| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE- POLICY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - POLICY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | DESCRIPTORS | SCORE | Score per item | Means of Verification/Remarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | NO | PARTLY | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 1. Issuance of Foundational Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 1.1 Has the organization issued policies articulating support to GAD mandates and establishing the essential elements of GAD Planning and Budgeting? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | No policy/policies articulating support to GAD mandates and establishing essential elements of GAD planning and budgeting issued | Policy/policies articulating support to GAD mandates and establishing at least one (1) essential element of GAD planning and budgeting issued | Policy/policies articulating support to GAD mandates and establishing all four essential elements of GAD planning and budgeting issued | 0.83 | Enumerate the GAD related policies issued (e.g., policy on setting up GFPS or GAD Office; collection and maintenance of sex-disaggregated database; conduct of organization-wide gender audit; capacity-building plan for GFPS and HR of organization). | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Policy Title | Purpose/ Subject Matter | Date Issued | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 1.2 Has the organization conducted a review of existing policies for consistency with emerging GAD issues? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | No policy reviewed | Some existing policies reviewed but no new policies re-issued and/ or revised | Some existing policies reviewed, revised and re-issued | 0 | Enumerate policies reviewed and/or re-issued/ revised for consistency with new GAD issuances (e.g. policy reconstituting the GAD Focal Point System based on MC 2011-01, etc.). | ||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Title | Type | Purpose/ Subject Matter | Date Issued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 1.3 Has the organization issued broad statements of intentions or aspirations reflecting its support for GAD- related activities? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | No broad statement supporting GAD- related activities issued | 1-2 broad statements supporting GAD- related activities issued | 3 or more broad statements supporting GAD-related activities issued | 0.83 | Enumerate broad statements issued in support of GAD related activities/issues (e.g., memorandum for the organization to participate in Women’s Month activities, 18-day Campaign on VAW, etc). | ||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Title | Type | Purpose/ Subject Matter | Date Issued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 Policy) | 1.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | DESCRIPTORS | SCORE | Score per item | Means of Verification/Remarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | NO | PARTLY | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 2. Issuance of Policies to mainstream GAD in the Organization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 2.1 Has the organization issued policies reflecting its interest for gender mainstreaming? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | No policy reflecting the organization’s interest for gender mainstreaming issued | 1-2 policies reflecting the organization’s interest for gender mainstreaming issued | 3 or more policies reflecting the organization’s interest for gender mainstreaming issued | 0 | List all policies issued by the organization related to gender mainstreaming (e.g. issuance of DOH department order to integrate GAD in all programs): | ||||||||||||||||||||
29 | Title | Type | Purpose/ Subject Matter | Date Issued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | 2.2 Has the organization issued policies addressing the gender needs of the clients (internal and external)? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | No policy reflecting gender needs of internal and/or external clients issued | 1-2 policies reflecting gender needs of internal and/or external clients issued | 3 or more policies reflecting gender needs of internal and/ or external clients issued | 0 | Enumerate all policies issued addressing gender needs of internal and external clients of the organization (e.g. issuance of policy for the establishment of a child-minding center for use of employees and clients with small children) | ||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Title | Type | Purpose/ Subject Matter | Date Issued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
38 | 2.3 Has the organization used gender-fair language and images in its policy issuances? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | Gender-fair language and images not yet used in policy issuances | Gender-fair language and images used in some policy issuances | Gender-fair language and images used in all policy issuances | 0.83 | Attach sample policy of the organization directing the use of gender-fair language and polices as well as policies of the organization that used gender-fair language and images. | ||||||||||||||||||||
39 | Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 2 Policy) | 0.83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | DESCRIPTORS | SCORE | Score per item | Means of Verification/Remarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | NO | PARTLY | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
43 | 3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
