or documents enhanced based on the results of gender analysis.
69
Policy/ Guidelines and/or Documents EnhancedGender Analysis Tools UsedRemarks
70
71
72
73
74
4.3 Has the organization integrated GAD perspective in its Vision, Mission and Goals)? (possible scores are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)GAD perspective not yet integrated in the Vision, Mission or GoalsGAD perspective integrated in either the Vision, Mission or GoalsGAD perspective integrated in the Vision, Mission and Goals0Identify where GAD perspective is integrated in the Vision, Mission and/or Goals (VMG) of the organization
75
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 4 Policy)
0
76
77
DESCRIPTORSSCOREScore per itemMeans of Verification/Remarks
78
NOPARTLYYES
79
5. Model GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 5)
80
5.1 Has the organization's GAD policies been used as model/standard by other organizations? (possible scores are 0, 2.5, and 5)Other organizations have not used the organization's policy/policies as model or standards1-2 organization/s have used the organization's policy/policies as model/standard3 or more organizations have used the organization's policy/policies as model/standard0List down existing GAD policies used as a model or replicated by other organizations (e.g. GAD Aenda or Strategic Framework for NGAs, Policy creating a Provincial Gad Office or GAD Code for LGUs
81
GAD PolicyGender Analysis Tools UsedRemarks
82
83
84
85
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 5 Policy)
0
86
TOTAL GMEF SCORE
(Policy)
3.32
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100