44 | 3.1 Has the organization adopted a GAD Agenda/Strategic Framework? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | No GAD Agenda/ Strategic Framework formulated | GAD Agenda/Strategic Framework formulated but not adopted by management | GAD Agenda/Strategic Framework formulated and adopted by management | 0 | Attach a copy of the GAD Agenda/ Strategic Framework of the organization (or GAD Code, if LGU) | ||||||||||||||||||||
45 | 3.2 Has the organization integrated GAD perspective in its organizational and/ or national/sectoral plan/s? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | GAD perspective not yet integrated in organizational and/ or national/ sectoral plan/s | GAD perspective integrated in selected areas of the organizational and/ or national/sectoral plan/s | GAD perspective integrated in all areas of the organizational and/or national/ sectoral plan/s | 0.83 | Enumerate the organizational and/or national/ sectoral plan/s in which GAD has been integrated (e.g. Philippine Development Plan, Annual Budget Call or Gender-Responsive LGU Plans such as Comprehensive Development Plan for LGU) Organizational Plans (e.g., Work Plan, Capacity Development Plan, Procurement Plan; Sectoral Plan i.e. Youth Plan, Disaster Plan, Disability Plan etc.) | ||||||||||||||||||||
46 | Title | Type | Date Issued | |||||||||||||||||||||||
47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 | 3.3 Has the organization formulated organizational/national/ sectoral policies on GAD? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | No organizational/ national/sectoral policies on GAD issued | 1-2 organizational/ national/ sectoral policies on GAD issued | 3 or more organizational/ national/sectoral policies on GAD issued | 0 | Provide complete title of sector specific GAD policies issued (e.g. Agency provision in the MCW i.e. CSC-Special Leave for Women, DFA- establishment of Gender Focal Point Officer in Philippine Embassies and Consulates, GAD Code, RH Code and NAP WPS) and attach copies if available. | ||||||||||||||||||||
53 | Title | Type | Purpose/ Subject Matter | Date Issued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 Policy) | 0.83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | DESCRIPTORS | SCORE | Score per item | Means of Verification/Remarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||
60 | NO | PARTLY | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
61 | 4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | 4.1 Has the organization’s GAD policy/policies resulted in bridging gender gaps of its clients (internal and external)? (possible scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) | No gender gaps addressed by GAD policy/policies | Gender gaps of either internal and/or external clients are addressed by 1-2 GAD policies | Gender gaps of either internal and/or external clients are addressed by 3 or more GAD policies | 0 | List down existing GAD policies of the organization and how it bridged gender gaps of its internal and/or external clients (e.g. lowering and responding to the cases Violence against Women | ||||||||||||||||||||
63 | Title of GAD Policy Issued | Intended Client/ Beneficiaries | Gender Gaps Addressed | |||||||||||||||||||||||
64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | Attach a copy of the policy assessment or Gender Impact Assessment conducted by the organization, if applicable. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
68 | 4.2 Has the organization used the results of gender analysis in the development and/or enhancement of policies? (possible scores are 0, 0.83, and 1.67) | Results of gender analysis was not used in the development and/or enhancement of policies | Results of gender analysis used in the development and/or enhancement of 1-2 policies | Results of gender analysis used in the development and/or enhancement of 3 or more policies | 0 | Enumerate enhanced policies, guidelines and/ or documents enhanced based on the results of gender analysis. | ||||||||||||||||||||
69 | Policy/ Guidelines and/or Documents Enhanced | Gender Analysis Tools Used | Remarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||
70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
74 | 4.3 Has the organization integrated GAD perspective in its Vision, Mission and Goals)? (possible scores are 0, 0.83, and 1.67) | GAD perspective not yet integrated in the Vision, Mission or Goals | GAD perspective integrated in either the Vision, Mission or Goals | GAD perspective integrated in the Vision, Mission and Goals | 0 | Identify where GAD perspective is integrated in the Vision, Mission and/or Goals (VMG) of the organization | ||||||||||||||||||||
75 | Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 Policy) | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
77 | DESCRIPTORS | SCORE | Score per item | Means of Verification/Remarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | NO | PARTLY | YES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
79 | 5. Model GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
80 | 5.1 Has the organization's GAD policies been used as model/standard by other organizations? (possible scores are 0, 2.5, and 5) | Other organizations have not used the organization's policy/policies as model or standards | 1-2 organization/s have used the organization's policy/policies as model/standard | 3 or more organizations have used the organization's policy/policies as model/standard | 0 | List down existing GAD policies used as a model or replicated by other organizations (e.g. GAD Aenda or Strategic Framework for NGAs, Policy creating a Provincial Gad Office or GAD Code for LGUs | ||||||||||||||||||||
81 | GAD Policy | Gender Analysis Tools Used | Remarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||
82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85 | Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 Policy) | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
86 | TOTAL GMEF SCORE (Policy) | 3.32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||